{"id":1700,"date":"2013-07-13T01:36:37","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T08:36:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=1700"},"modified":"2013-11-28T15:16:51","modified_gmt":"2013-11-28T23:16:51","slug":"07-the-character-of-english-poetry-1-vol-26-the-future-poetry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/26-the-future-poetry\/07-the-character-of-english-poetry-1-vol-26-the-future-poetry","title":{"rendered":"-07_The Character of English Poetry &#8211; 1.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"100%\" cellpadding=\"6\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\">  <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b>Chapter VII <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><font size=\"4\">&nbsp;The Character of English Poetry \u00ad 1<\/font><\/b> <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><br \/>\n\t\t\t<font size=\"5\">O<\/font>F ALL<\/b> the modern European tongues the English language \u2014 I think this may be said without any serious doubt,<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 has produced, not always the greatest or most<br \/>\nperfect, but at least the most rich and naturally powerful poetry, the most lavish of energy and innate genius. The unfettered play<br \/>\nof poetic energy and power has been here the most abundant and brought forth the most constantly brilliant fruits. And yet<br \/>\nit is curious to note that English poetry and literature have been a far less effective force in the shaping of European culture than<br \/>\nthe poetry and literature of other tongues inferior actually in natural poetic and creative energy. At least they have had to<br \/>\nwait till quite a recent date before they produced any potent effect and even then their direct influence was limited and not<br \/>\nalways durable. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tA glance will show how considerable has been this limitation. The poetic mind of Greece and Rome has pervaded and largely shaped the whole artistic production of Europe; Italian<br \/>\npoetry of the great age has thrown on some part of it at least a stamp only less profound; French prose and poetry<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 but the<br \/>\nlatter in a much less degree, \u2014 have helped more than any other literary influence to form the modern turn of the European mind<br \/>\nand its mode of expression; the shortlived outbursts of creative<br \/>\npower in the Spain of Calderon and the Germany of Goethe exercised an immediate, a strong, though not an enduring influence; the newly created Russian literature has been, though more subtly, among the most intense of recent cultural forces. But if<br \/>\nwe leave aside Richardson and Scott and, recently, Dickens in fiction and in poetry the very considerable effects of the belated<br \/>\ncontinental discovery of Shakespeare and the vehement and sudden wave of the Byronic influence, which did much to enforce the<br \/>\nnote of revolt and of a half sentimental, half sensual pessimism<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>48<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 0pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\twhich is even now one of the strongest shades in the literary<br \/>\ntone of modern Europe, \u2014 to the present day Shakespeare and Byron are the only two great names of English poetry which are<br \/>\ngenerally familiar on the continent and have had a real vogue, \u2014 we find the literature of the English tongue and especially<br \/>\nits poetry flowing in a large side-stream, always receiving much from the central body of European culture but returning upon<br \/>\nit in comparison very little. This insularity, not of reception but of reaction, is a marked phenomenon and calls for explanation. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tIf we look for the causes, \u2014 for such a paucity of influence cannot, certainly, be put down to any perversity or obtuseness<br \/>\nin the general mind of Europe, but must be due to some insufficiency or serious defect in the literature,<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 we shall find, I think,<br \/>\nif we look with other than English-trained eyes, that there is even in this rich and vigorous poetry abundant cause for the failure.<br \/>\nEnglish poetry is powerful but it is imperfect, strong in spirit, but uncertain and tentative in form; it is extraordinarily stimulating,<br \/>\nbut not often quite satisfying. It aims high, but its success is not as great as its effort. Especially, its imaginative force exceeds its<br \/>\nthought-power; it has indeed been hardly at all a really great instrument of poetic thought-vision; it has not dealt fruitfully<br \/>\nwith life. Its history has been more a succession of individual poetic achievements than a constant national tradition; in the<br \/>\nmass it has been a series of poetical revolutions without any strong inner continuity. That is to say that it has had no great<br \/>\nself-recognising idea or view of life expressive of the spiritual attitude of the nation or powerful to determine from an early time<br \/>\nits own sufficient artistic forms. But it is precisely the possession of such a self-recognising spiritual attitude and the attainment of<br \/>\na satisfying artistic form for it which make the poetry of a nation a power in the world&#8217;s general culture. For that which recognises<br \/>\nits self will most readily be recognised by others. And, again, that which attains the perfect form of its own innate character, will<br \/>\nbe most effective in forming others and leave its stamp in the building of the general mind of humanity. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tOne or two examples will be sufficient to show the vast difference. No poetry has had so powerful an influence as Greek<br \/>\n &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>49<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\npoetry; no poetry is, I think, within its own limits so perfect and satisfying. The limits indeed are marked and even, judged<br \/>\nby the undulating many-sidedness and wideness of the modern mind, narrow; but on its own lines this poetry works with a<br \/>\nflawless power and sufficiency. From beginning to end it dealt with life from one large view-point; it worked always from the<br \/>\ninspired reason, used a luminous intellectual observation and harmonised all it did by the rule of an enlightened and chastened<br \/>\naesthetic sense; whatever changes overtook it, it never departed from this motive and method which are the very essence of the<br \/>\nGreek spirit. And of this motive it was very conscious and by its clear recognition of it and fidelity to it was able to achieve an<br \/>\nartistic beauty and sufficiency of expressive form which affect us like an easily accomplished miracle and which have been the<br \/>\nadmiration of after ages. Even the poetry of the Greek decadence preserved enough of this power to act as a shaping influence on<br \/>\nLatin literature. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tFrench poetry is much more limited than the Greek, much<br \/>\nless powerful in inspiration. For it deals with life from the standpoint not of the inspired reason, but of the clear-thinking<br \/>\nintellect, not of the enlightened aesthetic sense, but of emotional sentiment. These are its two constant powers; the one gives it its<br \/>\nbrain-stuff, the other its poetical fervour and grace and charm and appeal. Throughout all the changes of the last century, in<br \/>\nspite of apparent cultural revolutions, the French spirit has remained in its poetry faithful to these two motives which are<br \/>\nof its very essence, and because of this fidelity it has always or almost always found for its work a satisfying and characteristic<br \/>\nform. To that combination of a clear and strong motive and a satisfying form it owes the immense influence it has exercised<br \/>\nfrom time to time on other European literatures. The cultural power of the poetry of other tongues may be traced to similar<br \/>\ncauses. But what has been the distinct spirit and distinguishing form of English poetry? Certainly, there is an English spirit which<br \/>\ncould not fail to be reflected in its poetry; but, not being clearly self-conscious, it is reflected obscurely and confusedly, and it<br \/>\nhas been at war within itself, followed a fluctuation of different <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>50<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">\n\t\t\tmotives and never succeeded in bringing about between them a conciliation and fusion. Therefore its form has suffered; it has<br \/>\nhad indeed no native and characteristic principle of form which would be, through all changes, the outward reflection of a clear<br \/>\nself-recognising spirit. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThe poetry of a nation is only one side of its self-expression<br \/>\nand its characteristics may be best understood if we look at it in relation to the whole mental and dynamic effort of the people.<br \/>\nIf we so look at the general contribution of the English nation to human life and culture, the eye is arrested by some remarkable<br \/>\nlacunae. These are especially profound in the arts: English music is a zero, English sculpture an unfilled void, English architecture<br \/>\nonly a little better;<sup><font size=\"2\">1<\/font><\/sup> English painting, illustrated by a few great names, has been neither a great artistic tradition nor a powerful<br \/>\ncultural force and merits only a casual mention by the side of the rich achievement of Italy, Spain, France, Holland, Belgium.<br \/>\nWhen we come to the field of thought we get a mixed impression like that of great mountain eminences towering out of a very<br \/>\nlow and flat plain. We find great individual philosophers, but no great philosophical tradition, two or three remarkable thinkers,<br \/>\nbut no high fame for thinking, a great multitude of the most famous names in science, but no national scientific culture. Still<br \/>\nin these fields there has been remarkable accomplishment and the influence on European thought has been frequently considerable and sometimes capital. But when finally we turn to the business of practical life, there is an unqualified preeminence: in<br \/>\nmechanical science and invention, in politics, in commerce and industry, in colonisation, travel, exploration, in the domination<br \/>\nof earth and the exploitation of its riches England has been till late largely, sometimes entirely the world&#8217;s leader, the creator of<br \/>\nits forms and the shaper of its motives. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThis peculiar distribution of the national capacities finds its<br \/>\nroot in certain racial characteristics. We have first the dominant Anglo-Saxon strain quickened, lightened and given force, power <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<sup><font size=\"2\">1<\/font><\/sup><font size=\"2\"> Outside the Gothic, and even there is not the continental magnificence of the past&#8217;s riches.<br \/>\n\t\t\t<\/font>&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>51<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nand initiative by the Scandinavian and Celtic elements. This mixture has made a national mind remarkably dynamic and<br \/>\npractical, with all the Teutonic strength, patience, industry, but liberated from the Teutonic heaviness and crudity, yet retaining<br \/>\nenough not to be too light of balance or too sensitive to the shocks of life; therefore, a nation easily first in practical intelligence and practical dealing with the facts and difficulties of life. Not, be it noted, by any power of clear intellectual thought<br \/>\nor by force of imagination or mental intuition, but rather by a strong vital instinct, a sort of tentative dynamic intuition. No<br \/>\nspirituality, but a robust ethical turn; no innate power of the thought and the word, but a strong turn for action; no fine play<br \/>\nof emotion or quickness of sympathy, but an abundant energy and force of will. This is one element of the national mind; the<br \/>\nother is the submerged, half-insistent Celtic spirit, gifted with precisely the opposite qualities, inherent spirituality, the gift of<br \/>\nthe word, the rapid and brilliant imagination, the quick and luminous intelligence, the strong emotional force and sympathy,<br \/>\nthe natural love of the things of the mind and still more of those beyond the mind, left to it from an ancient mystic tradition<br \/>\nand an old forgotten culture, forgotten in its mind, but still flowing in its blood, still vibrant in its subtler nerve-channels. In<br \/>\nlife a subordinate element, modifying the cruder Anglo-Saxon characteristics, breaking across them or correcting their excess,<br \/>\nsometimes refining and toning, sometimes exaggerating the energy of the Norman and the Scandinavian strength and drive,<br \/>\nwe may perhaps see it emerging at its best, least hampered, least discouraged, in English poetry, coming there repeatedly to the<br \/>\nsurface and then working with a certain force and vehement but still embarrassed power, like an imprisoned spirit let out for a<br \/>\nholiday but within not quite congenial bounds and with an unadaptable companion. From the ferment of these two elements,<br \/>\nfrom the vigorous but chaotic motion created by their fusion and their clash, arise both the greatness and the limitations of<br \/>\nEnglish poetry. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>52<\/font><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chapter VII &nbsp; &nbsp;The Character of English Poetry \u00ad 1 &nbsp; OF ALL the modern European tongues the English language \u2014 I think this may&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-26-the-future-poetry","wpcat-38-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1700"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9606,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1700\/revisions\/9606"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}