{"id":2694,"date":"2013-07-13T01:43:16","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:43:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2694"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:43:16","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:43:16","slug":"30-bande-mataram-18-9-06-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/30-bande-mataram-18-9-06-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-30_Bande Mataram 18-9-06.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tBande Mataram <\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t
\n\t{ CALCUTTA, September 18th, 1906}<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tIs Mendicancy Successful?
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tAn apologia for the mendicant policy has recently appeared in the columns of the
\nBengalee<\/i>. The heads of the defence practically
\nreduce themselves to two or three arguments. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t1. The policy of petitioning was recommended by Raja Rammohan Roy, has been pursued consistently since then and has been eminently successful\u2014 at least whatever political gains
\nhave been ours in the last century, have been won by this policy. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t2. Supposing this contention to be lost, there remains another. Mere petitioning is bad, but when the petition is backed by the will of the community, resolved to gain its object by every
\nlegitimate means, it is not mendicancy but an assertion of a natural right.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t3. Even if a petitioning policy be bad in principle, politics has nothing to do with principles, but must be governed by
\nexpediency, and not only general expediency, but the expediency of particular cases.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t4. Then there is the argumentum ad hominem<\/i>. The Dumaists petition, the Irish petition; why should not we?
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tWe believe this is a fair summary of our contemporary’s contentions.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tWe are not concerned to deny the antiquity of the petitioning policy, nor its illustrious origin. Raja Rammohan Roy was a
\ngreat man in the first rank of active genius and set flowing a stream of tendencies which have transformed our national life.
\nBut what was the only possible policy for him in his times and without a century of experience behind him, is neither the only
\npolicy nor the best policy for us at the present juncture. We join issue with our contemporary on his contention that whatever we
\n    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 173<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\thave gained politically has been due to petitioning. It appears
\nto us to show a shallow appreciation of political forces and an entire inability to understand the fundamental facts which
\nunderlie outward appearances. When the sepoys had conquered India for the English, choice lay before the British, either to hold
\nthe country by force and repression, or to keep it as long as possible by purchasing the co-operation of a small class of the
\npeople who would be educated so entirely on Western lines as to lose their separate individuality and their sympathy with the
\nmass of the nation. An essential part of this policy which became dominant owing to the strong personalities of Macaulay,
\nBentinck and others, was to yield certain minor rights to the small educated class, and concede the larger rights as slowly as
\npossible and only in answer to growing pressure. This policy was not undertaken as the result of our petitions or our wishes,
\nbut deliberately and on strong grounds. India was a huge country with a huge people strange and unknown to their rulers.
\nTo hold it for ever was then considered by most statesmen a chimerical idea; even to govern it and keep it tranquil for a time
\nwas not feasible without the sympathy and co-operation of the people themselves. It was therefore the potential strength of the
\npeople and not the wishes of a few educated men, which was the true determining cause of the scanty political gains we so
\nmuch delight in. Since then the spirit of the British people and their statesmen has entirely changed,\u2014 so changed that even a
\nRadical statesman like Mr. Morley brushes aside the expressed “will of the community” with a few abrupt and cavalier phrases.
\nWhy is this? Precisely because we have been foolish enough to follow a purely mendicant policy and to betray our own weakness. If we had not instituted the National Congress we might have continued in the old way for some time longer, getting
\nsmall and mutilated privileges whenever a strong Liberal Viceroy happened to come over. But the singularly ineffective policy and
\ninert nature of the Congress revealed to British statesmen\u2014 or so they thought,\u2014 the imbecility and impotence of our nation. A
\nperiod of repression, ever increasing in its insolence and cynical contempt for our feelings, has been the result. And now that
\n    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 174<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t<\/i>
\n\ta Liberal Government of unprecedented strength comes into
\npower, we find that the gains we can expect will be of the most unsubstantial and illusory kind and that we are not to get any
\nguarantee against their being withdrawn by another reactionary Viceroy after a few years. It is perfectly clear therefore that the
\npolicy of mendicancy will no longer serve. After all, cries the Bengalee<\/i>, we have only failed in the case of the Partition. We
\nhave failed in everything of importance for these many years, measure after measure has been driven over our prostrate heads
\nand the longed-for Liberal Government flouts us with a few grudging concessions in mere symptomatic cases of oppression.
\nThe long black list of reactionary measures remains and will remain unrepealed. We do not care to deny that in small matters
\npetitioning may bring us a trivial concession here or a slight abatement of oppression there; even there we shall fail in nine
\ncases and win in one. But nothing important, nothing lasting, nothing affecting the vital questions which most closely concern
\nus, can be hoped for from mere mendicancy. To the contention of antiquity and success, therefore, our answer is that this antique
\npolicy has not succeeded in the long run, but utterly failed, and that the time has come for a stronger and more effective policy to
\ntake its place. To the other contentions of the Bengalee <\/i>we shall reply in their proper order. This which is the true basis of the
\npetitionary philosophy, has neither reason nor fact to support it. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t________<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tBy the Way
\n<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Englishman <\/i>is at it again. His fiery imagination has winged its way over rivers and hills and is now disporting itself on airy
\npinions over far Sylhet. We learn from our contemporary that the British Government has been subverted in Sylhet, which is
\nnow being governed by a number of schoolboys who\u2014 horrible to relate\u2014 are learning the use of deadly
\nlathi<\/i>. This startling resolution is the result of Babu Bipin Chandra Pal’s recent visit to Sylhet. To crown these calamities, it appears that Golden Bengal
\nis circulating its seditious pamphlets broadcast. Its irrepressible   
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 175<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\temissaries seem not to have despaired even of converting the
\nMagistrate to their views, for even he is in possession of a copy. We have, however, news later than the
\nEnglishman<\/i>‘s. We have
\nbeen informed from a reliable source that the Sylhet Republic has been declared and that Babu Bipin Chandra Pal is to be its
\nfirst President. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t*
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Englishman <\/i>graciously accedes to the request of a correspondent who prays this “much-esteemed journal to accommodate the following lines”. There are some gems from the delicious production which the accommodating
\nEnglishman <\/i>has
\naccommodated. “We should always beg the Government and not fight it for favours.” Fighting for favours is distinctly good;
\nbut there is better behind. “It is impossible for us to obtain rights and privileges by fulminating acrimonious invectives on the Government and making the Anglo-Indian rulers the butt-end of mendacious persiflage and anathema.” Shade of Jabberjee! The
\njunior members of the Bar Library will enjoy this elegant description of themselves. “For ought I know most of the educated men
\nare opposed to the despicable spread-eagleism of a coterie of raw youths, who having adopted European costumes and rendered
\ntheir upper lips destitute of “knightly growth”, give themselves all the airs of a learned Theban and range themselves against
\nthe British Government.” This is a sentence which we would not willingly let die and we would suggest to the raw youths
\nwith the destitute upper lips that they might sit in council and devise means to preserve a literary gem which will immortalise
\nthem no less than the brilliant author. How infinitely superior is the true Jabberjee to the mock imitation. Even the author of the
\nletter to Mr. Morley must hide his diminished head before this outburst.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t“This attitude of the Extremists merely exposes their Boeotian
\nstupidity. Let them lay to it, that if they do not yet refrain from the obnoxious procedure, they are sure to come to grief.” We
\n    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 176<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t<\/i>will lay to it, S. M. After such a scintillation of Attic wit and
\nrumbling of Homeric thunder, our Boeotian stupidity finds itself irremediably reduced to Laconic silence. Truly, there seems to
\nbe some fearful and wonderful wild fowl in the ranks of the moderationists.
\n    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 110<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, September 18th, 1906}   Is Mendicancy Successful?   An apologia for the mendicant policy has recently appeared in the columns of…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2694"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2694\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}