{"id":2834,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:05","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2834"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:05","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:05","slug":"202-bande-mataram-23-3-08-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/202-bande-mataram-23-3-08-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-202_Bande Mataram 23-3-08.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tBande Mataram<\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t
\n\t{
\n\tCALCUTTA, March 23rd, 1908 } <\/b> <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nThe Weapon of Secession
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\nThere has been much talk recently of drawing up a constitution for the Congress, but even if we are able to decide the question
\nof the constitution, the next step before us will be to carry it out. To think that a paper constitution will help to bring about peace
\nbetween the parties, is to ignore the fact that men are swayed by feelings and not by machinery. Paper constitutions have always
\nfailed to effect their object, except when they are in harmony with the feeling of the nation and express the actual situation
\nin their arrangements. Whatever constitution we may draw up must be one which will suit the conditions of the country and
\nmeet the difficulties of the present crisis. We propose to go into the question from time to time and deal with the chief points
\nwhich in our opinion ought to be decided in order to form a real starting-point for the fresh life of the Congress. The first
\nand initially essential question is the object of the Congress, the function which it proposes to discharge and the aim which it sets
\nbefore itself. We agree with the Moderates that this is the first point on which a clear understanding is necessary, but we do not
\nfollow them in their contention that the decision of this question need imply the exclusion of all who differ from the precise terms
\nin which it is decided. The Congress is an expression of the life of the nation and the will and aspiration of the nation must
\ndecide the function and object of the Congress; but that will and aspiration are not immutable; they develop, change, progress,
\nand it is always the function of the dissentient minority to stand for that potential development and progress without which life
\nis impossible. The exclusion of the minority by a rigid shibboleth means the perpetuation in the Congress of a state of things which
\n   
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 951<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tmay correspond for the moment to the desire of the nation,
\nbut may cease so to correspond in a few years. It means the conversion of a national assembly into a party caucus.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\tThe function of the Congress has hitherto been to pass inoperative resolutions, its aim to influence British opinion. Needless
\nto say, the originators were men of ability and wide views, and they had an ulterior object in instituting this body and giving
\nit the shape it took. The situation in India as they envisaged it, resembled that of the patricians and plebeians in Rome; for
\nthey accepted the permanence of British control almost as a law of Nature though they were anxious to alter its conditions. A
\ncaste of white patricians arrogated the control of the State in all its functions and effected an inborn social superiority accompanied not only by an intolerable arrogance and aloofness but often by actual brutality; yet it was the indigenous mass that
\nsupplied the sinews of war and did the substantial work which secured the peaceful and efficient conduct of the administration.
\nThe political and social grievances were farther accentuated by the economical sufferings of the proletariat, which were largely
\ncaused by the selfish policy of the ruling caste. Yet there was no legal or constitutional means of redress, the people had no votes,
\nno means of checking directly or indirectly either executive or legislature, no power over the purse. The only force at their command was the vague strength of public opinion. The object of the Indian leaders, like that of the Roman plebeians, was to give a
\ndefinite form to that public opinion,\u2014 focus it, as it is commonly expressed,\u2014 and, secondly, to make that definitely formulated
\nopinion effective. In each case a new body was formed within the State which served the purpose of formulating popular sentiment
\nwith a view to bring pressure on the ruling caste and bring about a change in political conditions. But while the Roman comitia
\nbecame a new sovereign assembly in the State, existing side by side with the already recognised organs of Government, invested
\nwith full legislative powers, governing by means of plebiscites or resolutions of the people and appointing magistrates of its
\nown who were empowered to exercise a check on every action legislative, executive or fiscal of the Government, the Congress
\n   <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 952<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\thas remained from beginning to end a nullity. The difference lay
\npartly in the conditions, partly in the means employed.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThe originators of the Congress had undoubtedly before
\nthem an object very similar to that of their Roman prototypes. The Congress has sometimes been described as His Majesty’s
\npermanent Opposition; but the aim of the originators was to make it something less futile than a mere meeting of powerless
\ncritics; they certainly hoped that the plebiscites or resolutions of the Congress would eventually come to have a sovereign force
\nand translate themselves almost automatically into laws. But they took no sufficient notice of the immense difference in the
\nconditions of a struggle for popular rights which is introduced by the foreign character of the ruling caste. There can always be
\nan accommodation between the contending factions or classes within the same nationality, even though the accommodation
\nmay not come till after a severe and even violent struggle, but when the ruling caste is a caste of foreigners, it is unlikely to
\ngive up its powers on any lesser compulsion than the alternative of extinction and will often prefer extinction to surrender. Even
\nwhen the Congress leaders discovered that the bureaucracy was implacable and irreconcilable, they did not lay their hands on
\nthe right source of strength. The bureaucracy in India is in itself weak and powerless; it subsists greatly by the acquiescence and
\nsupport of the people, partly by the existence behind it of the strength of the British Empire. The Congress leaders saw only
\nthe second source of its strength and sought to cut it off by depriving the bureaucracy of the moral support of the British
\npublic. Their initial miscalculation pursued them. They forgot that the British justice to which they appealed was foreign justice, the justice of alien to alien, of self-satisfied and arrogant masters to discontented dependents with whom they have no
\nbonds of blood, culture, religion or social life. Justice might be on their side, but nature and self-interest were against them.
\nTherefore they failed.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThe real strength of their position lay in the other source
\nof bureaucratic security, the acquiescence and support of the people. As at Rome, so in India the ruling caste cannot last for a
\n   
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 953<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tmoment except by this aid and acquiescence of the plebeian
\nmass and when the plebeian leaders found their rulers deaf to the opinions and loudly-expressed feelings of the oppressed
\npopulace, they discovered an infallible weapon, a Brahmastra of peaceful political struggle, the weapon of secession. They gave
\nthe patricians notice that they would cease to give their aid and acquiescence to the patrician rule and would form a new city
\nover against Rome. In India, by force of a similar situation, we rediscovered this weapon of secession. For boycott is nothing
\nbut this secession; we threaten to secede industrially, educationally, politically, to refuse our aid and acquiescence to the
\nmaintenance of British exploitation and British education and British administration in India, and build ourselves a new city, a
\nState within the State by creating our own industries, our own schools and colleges, our own instruments of justice and protection, our own network of public, executive and administrative bodies throughout the realm. Only while it was enough for the
\nRomans to threaten, we have to carry out our threat before the weapon can be effective, because our ruling caste, being foreign,
\nwill certainly refuse to recognise the Congress as a sovereign body whether existing side by side with the present organs of
\ngovernment or replacing them until it has such a position as an actual fact; they will recognise only the realised aspiration, not
\nthe distant possibility. The party of peaceful secession of thoroughgoing passive resistance does not forget that besides the
\nsupport and acquiescence of the people the bureaucracy have another source of strength in the military force of the British
\nEmpire. They are often accused of forgetting it, but they realise it fully, only they also realise that this weapon of secession, of
\nboycott and self-help, is the only chance which yet remained of a peaceful solution of the problem,\u2014 and they are willing to
\nmake full use of that chance. <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\tThe question of the function of the Congress hinges upon
\nthis acceptance or rejection of this weapon. Whatever be the aim of the Congress, whether it be Swaraj or Colonial
\n\t\tself-government or administrative reform, it cannot be brought about by inoperative resolutions, it can only be brought about
\n    <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 954<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tby pressure; and the only means of pressure in our hands
\nis the threat or the practice of boycott or secession. If the function of the Congress is merely to focus public opinion, it
\nneed do nothing but pass resolutions and a few slight changes of procedure will be sufficient. But if its function is to pass
\neffective resolutions, if it is not only to focus public opinion but to collect and centralize national strength it will have to use the
\nweapon of secession to organize a State within the State, and for that purpose the body will have not only to be readjusted
\nbut gradually reconstructed.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t_________<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tSleeping Sirkar and Waking People
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tIn commenting on the helplessness of the frontier Hindus, the Afridi raids and the callous indifference of the British authorities,
\nthe Punjabee <\/i>reports the conversation between the old Chowdhury of a raided village and a high officer of the district. “Were
\nyou awake or asleep when the raiders came in?” asked the belated Heaven-born. “Sir,” was the old man’s reply, “we were all
\nasleep, for we thought our great Sirkar was wide awake. Had we known the Sirkar had gone to sleep, we would have, in that case,
\ntaken care to keep awake.” The reply carried with it a lesson which lies at the very root of all stable government. The king is
\nking because he tries to please his people; he rules not by right of strength and power which are given to him by God to help
\nhim in his duties, but by service,\u2014 because he gives protection, because he deals justice, because he helps his people in their
\nwants and in their sorrows. That is the ideal on which kingship is based, and when the ruler wilfully falls short of the ideal, he is
\npunished first by demoralisation, last by loss of the strength and power which are not his but delegated. The British are in India
\nbecause they had a certain mission to perform; but the condition of their tenure was justice, protection and sympathy, and if their
\nrule has lasted for these hundred years, it was because some of them tried to satisfy the condition. Unfortunately for them, they
\nallowed commercial greed to overcome their kingly instincts   
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 955<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tand the punishment of demoralisation has come upon them in
\nfull measure. Their sympathy exists only in Mr. John Morley’s stock of liberal cant phrases, their justice is no longer believed
\nin and their protection is now following the other virtues. Protection is vested in a corrupt and oppressive police of which the
\nruler of a great Province does not feel ashamed to be greeted as the friend and protector. Protection takes the form of making
\nAfridi raids an excuse for military practice on the frontier and then quietly allowing the raids to continue. The other kingly
\nqualities, provident wisdom, calm courage, the instinct for the right action and the right moment are already decayed. Only the
\npower and the strength remain and that will disappear when the people are compelled to feel their own strength. The strength
\nof God in the people has slumbered because they “thought that the great Sirkar was awake”, but they find, like the old
\nPunjabi, that the Sirkar is asleep and it is time for them to awake. Self-protection, not the protection of military exercises
\nin the frontier; self-protection, not the curse of a police enquiry\u2014 when this ideal wakes in the heart of the people, what will
\nbecome of mere power and strength which has no office left but selfishness and self-aggrandisement? How long will it be
\nbefore it is withdrawn as the strength of Arjuna was withdrawn when Krishna went from him; as the strength of Ravana was
\nwithdrawn when Rama beheld the Power of God protecting the Rakshasa in her arms, and prayed to the Mother?
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t__________<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tAnti-Swadeshi in Madras <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Madras Standard <\/i>has undoubtedly hit the right nail on
\nthe head when it derives the Tinnevelly disturbances from the establishment of the Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company and
\nthe attempt to throw difficulties in the way of its success. The struggle generated an acute feeling on both sides and when the
\ncommercial war extended itself and the people took sides with Indian labour against British capital in the affair of the Coral
\nMills, the patience of the English officials gave way and they   <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 956<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\trushed to the help of their mercantile caste-fellows, misusing
\nthe sacred seal of justice and the strong arm of power as instruments to maintain their trade supremacy. This unjust and
\nunwarrantable action has been responsible for the riots and the corpses of dead men lying with their gaping wounds uncared
\nfor in Tinnevelly streets,\u2014 uncared for but not forgotten in the book of divine reckoning. Nations as well as individuals are
\nsubject to the law of Karma, and in the present political and industrial revolt British rule in India is paying for the commercial rapacity which impelled it to prefer trade returns to justice and kingly duty and use its political power to turn India from
\na land of fabulous wealth into a nation of starving millions. The payment has only just begun\u2014 for these karmic debts are
\nusually repaid with compound interest.    <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 957<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, March 23rd, 1908 }   The Weapon of Secession   There has been much talk recently of drawing up a constitution…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}