{"id":2846,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:09","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2846"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:09","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:09","slug":"157-bande-mataram-5-11-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/157-bande-mataram-5-11-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-157_Bande Mataram 5-11-07.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\tBande Mataram<\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t
\n\t{
\n\tCALCUTTA, November 5th, 1907 }
\n\t<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\nMr. Tilak and the Presidentship
\nWhile writing of the Nagpur imbroglio we have touched very lightly on the question of Mr. Tilak’s Presidentship, the dispute
\nover which was the beginning and real cause of the discord at Nagpur. We regard this issue as one of immense importance
\nand shall today try to make clear our position in the matter and the reasons why we attach such a supreme importance to
\nit. The Bombay Moderates with their usual skill in the use of their one strong weapon, misrepresentation, have been writing
\nand speaking as if the question of Mr. Tilak’s election to the President’s chair were a personal issue; they blame Mr. Tilak for
\nnot withdrawing from the field, talk of us as Tilakites and assume throughout that we are fighting for a man and not for a principle.
\nIf it were a personal matter, Mr. Tilak who has always been an unselfish and unassuming patriot, always averse to pushing
\nhimself or to figuring personally more than was necessary for his work, always a strong fighter for the success of his ideas and
\nmethods but never for his own hand, would be the first to obviate all discord by withdrawing. But it is not a personal matter and
\nMr. Tilak has not himself come forward as a candidate for the Presidentship. His name was put forward last year by the Bengal
\nNationalists without consulting him and was again put forward this year as the embodiment of a principle. This being so, Mr.
\nTilak has no voice in the matter except as an individual member of the Nationalist party, and is not entitled to withdraw his name
\nexcept with the consent of his party. In fact his personal right of accepting or refusing the Presidentship can only arise when
\nand if it is offered him by the local Reception Committee or the All-India Committee. That the Moderates should not be able to
\n    <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 736<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n understand this is natural; their conception of a leader and the
\nNationalist conception of a leader are as the poles asunder. Mr. Tilak by his past career, his unequalled abilities and capacity for
\nleadership, his splendid courage and self-sacrifice, his services to the cause and the disinterestedness and devotion with which
\nhe used his influence, is naturally the most prominent of the Nationalist leaders, and our party looks up to his experience,
\nskill, cool acuteness and moral strength for guidance on great occasions like the Congress session when it has to act as a single
\nbody. But our idea of a leader is not and will never be one whom we have to follow as an individual for his own sake, whether he
\nis right or wrong; we follow him only so long as he is faithful to the principles of Nationalism and is ready to fight its battles in
\naccordance with the collective will of the party.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe question was first raised last year in Bengal when at a
\nmeeting of the Nationalists in Calcutta it was decided to suggest to the country the name of Mr. Tilak as President of the
\nCalcutta Congress and in accordance with this decision Srijut Bipin Chandra Pal, who was then touring in the Mofussil, was
\ncommunicated with and asked to bring the question forward and take the sense of the public upon it in Eastern Bengal. We
\nhave never concealed the fact that this was deliberately done in order to throw down the gauntlet publicly to Loyalism,
\nAnti-Swadeshism, Moderatism and every other ism <\/i>which seeks to bring in foreign considerations and alloy or weaken the pure
\nand uncompromising Nationalist creed. The nomination of Mr. Tilak was a crucial point as between the two parties, for three
\nseparate reasons. At that time the country was divided between the Swadeshists on principle and the Anti-Swadeshists\u2014 or, let
\nus say, “honest” Swadeshists of the Mehta-Watcha type and still more sharply between Boycotters and those who trembled at
\nthe very name of Boycott. From this point of view, the attempt to secure Mr. Tilak’s nomination was an attempt on our part
\nto have the Swadeshi-Boycott propaganda recognised on the Congress platform. Secondly, there was and still is a small ring
\nof Congress officials who treat the Congress as their own private property, decide in secret conclave what it shall do or not do,
\n   
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 737<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tand hand round the Presidentship among themselves and the occasional newcomers admitted to their ranks from the Legislative Councils, except when a live M.P. can be secured from England
\nor a Mahomedan had to be nominated to demonstrate Hindu-Musulman unity. The second object of the attempt to get Mr.
\nTilak nominated was to break through this oligarchic ring and establish the true nature of the Congress as no mere machinery
\nto be engineered by a few wealthy or successful proprietors, but a popular assembly in which the will of the people must
\nprevail. Thirdly, the opposition to Mr. Tilak and the attempt to force him always into the background arose largely from the
\nfeeling that Mr. Tilak’s views and personality are objectionable to the bureaucracy and that the nomination of a public man
\nonce convicted of sedition would deprive the Congress and, what was more important to Loyalists and leading men of the
\nCongress, of all chance of Government favour. But these very reasons which made the name of Mr. Tilak an offence and a
\nstumbling-block to the Loyalists, imposed upon the Nationalist party the duty of bringing forward Mr. Tilak’s name year after
\nyear until he is elected. Leadership in the Congress must no longer be regarded as a convenient and profitable road to appointments on the Bench and in the Government Councils but as a post of danger and a position of service to the people and
\nit must depend on service done and suffering endured for the cause and not in the slightest degree on bureaucratic approval,
\nand the national movement must be recognised as a sacred cause which exists in its own right and cannot consent to be regulated
\nby the smiles and frowns of the bureaucracy which it is its first object to displace. These are the principles for which our party
\nare contending when they insist on Mr. Tilak’s nomination and they are principles which are essential to the Nationalist position
\nand are as living today as they were last year. The question of Mr. Tilak’s Presidentship will be always with us until it is finally
\nset at rest by his election, for until then we shall pass it year after year.
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tBut so far as the Nagpur session is concerned, the question no longer exists. The attempt to make this question wholly
\n   
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 738<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tresponsible for the difficulty is disingenuous and the demand
\nthat Mr. Tilak should throw over his own party by a gratuitous refusal to be President if ever he is asked, so as to reassure
\nirreconcilable Loyalists in their fears, is absolutely preposterous. The Nagpur Nationalists have put his name forward and they
\nalone are competent to withdraw it. But such withdrawal is not necessary. They have failed to secure the necessary
\n\tthree-fourths majority and they can therefore no longer insist on his name unless they are asked to hold the Congress with their own
\nfunds. They are willing to withdraw in a body from the Reception Committee if the Moderates so desire; they are willing to
\nco-operate on lines both definite and reasonable; and they are willing, if called upon, to hold the Congress with any Moderate
\nPresident in the chair if the funds in Mr. Dixit’s hands are paid in. But they are not willing to misappropriate public money
\nfor the Congress funds and they are not willing to walk into the Loyalist trap by an admission of any personal responsibility
\nfor the disturbances that have taken place, in the shape of a guarantee that no disturbance of any kind shall take place at the
\ntime of the Congress. Such a guarantee can only be given by those who were responsible for the rowdyism or instigated it, and this
\nunwarrantable charge has already been emphatically denied by the leading Nationalists; to ask them to give a guarantee is to ask
\nthem to admit what they have already denied. If therefore the Moderates insist on these preposterous conditions, the public
\nwill know whom they have to blame.    <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tPage \u2013 739<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, November 5th, 1907 }   Mr. Tilak and the Presidentship While writing of the Nagpur imbroglio we have touched very lightly…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}