{"id":2127,"date":"2013-07-13T01:39:37","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:39:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2127"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:39:37","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:39:37","slug":"30-brahman-purusha-ishwara-maya-prakriti-shakti-vol-21-22-the-life-divine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/21-22-the-life-divine\/30-brahman-purusha-ishwara-maya-prakriti-shakti-vol-21-22-the-life-divine","title":{"rendered":"-30_Brahman Purusha Ishwara Maya Prakriti Shakti.html"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n <\/p>\n

\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\tChapter II <\/font><\/b>
\n\t\t\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nBrahman, Purusha, Ishwara  \u2014 <\/font><\/b>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\nMaya, Prakriti, Shakti <\/font><\/b>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nIt is there in beings indivisible and as if divided.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n
\nGita.<\/i>1<\/font><\/sup> <\/b><\/font>
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBrahman, the Truth, the Knowledge, the Infinite.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tTaittiriya Upanishad.<\/i>2<\/font><\/sup>
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tKnow Purusha and Prakriti to be both eternal without
\n\tbeginning<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\nGita.<\/i>3<\/font><\/sup> . <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nOne must know Maya as Prakriti and the Master of Maya as the great Lord of all.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n
\nSwetaswatara Upanishad.<\/i>4<\/font><\/sup> <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nIt is the might of the Godhead in the world that turns the wheel of Brahman. Him
\none must know, the supreme Lord of all lords, the supreme Godhead above all
\ngodheads. Supreme too is his Shakti and manifold the natural working of her
\nknowledge and her force. One Godhead, occult in all beings, the inner Self of
\nall beings, the all-pervading, absolute without qualities, the overseer of all
\nactions, the witness, the knower.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n
\nSwetaswatara Upanishad.<\/i>5<\/font><\/sup>
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nT<\/font>HERE<\/b> is then a supreme Reality eternal, absolute
\nand infinite. Because it is absolute and infinite, it is in its essence
\nindeterminable. It is indefinable and inconceivable by finite and defining Mind;
\nit is ineffable by a mind-created speech; it is describable neither by our
\nnegations,
\nneti neti<\/i>,  \u2014 for we cannot limit it by saying it is not this, it is
\nnot that,  \u2014 nor by our affirmations, for we cannot fix it by saying it is
\nthis,
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n1 XIII. 17.      2 II. 1.     
\n3 XIII. 20.      4 IV. 10.     
\n5 VI. 1, 7, 8, 11.   <\/font>
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 336<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n it is that,
\n\titi iti<\/i>. And yet, though in this way unknowable to us, it is not
\n\taltogether and in every way unknowable; it is self evident to itself and,
\n\talthough inexpressible, yet self-evident to a knowledge by identity of which
\n\tthe spiritual being in us must be capable; for that spiritual being is in
\n\tits essence and its original and intimate reality not other than this
\n\tSupreme Existence. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut although thus indeterminable to Mind, because of its absoluteness and
\ninfinity, we discover that this Supreme and Eternal Infinite determines itself
\nto our consciousness in the universe by real and fundamental truths of its being
\nwhich are beyond the universe and in it and are the very foundation of its
\nexistence. These truths present themselves to our conceptual cognition as the
\nfundamental aspects in which we see and experience the omnipresent Reality. In
\nthemselves they are seized directly, not by intellectual understanding but by a
\nspiritual intuition, a spiritual experience in the very substance of our
\nconsciousness; but they can also be caught at in conception by a large and
\nplastic idea and can be expressed in some sort by a plastic speech which does
\nnot insist too much on rigid definition or limit the wideness and subtlety of
\nthe idea. In order to ex press this experience or this idea with any nearness a
\nlanguage has to be created which is at once intuitively metaphysical and
\nrevealingly poetic, admitting significant and living images as the vehicle of a
\nclose, suggestive and vivid indication,  \u2014 a language such as we find
\nhammered out into a subtle and pregnant massiveness in the Veda and the
\nUpanishads. In the ordinary tongue of metaphysical thought we have to be content
\nwith a distant indication, an approximation by abstractions, which may still be
\nof some service to our intellect, for it is this kind of speech which suits our
\nmethod of logical and rational understanding; but if it is to be of real
\nservice, the intellect must consent to pass out of the bounds of a finite logic
\nand accustom itself to the logic of the Infinite. On this condition alone, by
\nthis way of seeing and thinking, it ceases to be paradoxical or futile to speak
\nof the Ineffable: but if we insist on applying a finite logic to the Infinite,
\nthe omnipresent Reality will escape us and we shall grasp instead an abstract
\nshadow, a dead form petrified into speech or a hard   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 337<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n incisive graph which speaks of the Reality but does not express it. Our way of
\n\tknowing must be appropriate to that which is to be known; otherwise we
\n\tachieve only a distant speculation, a figure of knowledge and not veritable
\n\tknowledge.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThe supreme Truth-aspect which thus manifests itself to us is an eternal and
\n\tinfinite and absolute self-existence, self-aware ness, self-delight of
\n\tbeing; this founds all things and secretly supports and pervades all things.
\n\tThis Self-existence reveals itself again in three terms of its essential
\n\tnature,  \u2014 self, conscious being or spirit, and God or the Divine
\n\tBeing. The Indian terms are more satisfactory,  \u2014 Brahman the Reality
\n\tis Atman, Purusha, Ishwara; for these terms grew from a root of Intuition
\n\tand, while they have a comprehensive preciseness, are capable of a plastic
\n\tapplication which avoids both vagueness in the use and the rigid snare of a
\n\ttoo limiting intellectual concept. The Supreme Brahman is that which in
\n\tWestern metaphysics is called the Absolute: but Brahman is at the same time
\n\tthe omnipresent Reality in which all that is relative exists as its forms or
\n\tits movements; this is an Absolute which takes all relativities in its
\n\tembrace. The Upanishads affirm that all this is the Brahman; Mind is
\n\tBrahman, Life is Brahman, Matter is Brahman; addressing Vayu, the Lord of
\n\tAir, of Life, it is said "O Vayu, thou art manifest Brahman"; and, pointing
\n\tto man and beast and bird and insect, each separately is identified with the
\n\tOne,  \u2014 "O Brahman, thou art this old man and boy and girl, this bird,
\n\tthis insect." Brahman is the Consciousness that knows itself in all that
\n\texists; Brahman is the Force that sustains the power of God and Titan and
\n\tDemon, the Force that acts in man and animal and the forms and energies of
\n\tNature; Brahman is the Ananda, the secret Bliss of existence which is the
\n\tether of our being and without which none could breathe or live. Brahman is
\n\tthe inner Soul in all; it has taken a form in correspondence with each
\n\tcreated form which it inhabits. The Lord of Beings is that which is
\n\tconscious in the conscious being, but he is also the Conscious in
\n\tinconscient things, the One who is master and in control of the many that
\n\tare passive in the hands of Force Nature. He is the Timeless and Time; He is
\n\tSpace and all that   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 338<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n is in Space; He is Causality and the cause and the effect: He is the thinker
\n\tand his thought, the warrior and his courage, the gambler and his
\n\tdice-throw. All realities and all aspects and all semblances are the
\n\tBrahman; Brahman is the Absolute, the Transcendent and incommunicable, the
\n\tSupracosmic Existence that sustains the cosmos, the Cosmic Self that upholds
\n\tall beings, but It is too the self of each individual: the soul or psychic
\n\tentity is an eternal portion of the Ishwara; it is his supreme Nature or
\n\tConsciousness-Force that has become the living being in a world of living
\n\tbeings. The Brahman alone is, and because of It all are, for all are the
\n\tBrahman; this Reality is the reality of everything that we see in Self and
\n\tNature. Brahman, the Ishwara, is all this by his Yoga-Maya, by the power of
\n\this Consciousness-Force put out in self-manifestation: he is the Conscious
\n\tBeing, Soul, Spirit, Purusha, and it is by his Nature, the force of his
\n\tconscious self-existence that he is all things; he is the Ishwara, the
\n\tomniscient and omnipotent All-ruler, and it is by his Shakti, his conscious
\n\tPower, that he manifests himself in Time and governs the universe. These and
\n\tsimilar statements taken together are all-comprehensive: it is possible for
\n\tthe mind to cut and select, to build a closed system and explain away all
\n\tthat does not fit within it; but it is on the complete and many-sided
\n\tstatement that we must take our stand if we have to acquire an integral
\n\tknowledge. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAn absolute, eternal and infinite Self-existence, Self-awareness, Self-delight
\nof being that secretly supports and pervades the universe even while it is also
\nbeyond it, is, then, the first truth of spiritual experience. But this truth of
\nbeing has at once an impersonal and a personal aspect; it is not only Existence,
\nit is the one Being absolute, eternal and infinite. As there are three
\nfundamental aspects in which we meet this Reality,  \u2014 Self, Conscious Being
\nor Spirit and God, the Divine Being, or to use the Indian terms, the absolute
\nand omnipresent Reality, Brahman, manifest to us as Atman, Purusha, Ishwara, 
\n\u2014 so too its power of Consciousness appears to us in three aspects: it is the
\nself-force of that consciousness conceptively creative of all things, Maya; it
\nis Prakriti, Nature or Force made dynamically   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 339<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n executive, working out all things under the witnessing eye of the Conscious
\n\tBeing, the Self or Spirit; it is the conscious Power of the Divine Being,
\n\tShakti, which is both conceptively creative and dynamically executive of all
\n\tthe divine workings. These three aspects and their powers base and comprise
\n\tthe whole of existence and all Nature and, taken together as a single whole,
\n\tthey reconcile the apparent disparateness and incompatibility of the
\n\tsupracosmic Transcendence, the cosmic universality and the separativeness of
\n\tour individual existence; the Absolute, cosmic Nature and ourselves are
\n\tlinked in oneness by this triune aspect of the one Reality. For taken by
\n\titself the existence of the Absolute, the Supreme Brahman, would be a
\n\tcontradiction of the relative universe and our own real existence would be
\n\tincompatible with its sole incommunicable Reality. But the Brahman is at the
\n\tsame time omnipresent in all relativities; it is the Absolute independent of
\n\tall relatives, the Absolute basing all relatives, the Absolute governing,
\n\tpervading, constituting all relatives; there is nothing that is not the
\n\tomnipresent Reality. In observing the triple aspect and the triple power we
\n\tcome to see how this is possible. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIf we look at this picture of the Self-Existence and its works as a unitary
\nunlimited whole of vision, it stands together and imposes itself by its
\nconvincing totality: but to the analysis of the logical intellect it offers an
\nabundance of difficulties, such as all attempts to erect a logical system out of
\na perception of an illimitable Existence must necessarily create; for any such
\nendeavour must either effect consistency by an arbitrary sectioning of the
\ncomplex truth of things or else by its comprehensiveness become logically
\nuntenable. For we see that the Indeterminable determines itself as infinite and
\nfinite, the Immutable admits a constant mutability and endless differences, the
\nOne becomes an innumerable multitude, the Impersonal creates or supports
\npersonality, is itself a Person; the Self has a nature and is yet other than its
\nnature; Being turns into becoming and yet it is always itself and other than its
\nbecomings; the Universal individualises itself and the Individual universalises
\nhimself; Brahman is at once void of qualities and capable of infinite qualities,
\nthe   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 340<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n Lord and Doer of works, yet a non-doer and a silent witness of the workings of
\n\tNature. If we look carefully at these workings of Nature, once we put aside
\n\tthe veil of familiarity and our unthinking acquiescence in the process of
\n\tthings as natural because so they always happen, we discover that all she
\n\tdoes in whole or in parts is a miracle, an act of some incomprehensible
\n\tmagic. The being of the Self-existence and the world that has appeared in it
\n\tare, each of them and both together, a supra rational mystery. There seems
\n\tto us to be a reason in things because the processes of the physical finite
\n\tare consistent to our view and their law determinable, but this reason in
\n\tthings, when closely examined, seems to stumble at every moment against the
\n\tirrational or infrarational and the suprarational: the consistency, the
\n\tdeterminability of process seems to lessen rather than increase as we pass
\n\tfrom matter to life and from life to mentality; if the finite consents to
\n\tsome extent to look as if it were rational, the infinitesimal refuses to be
\n\tbound by the same laws and the infinite is unseizable. As for the action of
\n\tthe universe and its significance, it escapes us altogether; if Self, God or
\n\tSpirit there be, his dealings with the world and us are incomprehensible,
\n\toffer no clue that we can follow. God and Nature and even ourselves move in
\n\ta mysterious way which is only partially and at points intelligible, but as
\n\ta whole escapes our comprehension. All the works of Maya look like the
\n\tproduction of a suprarational magical Power which arranges things according
\n\tto its wisdom or its phantasy, but a wisdom which is not ours and a phantasy
\n\twhich baffles our imagination. The Spirit that manifests things or manifests
\n\titself in them so obscurely, looks to our reason like a Magician and his
\n\tpower or Maya a creative magic: but magic can create illusions or it can
\n\tcreate astounding realities, and we find it difficult to decide which of
\n\tthese suprarational processes faces us in this universe. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut, in fact, the cause of this impression must necessarily be sought not in
\nanything illusory or fantastic in the Supreme or the universal Self-existence,
\nbut in our own inability to seize the supreme clue to its manifold existence or
\ndiscover the secret plan and pattern of its action. The Self-existent is the
\nInfinite and   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 341<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n its way of being and of action must be the way of the Infinite, but our
\n\tconsciousness is limited, our reason built upon things finite: it is
\n\tirrational to suppose that a finite consciousness and reason can be a
\n\tmeasure of the Infinite; this smallness cannot judge that Immensity; this
\n\tpoverty bound to a limited use of its scanty means cannot conceive the
\n\topulent management of those riches; an ignorant half-knowledge cannot follow
\n\tthe motions of an All-Knowledge. Our reasoning is based upon our experience
\n\tof the finite operations of physical Nature, on an incomplete observation
\n\tand uncertain understanding of something that acts within limits; it has
\n\torganised on that basis certain conceptions which it seeks to make general
\n\tand universal, and whatever contradicts or departs from these conceptions it
\n\tregards as irrational, false or inexplicable. But there are different orders
\n\tof the reality and the conceptions, measures, standards suitable to one need
\n\tnot be applicable to another order. Our physical being is built first upon
\n\tan aggregate of infinitesimals, electrons, atoms, molecules, cells; but the
\n\tlaw of action of these infinitesimals does not explain all the physical
\n\tworkings even of the human body, much less can they cover all the law and
\n\tprocess of action of man’s supraphysical parts, his life movements and mind
\n\tmovements and soul movements. In the body finites have been formed with
\n\ttheir own habits, properties, characteristic ways of action; the body itself
\n\tis a finite which is not a mere aggregate of these smaller finites which it
\n\tuses as parts, organs, constituent instruments of its operations; it has
\n\tdeveloped a being and has a general law which surpasses its dependence upon
\n\tthese elements or constituents. The life and mind again are supraphysical
\n\tfinites with a different and more subtle mode of operation of their own, and
\n\tno dependence on the physical parts for instrumentation can annul their
\n\tintrinsic character; there is something more and other in our vital and
\n\tmental being and vital and mental forces than the functioning of a physical
\n\tbody.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n But, again, each finite is in its reality or has behind it an Infinite which
\n\thas built and supports and directs the finite it has made as its
\n\tself-figure; so that even the being and law and process of the finite cannot
\n\tbe totally understood without a knowledge of that which is occult within or  
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 342<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n behind it: our finite knowledge, conceptions, standards may be valid within
\n\ttheir limits, but they are incomplete and relative. A law founded upon an
\n\tobservation of what is divided in Space and Time cannot be confidently
\n\tapplied to the being and action of the Indivisible; not only it cannot be
\n\tapplied to the spaceless and timeless Infinite, but it cannot be applied
\n\teven to a Time Infinite or a Space Infinite. A law and process binding for
\n\tour superficial being need not be binding on what is occult within us. Again
\n\tour intellect, founding itself on reason, finds it difficult to deal with
\n\twhat is infrarational; life is infrarational and we find that our
\n\tintellectual reason applying itself to life is constantly forcing upon it a
\n\tcontrol, a measure, an artificial procrustean rule that either succeeds in
\n\tkilling or petrifying life or constrains it into rigid forms and conventions
\n\tthat lame and imprison its capacity or ends by a bungle, a revolt of life, a
\n\tdecay or disruption of the systems and superstructures built upon it by our
\n\tintelligence. An instinct, an intuition is needed which the intellect has
\n\tnot at its command and does not always listen to when it comes in of itself
\n\tto help the mental working. But still more difficult must it be for our
\n\treason to understand and deal with the suprarational; the suprarational is
\n\tthe realm of the spirit, and in the largeness, subtlety, profundity,
\n\tcomplexity of its movement the reason is lost; here intuition and inner
\n\texperience alone are the guide, or, if there is any other, it is that of
\n\twhich intuition is only a sharp edge, an intense projected ray,  \u2014 the
\n\tfinal enlightenment must come from the suprarational Truth-consciousness,
\n\tfrom a supramental vision and knowledge. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut the being and action of the Infinite must not be therefore regarded as if it
\nwere a magic void of all reason; there is, on the contrary, a greater reason in
\nall the operations of the Infinite, but it is not a mental or intellectual, it
\nis a spiritual and supramental reason: there is a logic in it, because there are
\nrelations and connections infallibly seen and executed; what is magic to our
\nfinite reason is the logic of the Infinite. It is a greater reason, a greater
\nlogic because it is more vast, subtle, complex in its operations: it comprehends
\nall the data which our observation fails to seize, it deduces from them results
\nwhich neither our deduction nor   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 343<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\tinduction can anticipate, because our conclusions and inferences have a
\n\tmeagre foundation and are fallible and brittle. If we ob serve a happening,
\n\twe judge and explain it from the result and from a glimpse of its most
\n\texternal constituents, circumstances or causes; but each happening is the
\n\toutcome of a complex nexus of forces which we do not and cannot observe,
\n\tbecause all forces are to us invisible,  \u2014 but they are not invisible
\n\tto the spiritual vision of the Infinite: some of them are actualities
\n\tworking to produce or occasion a new actuality, some are possibles that are
\n\tnear to the pre-existent actuals and in a way included in their aggregate;
\n\tbut there can intervene always new possibilities that suddenly become
\n\tdynamic potentials and add themselves to the nexus, and behind all are
\n\timperatives or an imperative which these possibilities are labouring to
\n\tactualise. Moreover, out of the same nexus of forces different results are
\n\tpossible; what will come out of them is determined by a sanction which was
\n\tno doubt waiting and ready all the time but seems to come in rapidly to
\n\tintervene and alter everything, a decisive divine imperative. All this our
\n\treason cannot grasp because it is the instrument of an ignorance with a very
\n\tlimited vision and a small stock of accumulated and not always very certain
\n\tor reliable knowledge and because too it has no means of direct awareness;
\n\tfor this is the difference between intuition and intellect, that intuition
\n\tis born of a direct awareness while intellect is an indirect action of a
\n\tknowledge which constructs itself with difficulty out of the unknown from
\n\tsigns and indications and gathered data. But what is not evident to our
\n\treason and senses, is self-evident to the Infinite Consciousness, and, if
\n\tthere is a Will of the Infinite, it must be a Will that acts in this full
\n\tknowledge and is the perfect spontaneous result of a total self-evidence. It
\n\tis neither a hampered evolutionary Force bound by what it has evolved nor an
\n\timaginative Will acting in the void upon a free caprice; it is the truth of
\n\tthe Infinite affirming itself in the determinations of the finite. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt is evident that such a Consciousness and Will need not act in harmony with
\nthe conclusions of our limited reason or according to a procedure familiar to it
\nand approved of by our   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 344<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n constructed notions or in subjection to an ethical reason working for a limited
\n\tand fragmentary good; it might and does admit things deemed by our reason
\n\tirrational and unethical because that was necessary for the final and total
\n\tGood and for the working out of a cosmic purpose. What seems to us
\n\tirrational or reprehensible in relation to a partial set of facts, motives,
\n\tdesiderata might be perfectly rational and approvable in relation to a much
\n\tvaster motive and totality of data and desiderata. Reason with its partial
\n\tvision sets up constructed conclusions which it strives to turn into general
\n\trules of knowledge and action and it compels into its rule by some mental
\n\tdevice or gets rid of what does not suit with it: an infinite Consciousness
\n\twould have no such rules, it would have instead large intrinsic truths
\n\tgoverning automatically conclusion and result, but adapting them differently
\n\tand spontaneously to a different total of circumstances, so that by this
\n\tpliability and free adaptation it might seem to the narrower faculty to have
\n\tno standards whatever. In the same way, we cannot judge of the principle and
\n\tdynamic operation of infinite being by the standards of finite existence, 
\n\t\u2014 what might be impossible for the one would be normal and self-evidently
\n\tnatural states and motives for the greater freer Reality. It is this that
\n\tmakes the difference between our fragmentary mind consciousness constructing
\n\tintegers out of its fractions and an essential and total consciousness,
\n\tvision and knowledge. It is not indeed possible, so long as we are compelled
\n\tto use reason as our main support, for it to abdicate altogether in favour
\n\tof an undeveloped or half-organised intuition; but it is imperative on us in
\n\ta consideration of the Infinite and its being and action to enforce on our
\n\treason an utmost plasticity and open it to an awareness of the larger states
\n\tand possibilities of that which we are striving to consider. It will not do
\n\tto apply our limited and limiting conclusions to That which is illimitable.
\n\tIf we concentrate only on one aspect and treat it as the whole, we
\n\tillustrate the story of the blind men and the elephant; each of the blind
\n\tinquirers touched a different part and concluded that the whole animal was
\n\tsome object resembling the part of which he had had the touch. An experience
\n\tof some one aspect of the   <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 345<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n Infinite is valid in itself; but we cannot generalise from it that the
\n\tInfinite is that alone, nor would it be safe to view the rest of the
\n\tInfinite in the terms of that aspect and exclude all other view-points of
\n\tspiritual experience. The Infinite is at once an essentiality, a boundless
\n\ttotality and a multitude; all these have to be known in order to know truly
\n\tthe Infinite. To see the parts alone and the totality not at all or only as
\n\ta sum of the parts is a knowledge, but also at the same time an ignorance;
\n\tto see the totality alone and ignore the parts is also a knowledge and at
\n\tthe same time an ignorance, for a part may be greater than the whole because
\n\tit belongs to the transcendence; to see the essence alone because it takes
\n\tus back straight towards the transcendence and negate the totality and the
\n\tparts is a penultimate knowledge, but here too there is a capital ignorance.
\n\tA whole knowledge must be there and the reason must become plastic enough to
\n\tlook at all sides, all aspects and seek through them for that in which they
\n\tare one. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThus too, if we see only the aspect of self, we may concentrate on its static
\nsilence and miss the dynamic truth of the Infinite; if we see only the Ishwara,
\nwe may seize the dynamic truth but miss the eternal status and the infinite
\nsilence, become aware of only dynamic being, dynamic consciousness, dynamic
\ndelight of being, but miss the pure existence, pure consciousness, pure bliss of
\nbeing. If we concentrate on Purusha-Prakriti alone, we may see only the
\ndichotomy of Soul and Nature, Spirit and Matter, and miss their unity. In
\nconsidering the action of the Infinite we have to avoid the error of the
\ndisciple who thought of himself as the Brahman, refused to obey the warning of
\nthe elephant-driver to budge from the narrow path and was taken up by the
\nelephant’s trunk and removed out of the way; "You are no doubt the Brahman,"
\nsaid the master to his bewildered disciple, "but why did you not obey the driver
\nBrahman and get out of the path of the elephant Brahman?" We must not commit the
\nmistake of emphasising one side of the Truth and concluding from it or acting
\nupon it to the exclusion of all other sides and aspects of the Infinite. The
\nrealisation "I am That" is true, but we cannot safely proceed on it unless we
\nrealise also that all is <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 346<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tThat; our self-existence is a fact, but we must also be aware of other selves, of the same Self in other beings and of That which exceeds both own-self and other-self. The Infinite is one in a multiplicity and its action is only seizable by a supreme Reason which regards all and acts as a one-awareness that observes itself in difference and respects its own differences, so that each thing and each being has its form of essential being and its form of dynamic nature,
\nsvarupa<\/i>,
\nsvadharma<\/i>, and all are respected in the total working. The knowledge and action of the Infinite is one in an unbound variability: it would be from the point of view of the infinite Truth equally an error to insist either on a sameness of action in all circumstances or on a diversity of action without any unifying truth and harmony behind the diversity. In our own principle of conduct, if we sought to act in this greater Truth, it would be equally an error to insist on our self alone or to insist on other selves alone; it is the Self of all on which we have to found a unity of action and a total, infinitely plastic yet harmonious diversity of action; for that is the nature of the working of the Infinite.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIf we look from this view-point of a larger more plastic reason, taking account of the logic of the Infinite, at the difficulties which meet our intelligence when it tries to conceive the absolute and omnipresent Reality, we shall see that the whole difficulty
\n\tis verbal and conceptual and not real. Our intelligence looks at its concept
\n\tof the Absolute and sees that it must be indeterminable and at the same time it sees a world of determinations which emanates from the Absolute and exists in it,  \u2014 for it can emanate from nowhere else and can exist nowhere else; it is further baffled by the affirmation, also hardly disputable on the premisses, that all these determinates are nothing else than this very indeterminable Absolute. But the contradiction disappears when we understand that the indeterminability is not in its true sense negative, not an imposition of incapacity on the Infinite,
\n\tbut positive, a freedom within itself from limitation by its own
\n\tdeterminations and necessarily a freedom from all external determination by anything not itself, since there is no real possibility of such a not-self coming into existence. The Infinite is illimitably  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 347<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n free, free to determine itself infinitely, free from all restraining effect of its own creations. In fact the Infinite does not create, it manifests what is in itself, in its own essence of reality; it is itself that essence of all reality and all realities are powers of that one Reality. The Absolute neither creates nor is created, 
\n\u2014 in the current sense of making or being made; we can speak of creation
\n\tonly in the sense of the Being becoming in form and movement what it already
\n\tis in substance and status. Yet we have to emphasise its indeterminability in that special and positive sense, not as a negation but as an indispensable condition of its free infinite self-determination, because without that the Reality would be a fixed eternal determinate or else an indeterminate fixed and bound to a sum of possibilities of determination inherent within it. Its freedom from all limitation, from any binding by its own creation cannot be itself turned into a limitation, an absolute incapacity, a denial of all freedom of self-determination; it is this that would be a contradiction, it would be an attempt to define and limit by negation the infinite and illimitable. Into the central fact of the two sides of the nature of the Absolute, the essential and the self-creative or dynamic, no real contradiction enters; it is only a pure infinite essence that can formulate itself in infinite ways. One statement is complementary to the other, there is no mutual cancellation, no incompatibility; it is only the dual statement of a single inescapable fact by human reason in human language.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe same conciliation occurs everywhere, when we look with a straight and accurate look on the truth of the Reality. In our experience of it we become aware of an Infinite essentially
\n\tfree from all limitation by qualities, properties, features; on the other
\n\thand, we are aware of an Infinite teeming with innumerable qualities, properties, features. Here again the statement of illimitable freedom is positive, not negative; it does not negate what we see, but on the contrary provides the indispensable condition for it, it makes possible a free and infinite self-expression in quality and feature. A quality is the character of a power of conscious being; or we may say that the consciousness of being expressing what is in it makes the power it brings out  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 348<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\trecognisable by a native stamp on it which we call quality or character. Courage as a quality is such a power of being, it is a certain character of my consciousness expressing a formulated force of my being, bringing out or creating a definite kind of force of my nature in action. So too the power of a drug to cure is its property, a special force of being native to the herb or mineral from which it is produced, and this speciality is determined by the Real-Idea concealed in the involved consciousness which dwells in the plant or mineral; the idea brings out in it what was there at the root of its manifestation and has now come out thus empowered as the force of its being. All qualities, properties, features are such powers of conscious being thus put forth from itself by the Absolute; It has everything within It, It has the free power to put all forth;6<\/font><\/sup> yet we cannot define the Absolute as a quality of courage or a power of healing, we cannot even say that these are a characteristic feature of the Absolute, nor can we make up a sum of qualities and say “that is the Absolute”. But neither can we speak of the Absolute as a pure blank incapable of manifesting these things; on the contrary, all capacity is there, the powers of all qualities and characters are there inherent within it. The mind is in a difficulty because it has to say, “The Absolute or Infinite is none of these things, these things are not the Absolute or Infinite” and at the same time it has to say, “The Absolute is all these things, they are not something else than That, for That is the sole existence and the all-existence.” Here it is evident that it is an undue finiteness of thought conception and verbal expression which creates the difficulty, but there is in reality none; for it would be evidently absurd to say that the Absolute is courage or curing-power, or to say that courage and curing-power are the Absolute, but it would be equally absurd to deny the capacity of the Absolute to put forth courage or
\n\tcuring-power as self-expressions in its manifestation. When the logic of the finite fails us, we have to see with a direct and unbound vision what is behind in the logic of the Infinite. We can then realise
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n6 The word for creation in Sanskrit means a loosing or putting forth of what is in the being.  
\n<\/font> <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 349<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n that the Infinite is infinite in quality, feature, power, but that no sum of qualities, features, powers can describe the Infinite.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWe see that the Absolute, the Self, the Divine, the Spirit, the Being is One; the Transcendental is one, the Cosmic is one: but we see also that beings are many and each has a self, a spirit, a like yet different nature. And since the spirit and essence of things is one, we are obliged to admit that all these many must be that One, and it follows that the One is or has become many; but how can the limited or relative be the Absolute and how can man or beast or bird be the Divine Being? But in erecting this apparent contradiction the mind makes a double error. It is thinking in the terms of the mathematical finite unit which is sole in limitation, the one which is less than two and can become two only by division and fragmentation or by addition and multiplication; but this is an infinite Oneness, it is the essential and infinite Oneness which can contain the hundred and
\n\tthe thousand and the million and billion and trillion. Whatever astronomic
\n\tor more than astronomic figures you heap and multiply, they cannot overpass or exceed that Oneness; for, in the language of the Upanishad, it moves not, yet is always far in front when you would pursue and seize it. It can be said of it that it would not be the infinite Oneness if it were not capable of an infinite multiplicity; but that does not mean that the One is plural or can be limited or described as the sum of the Many: on the contrary, it can be the infinite Many because it exceeds all limitation or description by multiplicity and exceeds at the same time all limitation by finite conceptual oneness. Pluralism is an error because, though there is the spiritual plurality, the many souls are dependent and interdependent existences; their sum also is not the One nor is it the cosmic totality; they depend on the One and exist by its Oneness: yet the plurality is not unreal, it is the One Soul that dwells as the individual in these many souls and they are eternal in the One and by the one Eternal. This is difficult for the mental reason which makes an opposition between the Infinite and the finite and associates finiteness with plurality and infinity with oneness; but in the logic of the Infinite there is no such opposition and the eternity of the Many in the  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 350<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tOne is a thing that is perfectly natural and possible.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAgain, we see that there is an infinite pure status and immobile silence of the Spirit; we see too that there is a boundless movement of the Spirit, a power, a dynamic spiritual all-containing self-extension of the Infinite. Our conceptions foist upon this perception, in itself valid and accurate, an opposition between the silence and status and the dynamis and movement, but to the reason and the logic of the Infinite there can be no such opposition. A solely silent and static Infinite, an Infinite without an infinite power and dynamis and energy is inadmissible except as the perception of an aspect; a powerless Absolute, an impotent Spirit is unthinkable: an infinite energy must be the dynamis of the Infinite, an all-power must be the potency of the Absolute, an illimitable force must be the force of the Spirit. But the silence, the status are the basis of the movement, an eternal immobility is the necessary condition, field, essence even, of the infinite mobility, a stable being is the condition and foundation of the vast action of the Force of being. It is when we arrive at something of this silence, stability, immobility that we can base on it a force and energy which in our superficial restless state would be inconceivable. The opposition we make is mental and conceptual; in reality, the silence of the Spirit and the dynamis of the Spirit are complementary truths and inseparable. The immutable silent Spirit may hold its infinite energy silent and immobile within it, for it is not bound by its own forces, is not their subject or instrument, but it does possess them, does release them, is capable of an eternal and infinite action, does not weary or need to stop, and yet all the time its silent immobility inherent in its action and movement is not for a moment shaken or disturbed or altered by its action and movement; the witness silence of the Spirit is there in the very grain of all the voices and workings of Nature. These things may be difficult for us to understand because our own surface finite capacity in either direction is limited and our conceptions are based on our limitations; but it should be easy to see that these relative and finite conceptions do not apply to the Absolute and Infinite.  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 351<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Our conception of the Infinite is formlessness, but everywhere we see form and forms surrounding us and it can be and is affirmed of the Divine Being that he is at once Form and the Formless. For here too the apparent contradiction does not correspond to a real opposition; the Formless is not a negation of the power of formation, but the condition for the Infinite’s free
\n\tformation: for otherwise there would be a single Form or only a fixity or
\n\tsum of possible forms in a finite universe. The formless ness is the character of the spiritual essence, the spirit-substance of the Reality; all finite realities are powers, forms, self-shapings of that substance: the Divine is formless and nameless, but by that very reason capable of manifesting all possible names and shapes of being. Forms are manifestations, not arbitrary inventions out of nothing; for line and colour, mass and design which
\n\tare the essentials of form carry always in them a significance, are, it
\n\tmight be said, secret values and significances of an unseen reality made visible; it is for that reason that figure, line, hue, mass, composition can embody what would be otherwise unseen, can convey what would be otherwise occult to the sense. Form may be said to be the innate body, the inevitable self-revelation of the formless, and this is true not only of external shapes, but of the unseen formations of mind and life which we seize only by our thought and those sensible forms of which only the subtle grasp of the inner consciousness can become aware. Name in its deeper sense is not the word by which we describe the object, but the total of power, quality, character of the reality which a form of things embodies and which we try to sum up by a designating sound, a knowable name,
\nNomen<\/i>.
\nNomen
\n<\/i>in this sense, we might say, is
\nNumen<\/i>; the secret Names of the Gods are their power, quality, character of being caught up by the consciousness and made conceivable. The Infinite is nameless, but in that namelessness all possible names, Numens of the gods, the names and forms of all realities, are already envisaged and prefigured, because they are there latent and inherent in the
\n\tAll-Existence. <\/p>\n

It becomes clear from these considerations that the coexistence of the Infinite and the finite, which is the very nature   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 352<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tof universal being, is not a juxtaposition or mutual inclusion of two opposites, but as natural and inevitable as the relation of the principle of Light and Fire with the suns. The finite is a frontal aspect and a self-determination of the Infinite; no finite can exist in itself and by itself, it exists by the Infinite and because it is of one essence with the Infinite. For by the Infinite
\n\twe do not mean solely an illimitable self-extension in Space and Time, but
\n\tsomething that is also spaceless and timeless, a self existent Indefinable and Illimitable which can express itself in the infinitesimal as well as in the vast, in a second of time, in a point of space, in a passing circumstance. The finite is looked upon as a division of the Indivisible, but there is no such thing: for this division is only apparent; there is a demarcation, but no real separation is possible. When we see with the inner vision
\n\tand sense and not with the physical eye a tree or other object, what we
\n\tbecome aware of is an infinite one Reality constituting the tree or object, pervading its every atom and molecule, forming them out of itself, building the whole nature, process of becoming, operation of indwelling energy; all of these are itself, are this infinite, this Reality: we see it extending indivisibly and uniting all objects so that none is really separate from it or quite separate from other objects. “It stands” says the Gita “undivided in beings and yet as if divided.” Thus each object is that Infinite and one in essential being with all other objects that are also forms and names 
\n\u2014 powers, numens  \u2014 of the Infinite. <\/p>\n

This incoercible unity in all divisions and diversities is the mathematics of the Infinite, indicated in a verse of the Upanishads  \u2014 “This is the complete and That is the complete; subtract the complete from the complete, the complete is the remainder.” For so too it may be said of the infinite self-multiplication of the Reality that all things are that self-multiplication; the One becomes Many, but all these Many are That which was already and is always itself and in becoming the Many remains the One. There is no division of the One by the appearance of the finite, for it is the one Infinite that appears to us as the many finite: the creation adds nothing to the Infinite; it remains after creation what it was before. The Infinite is not a sum of things, it is   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 353<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n That which is all things and more. If this logic of the Infinite contradicts the conceptions of our finite reason, it is because it exceeds it and does not base itself on the data of the limited phenomenon, but embraces the Reality and sees the truth of all phenomena in the truth of the Reality; it does not see them as separate beings, movements, names, forms, things; for that they cannot be, since they could be that only if they were phenomena in the Void, things without a common basis or essence, fundamentally unconnected, connected only by coexistence and pragmatic relation, not realities which exist by their root of unity and, so far as they can be considered independent, are secured in their independence of outer or inner figure and movement only by their perpetual dependence on their parent Infinite, their secret identity with the one Identical. The Identical is their root, their cause of form, the one power of their varying powers, their constituting substance. <\/p>\n

The Identical to our notions is the Immutable; it is ever the same through eternity, for if it is or becomes subject to mutation or if it admits of differences, it ceases to be identical; but what we see everywhere is an infinitely variable fundamental oneness which seems the very principle of Nature. The basic Force is one, but it manifests from itself innumerable forces; the basic substance is one, but it develops many different substances and millions of unlike objects; mind is one but differentiates itself into many mental states, mind-formations, thoughts, perceptions differing from each other and entering into harmony or into conflict; life is one, but the forms of life are unlike and innumerable; humanity is one in nature, but there are different race types and every individual man is himself and in some way unlike others; Nature insists on tracing lines of difference on the leaves of one tree; she drives differentiation so far that it has been found that the lines on one man’s thumb are different from the lines of every other man’s thumb so that he can be identified by that differentiation alone,  \u2014 yet fundamentally all men are alike and there is no essential difference. Oneness or sameness is everywhere, differentiation is everywhere; the indwelling Reality has built the universe on the principle of the development of one   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 354<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tseed into a million different fashions. But this again is the logic of the Infinite; because the essence of the Reality is immutably the same, it can assume securely these innumerable differences of form and character and movement, for even if they were multiplied a trillionfold, that would not affect the underlying immutability of the eternal Identical. Because the Self and Spirit in things and beings is one everywhere, therefore Nature can afford this luxury of infinite differentiation: if there were not this secure basis which brings it about that nothing changes yet all changes, all her workings and creations would in this play collapse into disintegration and chaos; there would be nothing to hold her disparate movements and creations together. The immutability of the Identical does not consist in a monotone of changeless sameness incapable of variation; it consists in an unchangeableness of being which is capable of endless formation of being, but which no differentiation can destroy or impair or minimise. The Self becomes insect and bird and beast and man, but it is always the same Self through these mutations because it is the One who manifests himself infinitely in endless diversity. Our surface reason is prone to conclude that the diversity may be unreal, an appearance only, but if we look a little deeper we shall see that a real diversity brings out the real Unity, shows it as it were in its utmost capacity, reveals all that it can be and is in itself, delivers from its whiteness of hue the many tones of colour that are fused together there; Oneness finds itself infinitely in what seems to us to be a falling away from its oneness, but is really an inexhaustible diverse display of unity. This is the miracle, the Maya of the universe, yet perfectly logical, natural and a matter of course to the self-vision and self-experience of the Infinite. <\/p>\n

For the Maya of Brahman is at once the magic and the logic of an infinitely variable Oneness; if, indeed, there were only a rigid monotone of limited oneness and sameness, there would be no place for reason and logic, for logic consists in the right perceptions of relations: the highest work of reason is to find the one substance, the one law, the cementing latent reality connecting and unifying the many, the different, the discordant   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 355<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n and disparate. All universal existence moves between these two terms, a diversification of the One, a unification of the many
\n\tand diverse, and that must be because the One and the Many are fundamental
\n\taspects of the Infinite. For what the divine Self knowledge and All-knowledge brings out in its manifestation must be a truth of its being and the play of that truth is its Lila. <\/p>\n

This, then, is the logic of the way of universal being of Brahman and the basic working of the reason, the infinite intelligence of Maya. As with the being of Brahman, so with its consciousness, Maya: it is not bound to a finite restriction of itself or to one state or law of its action; it can be many things simultaneously, have many co-ordinated movements which to the finite reason may seem contradictory; it is one but innumerably manifold, infinitely plastic, inexhaustibly adaptable. Maya is the supreme and universal consciousness and force of the Eternal and Infinite and, being by its very nature unbound and illimitable, it can put forth many states of consciousness at a time, many dispositions of its Force, without ceasing to be the same consciousness-force
\n\tfor ever. It is at once transcendental, universal and individual; it is the
\n\tsupreme supracosmic Being that is aware of itself as All Being, as the Cosmic Self, as the Consciousness-force of cosmic Nature, and at the same time experiences itself as the individual being and consciousness in all existences. The individual consciousness can see itself as limited and separate, but can also put off its limitations and know itself as universal and again as transcendent of the universe; this is because there is in all these states or positions or underlying them the same triune consciousness in a triple status. There is then no difficulty in the One thus seeing or experiencing itself triply, whether from above in the Transcendent Existence or from between in the Cosmic Self or from below in the individual conscious being. All that is necessary for this to be accepted as natural and logical is to admit that there can be different real statuses of consciousness of the One Being, and that cannot be impossible for an Existence which is free and infinite and cannot be tied to a single condition; a free power of self-variation must be natural to a consciousness that is infinite. If the possibility of a manifold status of consciousness   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 356<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tis admitted, no limit can be put to the ways of its variation of status, provided the One is aware of itself simultaneously in all of them; for the One and Infinite must be thus universally conscious. The only difficulty, which a further consideration may solve, is to understand the connections between a status of limited or constructed consciousness like ours, a status of ignorance, and the infinite self-knowledge and all-knowledge. <\/p>\n

A second possibility of the Infinite Consciousness that must be admitted is its power of self-limitation or secondary
\nself-formation
\n\tinto a subordinate movement within the integral illimitable consciousness and knowledge; for that is a necessary consequence of the power of self-determination of the Infinite. Each self-determination of the self-being must have its own awareness of its self-truth and its self-nature; or, if we prefer so to put it, the Being in that determination must be so
\nself-aware. Spiritual individuality means that each individual self or spirit is a centre of self-vision and all-vision; the circumference  \u2014 the boundless circumference, as we may say,  \u2014 of this vision
\n\tmay be the same for all, but the centre may be different,  \u2014 not
\n\tlocated as in a spatial point in a spatial circle, but a psycho logical centre related with others through a coexistence of the diversely conscious Many in the universal being. Each being in a world will see the same world, but see it from its own self-being according to its own way of self-nature: for each will manifest its own truth of the Infinite, its own way of self-determination and of meeting the cosmic determinations; its vision by the law of unity in variety will no doubt be fundamentally the same as that of others, but it will still develop its own differentiation,
\n\t \u2014 as we see all human beings conscious in the one human way of the same
\n\tcosmic things, yet always with an individual difference. This self-limitation would be, not fundamental, but an individual specialisation of a common universality or totality; the spiritual individual would act from his own centre of the one Truth and according to his self-nature, but on a common basis and not with any blindness to other-self and other-nature. It would be consciousness limiting its action with full knowledge, not a movement of ignorance. But apart from this individualising   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 357<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n self-limitation, there must also be in the consciousness of the Infinite a power of cosmic limitation; it must be able to limit its action so as to base a given world or universe and to keep it in its own order, harmony, self-building: for the creation of a universe necessitates a special determination of the Infinite Consciousness to preside over that world and a holding back of all that is not needed for that movement. In the same way the putting forth of an independent action of some power like Mind, Life or Matter must have as its support a similar principle of self-limitation. It cannot be said that such a movement must be impossible for the Infinite, because it is illimitable; on the contrary, this must be one of its many powers; for its powers too are illimitable: but this also, like other self-determinations, other finite buildings, would not be a separation or a real division, for all the Infinite Consciousness would be around and behind it and supporting it and the special movement itself would be intrinsically aware not only of itself, but, in essence, of all that was behind it. This would be so, inevitably, in the integral consciousness of the Infinite: but we can suppose also that an intrinsic though not an active awareness of this kind, demarcating itself, yet indivisible, might
\n\tbe there too in the total self-consciousness of the movement of the Finite.
\n\tThis much cosmic or individual conscious self limitation would evidently be possible to the Infinite and can be accepted by a larger reason as one of its spiritual possibilities; but so far, on this basis, any division or ignorant separation or binding and blinding limitation such as is apparent in our own
\n\tconsciousness would be unaccountable. <\/p>\n

But a third power or possibility of
\n\tthe Infinite Conscious ness can be admitted, its power of self-absorption, of plunging into itself, into a state in which self-awareness exists but not as knowledge and not as all-knowledge; the all would then be involved in pure self-awareness, and knowledge and the inner consciousness itself would be lost in pure being. This is, luminously, the state which we call the Superconscience in an absolute sense, 
\n\u2014 although most of what we call superconscient is in reality not that but only a higher conscient, something that is conscious to itself and only superconscious to our own limited   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 358<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tlevel of awareness. This self-absorption, this trance of infinity is again, no longer luminously but darkly, the state which we call
\n\tthe Inconscient; for the being of the Infinite is there though by its
\n\tappearance of inconscience it seems to us rather to be an infinite non-being: a self-oblivious intrinsic consciousness and force are there in that apparent non-being, for by the energy of the Inconscient an ordered world is created; it is created in a trance of self-absorption, the force acting automatically and with an apparent blindness as in a trance, but still with the inevitability and power of truth of the Infinite. If we take a step further and admit that a special or a restricted and partial action of
\n\tself-absorption is possible to the Infinite, an action not always of its infinity concentrated limitlessly in itself, but confined to a special status or to an individual or cosmic self-determination, we have then the explanation of the concentrated condition or status by which it becomes aware separately of one aspect of its being. There can then be a fundamental double status such as that of the Nirguna standing back from the Saguna and absorbed in its own purity and immobility, while the rest is held back behind a veil and not admitted within that special status. In the same way we could account for the status of consciousness aware of one field of being or one movement of it, while the awareness of all the rest would be held behind and veiled or, as it were, cut off by a waking trance of dynamic concentration from the specialised or limited awareness occupied only with its own field or movement. The totality of the infinite consciousness would be there, not abolished, recoverable, but not evidently active, active only by implication, by inherence or by the instrumentality of the limited awareness, not in its own manifest power and presence. It will be evident that all these three powers can be accepted as possible to the dynamics of the Infinite Consciousness, and it is by considering the many ways in which they can work that we may get a clue to the operations of Maya. <\/p>\n

This throws light incidentally on the opposition made by our minds between pure consciousness, pure existence, pure bliss and the abundant activity, the manifold application, the endless vicissitudes of being, consciousness and delight of being   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 359<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n that take place in the universe. In the state of pure consciousness and pure being we are aware of that only, simple, immutable, self-existent, without form or object, and we feel that to be alone true and real. In the other or dynamic state we feel its dynamism to be perfectly true and natural and are even capable of thinking that no such experience as that of pure consciousness is possible. Yet it is now evident that to the Infinite Consciousness both the static and the dynamic are possible; these are two of its statuses and both can be present simultaneously in the universal awareness, the one witnessing the other and supporting it or not looking at it and yet automatically supporting it; or the silence and status may be there penetrating the activity or throwing it up like an ocean immobile below throwing up a mobility of waves on its surface. This is also the reason why it is possible for us in certain conditions of our being to be aware of several different states of consciousness at the same time. There is a state of being experienced in Yoga in which we become a double consciousness, one on the surface, small, active, ignorant, swayed by thoughts and feelings, grief and joy and all kinds of reactions, the other within calm, vast, equal, observing the surface being with an immovable detachment or indulgence or, it may be, acting upon its agitation to quiet, enlarge, transform it. So too we can rise to a consciousness above and observe the various parts of our being, inner and outer, mental, vital and physical and the subconscient below all, and act upon one or other or the whole from that higher status. It is possible also to go down from that height or from any height into any of these lower states and take its limited light or its obscurity as our place of working while the rest that we are is either temporarily put away or put behind or else kept as a field of reference from which we can get support, sanction or light and influence or as a status into which we can ascend or recede and from it observe the inferior movements. Or we can plunge into trance, get within ourselves and be conscious there while all outward things are excluded; or we can go beyond even this inner awareness and lose ourselves in some deeper other consciousness or some high superconscience. There is also a pervading equal consciousness   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 360<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tinto which we can enter and see all ourselves with one enveloping glance or omnipresent awareness one and indivisible. All this which looks strange and abnormal or may seem fantastic to the surface reason acquainted only with our normal status of limited ignorance and its movements divided from our inner higher and total reality, becomes easily intelligible and admissible in the light of the larger reason and logic of the Infinite or by the admission of the greater illimitable powers of the Self, the Spirit in us which is of one essence with the Infinite. <\/p>\n

Brahman the Reality is the self-existent Absolute and Maya
\n\tis the Consciousness and Force of this self-existence; but with regard to
\n\tthe universe Brahman appears as the Self of all existence, Atman, the cosmic Self, but also as the Supreme Self transcendent
\n\tof its own cosmicity and at the same time individual-universal in each being; Maya can then be seen as the self-power, Atma-Shakti, of the Atman. It is true that when we first become aware of this Aspect, it is usually in a silence of the whole being or at the least in a silence within which draws back
\n\tor stands away from the surface action; this Self is then felt as a status
\n\tin silence, an immobile immutable being, self-existent, pervading the whole universe, omnipresent in all, but not dynamic or active, aloof from the ever mobile energy of Maya. In the same way we can become aware of it as the Purusha, separate from Prakriti, the Conscious Being standing back from the activities of Nature. But this is an exclusive concentration which limits itself to a spiritual status and puts away from it all activity in order to realise the freedom of Brahman the self-existent Reality from all limitation by its own action and manifestation: it is an essential realisation, but not the total realisation. For we can see that the Conscious-Power, the Shakti that acts and creates, is not other than the Maya or all-knowledge of Brahman; it is the Power of the Self; Prakriti is the working of the Purusha, Conscious Being active by its own Nature: the duality then of Soul and
\nWorld-Energy, silent Self and the creative Power of the Spirit, is not really something dual and separate, it is biune. As we cannot separate Fire and the power of Fire, it has been said, so we cannot separate the Divine Reality and its Consciousness-Force,   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 361<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n Chit-Shakti. This first realisation of Self as something intensely silent and purely static is not the whole truth of it, there can also be a realisation of Self in its power, Self as the condition of world-activity and world-existence. However, the Self is a fundamental aspect of Brahman, but with a certain stress on its impersonality; therefore the Power of the Self has the appearance of a Force that acts automatically with the Self sustaining it, witness and support and originator and enjoyer of its activities but not involved in them for a moment. As soon as we become aware of the Self, we are conscious of it as eternal, unborn, unembodied, uninvolved in its workings: it can be felt within the form of being, but also as enveloping it, as above it, surveying its embodiment from above,
\nadhyaksa<\/i>; it is omnipresent, the same .<\/i> in everything, infinite and pure and intangible for ever. This Self can be experienced as the Self of the individual, the Self of the thinker, doer, enjoyer, but even so it always has this greater character; its individuality is at the same time a vast universality or very readily passes into that, and the next step to that is a sheer transcendence or a complete and ineffable passing into the Absolute. The Self is that aspect of the Brahman in which it is intimately felt as at once individual, cosmic, transcendent of the universe. The realisation of the Self is the straight and swift way towards individual liberation, a static universality, a Nature-transcendence. At the same time there is a realisation of Self in which it is felt not only sustaining and pervading and enveloping all things, but constituting everything and identified in a free identity with all its becomings in Nature. Even so, freedom and impersonality are always the character of the Self. There is no appearance of subjection to the workings of its own Power in the universe, such as the apparent subjection of the Purusha to Prakriti. To realise the Self is to realise the eternal
\n\tfreedom of the Spirit. <\/p>\n

The Conscious Being, Purusha, is the Self as
\n\toriginator, wit
\n\tness, support and lord and enjoyer of the forms and works of Nature. As the
\n\taspect of Self is in its essential character transcendental even when involved and identified with its universal and individual becomings, so the Purusha aspect is characteristically   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 362<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tuniversal-individual and intimately connected with Nature even when
\n\tseparated from her. For this conscious Spirit while retaining its impersonality and eternity, its universality, puts on at the same time a more personal aspect;7<\/font><\/sup> it is the impersonal-personal being in Nature from whom it is not altogether detached, for it is always coupled with her: Nature acts for the Purusha and by its sanction, for its will and pleasure; the Conscious Being imparts its consciousness to the Energy we call Nature, receives in that consciousness her workings as in a mirror, accepts the forms which she, the executive cosmic Force, creates and imposes on it, gives or withdraws its sanction from her movements. The experience of Purusha-Prakriti, the Spirit or Conscious Being in its relations to Nature, is of immense pragmatic importance; for on these relations the whole play of the consciousness depends in the embodied being. If the Purusha in us is passive and allows Nature to act, accepting all she imposes on him, giving a constant automatic sanction, then the soul in mind, life, body, the mental, vital, physical being in us, becomes subject to our nature, ruled by its formation, driven by its activities; that is the normal state of our ignorance. If the Purusha in us becomes aware of itself as the Witness and stands back from Nature, that is the first step to the soul’s freedom; for it becomes detached, and it is possible then to know Nature and her processes and in all independence, since we are no longer involved in her works, to accept or not to accept, to make the sanction no longer automatic but free and effective; we can choose what she shall do or not do in us, or we can stand back altogether from her works and withdraw into the Self’s spiritual silence, or we can reject her present formations and rise to a spiritual level of existence and from there re-create  <\/i>our existence. The Purusha can cease to be subject,
\nanisa<\/i>, and become lord of its nature,
\n īśvara<\/i>. <\/p>\n

In the philosophy of the Sankhyas we find developed most thoroughly the metaphysical idea of Purusha-Prakriti. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n7 The Sankhya philosophy stresses this personal aspect, makes the Purusha many, plural, and assigns universality to Nature; in this view each soul is an independent existence although all souls experience a common universal Nature.  
\n<\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 363<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n These two are eternally separate entities, but in relation to each other. Prakriti is Nature-power, an executive Power, it is Energy apart from Consciousness; for Consciousness belongs to the Purusha, Prakriti without Purusha is inert, mechanical, inconscient. Prakriti develops as its formal self and basis of action primal Matter and in it manifests life and sense and mind and intelligence; but intelligence too, since it is part of Nature and its product in primal Matter, is also inert, mechanical, inconscient, 
\n\u2014 a conception which sheds a certain light on the order and perfectly related workings of the Inconscient in the material universe: it is the light of the soul, the Spirit, that is imparted to the mechanical workings of sense-mind and intelligence, they become conscious by its consciousness, even as they become active only by the assent of the spirit. The Purusha becomes free by drawing back from Prakriti; it becomes master of her by refusing to be involved in Matter. Nature acts by three principles, modes or qualities of its stuff and its action, which in us become the fundamental modes of our psychological and physical substance and its workings, the principle of inertia, the principle of kinesis and the principle of balance, light and harmony: when these are in unequal motion, her action takes place; when they fall into equilibrium she passes into quiescence. Purusha, conscious being, is plural, not one and single, while Nature is one: it would seem to follow that whatever principle of oneness we find in existence belongs to Nature, but each soul is independent and unique, sole to itself and separate whether in its enjoyment of Nature or its liberation from Nature. All these positions of the Sankhya we find to be perfectly valid in experience when we come into direct inner contact with the realities of individual soul and universal Nature; but they are pragmatic truths and we are not bound to accept them as the whole or the fundamental truth either of self or of Nature. Prakriti presents itself as an inconscient Energy in the material world, but, as the scale of consciousness rises, she reveals herself more and more as a conscious force and we perceive that even her inconscience concealed a secret consciousness; so too conscious being is many in its individual   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 364<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tsouls, but in its self we can experience it as one in all and one in its own essential existence. Moreover, the experience of soul and Nature as dual is true, but the experience of their unity has also its validity. If Nature or Energy is able to impose its forms and workings on Being, it can only be because it is Nature or Energy of Being and so the Being can accept them as its own; if the Being can become lord of Nature, it must be because it is its own Nature which it had passively watched doing its work, but can control and master; even in its passivity its consent is necessary to the action of Prakriti and this relation shows sufficiently that the two are not alien to each other. The duality is a position taken up, a double status accepted for the operations of the self-manifestation of the being; but there is no eternal and fundamental separateness and dualism of Being and its Consciousness-Force, of the Soul and Nature. <\/p>\n

It is the Reality, the Self, that takes the position of the Conscious Being regarding and accepting or ruling the works of its own Nature. An apparent duality is created in order that there may be a free action of Nature working itself out with the support of the Spirit and again a free and masterful action of the Spirit controlling and working out Nature. This duality is also
\n\tnecessary that the Spirit may be at any time at liberty to draw back from
\n\tany formation of its Nature and dissolve all formation or accept or enforce a new or a higher formation. These are very evident possibilities of the Spirit in its dealings with its own Force and they can be observed and verified in our own experience; they are logical results of the powers of the Infinite Consciousness, powers which we have seen to be native to its infinity. The Purusha aspect and the Prakriti aspect go always together and whatever status Nature or Consciousness-force in action assumes, manifests or develops, there is a corresponding status of the Spirit. In its supreme status the Spirit is the supreme Conscious Being, Purushottama, and the Consciousness-Force is his supreme Nature, Para-Prakriti. In each status of the gradations of Nature, the Spirit takes a poise of its being proper to that gradation; in Mind-Nature it becomes the mental being,   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 365<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\tin Life-Nature it becomes the vital being, in nature of Matter it becomes
\n\tthe physical being, in supermind it becomes the Being of Knowledge; in the supreme spiritual status it becomes the Being of Bliss and pure Existence. In us, in the embodied individual, it stands behind all as the psychic Entity, the inner Self supporting the other formulations of our consciousness and spiritual existence. The Purusha, individual in us, is cosmic in the cosmos, transcendent in the transcendence: the identity with the Self is apparent, but it is the Self in its pure
\n\timpersonal-personal status of a Spirit in things and beings  \u2014 impersonal because undifferentiated by personal quality, personal because it presides over the individualisations of self in each individual  \u2014 which deals with the works of its Consciousness-force, its executive force of self-nature, in whatever poise is necessary for that purpose. <\/p>\n

But it is evident that whatever the posture taken or relation formed in any individual nodus of Purusha-Prakriti, the Being is in a fundamental cosmic relation lord or ruler of its nature: for even when it allows Nature to have its own way with it, its consent is necessary to support her workings. This comes out in its fullest revelation in the third aspect of the Reality, the Divine Being who is the master and creator of the universe. Here
\n\tthe supreme Person, the Being in its transcendental and cosmic consciousness
\n\tand force, comes to the front, omnipotent, omniscient, the controller of all energies, the Conscious in all that is conscient or inconscient, the Inhabitant of all souls and minds and hearts and bodies, the Ruler or Overruler of all works, the Enjoyer of all delight, the Creator who has built all things in his own being, the All-Person of whom all beings are personalities, the Power from whom are all powers, the Self, the Spirit in all, by his being the Father of all that is, in his Consciousness-Force the Divine Mother, the Friend of all creatures, the All-blissful and All-beautiful of whom beauty and joy are the revelation, the All-Beloved and All-Lover. In a certain sense, so seen and understood, this becomes the most comprehensive of the aspects of the Reality, since here all are united in a single formulation; for the Ishwara is supracosmic as well as intracosmic; He is<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 366<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\n\tthat which exceeds and inhabits and supports all individuality; He is the supreme and universal Brahman, the Absolute, the supreme Self, the supreme Purusha.8<\/font><\/sup>
\nBut, very clearly, this is not the personal God of popular religions, a being limited by his qualities, individual and separate from all others; for all such personal gods are only limited representations or names and divine personalities of the one Ishwara. Neither is this the Saguna Brahman active and possessed of qualities, for that is only one side of the being of the Ishwara; the Nirguna immobile and without qualities is another aspect of His existence. Ishwara is Brahman the Reality, Self, Spirit, revealed as possessor, enjoyer of his own self-existence, creator of the universe and one with it, Pantheos, and yet superior to it, the Eternal, the Infinite, the Ineffable, the Divine Transcendence. <\/p>\n

The sharp opposition made between personality and impersonality by our mental way of thinking is a creation of the mind based on the appearances of the material world; for here in terrestrial existence the Inconscient from which everything takes its origin appears as something entirely impersonal; Nature, the inconscient Energy, is entirely impersonal in her manifest essence and dealings; all Forces wear this mask of impersonality, all qualities and powers, Love and Delight and Consciousness itself, have this aspect. Personality makes its apparition as a creation of consciousness in an impersonal world; it is a limitation by
\n\ta restricted formation of powers, qualities, habitual forces of the
\n\tnature-action, an imprisonment in a limited circle of self experience which we have to transcend, 
\n\u2014 to lose personality is necessary if we are to gain universality, still more necessary if we are to rise into the Transcendence. But what we thus call personality is only a formation of superficial consciousness; behind it is the Person who takes on various personalities, who can have at the same time many personalities but is himself one, real, eternal. If we look at things from a larger point of view, we might say that what is impersonal is only a power of the Person: existence itself has no meaning without an Existent, consciousness has no <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n8
\nGita.<\/i>   <\/font> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 367<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n standing-place if there is none who is conscious, delight is useless and invalid without an enjoyer, love can have no foundation or fulfilment if there is no lover, all-power must be otiose if there is not an Almighty. For what we mean by Person is conscious being; even if this emerges here as a term or product of the Inconscient, it is not that in reality: for it is the Inconscient itself that is a term of the secret Consciousness; what emerges is greater than that in which it emerges, as Mind is greater than Matter, Soul than Mind; Spirit, most secret of all, the supreme emergence, the last revelation, is the greatest of all, and Spirit is the Purusha, the All-Person, the omnipresent Conscious Being. It is the mind’s ignorance of this true Person in us, its confusion of person with
\n\tour experience of ego and limited personality, the misleading phenomenon of
\n\tthe emergence of limited consciousness and personality in an inconscient existence that have made us create an opposition between these two aspects of the Reality, but in truth there is no opposition. An eternal infinite self-existence is the supreme reality, but the supreme transcendent eternal Being, Self and Spirit, 
\n\u2014 an infinite Person, we may say, because his being is the essence and source of all personality,  \u2014 is the reality and meaning of self-existence: so too the cosmic Self, Spirit, Being, Person is the reality and meaning of cosmic existence; the same Self, Spirit, Being or Person manifesting its multiplicity is the reality and meaning of individual existence. <\/p>\n

If we admit the Divine Being, the supreme Person and
\nAll-Person as the Ishwara, a difficulty arises in understanding his
\n\trule or government of world-existence, because we immediately transfer to
\n\thim our mental conception of a human ruler; we picture him as acting by the mind and mental will in an omnipotent arbitrary fashion upon a world on which he imposes his mental conceptions as laws, and we conceive of his will as a free caprice of his personality. But there is no need for the Divine Being to act by an arbitrary will or idea as an omnipotent yet ignorant human being  \u2014 if such an omnipotence were possible  \u2014 might do: for he is not limited by mind; he has an all-consciousness in which he is aware of the truth of all things and aware of his own all-wisdom working them out according to the truth   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 368<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tthat is in them, their significance, their possibility or necessity, the imperative selfness of their nature. The Divine is free and not bound by laws of any making, but still he acts by laws and processes because they are the expression of the truth of things,  \u2014 not their mechanical, mathematical or other outward truth alone, but the spiritual reality of what they are, what they have become and have yet to become, what they have it within themselves to realise. He is himself present in the working, but he also exceeds and can overrule it; for on one side Nature works according to her limited complex of formulas and is informed and supported in their execution by the Divine Presence, but on the other side there is an overseeing, a higher working and determination, even an intervention, free but not arbitrary, often appearing to us magical and miraculous because it proceeds and acts upon Nature from a divine Supernature: Nature here is a limited expression of that Supernature and open to intervention or mutation by its light, its force, its influence. The mechanical, mathematical, automatic law of things is a fact, but within it there is a spiritual law of consciousness at work which gives to the mechanical steps of Nature’s forces an inner turn and value, a significant rightness and a secretly conscious necessity, and above it there is a spiritual freedom that knows and acts in the supreme and universal truth of the Spirit. Our view of the divine government of the world or of the secret of its action is either incurably anthropomorphic or else incurably mechanical; both the anthropomorphism and mechanism have their elements of truth, but they are only a side, an aspect, and the real truth is that the world is governed by the One in all and over all who is infinite in his consciousness and it is according to the law and logic of an infinite consciousness that we ought to understand the significance and building and movement of the universe. <\/p>\n

If we regard this aspect of the one Reality and put it in close connection with the other aspects, we can get a complete view of the relation between the eternal Self-Existence and the dynamics of the Consciousness-Force by which it manifests the universe. If we place ourselves in a silent Self-existence immobile, static, inactive, it will appear that a conceptive Consciousness-Force,   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 369<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n Maya, able to effectuate all its conceptions, a dynamic consort of the Self of silence, is doing everything; it takes its stand on the fixed unmoving eternal status and casts the spiritual substance of being into all manner of forms and movements to which its passivity consents or in which it takes its impartial pleasure, its immobile delight of creative and mobile existence. Whether this be a real or an illusory existence, that must be its substance and significance. Consciousness is at play with Being, Force of Nature does what it wills with Existence and makes it the stuff of her creations, but secretly the consent of the Being must be there at every step to make this possible. There is an evident truth in this perception of things; it is what we see happening everywhere in us and around us; it is a truth of the universe and must answer to a fundamental truth-aspect of the Absolute. But when we step back from the outer dynamic appearances of things, not into a witness Silence, but into an inner dynamic participating experience of the Spirit, we find that this Consciousness-Force, Maya, Shakti, is itself the power of the Being, the Self-Existent, the Ishwara. The Being is lord of her and of all things, we see him doing everything in his own sovereignty as the creator and ruler of his own manifestation; or, if he stands back and allows freedom of action to the forces of Nature and her creatures, his sovereignty is still innate in the permission, at every step his tacit  <\/i> sanction, “Let it be so”,
\ntathāstu<\/i>, is there implicit; for otherwise nothing could be done or
\n\thappen. Being and its Consciousness Force, Spirit and Nature cannot be fundamentally dual: what Nature does, is really done by the Spirit. This too is a truth that becomes evident when we go behind the veil and feel the presence of a living Reality which is everything and determines everything, is the All-powerful and the All-ruler; this too is a fundamental truth-aspect of the Absolute. <\/p>\n

Again, if we remain absorbed in the Silence, the creative Consciousness and her works disappear into the Silence; Nature and the creation for us cease to exist or be real. On the other hand, if we look exclusively at the Being in its aspect of the sole-existent Person and Ruler, the Power or Shakti by which he does all things disappears into his uniqueness or becomes an   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 370<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tattribute of His cosmic personality; the absolute monarchy of the one Being becomes our perception of the universe. Both these experiences create many difficulties for the mind due to its
\n\tnon-perception of the reality of the Self-Power whether in quiescence or in action, or to a too exclusively negative experience of the Self, or to the too anthropomorphic character our conceptions attach to the Supreme Being as Ruler. It is evident that we are looking at an Infinite of which the Self-Power is capable of many movements, all of them valid. If we look again more largely and take account of both the impersonal and the personal truth of things as one truth, if in that light, the light of personality in impersonality, we see the biune aspect of Self and Self-Power, then in the Person Aspect a dual Person emerges, Ishwara-Shakti, the Divine Self and Creator and the Divine Mother and Creatrix
\n\tof the universe; there becomes apparent to us the mystery of the masculine
\n\tand feminine cosmic Principles whose play and inter action are necessary for all creation. In the superconscient truth of the Self-Existence these two are fused and implied in each
\n\tother, one and indistinguishable, but in the spiritual-pragmatic truth of
\n\tthe dynamism of the universe, they emerge and be come active; the Divine Mother-Energy as the universal creatrix, Maya, Para-Prakriti, Chit-Shakti, manifests the cosmic Self and Ishwara and her own self-power as a dual principle; it is through her that the Being, the Self, the Ishwara, acts and he does nothing except by her; though his Will is implicit in her, it is she who works out all as the supreme Consciousness-Force who holds all souls and beings within her and as executive Nature; all exists and acts according to Nature, all is the Consciousness-Force manifesting and playing with the Being in millions of forms and movements into which she casts his existence. If we draw back from her workings, then all can fall into quiescence and we can enter into the silence, because she consents to cease from her dynamic activity; but it is in her quiescence and silence that we are quiescent and cease. If we would affirm our independence of Nature, she reveals to us the supreme and omnipresent power of the Ishwara and ourselves as beings of his being, but that power is herself and we are that in her supernature. If we would realise   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 371<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n a higher formation or status of being, then it is still through her, through the Divine Shakti, the Consciousness-Force of the Spirit that it has to be done; our surrender must be to the Divine Being through the Divine Mother: for it is towards or into the supreme Nature that our ascension has to take place and it can only be done by the supramental Shakti taking up our mentality and transforming it into her supramentality. Thus we see that there is no contradiction or incompatibility between these three aspects of Existence, or between them in their eternal status and the three modes of its Dynamis working in the universe. One Being, one Reality as Self bases, supports, informs, as Purusha or Conscious Being experiences, as Ishwara wills, governs and possesses its world of manifestation created and kept in motion and action by its own Consciousness-Force or Self-Power,  \u2014 Maya, Prakriti, Shakti. <\/p>\n

A certain difficulty arises for our mind in reconciling these different faces or fronts of the One Self and Spirit, because we are obliged to use abstract conceptions and defining words and ideas for something that is not abstract, something that is spiritually living and intensely real. Our abstractions get fixed into differentiating concepts with sharp lines between them: but the Reality is not of that nature; its aspects are many but shade off into each other. Its truth could only be rendered by ideas and images metaphysical and yet living and concrete,  \u2014 images which might be taken by the pure Reason as figures and symbols but are more than that and mean more to the intuitive vision and feeling, for they are realities of a dynamic spiritual experience. The impersonal truth of things can be rendered into the abstract formulas of the pure reason, but there is another side of truth which belongs to the spiritual or mystic vision and without that inner vision of realities the abstract formulation of them is insufficiently alive, incomplete. The mystery of things is the true truth of things; the intellectual presentation is only truth in representation, in abstract symbols, as if in a cubist art of thought-speech, in geometric figure. It is necessary in a philosophic inquiry to confine oneself mostly to this intellectual presentation, but it is as well to remember that this is only the   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 372<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tabstraction of the Truth and to seize it completely or express it completely there is needed a concrete experience and a more living and full-bodied language. <\/p>\n

Here it becomes opportune to see how in this aspect of the Reality we must regard the relation we have discovered between the One and the Many; this amounts to a determination of the
\n\ttrue connection between the individual and the Divine Being, between the
\n\tSoul and the Ishwara. In the normal theistic conception the Many are created by God; made by him as a potter might make a vessel, they are dependent on him as are creatures on their creator. But in this larger view of the Ishwara the Many are themselves the Divine One in their inmost reality, individual selves of the supreme and universal Self-Existence, eternal as he is eternal but eternal in his being: our material existence is indeed a creation of Nature, but the soul is an immortal portion of the Divinity and behind it is the Divine Self in the natural
\n\tcreature. Still the One is the fundamental Truth of existence, the Many
\n\texist by the One and there is therefore an entire dependence of the manifested being on the Ishwara. This dependence is concealed by the separative ignorance of the ego which strives to exist in its own right, although at every step it is evidently dependent on the cosmic Power that created it, moved by it, a part of its cosmic being and action; this effort of the ego is clearly a misprision, an erroneous reflection of the truth of the self-existence that is within us. It is true that there is something in us, not in the ego but in the self and inmost being, that surpasses cosmic Nature and belongs to the Transcendence. But this too finds itself independent of Nature only by dependence on a higher Reality; it is through self-giving or surrender of soul and nature to the Divine Being that we can attain to our highest self and supreme Reality, for it is the Divine Being who is that highest self and that supreme Reality, and we are self-existent and eternal only in his eternity and by his self-existence. This dependence is not contradictory of the Identity, but is itself the door to the realisation of the Identity, 
\n\u2014 so that here again we meet that phenomenon of duality expressing unity, proceeding from unity and opening back into unity, which is the constant   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 373<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n secret and fundamental operation of the universe. It is this truth of the consciousness of the Infinite that creates the possibility of all relations between the many and the One, among which the realisation of oneness by the mind, the presence of oneness in the heart, the existence of oneness in all the members is a highest peak, and yet it does not annul but confirms all the other personal relations and gives them their fullness, their complete delight, their entire significance. This too is the magic, but also the logic of the Infinite. <\/p>\n

One problem still remains to be solved, and it can be solved on the same basis; it is the problem of the opposition between the Non-Manifest and the manifestation. For it might be said that all that has been advanced hitherto may be true of the manifestation, but the manifestation is a reality of an inferior order, a partial movement derived from the Non-Manifest Reality and, when we enter into that which is supremely Real, these truths of the universe cease to have any validity. The Non-Manifest is the timeless, the utterly eternal, an irreducible absolute self-existence to which the manifestation and its limitations can give no clue or only a clue that by its insufficiency is illusory and deceptive. This raises the problem of the relation of Time to the timeless Spirit; for we have supposed on the contrary that what is in unmanifestation in the Timeless Eternal is manifested in
\nTime-Eternity. If that is so, if the temporal is an expression of the Eternal, then however different the conditions, however partial the expression, yet what is fundamental in the Time-expression must be in some way pre-existent in the Transcendence and drawn from the timeless Reality. For if not, these fundamentals must come into it direct from an Absolute which is other than Time or Timelessness, and the Timeless Spirit must be a supreme spiritual negation, an indeterminable basing the Absolute’s freedom from limitation by what is formulated in Time,  \u2014 it must be the negative to the Time positive, in the same relation to it as the Nirguna to the Saguna. But, in fact, what we mean by the Timeless is a spiritual status of existence not subject to the time movement or to the successive or the relative time-experience of a past, present and future. The timeless Spirit is not necessarily a   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 374<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tblank; it may hold all in itself, but in essence, without reference to time
\n\tor form or relation or circumstance, perhaps in an eternal unity. Eternity is the common term between Time and the Timeless Spirit. What is in the Timeless unmanifested, implied, essential, appears in Time in movement, or at least in design and relation, in result and circumstance. These two then are the same Eternity or the same Eternal in a double status; they are a twofold status of being and consciousness, one an eternity of
\n\timmobile status, the other an eternity of motion in status. <\/p>\n

The original
\n\tstatus is that of the Reality timeless and space less; Space and Time would be the same Reality self-extended to contain the deployment of what was within it. The difference would be, as in all the other oppositions, the Spirit looking at itself in essence and principle of being and the same Spirit looking at itself in the dynamism of its essence and principle. Space and Time are our names for this self-extension of the one Reality. We are apt to see Space as a static extension in which all things stand or move together in a fixed order; we see Time as a mobile extension which is measured by movement and event: Space then would be Brahman in self-extended status; Time would be Brahman in self-extended movement. But this may be only a first view and inaccurate: Space may be really a constant mobile, the constancy and the persistent time-relation of things in it creating the sense of stability of Space, the mobility creating the sense of time-movement in stable Space. Or, again, Space would be Brahman extended for the holding together of forms and objects; Time would be Brahman self-extended for the deployment of the movement of self-power carrying forms and objects; the two would then be a dual aspect of one and the same self-extension of the cosmic Eternal. <\/p>\n

A purely physical Space might be regarded as in itself a property of Matter; but Matter is a creation of Energy in movement. Space therefore in the material world could be either a fundamental self-extension of material Energy or its self-formed existence-field, its representation of the Inconscient Infinity in which it is acting, a figure in which it accommodates the formulas and movements of its own action and self-creation.   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 375<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n Time would be itself the course of that movement or else an impression created by it, an impression of something that presents itself to us as regularly successive in its appearance, 
\n\u2014 a division or a continuum upholding the continuity of movement and yet marking off its successions, 
\n\u2014 because the movement itself is regularly successive. Or else Time could be a dimension of Space necessary for the complete action of the Energy, but not understood by us as such because it is seen by our conscious subjectivity as something itself subjective, felt by our mind, not perceived by our senses, and therefore not recognised as a dimension of Space which has to us the appearance of a sense-created or sense-perceived objective extension. <\/p>\n

In any case, if Spirit is the fundamental reality, Time and Space must either be conceptive conditions under which the Spirit sees its own movement of energy or else they must be fundamental conditions of the Spirit itself which assume a different appearance or status according to the status of consciousness in which they manifest. In other words there is a different Time and Space for each status of our consciousness and even different movements of Time and Space within each status; but all would be renderings of a fundamental spiritual reality of Time-Space. In fact, when we go behind physical Space, we become aware of an extension on which all this movement is based and this extension is spiritual and not material; it is Self or Spirit containing all action of its own Energy. This origin or basic reality of Space begins to become apparent when we draw back from the physical: for then we become aware of a subjective Space-extension in which mind itself lives and moves and which is other than physical Space-Time, and yet there is an interpenetration; for our mind can move in its own space in such a way as to effectuate a movement also in space of Matter or act upon something distant in space of Matter. In a still deeper condition of consciousness we are aware of a pure spiritual Space; in this awareness Time may no longer seem to exist, because all movement ceases, or, if there is a movement or happening, it can take place independent of any observable Time sequence.   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 376<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

If we go behind Time by a similar inward motion, drawing back from the physical and seeing it without being involved in it, we discover that Time observation and Time movement are relative, but Time itself is real and eternal. Time observation depends not only on the measures used, but on the consciousness and the position of the observer: moreover, each state of consciousness has a different Time relation; Time in Mind consciousness and Mind Space has not the same sense and measure of its movements as in physical Space; it moves there quickly or slowly according to the state of the consciousness. Each state of consciousness has its own Time and yet there can be relations of Time between them; and when we go behind the physical surface, we find several different Time statuses and Time movements coexistent in the same consciousness. This is evident in dream Time where a long sequence of happenings can occur in a period which corresponds to a second or a few seconds of physical Time. There is then a certain relation between different Time statuses but no ascertainable correspondence of measure. It would seem as if Time had no objective reality, but depends on whatever conditions may be established by action of consciousness in its relation to status and motion of being: Time would seem to be purely subjective. But, in fact, Space also would appear by the mutual relation of Mind-Space and
\nMatter-Space to be subjective; in other words, both are the original spiritual extension, but it is rendered by mind in its purity into a subjective mind-field and by sense-mind into an objective field of sense-perception. Subjectivity and objectivity are only two sides of one consciousness, and the cardinal fact is that any given Time or Space or any given Time-Space as a whole is a status of being in which there is a movement of the consciousness and force of the being, a movement that creates or manifests events and happenings; it is the relation of the consciousness that sees and the force that formulates the happenings, a relation inherent in the status, which determines the sense of Time and creates our awareness of Time-movement, Time-relation, Time-measure. In its fundamental truth the original status of Time behind all its variations is nothing else than the eternity of the Eternal, just as   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 377<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n the fundamental truth of Space, the original sense of its reality, is the infinity of the Infinite. <\/p>\n

The Being can have three different states of its consciousness with regard to its own eternity. The first is that in which there is the immobile status of the Self in its essential existence, self-absorbed or self-conscious, but in either case without development of consciousness in movement or happening; this is what we distinguish as its timeless eternity. The second is its whole-consciousness of the successive relations of all things belonging to a destined or an actually proceeding manifestation, in which what we call past, present and future stand together as if in a map or settled design or very much as an artist or painter or architect might hold all the detail of his work viewed as a whole, intended or reviewed in his mind or arranged in a plan for execution; this is the stable status or simultaneous integrality of Time. This seeing of Time is not at all part of our normal awareness of events as they happen, though our view of the past, because it is already known and can be regarded in the
\n\twhole, may put on something of this character; but we know that this
\n\tconsciousness exists because it is possible in an exceptional state to enter into it and see things from the view-point of this simultaneity of Time-vision. The third status is that of a processive movement of Consciousness-Force and its successive working out of what has been seen by it in the static vision of the Eternal; this is the Time movement. But it is in one and the same Eternity that this triple status exists and the movement takes place; there are not really two eternities, one an eternity of status, another an eternity of movement, but there are different statuses or positions taken by Consciousness with regard to the one Eternity. For it can see the whole Time development from outside or from above the movement; it can take a stable position within the movement and see the before and the after in a fixed, determined or destined succession; or it can take instead a mobile position in the movement, itself move with it from moment to moment and see all that has happened receding back into the past and all that has to happen coming towards it from the future; or else it may concentrate on the moment it occupies and   <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 378<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tsee nothing but what is in that moment and immediately around or behind it. All these positions can be taken by the being of the Infinite in a simultaneous vision or experience. It can see Time from above and inside Time, exceeding it and not within it; it can see the Timeless develop the Time-movement without ceasing to be timeless, it can embrace the whole movement in a static and a dynamic vision and put out at the same time something of itself into the moment-vision. This simultaneity may seem to the finite consciousness tied to the moment-vision a magic of the Infinite, a magic of Maya; to its own way of perception which needs to limit, to envisage one status only at a time in order to harmonise, it would give a sense of confused and inconsistent unreality. But to an infinite consciousness such an integral simultaneity of vision and experience would be perfectly logical and consistent; all could be elements of a whole-vision capable of being closely related together in a harmonious arrangement, a multiplicity of view bringing out the unity of the thing seen, a diverse presentation of concomitant aspects of the One Reality. <\/p>\n

If there can be this simultaneous multiplicity of
\nself-presentation of one Reality, we see that there is no impossibility in the coexistence of a Timeless Eternal and a Time Eternity. It would be the same Eternity viewed by a dual self-awareness and there could be no opposition between them; it would be a correlation of two powers of the self-awareness of the infinite
\n\tand eternal Reality,  \u2014 a power of status and non-manifestation, a
\n\tpower of self-effecting action and movement and manifestation. Their simultaneity, however contradictory and difficult to reconcile it might seem to our finite surface seeing, would be intrinsic and normal to the Maya or eternal self-knowledge and all-knowledge of Brahman, the eternal and infinite knowledge and wisdom-power of the Ishwara, the consciousness-force of the self-existent Sachchidananda. <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 379<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Chapter II   Brahman, Purusha, Ishwara  \u2014 Maya, Prakriti, Shakti   It is there in beings indivisible and as if divided. Gita.1 Brahman, the Truth,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-21-22-the-life-divine","wpcat-45-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}