{"id":2740,"date":"2013-07-13T01:43:34","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:43:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2740"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:43:34","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:43:34","slug":"129-bande-mataram-10-8-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/129-bande-mataram-10-8-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-129_Bande Mataram 10-8-07.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\tBande Mataram<\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t
\n\t{
\n\tCALCUTTA, August 10th, 1907 }
\n\t<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n
\nTo Organise <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\nSrijut Surendranath Banerji in his remarkable speech in College Square, the other day, observed that what the country
\nnow needed was not oratory but statesmanship, for the only effective answer to bureaucratic repression is the organisation
\nof the whole strength of the country to carry out its national ideal in spite of all repression. We think the veteran leader has
\ngauged the situation very accurately, but we confess we do not see at present where the statesmanship is to come from which
\nis to carry out the difficult, arduous and delicate task before us. What we have done hitherto we have done without leadership,
\nalmost without clear purpose, under an inspiring and impelling force which we must necessarily think divine. Where that force
\nhas visibly guided us, we have done astonishing things: but at the same time there has been much confusion, one-sidedness
\nand incoherence in our work. And now that a powerful and organised Government has set itself in grim earnest to destroy
\nour movement, it is imperative that we too should organise and make our whole potential strength effective for self-defence. The
\ndivine guidance will only be continued to us if we show ourselves in our strength and wisdom worthy of it. But it cannot be denied
\nthat the first effect of the repression has been to disorganise our work. Since it began, there has been no concerted and coherent
\naction, every man has done what seemed good in his own eyes or else remained inactive. The result has been much weakness,
\nsupineness and ineffectiveness. Barisal fights for its own hand to maintain the boycott. The
\nYugantar <\/i>attacked carries on a
\nheroic struggle with the bureaucracy with what stray assistance, individual generosity or patriotism may offer it. But organised
\n   
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 630<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nresistance, organised persistence even there is none.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThis unsatisfactory condition of things is traceable to one main cause. All Bengal is heartily agreed in Swadeshi and professedly all are agreed on the necessity of industrial boycott. But a majority of the older leaders, trained in another school
\nof politics, cannot adapt themselves to the new state of things, they cannot even throw themselves heartily into the only measures which can make the industrial boycott crushingly effective, and they are out of sympathy with the wider developments of
\nboycott which are becoming indispensable if we are to meet the bureaucratic attack with full success. They object personally to the new men and decline to work in co-operation with them. The new men, on the other hand, who have immensely
\nincreased their following and influence in the country, are not in possession of the machinery of Congress and Conference,
\nare in fact zealously excluded from it by the present possessors and have but small following among the richer men who might
\nprovide the sinews of war. They are moreover prevented, by a natural unwillingness to hopelessly divide the nation, from organising a machinery of their own. Yet to talk of organising the nation while excluding the new men is absurd. If the older
\nparty have the greater solidity and resources, the younger men have the lion’s share of the energy and driving force, they divide
\nthe great middle class and are no longer there in a hopeless minority, but are gathering adherents all over the country (even
\nin Madras they commanded one third of the votes at the last Conference) and they exercise an overwhelming empire over the
\nminds of the rising generation. To organise the nation means to make all its elements of strength efficient for a single clear
\nand well-understood work under the leadership of a recognised central force. To exclude such important forces as these we have
\ndescribed, means simply to leave the nation unorganised. <\/span><\/p>\n

\nThe country is in need of a statesman, yes: but what kind of
\nstatesman? He must be a man thoroughly steeped in the gospel of Nationalism, with a clear and fearless recognition of the goal
\nto which we are moving, with a dauntless courage to aim consciously, steadily, indomitably towards it, with a consummate
\n    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 631<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tskill to mask his movements and aims when necessary and to
\nmove boldly and openly when necessary, and, last but not least, with an overmastering magnetic power and tact to lead and use
\nand combine men of all kinds and opinions. Such a leader might organise the nation to some purpose, but those who shrink from
\nfollowing where their hearts and intellects lead them or who from party feelings or personal dislike or jealousy try to exclude
\npowerful forces from the common national work cannot claim the name of statesman. It is an encouraging sign of the times
\nthat Surendranath is coming more and more into sympathy with thorough-going Nationalism, but will he have the courage and
\nmagnanimity to hold out his hand to the new men, and if he does will he be able to retain the loyalty of his principal followers? If
\nnot, he will never be able to carry out the task he has declared to be the one and supreme need of the nation.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t__________<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tStatutory Distinction <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tMr. Morley is opposed to ensuring by a statute the presence of
\nat least two Indians on the India Council. The very idea that there should be any “statutory distinction” between class and
\nclass is repulsive to his fine sense of political equality. Of course, it is only Statutory distinctions that he objects to: to real and
\npractical distinctions there is no objection whatever. Mr. Morley is a philosopher, and so long as there is no philosophical and
\ntheoretic distinction, it does not matter a bit if there is no practical equality: for principles are universal, but their application
\nis to be confined to Europe. Such is Morleyesque liberalism, that queer combination of autocracy, selfishness, repression and
\n“sympathy”. Mr. Morley also negatived the proposal to limit the number of retired civilians on the India Council; for, he said,
\nthat would defeat the very object of the Council. Of course, for the whole object of the Council is to prime the Secretary
\nof State with the narrow and reactionary views of hide-bound officialism, and to have other elements largely represented would
\ndefeat that object. Right, very Liberal Mr. Morley!    <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 632<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, August 10th, 1907 }   To Organise   Srijut Surendranath Banerji in his remarkable speech in College Square, the other day,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2740\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}