{"id":1716,"date":"2013-07-13T01:36:42","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T08:36:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=1716"},"modified":"2013-11-28T15:12:25","modified_gmt":"2013-11-28T23:12:25","slug":"11-the-course-of-english-poetry-3-vol-26-the-future-poetry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/26-the-future-poetry\/11-the-course-of-english-poetry-3-vol-26-the-future-poetry","title":{"rendered":"-11_The Course of English Poetry &#8211; 3.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"100%\" cellpadding=\"6\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\">  <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b>Chapter XI <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><font size=\"4\">&nbsp;The Course of English Poetry \u00ad 3<\/font><\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<b><font size=\"5\">T<\/font>HE ELIZABETHAN<\/b> drama is an expression of the stir of<br \/>\nthe life-spirit; at its best it has a great or strong, buoyant or rich or beautiful, passionately excessive or gloomily<br \/>\ntenebrous force of vital poetry. The rest of the utterance of the time is full of the lyric joy, sweetness or emotion or moved and<br \/>\ncoloured self-description of the same spirit. There is much in it of curious and delighted thinking, but little of a high and firm<br \/>\nintellectual value. Culture is still in its imaginative childhood and the thinking mind rather works for the curiosity and beauty<br \/>\nof thought and even more for the curiosity and beauty of the mere expression of thought than for its light and its vision. The<br \/>\npoetry which comes out of this mood is likely to have great charm and imaginative, emotional or descriptive appeal, but<br \/>\nmay very well miss that depth of profounder substance and that self-possessing plenitude of form which are the other and<br \/>\nindispensable elements of a rounded artistic creation. Beauty of poetical expression abounds in an unstinted measure, but for<br \/>\nthe music of a deeper spirit or higher significance we have to wait; the attempt at it we get, but not often all the success of its<br \/>\npresence. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tSpenser, the poet of second magnitude of the time, gives us in<br \/>\nhis work this beauty in its fullest abundance, but also the limited measure of that greater but not quite successful endeavour. The<br \/>\n<i>Faerie Queene <\/i>is indeed a poem of unfailing imaginative charm and its two opening cantos are exquisite in execution; there<br \/>\nis a stream of liquid harmony, of curiously opulent, yet finely tempered description, of fluid poetical phrase and minutely seen<br \/>\nimage. For these are Spenser&#8217;s constant gifts, the native form of his genius which displays more of descriptive vision than of<br \/>\nany larger creative power or narrative force. An inspired idea is worked out; a little too much lost in detail and in the diffusion of<br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 8<\/font>3<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\na wealthy prolixity, it still holds well together its rather difficult and entangling burden of symbols and forms and achieves in<br \/>\nthe end some accomplished totality of fine poetic effect. But if we read on after this fine opening and look at the poem as a<br \/>\nwhole, the effect intended fails, not because it happened to be left unfinished, nor even because the power in it is not equally<br \/>\nsustained and is too evidently running thinner and thinner as it proceeds, but because it could not have come to a successful<br \/>\ncompletion. Kalidasa&#8217;s <i>Birth of the War-God <\/i>was left unfinished, or finished by a very inferior hand, yet even in the fragment there<br \/>\nis already a masterly totality of effect; there is the sense of a great and admirable design. Virgil&#8217;s<br \/>\n<i>Aeneid<\/i>, though in a way finished,<br \/>\ndid not receive those last touches which sometimes make all the difference between perfection and the approach to it; and we<br \/>\nfeel too, not a failure of art, \u2014 for that is a defect which could never be alleged against Virgil,<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 but a relative thinning of the<br \/>\nsupporting power and inspiration. Still the consummate artistic intelligence of the poet has been so steadily at work, so complete<br \/>\nfrom the very inception, it has so thought out and harmonised its idea from the beginning that a fine and firm total effect is<br \/>\ngiven. But here there is a defect of the artistic intellect, a vice or insufficiency in its original power of harmonising construction,<br \/>\ncharacteristic of the Elizabethan, almost of the English mind. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tSpenser&#8217;s intention seems to have been to combine in his<br \/>\nown way the success of Ariosto with the success of Dante. His work was to have been in its form a rich and beautiful romance;<br \/>\nbut it must be too at the same time a great interpretation by image and symbol, not here of the religious or spiritual, but<br \/>\nof the ethical meaning of human life. A faery-tale and a vivid ethical symbol in one is his conception of his artistic task. That<br \/>\nis a kind of combination difficult enough to execute, but capable of a great and beautiful effect in a master hand. But the Elizabethan intellectual direction runs always towards conceit and curious complication; it is unable to follow an idea for the sake<br \/>\nof what is essential in it, but tangles it up in all sorts of turns and accessories: seizing on all manner of disparates, it tends to throw<br \/>\nthem together without any real fusion. Spenser in his idea and its &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>84<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nexecution fell a victim to all these defects of the intelligence. He has taken his intellectual scheme from his Hellenism, the virtues<br \/>\nto be figured in typical human beings; but he has dressed it up with the obvious and trivial mediaeval ingenuity of the allegory.<br \/>\nNor is he satisfied with a simple form of this combination; he has an ambition of all-including representativeness which far<br \/>\nexceeds his or perhaps any possible power of fusing creation. The turn of the allegory must be at once ethical, ecclesiastical<br \/>\nand political in one fell complexity; his witch of Faery-land embodies Falsehood, the Roman Catholic Church and Mary Queen<br \/>\nof Scots in an irritating and impossible jumble. The subject of a poem of this kind has to be the struggle of the powers of good<br \/>\nand evil, but the human figures through whom it works out to its issues, cannot be merely the good or the evil, this or that virtue or<br \/>\nvice; they should stand for them as their expressive opportunity of life, not merely as their allegorical body. Spenser, a great poet,<br \/>\nis not blind to this elementary condition; but his tangled skein of allegory continually hampers the sounder conception, and the<br \/>\ninterpretative narration works itself out through the confused maze of its distracting elements which we are obliged to accept,<br \/>\nnot for their own interest or living force and appeal, but for the beauty of the poetic expression and description to which they<br \/>\ngive occasion. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tBesides this fault of the initial conception, there are defects in the execution. After a time at least the virtues and vices altogether lose their way in faery-land or they become<br \/>\nmistily vague and negligible; and this, considering the idea of the poem, ought not to be, but certainly is a great relief to<br \/>\nthe reader. We are well contented to read the poem or, still better, each canto apart as a romance and leave the ulterior<br \/>\nmeaning to take care of itself; what was intended as a great ethical interpretative poem of the human soul, lives only as<br \/>\na beautiful series of romantic descriptions and incidents. We can see where the defect is if we make a comparison with the<br \/>\ntwo greater poems of Greece and India which had an intention not altogether unsimilar, the Ramayana fusing something like a<br \/>\nvast faery-tale with the story of an immense struggle between &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>85<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nworld-powers of good and evil, the Odyssey with its magic of romance and its story of the assertion of right and of domestic<br \/>\nand personal virtue against unbridled licence and wrong in an epic encounter between these opposite forces. The Odyssey is a<br \/>\nbattle of human will and character supported by divine power against evil men and wrathful gods and adverse circumstance<br \/>\nand the deaf opposition of the elements, and its scenes move with an easy inevitability between the lands of romance and the<br \/>\nromance of actual human life; but nowhere does the poet lose in the wealth of incident and description either the harmonising<br \/>\naesthetic colour or the simple central idea. The Ramayana too is made up of first materials which belong to the world of faery<br \/>\nromance; but, lifted into an epic greatness, they support easily a grandiose picture of the struggle of incarnate God and Titan, of a<br \/>\nhuman culture expressing the highest order and range of ethical values with a giant empire of embattled anarchic force, egoistic<br \/>\nviolence and domination and lawless self-assertion. The whole is of a piece, and even in its enormous length and protracted<br \/>\ndetail there is a victorious simplicity, largeness and unity. The English poet loses himself in the outward, in romantic incident<br \/>\nand description pursued by his imagination for their own sake. His idea is often too much and too visibly expressed, yet in<br \/>\nthe end finds no successful expression. Instead of relying upon the force of his deeper poetic idea to sustain him, he depends<br \/>\non intellectual device and parades his machinery. The thread of connection is wandering and confused. He achieves a diffuse<br \/>\nand richly confused perplexity, not the unity of a living whole. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThese are the natural limitations of the Elizabethan age, and<br \/>\nwe have to note them with what may seem at first a disproportionate emphasis, because they are the key to the immediately<br \/>\nfollowing reaction of English poetry with its turn in Milton towards a severe and serious intellectual effort and discipline and<br \/>\nits fall in Dryden and Pope to a manner which got away from the most prominent defects of the Elizabethan mind at the price<br \/>\nof a complete and disastrous loss of all its great powers. English poetry before Milton had not passed through any training of<br \/>\nthe poetic and artistic intelligence; it had abounding energy and <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>86<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\npower, but no self-discipline of the idea. Except in Shakespeare it fails to construct; it at once loses and finds itself in a luxurious indulgence of its force, follows with a loose sweetness or a vehement buoyancy all its impulses good, bad or indifferent.<br \/>\nStill what it does achieve, is unique and often superlative in its kind. It achieves an unsurpassed splendour of imaginative<br \/>\nvitality and eager vision of the life spirit, and an unsurpassed intensity of poetical expression; life vents itself in speech, pours<br \/>\nits lyric emotion, lavishes its intimate and intuitive description of itself in passionate detail, thinks aloud in a native utterance of<br \/>\npoetry packed with expressive image or felicitous in directness. There is no other poetry which has in at all the same degree this<br \/>\nachievement. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThis poetry is then great in achievement within the limits of<br \/>\nits method and substance. That substance and method belong to the second step of the psychological gradations by which poetry<br \/>\nbecomes a more and more profound and subtle instrument of the self-expression of the human spirit. English poetry, I have<br \/>\nremarked, follows the grades of this ascension with a singular fidelity of sequence. At first it was satisfied with only a primary<br \/>\nsuperficial response to the most external appearances of life, its visible figures and incidents, its primary feelings and characteristics. To mirror these things clearly, justly, with a certain harmony of selection and a just sufficient transmutation in the<br \/>\npersonality and aesthetic temperament is enough for this earlier type of poetry, all the more easily satisfied because everything<br \/>\nseen by the eye is fresh, interesting, stimulating, and the liveliness of the poetic impression replaces the necessity of subtlety or<br \/>\ndepth. Great poetry can be written in early times with this as its substantial method, but not afterwards when the race mind has<br \/>\nbegun to make an intenser and more inward response to life. It then becomes the resort of a secondary inspiration which is<br \/>\nunable to rise to the full heights of poetic possibility. Or else, if this external method still persists as part of the outward manner<br \/>\nof a more subjective creation, it is with a demand for more heightened effects and a more penetrating expression. The last<br \/>\nwas the demand and method of the Elizabethan age. &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>87<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;text-indent:25pt\">\nIn Elizabethan poetry the physical and external tendency still persists, but it is no longer sufficient to satisfy either the<br \/>\nperceiving spirit or its creative force. Where it is most preserved, it still demands a more vehement response, strong colours, violent passions, exaggerated figures, out-of-the-way or crowding events. Life is still the Muse of this poetry, but it is a Life which<br \/>\ndemands to feel itself more and is already knocking or trying to knock at the gates of the deeper subjective being. And in all the<br \/>\nbest work of the time it has already got there, not very deep, but still enough to be initially subjective. Whatever Shakespeare<br \/>\nmay suggest, \u2014 a poet&#8217;s critical theories are not always a just clue to his inspiration,<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 there is not here any true or exact<br \/>\nholding up of a mirror to life and Nature, but instead a moved and excited reception and evocation. Life throws its impressions,<br \/>\nbut what seizes upon them is a greater and deeper life-power in the poet which is not satisfied with mirroring or just beautifully<br \/>\nresponding to what is cast upon it, but begins to throw up at once around them its own rich matter of receptive being and shaping<br \/>\nforce and so creates something new, something more personal, intimate, fuller of a first inner vision, emotion, passion of<br \/>\nself-expression. This is the source of the new intensity; it is this impulse towards an utterance of the creative life-power within<br \/>\nwhich drives towards the dramatic form and acts with such unexampled power in Shakespeare. At another extremity of the<br \/>\nElizabethan mind, in Spenser, it gets much farther away from the actuality of life; it takes the impressions of the surrounding<br \/>\nphysical world as hints only for a purely imaginative creation which seems to be truly drawn not from the life of earth, but<br \/>\nfrom a more beautiful and harmonious life-scene that exists either within our own unplumbed depths or on other subtler<br \/>\nvital or physical planes. This creation has an aim in it at things symbolic, otherwise revelatory, deeper down in the soul itself,<br \/>\nand it tries to shadow them out through the magic of romance, since it cannot yet intimately seize and express them. Still even<br \/>\nthere the method of the utterance, if not altogether its aim, is the voice of Life lifting itself out into waves of word and colour and<br \/>\nimage and sheer beauty of sound. Imagination, thought, vision<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 <\/font>88<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 0pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\twork with the emotional life-mind as their instrument or rather<br \/>\nwork in it as a medium, accepted as the very form of their being and the very force of their nature. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tGreat poetry is the result, but there are other powers of the human consciousness which have not yet been mastered, and to<br \/>\nget at these is the next immediate step of English poetry. The way it follows is to bring forward the intellect as its chief instrument;<br \/>\nthe thought-mind is no longer carried along in the wave of life, but detaches itself from it to observe and reflect upon it. At first<br \/>\nthere is an intermediate manner, that of Milton&#8217;s early work and of the Carolean poets, in which something of the Elizabethan<br \/>\nimpulse, something of its intense imaginative sight or its charm of emotion, prolongs itself for a while, but is fast fading away<br \/>\nunder the stress of an increasing intellectuality, a strong dryness of the light of the reason and a growing hardness of form and<br \/>\nconcentrated narrowness of the observing eye. This movement rises on one side into the ripened classical perfection of Milton,<br \/>\nand falls away on the other through Waller into the reaction in Dryden and Pope.<br \/>\n &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u201389<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chapter XI &nbsp; &nbsp;The Course of English Poetry \u00ad 3 &nbsp; &nbsp;THE ELIZABETHAN drama is an expression of the stir of the life-spirit; at its&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-26-the-future-poetry","wpcat-38-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1716"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1716\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9593,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1716\/revisions\/9593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}