{"id":1956,"date":"2013-07-13T01:38:31","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:38:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=1956"},"modified":"2013-11-27T00:29:18","modified_gmt":"2013-11-27T08:29:18","slug":"06-political-life-1893-1910-vol-36-autobiographical-notes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/36-autobiographical-notes\/06-political-life-1893-1910-vol-36-autobiographical-notes","title":{"rendered":"-06_Political Life, 1893-1910.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPolitical Life, 1893 \u00ad 1910 <\/font><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tA General Note on Sri Aurobindo’s Political Life <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There were three sides to Sri Aurobindo’s political ideas and activities. First, there was the action with which he started, a
\nsecret revolutionary propaganda and organisation of which the central object was the preparation of an armed insurrection.
\nSecondly, there was a public propaganda intended to convert the whole nation to the ideal of independence which was regarded,
\nwhen he entered into politics, by the vast majority of Indians as unpractical and impossible, an almost insane chimera. It was
\nthought that the British Empire was too powerful and India too weak, effectively disarmed and impotent even to dream of the
\nsuccess of such an endeavour. Thirdly, there was the organisation of the people to carry on a public and united opposition
\nand undermining of the foreign rule through an increasing noncooperation and passive resistance. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAt that time the military organisation of the great empires and their means of military action were not so overwhelming
\nand apparently irresistible as they now are: the rifle was still the decisive weapon, air power had not developed and the force
\nof artillery was not so devastating as it afterwards became. India was disarmed, but Sri Aurobindo thought that with proper
\norganisation and help from outside this difficulty might be overcome and in so vast a country as India and with the smallness of
\nthe regular British armies, even a guerrilla warfare accompanied by general resistance and revolt might be effective. There was
\nalso the possibility of a great revolt in the Indian army. At the same time he had studied the temperament and characteristics
\nof the British people and the turn of their political instincts, and he believed that although they would resist any attempt at
\nself-liberation by the Indian people and would at the most only concede very slowly such reforms as would not weaken their
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>47<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

imperial control, still they were not of the kind which would be ruthlessly adamantine to the end: if they found resistance and
\nrevolt becoming general and persistent they would in the end try to arrive at an accommodation to save what they could of their
\nempire or in an extremity prefer to grant independence rather than have it forcefully wrested from their hands. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tIn some quarters there is the idea that Sri Aurobindo’s political standpoint was entirely pacifist, that he was opposed in
\nprinciple and in practice to all violence and that he denounced terrorism, insurrection etc. as entirely forbidden by the spirit
\nand letter of the Hindu religion. It is even suggested that he was a forerunner of the gospel of Ahimsa. This is quite incorrect. Sri Aurobindo is neither an impotent moralist nor a weak pacifist. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe rule of confining political action to passive resistance was adopted as the best policy for the National Movement
\nat that stage and not as a part of a gospel of Non-violence or pacific idealism. Peace is a part of the highest ideal, but it
\nmust be spiritual or at the very least psychological in its basis; without a change in human nature it cannot come with any
\nfinality. If it is attempted on any other basis (moral principle or gospel of Ahimsa or any other) it will fail, and even may
\nleave things worse than before. He is in favour of an attempt to put down war by international agreement and international
\nforce, what is now contemplated in the “New Order”, if that proves possible, but that would not be Ahimsa, it would be a
\nputting down of anarchic force by legal force, and even then one cannot be sure that it would be permanent. Within nations
\nthis sort of peace has been secured, but it does not prevent occasional civil wars and revolutions and political outbreaks
\nand repressions, sometimes of a sanguinary character. The same might happen to a similar world-peace. Sri Aurobindo has never
\nconcealed his opinion that a nation is entitled to attain its freedom by violence, if it can do so or if there is no other way;
\nwhether it should do so or not, depends on what is the best policy, not on ethical considerations. Sri Aurobindo’s position
\nand practice in this matter was the same as Tilak’s and that of   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>48<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nother Nationalist leaders who were by no means Pacifists or worshippers of Ahimsa.1<\/font><\/sup> <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tFor the first few years in India, Sri Aurobindo abstained from any political activity (except the writing of the articles in
\nthe Indu Prakash) <\/i>and studied the conditions in the country so that he might be able to judge more maturely what could
\nbe done. Then he made his first move when he sent a young Bengali soldier of the Baroda army, Jatin Banerji, as his lieutenant to Bengal with a programme of preparation and action which he thought might occupy a period of 30 years before
\nfruition could become possible. As a matter of fact it has taken 50 years for the movement of liberation to arrive at fruition and
\nthe beginning of complete success. The idea was to establish secretly or, as far as visible action could be taken, under various
\npretexts and covers, revolutionary propaganda and recruiting throughout Bengal. This was to be done among the youth of the
\ncountry while sympathy and support and financial and other assistance were to be obtained from the older men who had
\nadvanced views or could be won over to them. Centres were to be established in every town and eventually in every village. Societies of young men were to be established with various ostensible objects, cultural, intellectual or moral and those already existing
\nwere to be won over for revolutionary use. Young men were to be trained in activities which might be helpful for ultimate
\nmilitary action, such as riding, physical training, athletics of various kinds, drill and organised movement. As soon as the
\nidea was sown it attained a rapid prosperity; already existing small groups and associations of young men who had not yet
\nthe clear idea or any settled programme of revolution began to turn in this direction and a few who had already the revolutionary aim were contacted and soon developed activity on organised lines; the few rapidly became many. Meanwhile Sri
\nAurobindo had met a member of the Secret Society in Western India, and taken the oath of the Society and had been introduced <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t1 This and the preceding paragraph were inserted here when this note was first published in 1948. They incorporate, with some changes, most of a previously written note<\/i>
\npublished on pages 72 \u00ad 73. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>  
\n50<\/i> <\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>49<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

to the Council in Bombay. His future action was not pursued under any directions by this Council, but he took up on his own
\nresponsibility the task of generalising support for its objects in Bengal where as yet it had no membership or following. He
\nspoke of the Society and its aim to P. Mitter and other leading men of the revolutionary group in Bengal and they took the oath
\nof the Society and agreed to carry out its objects on the lines suggested by Sri Aurobindo. The special cover used by Mitter’s
\ngroup was association for lathi play which had already been popularised to some extent by Sarala Ghoshal in Bengal among
\nthe young men; but other groups used other ostensible covers. Sri Aurobindo’s attempt at a close organisation of the whole movement did not succeed, but the movement itself did not suffer by that, for the general idea was taken up and activity of many
\nseparate groups led to a greater and more widespread diffusion of the revolutionary drive and its action. Afterwards there came
\nthe partition of Bengal and a general outburst of revolt which favoured the rise of the extremist party and the great nationalist
\nmovement. Sri Aurobindo’s activities were then turned more and more in this direction and the secret action became a secondary
\nand subordinate element. He took advantage, however, of the Swadeshi movement to popularise the idea of violent revolt in
\nthe future. At Barin’s suggestion he agreed to the starting of a paper, Yugantar<\/i>, which was to preach open revolt and the
\nabsolute denial of the British rule and include such items as a series of articles containing instructions for guerrilla warfare.
\nSri Aurobindo himself wrote some of the opening articles in the early numbers and he always exercised a general control; when a
\nmember of the sub-editorial staff, Swami Vivekananda’s brother, presented himself on his own motion to the police in a search
\nas the editor of the paper and was prosecuted, the Yugantar<\/i> under Sri Aurobindo’s orders adopted the policy of refusing to
\ndefend itself in a British Court on the ground that it did not recognise the foreign Government and this immensely increased
\nthe prestige and influence of the paper. It had as its chief writers and directors three of the ablest younger writers in Bengal, and
\nit at once acquired an immense influence throughout Bengal. It   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>50<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nmay be noted that the Secret Society did not include terrorism in its programme but this element grew up in Bengal as a result
\nof the strong repression and the reaction to it in that province.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe public activity of Sri Aurobindo began with the writing of the articles in the Indu Prakash. <\/i>These [nine]2<\/font><\/sup> articles written at the instance of K. G. Deshpande, editor of the paper
\nand Sri Aurobindo’s Cambridge friend, under the caption “New Lamps for Old” vehemently denounced the then congress policy
\nof pray, petition and protest and called for a dynamic leadership based upon self-help and fearlessness. But this outspoken and
\nirrefutable criticism was checked by the action of a Moderate leader who frightened the editor and thus prevented any full
\ndevelopment of his ideas in the paper; he had to turn aside to generalities such as the necessity of extending the activities of the
\nCongress beyond the circle of the bourgeois or middle class and calling into it the masses. Finally, Sri Aurobindo suspended all
\npublic activity of this kind and worked only in secret till 1905, but he contacted Tilak whom he regarded as the one possible
\nleader for a revolutionary party and met him at the Ahmedabad Congress; there Tilak took him out of the pandal and talked to
\nhim for an hour in the grounds expressing his contempt for the Reformist movement and explaining his own line of action in
\nMaharashtra.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tSri Aurobindo included in the scope of his revolutionary
\nwork one kind of activity which afterwards became an important item in the public programme of the Nationalist party. He
\nencouraged the young men in the centres of work to propagate the Swadeshi idea which at that time was only in its infancy and
\nhardly more than a fad of the few. One of the ablest men in these revolutionary groups was a Mahratta named Sakharam Ganesh
\nDeuskar who was an able writer in Bengali (his family had been long domiciled in Bengal) and who had written a popular life
\nof Shivaji in Bengali in which he first brought in the name of Swaraj, afterwards adopted by the Nationalists as their word
\nfor independence, \u2014 Swaraj became one item of the fourfold<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t2 1948 edition
\n<\/i>seven. See Table 1, page 565. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>51<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

Nationalist programme. He published a book entitled Desher<\/i> Katha <\/i>describing in exhaustive detail the British commercial
\nand industrial exploitation of India. This book had an immense repercussion in Bengal, captured the mind of young Bengal
\nand assisted more than anything else in the preparation of the Swadeshi movement. Sri Aurobindo himself had always considered the shaking off of this economic yoke and the development of Indian trade and industry as a necessary concomitant of the
\nrevolutionary endeavour.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAs long as he was in the Baroda service, Sri Aurobindo could
\nnot take part publicly in politics. Apart from that, he preferred to remain and act and even to lead from behind the scenes without
\nhis name being known in public; it was the Government’s action in prosecuting him as editor of the
\nBande Mataram <\/i>that forced
\nhim into public view. And from that time forward he became openly, what he had been for sometime already, a prominent
\nleader of the Nationalist party, its principal leader in action in Bengal and the organiser there of its policy and strategy. He had
\ndecided in his mind the lines on which he wanted the country’s action to run: what he planned was very much the same as was
\ndeveloped afterwards in Ireland as the Sinn Fein movement; but Sri Aurobindo did not derive his ideas, as some have represented, from Ireland, for the Irish movement became prominent later and he knew nothing of it till after he had withdrawn to
\nPondicherry. There was moreover a capital difference between India and Ireland which made his work much more difficult; for
\nall its past history had accustomed the Irish people to rebellion against British rule and this history might be even described as a
\nconstant struggle for independence intermittent in its action but permanently there in principle; there was nothing of this kind
\nin India. Sri Aurobindo had to establish and generalise the idea of independence in the mind of the Indian people and at the
\nsame time to push first a party and then the whole nation into an intense and organised political activity which would lead to
\nthe accomplishment of that ideal. His idea was to capture the Congress and to make it an instrument for revolutionary action
\ninstead of a centre of a timid constitutional agitation which
\n <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>52<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

would only talk and pass resolutions and recommendations to
\nthe foreign Government; if the Congress could not be captured, then a central revolutionary body would have to be created
\nwhich could do this work. It was to be a sort of State within the State giving its directions to the people and creating organised
\nbodies and institutions which would be its means of action; there must be an increasing non-cooperation and passive resistance
\nwhich would render the administration of the country by a foreign Government difficult or finally impossible, a universal
\nunrest which would wear down repression and finally, if need be, an open revolt all over the country. This plan included a
\nboycott of British trade, the substitution of national schools for the Government institutions, the creation of arbitration courts
\nto which the people could resort instead of depending on the ordinary courts of law, the creation of volunteer forces which
\nwould be the nucleus of an army of open revolt, and all other action that could make the programme complete. The part Sri
\nAurobindo took publicly in Indian politics was of brief duration, for he turned aside from it in 1910 and withdrew to Pondicherry;
\nmuch of his programme lapsed in his absence, but enough had been done to change the whole face of Indian politics and the
\nwhole spirit of the Indian people, to make independence its aim and non-cooperation and resistance its method, and even an
\nimperfect application of this policy heightening into sporadic periods of revolt has been sufficient to bring about the victory.
\nThe course of subsequent events followed largely the line of Sri Aurobindo’s idea. The Congress was finally captured by the
\nNationalist party, declared independence its aim, organised itself for action, took almost the whole nation minus a majority
\nof the Mohammedans and a minority of the depressed classes into acceptance of its leadership and eventually formed the first
\nnational, though not as yet an independent, Government in India and secured from Britain acceptance of independence for India.3<\/font><\/sup> <\/p>\n

\n

At first Sri Aurobindo took part in Congress politics only<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t3 This sentence, unlike the final one in this “General Note” (see page 66), was not<\/i>
\nrevised before publication in 1948. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>53<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

from behind the scenes as he had not yet decided to leave the Baroda service; but he took long leave without pay in which,
\nbesides carrying on personally the secret revolutionary work, he attended the Barisal Conference broken up by the police
\nand toured East Bengal along with Bepin Pal and associated himself closely with the forward group in the Congress. It was
\nduring this period that he joined Bepin Pal in the editing of the Bande Mataram<\/i>, founded the new political party in Bengal
\nand attended the Congress session at Calcutta at which the Extremists, though still a minority, succeeded under the leadership
\nof Tilak in imposing part of their political programme on the Congress. The founding of the Bengal National College gave him
\nthe opportunity he needed and enabled him to resign his position in the Baroda service and join the college as its Principal. Subodh
\nMullick, one of Sri Aurobindo’s collaborators in his secret action and afterwards also in Congress politics, in whose house he usually lived when he was in Calcutta, had given a lakh of rupees for this foundation and had stipulated that Sri Aurobindo should
\nbe given a post of professor in the college with a salary of Rs. 150; so he was now free to give his whole time to the service
\nof the country. Bepin Pal, who had been long expounding a policy of self-help and non-cooperation in his weekly journal,
\nnow started a daily with the name of Bande Mataram<\/i>, but it was likely to be a brief adventure since he began with only Rs. 500
\nin his pocket and no firm assurance of financial assistance in the future. He asked Sri Aurobindo to join him in this venture to
\nwhich a ready consent was given, for now Sri Aurobindo saw his opportunity for starting the public propaganda necessary for his
\nrevolutionary purpose. He called a meeting of the forward group of young men in the Congress and [they] decided then to organise
\nthemselves openly as a new political party joining hands with the corresponding group in Maharashtra under the proclaimed
\nleadership of Tilak and to join battle with the Moderate party which was done at the Calcutta session. He also persuaded them
\nto take up the Bande Mataram <\/i>daily as their party organ and a Bande Mataram Company was started to finance the paper,
\nwhose direction Sri Aurobindo undertook during the absence of   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>54<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nBepin Pal who was sent on a tour in the districts to proclaim the purpose and programme of the new party. The new party
\nwas at once successful and the Bande Mataram <\/i>paper began to circulate throughout India. On its staff were not only Bepin Pal
\nand Sri Aurobindo but some other very able writers, Shyam Sundar Chakravarty, Hemendra Prasad Ghose and Bejoy Chatterji.
\nShyam Sundar and Bejoy were masters of the English language, each with a style of his own; Shyam Sundar caught up something
\nlike Sri Aurobindo’s way of writing and later on many took his articles for Sri Aurobindo’s. But after a time dissensions arose
\nbetween Bepin Pal on one side and the other contributors and the directors of the Company because of temperamental incompatibility and differences of political view especially with regard to the secret revolutionary action with which others sympathised
\nbut to which Bepin Pal was opposed. This ended soon in Bepin Pal’s separation from the journal. Sri Aurobindo would not have
\nconsented to this departure, for he regarded the qualities of Pal as a great asset to the
\nBande Mataram, <\/i>since Pal, though not
\na man of action or capable of political leadership, was perhaps the best and most original political thinker in the country, an
\nexcellent writer and a magnificent orator: but the separation was effected behind Sri Aurobindo’s back when he was convalescing
\nfrom a dangerous attack of fever. His name was even announced without his consent in
\nBande Mataram <\/i>as editor but for one
\nday only, as he immediately put a stop to it since he was still formally in the Baroda service and in no way eager to have his
\nname brought forward in public. Henceforward, however, he controlled the policy of the
\nBande Mataram <\/i>along with that of
\nthe party in Bengal. Bepin Pal had stated the aim of the new party as complete self-government free from British control but
\nthis could have meant or at least included the Moderate aim of colonial self-government and Dadabhai Naoroji as President
\nof the Calcutta session of the Congress had actually tried to capture the name of Swaraj, the Extremists’ term for independence, for this colonial self-government. Sri Aurobindo’s first preoccupation was to declare openly for complete and absolute independence as the aim of political action in India and to   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>55<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

insist on this persistently in the pages of the journal; he was the first politician in India who had the courage to do this
\nin public and he was immediately successful. The party took up the word Swaraj to express its own ideal of independence
\nand it soon spread everywhere; but it was taken up as the ideal of the Congress much later on at the [Lahore]4<\/font><\/sup> session of
\nthat body when it had been reconstituted and renovated under Nationalist leadership. The journal declared and developed a
\nnew political programme for the country as the programme of the Nationalist Party, non-cooperation, passive resistance,
\nSwadeshi, Boycott, national education, settlement of disputes in law by popular arbitration and other items of Sri Aurobindo’s
\nplan. Sri Aurobindo published in the paper a series of articles on passive resistance, another developing a political philosophy
\nof revolution and wrote many leaders aimed at destroying the shibboleths and superstitions of the Moderate Party, such as the
\nbelief in British justice and benefits bestowed by foreign government in India, faith in British law courts and in the adequacy
\nof the education given in schools and universities in India and stressed more strongly and persistently than had been done the
\nemasculation, stagnation or slow progress, poverty, economic dependence, absence of a rich industrial activity and all other
\nevil results of a foreign government; he insisted especially that even if an alien rule were benevolent and beneficent, that could
\nnot be a substitute for a free and healthy national life. Assisted by this publicity the ideas of the Nationalists gained ground
\neverywhere especially in the Punjab which had before been predominantly moderate. The
\nBande Mataram <\/i>was almost unique
\nin journalistic history in the influence it exercised in converting the mind of a people and preparing it for revolution. But its
\nweakness was on the financial side; for the Extremists were still a poor man’s party. So long as Sri Aurobindo was there in active
\ncontrol, he managed with great difficulty to secure sufficient public support for running the paper, but not for expanding
\nit as he wanted, and when he was arrested and held in jail<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t4 1948 edition
\n<\/i>Karachi. See Table 1, page 565. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>56<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nfor a year, the economic situation of Bande Mataram <\/i>became desperate: finally, it was decided that the journal should die
\na glorious death rather than perish by starvation and Bejoy Chatterji was commissioned to write an article for which the
\nGovernment would certainly stop the publication of the paper. Sri Aurobindo had always taken care to give no handle in the
\neditorial articles of the Bande Mataram <\/i>either for a prosecution for sedition or any other drastic action fatal to its existence; an
\neditor of The Statesman <\/i>complained that the paper reeked with sedition patently visible between every line but it was so skilfully
\nwritten that no legal action could be taken. The manoeuvre succeeded and the life of the
\nBande Mataram <\/i>came to an end in
\nSri Aurobindo’s absence.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe Nationalist programme could only achieve a partial beginning before it was temporarily broken by severe government repression. Its most important practical item was Swadeshi plus
\nBoycott; for Swadeshi much was done to make the idea general and a few beginnings were made, but the greater results showed
\nthemselves only afterwards in the course of time. Sri Aurobindo was anxious that this part of the movement should be not only
\npropagated in idea but given a practical organisation and an effective force. He wrote from Baroda asking whether it would
\nnot be possible to bring in the industrialists and manufacturers and gain the financial support of landed magnates and create an
\norganisation in which men of industrial and commercial ability and experience and not politicians alone could direct operations
\nand devise means of carrying out the policy; but he was told that it was impossible, the industrialists and the landed magnates
\nwere too timid to join in the movement, and the big commercial men were all interested in the import of British goods and
\ntherefore on the side of the status quo: so he had to abandon his idea of the organisation of Swadeshi and Boycott. Both Tilak
\nand Sri Aurobindo were in favour of an effective boycott of British goods \u2014 but of British goods only; for there was little
\nin the country to replace foreign articles: so they recommended the substitution for the British of foreign goods from Germany
\nand Austria and America so that the fullest pressure might be   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>57<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

brought upon England. They wanted the Boycott to be a political weapon and not merely an aid to Swadeshi; the total boycott of
\nall foreign goods was an impracticable idea and the very limited application of it recommended in Congress resolutions was too
\nsmall to be politically effective. They were for national self-sufficiency in key industries, the production of necessities and
\nof all manufactures of which India had the natural means, but complete self-sufficiency or autarchy did not seem practicable or
\neven desirable since a free India would need to export goods as well as supply them for internal consumption and for that she
\nmust import as well and maintain an international exchange. But the sudden enthusiasm for the boycott of all foreign goods
\nwas wide and sweeping and the leaders had to conform to this popular cry and be content with the impulse it gave to the
\nSwadeshi idea. National education was another item to which Sri Aurobindo attached much importance. He had been disgusted
\nwith the education given by the British system in the schools and colleges and universities, a system of which as a professor in the
\nBaroda College he had full experience. He felt that it tended to dull and impoverish and tie up the naturally quick and brilliant
\nand supple Indian intelligence, to teach it bad intellectual habits and spoil by narrow information and mechanical instruction
\nits originality and productivity. The movement began well and many national schools were established in Bengal and many
\nable men became teachers, but still the development was insufficient and the economical position of the schools precarious.
\nSri Aurobindo had decided to take up the movement personally and see whether it could not be given a greater expansion and a
\nstronger foundation, but his departure from Bengal cut short this plan. In the repression and the general depression caused by it,
\nmost of the schools failed to survive. The idea lived on and it may be hoped that it will one day find an adequate form and body.
\nThe idea of people’s courts was taken up and worked in some districts, not without success, but this too perished in the storm.
\nThe idea of volunteer groupings had a stronger vitality; it lived on, took shape, multiplied its formations and its workers were
\nthe spearhead of the movement of direct action which broke   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>58<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nout from time to time in the struggle for freedom. The purely political elements of the Nationalist programme and activities
\nwere those which lasted and after each wave of repression and depression renewed the thread of the life of the movement for
\nliberation and kept it recognisably one throughout nearly fifty years of its struggle. But the greatest thing done in those years
\nwas the creation of a new spirit in the country. In the enthusiasm that swept surging everywhere with the cry of Bande Mataram
\nringing on all sides men felt it glorious to be alive and dare and act together and hope; the old apathy and timidity were broken
\nand a force created which nothing could destroy and which rose again and again in wave after wave till it carried India to the
\nbeginning of a complete victory.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAfter the Bande Mataram <\/i>case, Sri Aurobindo became the
\nrecognised leader of Nationalism in Bengal. He led the party at the session of the [district]5<\/font><\/sup> Conference at Midnapore where
\nthere was a vehement clash between the two parties. He now for the first time became a speaker on the public platform, addressed large meetings at Surat and presided over the Nationalist conference there. He stopped at several places on his way back
\nto Calcutta and was the speaker at large meetings called to hear him.6<\/font><\/sup> He led the party again at the session of the Provincial
\nConference at Hooghly. There it became evident for the first time that Nationalism was gaining the ascendant, for it commanded a majority among the delegates and in the Subjects Committee Sri Aurobindo was able to defeat the Moderates’
\nresolution welcoming the Reforms and pass his own resolution stigmatising them as utterly inadequate and unreal and rejecting
\nthem. But the Moderate leaders threatened to secede if this was maintained and to avoid a scission he consented to allow the
\nModerate resolution to pass but spoke at the public session explaining his decision and asking the Nationalists to acquiesce
\nin it in spite of their victory so as to keep some unity in the political forces of Bengal. The Nationalist delegates, at first <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t5 1948 edition <\/i>Bengal Provincial. See Table 1, page 565. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n\t\t\t<\/font> <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t6
\nSee Table 2, page 568. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>59<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

triumphant and clamorous, accepted the decision and left the hall quietly at Sri Aurobindo’s order so that they might not
\nhave to vote either for or against the Moderate resolution. This caused much amazement and discomfiture in the minds of the
\nModerate leaders who complained that the people had refused to listen to their old and tried leaders and clamoured against
\nthem, but at the bidding of a young man new to politics they had obeyed in disciplined silence as if a single body. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAbout this period Sri Aurobindo had decided to take up charge of a Bengali daily,
\nNava Shakti<\/i>, and had moved from
\nhis rented house in Scott’s Lane, where he had been living with his wife and sister, to rooms in the office of this newspaper,
\nand there, before he could begin this new venture, early one morning while he was still sleeping, the police charged up the
\nstairs, revolver in hand, and arrested him. He was taken to the police station and thence to Alipore Jail where he remained for
\na year during the magistrate’s investigation and the trial in the Sessions Court at Alipore. At first he was lodged for some time
\nin a solitary cell but afterwards transferred to a large section of the jail where he lived in one huge room with the other prisoners
\nin the case; subsequently, after the assassination of the approver in the jail, all the prisoners were confined in contiguous but
\nseparate cells and met only in the court or in the daily exercise where they could not speak to each other. It was in the second
\nperiod that Sri Aurobindo made the acquaintance of most of his fellow-accused. In the jail he spent almost all his time in reading
\nthe Gita and the Upanishads and in intensive meditation and the practice of Yoga. This he pursued even in the second interval
\nwhen he had no opportunity of being alone and had to accustom himself to meditation amid general talk and laughter, the playing
\nof games and much noise and disturbance; in the first and third periods he had full opportunity and used it to the full. In the
\nSessions Court the accused were confined in a large prisoners’ cage and here during the whole day he remained absorbed in
\nhis meditation attending little to the trial and hardly listening to the evidence. C. R. Das, one of his Nationalist collaborators and
\na famous lawyer, had put aside his large practice and devoted   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>60<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nhimself for months to the defence of Sri Aurobindo who left the case entirely to him and troubled no more about it; for he had
\nbeen assured from within and knew that he would be acquitted. During this period his view of life was radically changed; he had
\ntaken up Yoga with the original idea of acquiring spiritual force and energy and divine guidance for his work in life. But now the
\ninner spiritual life and realisation which had continually been increasing in magnitude and universality and assuming a larger
\nplace took him up entirely and his work became a part and result of it and besides far exceeded the service and liberation of
\nthe country and fixed itself in an aim, previously only glimpsed, which was world-wide in its bearing and concerned with the
\nwhole future of humanity.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tWhen he came out from jail, Sri Aurobindo found the whole
\npolitical aspect of the country altered; most of the Nationalist leaders were in jail or in self-imposed exile and there was a
\ngeneral discouragement and depression, though the feeling in the country had not ceased but was only suppressed and was growing by its suppression. He determined to continue the struggle; he held weekly meetings in Calcutta, but the attendance which
\nhad numbered formerly thousands full of enthusiasm was now only of hundreds and had no longer the same force and life.
\nHe also went to places in the districts to speak and at one of these delivered his speech at Uttarpara in which for the first time
\nhe spoke publicly of his Yoga and his spiritual experiences. He started also two weeklies, one in English and one in Bengali, the
\nKarmayogin <\/i>and Dharma<\/i>, which had a fairly large circulation and were, unlike the
\nBande Mataram<\/i>, easily self-supporting. He
\nattended and spoke at the Provincial Conference at [Hooghly]7<\/font><\/sup> in 1909: for in Bengal owing to the compromise at [Pabna]8<\/font><\/sup>
\nthe two parties had not split altogether apart and both joined in the Conference, though there could be no representatives of
\nthe Nationalist party at the meeting of the Central Moderate Body which had taken the place of the Congress. Surendra Nath <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t7 1948 edition <\/i>Barisal<\/font>. See Table 1, page 566. \u2014 Ed.<\/font><\/i><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t8 1948 edition
\n<\/i>Hooghly. See Table 1, page 566. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>61<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

Banerji had indeed called a private conference attended by Sri Aurobindo and one or two other leaders of the Nationalists to
\ndiscuss a project of uniting the two parties at the session in [Lahore]9<\/font><\/sup> and giving a joint fight to the dominant right wing
\nof the Moderates; for he had always dreamt of becoming again the leader of a united Bengal with the Extremist party as his
\nstrong right arm: but that would have necessitated the Nationalists being appointed as delegates by the Bengal Moderates and
\naccepting the constitution imposed at Surat. This Sri Aurobindo refused to do; he demanded a change in that constitution enabling newly formed associations to elect delegates so that the Nationalists might independently send their representatives to
\nthe All-India session and on this point the negotiations broke down. Sri Aurobindo began however to consider how to revive the national movement under the changed circumstances. He glanced at the possibility of falling back on a Home Rule
\nmovement which the Government could not repress, but this, which was actually realised by Mrs. Besant later on, would have
\nmeant a postponement and a falling back from the ideal of independence. He looked also at the possibility of an intense and
\norganised passive resistance movement in the manner afterwards adopted by Gandhi. He saw however that he himself could not
\nbe the leader of such a movement.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAt no time did he consent to have anything to do with the
\nsham Reforms which were all the Government at that period cared to offer. He held up always the slogan of “no compromise” or, as he now put it in his Open Letter to his countrymen published in the
\nKarmayogin<\/i>, “no co-operation without control”. It was only if real political, administrative and financial control were given to popular ministers in an elected Assembly
\nthat he would have anything to do with offers from the British Government. Of this he saw no sign until the proposal of the
\nMontagu Reforms in which first something of the kind seemed to appear. He foresaw that the British Government would have
\nto begin trying to meet the national aspiration half-way, but<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t9 1948 edition
\n<\/i>Benares. See Table 1, page 566. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n<\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>62<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

he would not anticipate that moment before it actually came.
\nThe Montagu Reforms came nine years after Sri Aurobindo had retired to Pondicherry and by that time he had abandoned all
\noutward and public political activity in order to devote himself to his spiritual work, acting only by his spiritual force on
\nthe movement in India, until his prevision of real negotiations between the British Government and the Indian leaders was
\nfulfilled by the Cripps’ proposal and the events that came after.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tMeanwhile the Government were determined to get rid of
\nSri Aurobindo as the only considerable obstacle left to the success of their repressive policy. As they could not send him to
\nthe Andamans they decided to deport him. This came to the knowledge of Sister Nivedita and she informed Sri Aurobindo
\nand asked him to leave British India and work from outside so that his work would not be stopped or totally interrupted. Sri
\nAurobindo contented himself with publishing in the Karmayogin<\/i> a signed article in which he spoke of the project of deportation
\nand left the country what he called his last will and testament; he felt sure that this would kill the idea of deportation and in fact it
\nso turned out. Deportation left aside, the Government could only wait for some opportunity for prosecution for sedition and this
\nchance came to them when Sri Aurobindo published in the same paper another signed article reviewing the political situation.
\nThe article was sufficiently moderate in its tone and later on the High Court refused to regard it as seditious and acquitted
\nthe printer. Sri Aurobindo one night at the Karmayogin <\/i>office received information of the Government’s intention to search
\nthe office and arrest him. While considering what should be his attitude, he received a sudden command from above to go to
\nChandernagore in French India. He obeyed the command at once, for it was now his rule to move only as he was moved by
\nthe divine guidance and never to resist and depart from it; he did not stay to consult with anyone but in ten minutes was at the
\nriver ghat and in a boat plying on the Ganges, in a few hours he was at Chandernagore where he went into secret residence. He
\nsent a message to Sister Nivedita asking her to take up the editing of the Karmayogin
\n<\/i>in his absence. This was the end of his active
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>63<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

connection with his two journals. At Chandernagore he plunged entirely into solitary meditation and ceased all other activity.
\nThen there came to him a call to proceed to Pondicherry. A boat manned by some young revolutionaries of Uttarpara took him to
\nCalcutta; there he boarded the Dupleix <\/i>and reached Pondicherry on April 4, 1910. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAt Pondicherry, from this time onwards Sri Aurobindo’s practice of Yoga became more and more absorbing. He dropped
\nall participation in any public political activity, refused more than one request to preside at sessions of the restored Indian
\nNational Congress and made a rule of abstention from any public utterance of any kind not connected with his spiritual
\nactivities or any contribution of writings or articles except what he wrote afterwards in the
\nArya. <\/i>For some years he kept up
\nsome private communication with the revolutionary forces he had led through one or two individuals, but this also he dropped
\nafter a time and his abstention from any kind of participation in politics became complete. As his vision of the future grew clearer,
\nhe saw that the eventual independence of India was assured by the march of Forces of which he became aware, that Britain
\nwould be compelled by the pressure of Indian resistance and by the pressure of international events to concede independence
\nand that she was already moving towards that eventuality with whatever opposition and reluctance. He felt that there would be
\nno need of armed insurrection and that the secret preparation for it could be dropped without injury to the nationalist cause, although the revolutionary spirit had to be maintained and would be maintained intact. His own personal intervention in politics
\nwould therefore be no longer indispensable. Apart from all this, the magnitude of the spiritual work set before him became more
\nand more clear to him, and he saw that the concentration of all his energies on it was necessary. Accordingly, when the Ashram
\ncame into existence, he kept it free from all political connections or action; even when he intervened in politics twice afterwards
\non special occasions, this intervention was purely personal and the Ashram was not concerned in it. The British Government and
\nnumbers of people besides could not believe that Sri Aurobindo   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>64<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nhad ceased from all political action and it was supposed by them that he was secretly participating in revolutionary activities and
\neven creating a secret organisation in the security of French India. But all this was pure imagination and rumour and there
\nwas nothing of the kind. His retirement from political activity was complete, just as was his personal retirement into solitude
\nin 1910.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tBut this did not mean, as most people supposed, that he
\nhad retired into some height of spiritual experience devoid of any further interest in the world or in the fate of India. It
\ncould not mean that, for the very principle of his Yoga was not only to realise the Divine and attain to a complete spiritual
\nconsciousness, but also to take all life and all world activity into the scope of this spiritual consciousness and action and to
\nbase life on the Spirit and give it a spiritual meaning. In his retirement Sri Aurobindo kept a close watch on all that was
\nhappening in the world and in India and actively intervened whenever necessary, but solely with a spiritual force and silent
\nspiritual action; for it is part of the experience of those who have advanced far in Yoga that besides the ordinary forces and
\nactivities of the mind and life and body in Matter, there are other forces and powers that can act and do act from behind
\nand from above; there is also a spiritual dynamic power which can be possessed by those who are advanced in the spiritual
\nconsciousness, though all do not care to possess or, possessing, to use it, and this power is greater than any other and more
\neffective. It was this force which, as soon as he had attained to it, he used, at first only in a limited field of personal work,
\nbut afterwards in a constant action upon the world forces. He had no reason to be dissatisfied with the results or to feel the
\nnecessity of any other kind of action. Twice however he found it advisable to take in addition other action of a public kind.
\nThe first was in relation to the second World War. At the beginning he did not actively concern himself with it, but when
\nit appeared as if Hitler would crush all the forces opposed to him and Nazism dominate the world, he began to intervene.
\nHe declared himself publicly on the side of the Allies, made   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>65<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

some financial contributions in answer to the appeal for funds and encouraged those who sought his advice to enter the army
\nor share in the war effort. Inwardly, he put his spiritual force behind the Allies from the moment of Dunkirk when everybody
\nwas expecting the immediate fall of England and the definite triumph of Hitler, and he had the satisfaction of seeing the rush
\nof German victory almost immediately arrested and the tide of war begin to turn in the opposite direction. This he did, because
\nhe saw that behind Hitler and Nazism were dark Asuric forces and that their success would mean the enslavement of mankind
\nto the tyranny of evil, and a set-back to the course of evolution and especially to the spiritual evolution of mankind: it would
\nlead also to the enslavement not only of Europe but of Asia, and in it India, an enslavement far more terrible than any this country
\nhad ever endured, and the undoing of all the work that had been done for her liberation. It was this reason also that induced him
\nto support publicly the Cripps’ offer and to press the Congress leaders to accept it. He had not, for various reasons, intervened
\nwith his spiritual force against the Japanese aggression until it became evident that Japan intended to attack and even invade
\nand conquer India. He allowed certain letters he had written in support of the war affirming his views of the Asuric nature and
\ninevitable outcome of Hitlerism to become public. He supported the Cripps’ offer because by its acceptance India and Britain
\ncould stand united against the Asuric forces and the solution of Cripps could be used as a step towards independence. When
\nnegotiations failed, Sri Aurobindo returned to his reliance on the use of spiritual force alone against the aggressor and had
\nthe satisfaction of seeing the tide of Japanese victory, which had till then swept everything before it, changed immediately into a
\ntide of rapid, crushing and finally immense and overwhelming defeat. He had also after a time the satisfaction of seeing his
\nprevisions about the future of India justify themselves so that she stands independent with whatever internal difficulties. <\/p>\n

\n

Written 7 November 1946; revised and published 1948   <\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>66<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n The Indu Prakash <\/i>Articles <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo revolved these things in his mind, and read,
\nwrote and thought incessantly. Could not something be done? Could he not find an opportunity for service in the larger life
\nof Bengal, \u2014 of the Indian nation itself? <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

He had already in England decided to devote his life to the service of his country and its liberation. He even began soon after coming to India to write on political matters (without giving his
\nname) in the daily press, trying to awaken the nation to the ideas of the future. But these were not well received by the leaders of
\nthe time, they succeeded in preventing farther publication and he drew back into silence. But he did not abandon either his
\nideas or his hope of an effective action.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[New Lamps for Old<\/i>, the series of articles he published in the Indu Prakash<\/i>, was on Indian civilisation.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This title did not refer to Indian civilisation but to Congress politics. It is not used in the sense of the Aladdin story, but was
\nintended to imply the offering of new lights to replace the old and faint reformist lights of the Congress. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

It is said that Sri Aurobindo was persuaded to discontinue his
\ncontribution to Indu Prakash <\/i>by the late Mahadeo Govind Ranade. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The facts are: After the first two articles, Ranade called the proprietor [saying] that these articles were revolutionary and
\ndangerous and a case for sedition might be brought against the paper. The proprietor alarmed told the editor K. G. Deshpande
\nthat this series must be discontinued. It was finally concluded that the tone should be moderated, the substance made more
\nacademic and the thus moderated articles could then continue. Sri Aurobindo lost interest in these muzzled productions, sent in
\nnumbers at long intervals and finally dropped the whole affair.   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>67<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

\n\t\t\tSri Aurobindo saw Ranade at this time, his only contact; Ranade advised him to take some special subject and write about
\n[it], he recommended Jail Reform, perhaps thinking that this writer would soon have personal experience of jails and thus
\nbecome an expert on his subject! <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t[Another version:<\/i>] The facts about the articles in the Indu
\nPrakash were these. They were begun at the instance of K. G. Deshpande, Aurobindo’s Cambridge friend, who was editor
\nof the paper, but the first two articles made a sensation and frightened Ranade and other Congress leaders. Ranade warned
\nthe proprietor of the paper that, if this went on, he would surely be prosecuted for sedition. Accordingly the original plan of the
\nseries had to be dropped at the proprietor’s instance. Deshpande requested Sri Aurobindo to continue in a modified tone and
\nhe reluctantly consented, but felt no farther interest and the articles were published at long intervals and finally dropped of
\nthemselves altogether.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[The authorities objected to his patriotic activities.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Is the reference to the Baroda authorities? Sri Aurobindo is
\nnot aware that his utterances or writings were ever objected to by them. His articles in the Indu Prakash were anonymous,
\nalthough many people in Bombay knew that he was the writer. Otherwise, except for a few speeches at functions in the Palace
\nitself such as the reception of Dr. S. K. Mullick which had nothing to do [with]10<\/font><\/sup> politics, he spoke mainly as Chairman of the
\nBaroda College Union, there was no objection made at any time and he continued to preside over some of these debates until
\nhe left Baroda. It was in England while at Cambridge that he made revolutionary speeches at the meetings of the Indian Majlis
\nwhich were recorded as a black mark against him by the India Office. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t10 MS (dictated) <\/i>at  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>68<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n Beginnings of the Revolutionary Movement
\n\t<\/a> <\/b> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

During his stay at Baroda Sri Aurobindo got into touch with
\nmen that counted, groups that counted. He went to Bengal “to see what was the hope of revival, what was the political
\ncondition of the people, and whether there was the possibility of a real movement”. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It might be added that he had begun a work that was still nameless; and it was in the course of that work that he went to Bengal
\n“to see what was the hope of revival etc.”<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

He found that in Bengal “the prevailing mood was apathy and despair”. There was no other go except to bide his time. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It should be added, “and continue his political work behind the scenes in silence. The moment for public work had not yet
\ncome.”<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tOnce his work was started he continued it until circumstances made it possible to join in a public movement.<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\nEven his own intrepid province of Bengal was in no mood to be persuaded by Sri Aurobindo and his gospel of virile
\nnationalism. <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\nIt was anything but intrepid at the time; it was the mantra
\nof Bande Mataram and the leap into revolutionary action that changed the people of the province. <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[He sent some of his friends from Baroda and Bombay to
\nBengal to prepare for the revolutionary movement.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It was not any of his friends at Baroda and in Bombay who went
\nto Bengal on his behalf. His first emissary was a young Bengali who had by the help of Sri Aurobindo’s friends in the Baroda
\nArmy enlisted as a trooper in a cavalry regiment in spite of the prohibition by the British Government of the enlistment of any
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>69<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

Bengali in any army in India. This man who was exceedingly energetic and capable, formed a first group in Calcutta which
\ngrew rapidly (afterwards many branches were established); he also entered into relations with P. Mitter and other revolutionaries already at work in the province. He was joined afterwards by Barin who had in the interval come to Baroda. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[Among the leading lights of the day was P. Mitter who was a
\npositivist.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

P. Mitter had a spiritual life and aspiration of his own and a
\nstrong religious feeling; he was like Bepin Pal and several other prominent leaders of the new nationalist movement in Bengal,
\na disciple of the famous Yogi Bejoy Goswami, but he did not bring these things into his politics. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[At this time there was at Bombay a secret society headed by
\na Rajput prince of Udaipur.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This Rajput leader was not a prince, that is to say a Ruling Chief
\nbut a noble of the Udaipur State with the title of Thakur. The Thakur was not a member of the council in Bombay; he stood
\nabove it as the leader of the whole movement while the council helped him to organise Maharashtra and the Mahratta States.
\nHe himself worked principally upon the Indian Army of which he had already won over two or three regiments. Sri Aurobindo
\ntook a special journey into Central India to meet and speak with Indian sub-officers and men of one of these regiments. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

Since 1902 Sri Aurobindo wished to enter the political fray and
\nto contribute his mite to the forces that were seriously working for the country’s redemption and rehabilitation. He held
\nprivate talks, he corresponded, he put pressure on front-rank leaders; but as yet he could do little.
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>70<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nThis does not give a correct idea. He had already joined with some of the more advanced leaders to organise bodies for political action which would act when the time for action came;11<\/font><\/sup> it was only in public as yet that he could do little. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n Attitude towards Violent Revolution
\n\t<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

[Sri Aurobindo did not believe in, nor did he like, violent
\nrevolution.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This is incorrect. If Sri Aurobindo had not believed in the efficacy
\nof violent revolution or had disliked it, he would not have joined the secret society whose whole purpose was to prepare a national
\ninsurrection. His historical studies had not taught him the lesson indicated here. On the contrary, he had studied with interest
\nthe revolutions and rebellions which led to national liberation, the struggle against the English in mediaeval France and the
\nrevolts which liberated America and Italy. He took much of his inspiration from these movements and their leaders, especially
\nJeanne d’Arc<\/span> and Mazzini. In his public activity he took up noncooperation and passive resistance as a means in the struggle
\nfor independence but not the sole means and so long as he was in Bengal he maintained a secret revolutionary activity as
\na preparation for open revolt, in case passive resistance proved insufficient for the purpose. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t11 The programme of this organisation was at first Swaraj, Swadeshi, Boycott \u2014 Swaraj meaning to it complete independence. The word Swaraj was first used by the Bengali-Maratha publicist, Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar, writer of Desher Katha<\/i>, a book compiling all the details of India’s economic servitude which had an enormous influence
\non the young men of Bengal and helped to turn them into revolutionaries. The word was taken up as their ideal by the revolutionary party and popularised by the vernacular paper Sandhya edited by Brahmabandhab Upadhyaya; it was caught hold of by Dadabhai Naoroji at the Calcutta Congress as the equivalent of colonial self-government but did
\nnot long retain that depreciated value. Sri Aurobindo was the first to use its English equivalent “independence” and reiterate it constantly in the Bande Mataram as the one
\nand immediate aim of national politics. [Sri Aurobindo’s note.<\/i>]  
\n\t\t\t<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>71<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

General Note <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

(referring especially to the Alipur Case and
\nSri Aurobindo’s politics) <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

There seems to be put forth here and in several places the idea
\nthat Sri Aurobindo’s political standpoint was entirely pacifist, that he was opposed in principle and in practice to all violence
\nand that he denounced terrorism, insurrection etc. as entirely forbidden by the spirit and letter of the Hindu religion. It is
\neven suggested that he was a forerunner of Mahatma Gandhi and his gospel of Ahimsa. This is quite [incorrect]12<\/font><\/sup> and, if left,
\nwould give a wrong idea about Sri Aurobindo. He has given his ideas on the subject, generally, in the Essays on the Gita,
\nFirst Series (Chapter IV?) where he supports the Gita’s idea of dharmya yuddha
\n<\/i>and criticises, though not expressly, the
\nGandhian ideas of soul-force. If he had held the pacifist ideal, he would never have supported the Allies (or anybody else) in this
\nWar, still less sanctioned some of his disciples joining the Army as airmen, soldiers, doctors, electricians etc. The declarations
\nand professions quoted in the book are not his, at the most they may have been put forward by his lawyers or written, more
\nprudentially than sincerely, by colleagues in the Bande Mataram.<\/i> The rule of confining political action to passive resistance was
\nadopted as the best policy for the National Movement at that stage and not as part of a gospel of Non-violence or Peace.
\nPeace is part of the highest ideal, but it must be spiritual or at the very least psychological in its basis; without a change in
\nhuman nature it cannot come with any finality. If it is attempted on any other basis (mental principle, or gospel of Ahimsa or any
\nother) it will fail, and even may leave things worse than before. He is in favour of an attempt to put down war by international
\nagreement and international force, \u2014 what is now contemplated in the “New Order”,
\n\u2014 if that proves possible, but that would
\nnot be Ahimsa, it would be a putting down of anarchic force by legal force, and one cannot be sure that it would be permanent. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t12 MS <\/i>correct
\n\t\t\t<\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>72<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

Within nations this sort of peace has been secured, but it does
\nnot prevent occasional civil wars and revolutions and political outbreaks and repressions, sometimes of a sanguinary character.
\nThe same might happen to a similar world-peace. Sri Aurobindo has never concealed his opinion that a nation is entitled to attain
\nits freedom by violence, if it can do so or if there is no other way; whether it should do so or not, depends on what is the best
\npolicy, not on ethical considerations of the Gandhian kind. Sri Aurobindo’s position (and practice) in this matter was the same
\nas Tilak’s and that of other Nationalist leaders who were by no means Pacifists or worshippers of Ahimsa. Those of them who
\ntook a share in revolutionary activities, kept a veil over them for reasons which need not be discussed now. Sri Aurobindo knew
\nof all these things and took his own path, but he has always remained determined not to lift the veil till the proper time comes. <\/p>\n

\n

It follows that the passages which convey the opposite idea must be omitted in the interests of Truth or rewritten. Nothing
\nneed be said about the side of the Nationalist activities of that time in connection with Sri Aurobindo. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Sister Nivedita <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

[Sister Nivedita was invited to Baroda in 1904 by the Maharaja of Baroda.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I do not remember whether she was invited but I think she was
\nthere as a State guest. Khaserao and myself went to receive her at the station. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[Sri Aurobindo had talks with Nivedita about Ramakrishna
\nand Vivekananda.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I do not remember Nivedita speaking to me on spiritual subjects
\nor about Ramakrishna and Vivekananda. We spoke of politics and other subjects. On the way from the station to the town she
\ncried out against the ugliness of the College [building]13<\/font><\/sup> and its<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t13 MS
\n<\/i>buildings
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>73<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

top-heavy dome and praised the Dharmashala near it. Khaserao stared at [her] and opined that she must be at least slightly
\ncracked to have such ideas! I was very much enamoured at the time of her book Kali the Mother and I think we spoke of that;
\nshe had heard, she said, that I was a worshipper of Force, by which she meant that I belonged to the secret revolutionary party
\nlike herself and I was present at her interview with the Maharaja whom she invited to support the secret revolution; she told him
\nthat he could communicate with her through me. Sayajirao was much too cunning to plunge into such a dangerous business and
\nnever spoke to me about it. That is all I remember.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[Sri Aurobindo was influenced by the patriotic fervour of Swami Vivekananda’s utterances, such as his “Mission of the
\nVedanta” speech.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo was not aware of this speech or of any political action by Vivekananda. He had only heard casually of Vivekananda’s intense patriotic feelings which inspired Sister
\nNivedita. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tBhawani Mandir<\/i>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bhawani Mandir was written by Sri Aurobindo but it was more Barin’s idea than his. It was not meant to train people for assassination but for revolutionary preparation of the country. The idea was soon dropped as far as Sri Aurobindo was concerned, but
\nsomething of the kind was attempted by Barin in the Maniktala Garden and it is to this evidently that Hemchandra refers. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[An attempt was made to find a site where the Bhawani
\nMandir idea could be put into operation; later the plan was dropped.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo does not remember anything of this kind nor of any formal decision to abandon the Bhawani Mandir idea. This
\nselection of a site and a head of the monastery must have been   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>74<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nsimply an idea of Barin. He had travelled among the hills trying to find a suitable place but caught hill-fever and had to abandon
\nhis search and return to Baroda. Subsequently he went back to Bengal, but Sri Aurobindo did not hear of any discovery of a
\nsuitable place. Sakaria Swami was Barin’s Guru: he had been a fighter in the Mutiny on the rebel side and he showed at the
\nbreaking of the Surat Congress a vehement patriotic excitement which caused his death because it awoke the poison of the bite
\nof a mad dog which he had reduced to inactivity by a process of his Yogic will; but Sri Aurobindo would not have chosen him for
\nany control of the political side of such an institution. The idea of Bhawani Mandir simply lapsed of itself. Sri Aurobindo thought
\nno more about it, but Barin who clung to the idea tried to establish something like it on a small scale in the Maniktala Garden. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n The Indian National Congress: <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n Moderates and Extremists <\/b><\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

[Allan Hume founded the Indian National Congress to act as
\nan intermediary between the elite of the English and Indian peoples.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This description of the Congress as an intermediary etc. would hardly have been recognised or admitted by the Congress itself
\nat that time. The British Government also would not have recognised it. It regarded the institution with dislike and ignored it as much as possible. Also, Sri Aurobindo was totally opposed to making any approach on behalf of the nation to
\nthe British Government; he regarded the Congress policy as a process of futile petition and protest and considered self-help,
\nnon-cooperation and organisation of all forces in the nation for revolutionary action as the sole effective policy. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo, like all his countrymen, had great respect for
\nGokhale; . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[Altered to:<\/i>] Sri Aurobindo, like all his countrymen, did not fail
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>3<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

to recognise the finer elements in Gokhale’s mind and character; . . . <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Alter as indicated. After an hour’s conversation with Gokhale in the train between Ahmedabad and Baroda it was impossible
\nfor Sri Aurobindo to retain any great respect for Gokhale as a politician, whatever his merits as a man. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[In 1904 an extremist section was formed in the Congress;
\nits members were waiting for the December 1904 session in Bombay in order to make themselves felt.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It is not clear to what this refers. In 1904 the Extremist party had not been publicly formed, although there was an advanced
\nsection in the Congress, strong in Maharashtra but still small and weak elsewhere and composed mostly of young men; there were
\nsometimes disputes behind the scenes but nothing came out in public. These men of extremer views were not even an organised
\ngroup; it was Sri Aurobindo who in 1906 persuaded this group in Bengal to take [a] public position as a party, proclaim Tilak as
\ntheir leader and enter into a contest with the Moderate leaders for the control of the Congress and of public opinion and action
\nin the country. The first great public clash between the two parties took place in the sessions of the Congress at Calcutta where
\nSri Aurobindo was present but still working behind the scenes, the second at the [district]14<\/font><\/sup> Conference at Midnapur where
\nhe for the first time acted publicly as the leader of the Bengal Nationalists, and the final break took place at Surat in 1907. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe Barisal Conference and the Start of the Yugantar<\/i>
\n\t\t\t<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[At the Barisal Conference (April 1906)] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo took part in the Barisal Conference and was in the front row15<\/font><\/sup> of three persons in the procession which was <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t14 MS <\/i>Bengal Provincial. <\/font>
\n\t\t\tSee Table 1, page 566. \u2014 Ed.<\/font><\/i><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t15 See Table 2, page 568.
\n\u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>76<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\ndispersed by the police charge. After the breaking up of the Conference he accompanied Bepin Pal in a tour of East Bengal
\nwhere enormous meetings were held, \u2014 in one district in spite of the prohibition of the District Magistrate. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n *<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

Besides Sri Aurobindo, there were also other fiery propagators
\nof the new gospel of Nationalism \u2014 notably Brahmabandhab Upadhyaya, Bhupendranath Dutt and Sri Aurobindo’s
\nyounger brother, Barindra Kumar Ghose. . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tBhupendranath Dutt<\/i>. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tIn the interests of truth this name should be omitted. Bhupen Dutt was at the time only an obscure hand in the Yugantar office
\nincapable of writing anything important and an ordinary recruit in the revolutionary ranks quite incapable of leading anybody,
\nnot even himself. When the police searched the office of the newspaper, he came forward and in a spirit of bravado declared
\nhimself the editor, although that was quite untrue. Afterwards he wanted to defend himself, but it was decided that the Yugantar,
\na paper ostentatiously revolutionary advocating armed insurrection, could not do that and must refuse to plead in a British
\ncourt. This position was afterwards maintained throughout and greatly enhanced the prestige of the paper. Bhupen was sentenced, served his term and subsequently went to America. This at the time was his only title to fame. The real editors or writers
\nof Yugantar (for there was no declared editor) were Barin, Upen Banerji (also a subeditor of the Bande Mataram) and Debabrata
\nBose who subsequently joined the Ramakrishna Mission (being acquitted in the Alipur case) and was [ ]16<\/font><\/sup> prominent among the Sannyasis at Almora and as a writer in the Mission’s journals. Upen and Debabrata were masters of Bengali prose and it was
\ntheir writings and Barin’s that gained an unequalled popularity for the paper. These are the facts, but it will be sufficient to omit
\nBhupen’s name.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t16 MS <\/i>a
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>77<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

Principal of the Bengal National College
\n<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

The Bengal National College was . . . founded and Sri Aurobindo became its Principal. . . . But [his nationalistic activities were] not to the liking of the management, and Sri Aurobindo
\ntherefore resigned his position. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

At an early period he left the organisation of the college to the
\neducationist Satish Mukherjee and plunged fully into politics. When the Bande Mataram case was brought against him, he resigned his post in order not to embarrass the College authorities but resumed it again on his acquittal. During the Alipur Case he
\nresigned finally at the request of the College authorities. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Now [after resigning from the Bengal National College] Sri
\nAurobindo was free to associate himself actively with the Nationalist Party and its accredited organ,
\nBandemataram<\/i>. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It was done long before that as the above account will show.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

It appears that, when he was in full charge of the College, he used to lecture for ten hours per week, and he taught,
\nin addition to English Literature, British, Greek and Roman History also. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Not correct, should be omitted. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tStart of the Bande Mataram<\/i>
\n\t\t\t<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo was now in Calcutta \u2014 and he was in his element. He had given up his Baroda job, its settled salary and
\nits seductive prospects; was he taking a blind leap into the dangerous unknown? . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo was present at the Congress in 1904 and again in 1906 and took a part in the counsels of the extremist party
\nand in the formation of its fourfold programme \u2014 “Swaraj, swadeshi, boycott, national education”
\n\u2014 which the Moderate
\nleaders after a severe tussle behind the scenes were obliged to   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>78<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nincorporate in the resolutions of 1906. Bepin Pal had just started a daily paper Bande Mataram with only 500 Rs in his pocket.
\nSri Aurobindo took up joint editorship of the journal, edited the paper during Bepin Pal’s absence and induced the Nationalist
\nparty to take it up as their organ and finance it. He called a meeting of the party leaders at which it was decided at his
\ninstance to give up the behind the scenes jostlings with the Moderates, and declare an open war on Moderatism and place before
\nthe country what was practically a revolutionary propaganda. He gave up his Baroda job some time after this; he had taken
\nindefinite leave without pay; for this reason he did not take up officially and publicly the editorship of the Bande Mataram
\nalthough after Bepin Pal left that post, he was practically in full control of the policy of the paper. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n *<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[The Bande Mataram <\/i>was started on 7 August 1906. The
\njoint stock company was declared on 18 October 1906. From August to October 1906 Bepin Pal was the editor.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bepin Pal started the Bande Mataram with 500 Rs in his pocket donated by Haridas Haldar. He called in my help as assistant
\neditor and I gave it. I called a private meeting of the Nationalist leaders in Calcutta and they agreed to take up the Bande
\nMataram as their party paper with Subodh and Nirod Mullick as the principal financial supporters. A company was projected and
\nformed, but the paper was financed and kept up meanwhile by Subodh. Bepin Pal who was strongly supported by C. R. Das and
\nothers remained as editor. Hemprasad Ghose and Shyamsundar Chakrabarti joined the editorial staff but they could not get on
\nwith Bepin Babu and were supported by the Mullicks. Finally Bepin Pal had to retire, I don’t remember whether in November
\nor December, probably the latter. I was myself very ill, almost to death, in my father-in-law’s house in [Mott’s]17<\/font><\/sup> Lane and did
\nnot know what was going on. They put my name as editor on the paper without my consent, but I spoke to the Secretary <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t17 MS <\/i>Serpentine. See Table 1, page 566. \u2014 Ed.<\/i>  
\n\t\t\t<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>79<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

pretty harshly and had the insertion discontinued. I also wrote a strong letter on the subject to Subodh. From that time Bepin Pal
\nhad no connection with the Bande Mataram. Somebody said or wrote that he resumed his editorship after I was arrested
\nin the Alipur Case. I never heard of that. I was told by Bejoy Chatterji after I came out from jail that he, Shyamsundar and
\nHemprasad had carried on somehow with the paper, but the finances became
\nimpossible, so he deliberately wrote an article which made the Govt come down on
\nthe paper and stop its publication, so that the Bande Mataram might end with
\nsome \u00e9clat and in all honour. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

The Policy of the Bande Mataram<\/i>
\n<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

In other ways also Sri Aurobindo sought to appeal to the hearts
\nof the Indian and British peoples. . . . Vidula <\/i>. . . appeared in the second issue of the Weekly
\nBandemataram<\/i>, which also
\ncontained “An Unreported Conversation” in verse between a Briton and Ajit Singh on the eve of his arrest. Another inspiring
\nitem in the issue was . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

As a politician it was part of Sri Aurobindo’s principles never
\nto appeal to the British people; that he would have considered as part of the mendicant policy. These articles and other
\nitems (satiric verse, parodies, etc.) referred to in these pages (not of course Vidula and Perseus) were the work of Shyamsundar
\nChakrabarti, not of Sri Aurobindo. Shyamsundar was a witty parodist and could write with much humour, as also with a
\ntelling rhetoric; he had caught some imitation of Sri Aurobindo’s style and many could not distinguish between their writings. In
\nAurobindo’s absences from Calcutta it was Shyamsundar who wrote most of the Bande Mataram editorials, those excepted
\nwhich were sent by Aurobindo from Deoghar.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

He was able to contemplate politics purged of all rancour . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo never brought any rancour into his politics. He
\n   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>80<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nnever had any hatred for England or the English people; he based his claim for freedom for India on the inherent right to
\nfreedom, not on any charge of misgovernment or oppression; if he attacked persons even violently, it was for their views or
\npolitical action, not from any other motive. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n The Bande Mataram <\/i>Sedition Case
\n\t<\/a>
\n<\/b> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Earlier in the year [1907<\/i>] he had been prosecuted in connection with his editorship of
\nBandemataram <\/i>and the series of
\narticles he wrote for the paper under the heading, “The New Path”. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

No \u2014 the prosecution was for a letter written by somebody to the Editor and for the publication of articles included in the Jugantar case but not actually used by the prosecution. The Bande Mataram was never prosecuted for its editorial articles.
\nThe editor of the Statesman complained that they were too diabolically clever, crammed full of sedition between the lines,
\nbut legally unattackable because of the skill of the language. The Government must have shared this view, for they never
\nventured to attack the paper for its editorial or other articles, whether Sri Aurobindo’s or from the pen of his three editorial
\ncolleagues. There is also the fact that Sri Aurobindo never based his case for freedom on racial hatred or charges of tyranny
\nor misgovernment, but always on the inalienable right of the nation to independence. His stand was that even good government could not take the place of national government, \u2014 independence. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

He had been acquitted then, but the prosecution had succeeded, if anything, only in putting Sri Aurobindo to the fore-front and making the Indian intelligentsia only more than
\never eager to read and con the columns of the one and only Bandemataram<\/i>. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo had confined himself to writing and leadership   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>81<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

behind the scenes, not caring to advertise himself or put forward his personality, but the imprisonment and exile of other leaders
\nand the publicity given to his name by the case compelled him to come forward and take the lead on the public platform. <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

The Surat Congress <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

This version does not represent accurately the facts as Sri Aurobindo remembers them. So far as he knows there was no attempt at fire. The session of the Congress had first been arranged at Nagpur, but Nagpur was predominantly a Mahratta city and violently extremist. Gujerat was at that time predominantly
\nmoderate, there were very few Nationalists and Surat was a stronghold of Moderatism though afterwards Gujerat became,
\nespecially after Gandhi took the lead, one of the most revolutionary of the provinces. So the Moderate leaders decided to hold
\nthe Congress at Surat. The Nationalists however came there in strength from all parts, they held a public conference with Sri
\nAurobindo as president and for some time it was doubtful which side would have the majority, but finally in this moderate city
\nthat party was able to bring in a crowd of so-called delegates up to the number of 1300 while the Nationalists were able by
\nthe same method to muster something over 1100. It was known that the Moderate leaders had prepared a new constitution for
\nthe Congress which would make it practically impossible for the extreme party to command a majority at any annual session
\nfor many years to come. The younger Nationalists, especially those from Maharashtra, were determined to prevent this by
\nany means and it was decided by them to break the Congress if they could not swamp it; this decision was unknown to Tilak
\nand the older leaders but it was known to Sri Aurobindo. At the sessions Tilak went on to the platform to propose a resolution
\nregarding the presidentship of the Congress; the president appointed by the Moderates refused to him the permission to speak
\nbut Tilak insisted on his right and began to read his resolution and speak. There was a tremendous uproar, the young Gujerati
\nvolunteers lifted up chairs over the head of Tilak to beat him.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>
\n\t\t\t82<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

At that the Mahrattas became furious, a Mahratta shoe came
\nhurtling across the pavilion aimed at the President Dr. Rash Behari Ghose and hit Surendra Nath Banerji on the shoulder.
\nThe young Mahrattas in a body charged up to the platform, the Moderate leaders fled and after a short fight on the platform with
\nchairs the session broke up not to be resumed. The Moderate leaders decided to suspend the Congress and replace it by a
\nnational conference with a constitution and arrangement which would make it safe for their party. Meanwhile Lajpatrai came
\nto Tilak and informed him that the Government had decided, if the Congress split, to crush the Extremists by the most ruthless
\nrepression. Tilak thought, and the event proved that he was right, that the country was not yet ready to face successfully such
\na repression and he proposed to circumvent both the Moderate plan and the Government plan by the Nationalists joining the
\nconference and signing the statement of adhesion to the new constitution demanded by the Moderates. Sri Aurobindo and
\nsome other leaders were opposed to this submission; they did not believe that the Moderates would admit any Nationalists
\nto their conference (and this proved to be the case) and they wanted the country to be asked to face the repression. Thus the
\nCongress ceased for a time to exist; but the Moderate conference was not a success and was attended only by small and always
\ndwindling numbers. Sri Aurobindo had hoped that the country would be strong enough to face the repression, at least in Bengal
\nand Maharashtra where the enthusiasm had become intense and almost universal; but he thought also that even if there was a
\ntemporary collapse the repression would create a deep change in the hearts and minds of the people and the whole nation would
\nswing over to nationalism and the ideal of independence. This actually happened and when Tilak returned from jail in Burma
\nafter 6 years he was able in conjunction with Mrs Besant not only to revive the Congress but to make it representative of a nation
\npledged to the nationalist cause. The Moderate party shrank into a small body of liberals and even these finally subscribed to
\nthe ideal of complete independence.<\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>83<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

After the Surat debacle, Sri Aurobindo did not return to Bengal immediately, as he had originally intended; impelled by
\nan inner urge, he undertook a political tour instead in the Bombay presidency and the Central Provinces. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There was no tour. Sri Aurobindo went to Poona with Lele and after his return to Bombay went to Calcutta. All the speeches he
\nmade were at this time (except those at Bombay and at Baroda) at places on his way wherever he stopped for a day or two. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe Alipore Bomb Case <\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Amrita Bazar Patrika <\/i>asked editorially: ” . . . but why
\nwere they (Aurobindo and others) pounced upon in this mysterious manner, handcuffed and then dragged before the Police
\nCommissioner. . . . ” <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

No, tied with a rope;18<\/font><\/sup> this was taken off on the protest of
\nBhupen Bose, the Congress Moderate leader.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nThe hands were not tied, the cord was put round his waist, but before leaving the house it was removed on the remonstrance of
\nBhupendra Nath [Bose],19<\/font><\/sup> the Moderate leader, who on hearing of the arrest had come to question the police about its motive. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

[Earth from Dakshineshwar was found in Sri Aurobindo’s
\nroom when the police searched his house in May 1908.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The earth was brought to me by a young man connected with
\nthe Ramakrishna Mission and I kept it; it was there in my room when the police came to arrest me. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

The case commenced before the Alipore Magistrate’s Court
\non the 19th May, 1908 and continued intermittently for a<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t18 See Table 2, page 568.
\n\u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t19 MS (dictated) <\/i>Dutt  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>84<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

whole year. Mr. Beachcroft, the magistrate, had been with Sri Aurobindo in Cambridge. . . . The case in due course went
\nup to the Sessions Court and the trial commenced there in October 1908. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[Sri Aurobindo indicated that the last sentence should be placed<\/i> before “Mr. Beachcroft”, changed “magistrate” to “Judge in the<\/i>
\nSessions Court”, and wrote:<\/i>] The preliminary trial (a very long one) took place before Birley, a young man unknown to Sri
\nAurobindo. Beachcroft was not “magistrate” but Judge in the Sessions Court. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t*<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

In his dignified statement to the court, Sri Aurobindo pointed
\nout that it was perfectly true that he had taught the people of India the meaning and the message of national independence. . . . <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo never made a public statement in the Court.
\nWhen asked by the Court, he said he would leave the case to his lawyers, they would speak for him; he himself did not wish
\nto make any statement or answer the Court’s questions. If any such statement as the one spoken of was made, it must have been
\ndrawn up by the lawyers on his behalf, not made by himself. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[While in the Alipore jail Sri Aurobindo became ill.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sri Aurobindo did not fall ill while in prison; he was in normal health except for a superficial ailment for some time which was
\nof no consequence. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

A year’s seclusion and meditation in the Alipore jail no doubt
\nworked a great transformation in Sri Aurobindo. . . . Once again \u2014 now as ever
\n\u2014 “service” was Sri Aurobindo’s urge to
\naction. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The idea was “work” for the country, for the world, finally for
\nthe Divine, nishkama karma<\/i>, rather than an ideal of service.   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>85<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n

The Open Letters of July and December 1909
\n<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

[Sri Aurobindo’s “Open Letter to My Countrymen” of July
\n1909 and the second open letter dated December 1909] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There is some confusion here and generally with regard to the
\ntwo letters. Sri Aurobindo was not relying upon any change in Government policy for the effect of the first letter.20<\/font><\/sup> He writes
\nclearly that the proposed reforms were false and unreal and not acceptable. All he says is that if real reforms giving real
\npower or control were offered, even if they gave only partial and not complete self-government then the Nationalist Party might
\naccept them as the means towards complete Self-Government. Till then the Nationalists would maintain the struggle and their
\npolicy of non-cooperation and passive resistance. He relied not upon this but upon an intuitive perception that the Government
\nwould not think it politic or useful to deport him if he left a programme which others could carry out in his absence. Also
\nthe considerations about Home Rule and complete passive resistance had no connection with the first letter, because they
\ndid not occur to Sri Aurobindo at the time. It was afterwards about the period of the second signed letter21<\/font><\/sup> that he weighed the
\ncircumstances and the situation in the country and considered whether it would not be necessary for a time to draw back a little
\nin order to make a continued political action possible,
\n\t\t\treculer pour mieux sauter,<\/span>
\n\t\t\tas the national movement seemed otherwise
\nthreatened with a complete pause. A Home Rule movement or a movement of the South African type suggested themselves to him
\nand he foresaw that they might be resorted to in the near future; but he decided that such movements were not for him to lead
\nand that he must go on with the movement for independence as it was. In the second letter also he rejects the reforms as
\ninadequate and advocates a continuance and reorganisation of<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t20 “An Open Letter to My Countrymen”,
\n<\/i>Karmayogin, 31 July 1909; reproduced in<\/i>
\nKarmayogin: Political Writings and Speeches 1909 \u00ad 1910, Volume 8 of <\/i>THE COMPLETE WORKS OF SRI AUROBINDO, pp. 150 \u00ad 60.<\/i>
\n\t\t\t<\/font> <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t21 “To My Countrymen”, <\/i>Karmayogin, 25 December 1909; reproduced in <\/i>Karmayogin: Political Writings and Speeches 1909 \u00ad 1910, pp. 372 \u00ad 76.
\n\u2014 Ed.<\/i>
\n  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>86<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\nthe Nationalist movement.22<\/font><\/sup> This was on December 25th, five months after the first letter. Sri Aurobindo does not understand
\nthe reference to the coup de force and the stratagem; if by the coup de force is meant the proposed search and arrest, that was
\nundertaken in connection with and as a result of the second letter which was to be made the subject of a prosecution. As Sri
\nAurobindo went to Chandernagore and disappeared from view the search was not made and the warrant was held back and
\nthe prosecution postponed till he should again reappear. This happened in February, a month or more after the appearance of
\nthe second letter. Sri Aurobindo wanted the police to disclose their hand and act and the stratagem he wrote about was an
\nanswer to a letter forwarded to him at Chandernagore which he knew to be from a police spy asking him to reappear and
\nface his trial. He replied that he had no reason to do so as there was no public warrant against him and no prosecution had been
\nannounced; he thought this would have the effect of the police coming out into the open with a warrant and prosecution and
\nin fact it had this effect. <\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

\n The Karmayogin <\/i>Case
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b><\/p>\n

\n  <\/p>\n

[The police, unable to serve their warrant against Sri Aurobindo in the Karmayogin
\n<\/i>case, arrested the printer, a simple
\nartisan.] <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The printer was in fact only someone who took that title in
\norder to meet the demand of the law for someone who would be responsible for what was printed. He was not always the actual
\nprinter.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t22 Sri Aurobindo would have accepted Diarchy as a step if it had given a genuine
\ncontrol. It was not till Provincial Autonomy was conceded that he felt a real change in the British attitude had begun; the Cripps offer he accepted as a further progress in
\nthat change and the final culmination in the Labour Government’s new policy as its culmination. [Sri Aurobindo’s note<\/i>.]
\n  
\n<\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 <\/font>87<\/font><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Political Life, 1893 \u00ad 1910   A General Note on Sri Aurobindo’s Political Life   There were three sides to Sri Aurobindo’s political ideas and…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1956","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-36-autobiographical-notes","wpcat-42-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1956","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1956"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1956\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9524,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1956\/revisions\/9524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1956"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1956"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1956"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}