{"id":286,"date":"2013-07-13T01:27:06","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:27:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=286"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:27:06","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:27:06","slug":"091-sankharitolas-apologia-vol-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/01-sabcl\/01-bande-mataram-volume-01\/091-sankharitolas-apologia-vol-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","title":{"rendered":"-091_Sankharitola&#8217;s Apologia.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"6\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p><P align=\"justify\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;text-align:center;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"4\"><b>Sankharitola&#8217;s Apologia<\/b><\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"justify\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"justify\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><b><font size=\"3\">T<\/font><\/b><font size=\"3\"><b>HE<\/b> omniscient editor of<br \/>\nthe <I>Indian Nation <\/I>exposed himself last week to a well-deserved<br \/>\ncastigation at our hands by trespassing into history, of which he evidently<br \/>\nknows less than a fifth form schoolboy in an English public school. We gave him<br \/>\nhis deserts, but were careful to couch our criticism, however deservedly severe,<br \/>\nin perfectly courteous language. We find, however, that the<br \/>\ncourtesy was thrown<\/font><\/SPAN><font size=\"3\"> <\/font> away<font size=\"3\"> <\/font><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">on the most hysterically foul-mouthed<br \/>\npublicist in the whole Indian Press. The late Sambhunath Mukherji ironically<br \/>\ndescribed Mr. N. N. Ghose as a thundering cataract of law: he might more aptly<br \/>\nhave described him as a thundering cataract of billingsgate. He has attempted to<br \/>\nanswer our criticism in this week&#8217;s <I>Indian Nation<\/I>,<I> <\/I>but the answer is so<br \/>\nmuch befouled with an almost maniacal virulence of abuse that most of our<br \/>\nfriends have advised us to ignore his frenzies and never again give him the<br \/>\nnotoriety he desires by noticing him in our columns. It is true that the<br \/>\n<I>Indian Nation <\/I>addresses itself to a microscopic audience and expresses<br \/>\nthe personal vanities, selfishness, jealousies of a single man, but so long as<br \/>\nit enjoys a false reputation for learning and wisdom even<br \/>\nwith a limited circle or trades on that reputation to attack and discredit the<br \/>\nNational movement, it is our duty to expose its pretensions, and we shall not be<br \/>\ndeterred by any abuse, however foul.<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Mr. N. N. Ghose&#8217;s<br \/>\nreply falls into three parts, of which one consists merely of rancorous<br \/>\nvituperation, another of a feeble attempt to wriggle out of the uncomfortable<br \/>\nposition he has got into by his failure to consult a few historical primers<br \/>\nbefore writing, and the third<br \/>\nis a restatement of his opinions about nationality formulated this time in the<br \/>\nshape of general ideas without any basis either of historical fact or of<br \/>\nMetropolitan College fiction. As to the abuse we can only say that it might have<br \/>\nbeen more skilfully done. At least it might have been more coherent. The<br \/>\naggrieved sage of Sankharitola picks out from all the <\/font><br \/>\n<I><font size=\"3\">Bande<\/font><\/I><\/SPAN><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"justify\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"justify\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%;text-align:center\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">Page-51<\/font><\/SPAN><font size=\"3\">8<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<HR><\/p>\n<p><P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><I>Mataram <\/I>writers<br \/>\nSrijut Aurobindo Ghose for the object of his wrath and among other elegant terms <\/SPAN><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">of abuse calls him a prig and a <i>Graeculus esuriens<\/i>.<i> <\/i><br \/>\nTo those who may not be such accomplished Latin scholars as the Principal of the<br \/>\nMetropolitan College, we may explain that the last expression means a starving<br \/>\nand greedy scholar who is prepared to commit any vileness for the sake of<br \/>\nearning a livelihood. We will not stop to ask whether this description applies<br \/>\nto Srijut Aurobindo Ghose or to a Principal who daily exhorts his students to<br \/>\nsubordinate honour, high feeling and patriotism to the supreme consideration of<br \/>\nbread and himself practises the lofty philosophy he preaches. We will only ask<br \/>\nMr. Ghose whether a man can be at once a prig and an <i>esurient Greekling<\/i>.<i><br \/>\n<\/i>Srijut Aurobindo Ghose may be one or the other or neither, but he can hardly<br \/>\nbe both. Either Mr. N. N. Ghose&#8217;s knowledge of Latin is as distinguished and<br \/>\ncorrect as his knowledge of history, or else he is so ignorant of English as to<br \/>\nbe even ignorant what the word prig means. We can understand his being in a rage<br \/>\nat the merciless exposure of pretended scholarship, but that does not excuse his<br \/>\nincoherence; nor is it a sufficient reason for what was once a fair counterfeit<br \/>\nof a gentleman and a scholar turning himself into the image of a spitting and<br \/>\nswearing tom-cat. And with that we leave Mr. N. N. Ghose the fishwife and pass<br \/>\non to Mr. N. N. Ghose the historian. <\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\nHe does not try to justify his blunders, &#8212; that would be hopeless &#8212; but he<br \/>\ndoes try to excuse them. He practically admits that his Italian republics are a<br \/>\nblunder and that he was thinking of the Middle<i> <\/i>Ages when he was writing<br \/>\nof the nineteenth century. But he pleads that Burke uses the word commonwealth<br \/>\nin the sense of state and therefore Mr. N. N. Ghose can use the word republic in<br \/>\nthe same sense. This is Metropolitan College logic and Metropolitan College<br \/>\nknowledge of English. Does Mr. Ghose really think that republic and commonwealth<br \/>\nmean the same thing precisely or that Burke would have talked of the Russian<br \/>\nrepublic when he meant the Russian monarchy? But, says Mr. Ghose, it does not<br \/>\nmatter, as I was not talking<i> <\/i>about forms of government. But if Mr. Ghose<br \/>\nin his class was to talk about adjectives when he meant nouns, would it be an<br \/>\nexcuse to say that he was not talking about the difference between various<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">Page-519<\/font><\/P><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">parts of speech? His defence of his other blunders is<br \/>\nstill more <\/font> <SPAN><font size=\"3\">amusing.<\/font><\/SPAN><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/SPAN><font size=\"3\">Says the Oracle: &#8220;To combat our proposition<br \/>\nabout ancient Greece an academic commonplace is trotted out, namely, that the<br \/>\npeople of Greece never developed a panhellenic sentiment.&#8221; Really this is enough<br \/>\nto take one&#8217;s breath away. Mr. Ghose told us last week that the Greeks became an<br \/>\nunited nation under the pressure of the Persian invasion; this week he coolly<br \/>\ntells us that it is an academic commonplace that the Greeks never even developed<br \/>\na panhellenic sentiment. We certainly never said anything of the sort. The<br \/>\nGreeks, as any tyro in history knows, did develop a panhellenic sentiment but it<br \/>\nwas never strong enough<SPAN> <\/SPAN><br \/>\n<SPAN>\u2014<\/SPAN><SPAN> and <\/SPAN>that was all we said<SPAN> <\/SPAN><br \/>\n<SPAN>\u2014<\/SPAN><SPAN> <\/SPAN>to unite them into a nation. But Mr. Ghose flounders<br \/>\nstill deeper into the mire in the next sentences. &#8220;What does it signify whether<br \/>\nthey did or not? The whole question is, could the Greek states have been set<br \/>\nagainst one another? Athens and Sparta, for instance, against each other? And if<br \/>\nnot, why not?&#8221; Really, Mr. Ghose, really now! Is it possible you do<br \/>\n<SPAN>not<\/SPAN><SPAN> know that soon after the<br \/>\nPersian invasion which you say <\/SPAN>made Greece<br \/>\nan united nation, Athens and Sparta were at each other&#8217;s throats and the whole<br \/>\nof the Greek world by land and sea turned into one vast battlefield on which the<br \/>\nHellenic cities engaged in a murderous internecine strife? What would we think<br \/>\nof a &#8220;scholar&#8221; who pretended to know Indian history and yet asserted that the<br \/>\nHindus became an united nation under the pressure of the Mahomedan invasion and<br \/>\nthat it was impossible to set the Hindu states against each other, Mewar and<br \/>\nAmber for instance? Yet this is precisely the blunder Mr. Ghose has committed<br \/>\nwith respect to Greek history. But he pleads bitterly that his facts are no<br \/>\ndoubt all wrong, but the conclusions he bases on them are right. What do facts<br \/>\nmatter? It is only Mr. N. N. Ghose&#8217;s opinions which matter.<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><SPAN><font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/SPAN><font size=\"3\">Mr. Ghose accuses us of incapacity to understand the substance of his<br \/>\narticle. We quite admit that it is difficult to understand the mystic wisdom of<br \/>\na sage who asserts that the soundness of his premises has nothing to do with the<br \/>\nsoundness of his conclusions. Mr. Ghose stated certain facts as supporting a<br \/>\nconclusion otherwise unsupported. We have proved that his<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">Page-520<\/font><\/SPAN><\/P><br \/>\n<HR><\/p>\n<p><P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">facts are all childish blunders. He must therefore<br \/>\naccept one of the two horns of a dilemma: either his facts had nothing to do<br \/>\nwith his &#8220;truism&#8221; or his &#8220;truism&#8221; itself is an error. But we had another object<br \/>\nin view in exposing the pretentious sciolism of this arrogant publicist. Our<br \/>\nbusiness with him is not so much to disprove his opinions as to convince the few<br \/>\nwho still believe in him of the hollowness of his pretensions. It was for this<br \/>\nreason that we dwelt on his blunders last week and have done the same this week,<br \/>\n\u2014 in order to show that this gentleman who claims a monopoly of culture and<br \/>\nwisdom in India, is a half educated shallow man whose boasted mastery of the<br \/>\nEnglish language even is imperfect and who in other subjects, such as history<br \/>\nand politics, is an ignoramus pretending to knowledge.<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"right\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><I><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">Bande Mataram<\/I>,<I><br \/>\n<\/I> <\/font> <font size=\"3\">August 24, 1907<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<b><font size=\"3\"><a name=\"Our False Friends\">Our False Friends<\/a><\/font><\/b><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;<\/font><font size=\"3\"> <\/font><br \/>\n<\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">The <I>Englishman <\/I>has been warning us against our<br \/>\nfalse friends. We have been asked to avert our eyes from those Indian delegates<br \/>\nwho have asked the socialistic Conference at Stuttgart to liberate one-fifth of<br \/>\nthe human race from serfdom. The <I>Englishman <\/I>unblushingly calls these<br \/>\nIndian delegates our enemies and perhaps points to himself as our only friend,<br \/>\nguide and philosopher. With the <I>Englishman <\/I>for our friend, and the<br \/>\n<I>Civil and Military Gazette <\/I>for our ally and the rest of the Anglo-Indian<br \/>\nPress for our well-wishers it is no doubt sinful to long for a change for<br \/>\nthe<SPAN><br \/>\n<\/SPAN><SPAN>paradise of<br \/>\nuniversal brotherhood. India is the freest of lands, <\/SPAN>retorts the Hare Street Journal to the misrepresentation<br \/>\nof our false friends in the above socialistic Conference. Here under British<br \/>\nrule the people enjoy religious freedom, they are allowed to stick to their<br \/>\nabsurd social customs, they are not denied food, clothing and luxuries. What is<br \/>\nthere wanting to their freedom the <I>Englishman <\/I>is at a loss to discover.<br \/>\nDoes our contemporary seriously desire enlightenment on the point? Or is he<br \/>\nindulging in a bit of Hare Street humour at our expense? Is it owing to this<br \/>\nfreedom of which we are the enviable possessors that he himself as well as his<br \/>\nprototype in Lahore enjoy the monopoly of pour-<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">Page-521<\/font><\/SPAN><\/P><br \/>\n<HR><\/p>\n<p><P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">ing daily vile abuses on us with perfect safety and<br \/>\nimmunity? Is it due to this freedom that we are threatened with imprisonment for<br \/>\nrepublishing the articles of the <I>Yugantar <\/I>and they are supported and<br \/>\npatronised for the very same offence? Is it for this enviable freedom that some<br \/>\ninnocent men of Comilla were very near being hanged and transported without a<br \/>\nshred of evidence against them? Is it in consequence of this freedom that a<br \/>\nhighly respectable accused at Rawalpindi is taking his trial on a sick bed? Is<br \/>\nit in the exercise of their rights as free citizens of the British Empire that Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh have been deported without even the mention of<br \/>\nthe charge against them? This freedom is perhaps responsible for the banishment<br \/>\nof an Arya Samajist from his country though the trying magistrate has declared<br \/>\nhim quite innocent of the charge brought against him. Is it a tangible<br \/>\ndemonstration of our freedom that we cannot keep our food grains for our own use<br \/>\neven when there is a terrible famine in the land? Is it because we are free to<br \/>\nthink and act that the Partition of Bengal has been carried out in the teeth of<br \/>\nan unanimous and protracted opposition? The disarming of a whole people is<br \/>\nanother incontrovertible evidence of their freedom. They are not allowed the use<br \/>\nof arms because they are free. Their manhood is repressed because they are free.<br \/>\nThey are converted into so many harmless cattle because their Mother-country is<br \/>\nthe freest of all countries! If we had even a jot of freedom the <I>Englishman<br \/>\n<\/I>could not have flung in our face such a mocking statement. The world has<br \/>\ncome to know of India&#8217;s true condition, and these interested and shameless<br \/>\nperversions of truth can deceive nobody.<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"right\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><I><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">Bande Mataram<\/I>,<I><br \/>\n<\/I> <\/font> <font size=\"3\">August 26, 1907<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;<\/font><font size=\"3\"> <\/font><br \/>\n<B><SPAN><br \/>\n<a name=\"Repression and Unity\"><font size=\"3\">Repression and Unity<\/font><\/a><\/SPAN><\/B><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><B><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;<\/font><font size=\"3\"> <\/font><br \/>\n<\/B><\/P><br \/>\n<P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">One of the most encouraging signs of the present times<br \/>\nis the effect of repression in bringing together men of all views who have the<br \/>\nfuture welfare and greatness of their country at heart. At this time last year<br \/>\nthe great fight between the old and new parties was just beginning to pass from<br \/>\nthe stage of loose occasional<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">Page-522<\/font><\/SPAN><\/P><br \/>\n<HR><\/p>\n<p><P class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">skirmishes into a close and prolonged struggle. The<br \/>\nemergence of Nationalism as a self-conscious force determined to take shape and<br \/>\nfight for the domination of the national mind was indicated by the appearance of<br \/>\nthe <I>Bande Mataram <\/I>as the first out and out Nationalist daily in the<br \/>\nEnglish tongue published in India. For the first time a gospel of undiluted<br \/>\nNationalism without any mitigating admixture of prudent concealment or<br \/>\ndiplomatic reservation was poured daily into the ears of the educated class in<br \/>\nIndia. At first the <I>Bande Mataram <\/I>and the cause it came to champion had<br \/>\nto make a hard fight for existence and for a voice in the country, and in the<br \/>\nstruggle which culminated in the last session of the Congress, many hard words<br \/>\nwere used on both sides, strong animosities aroused and what seemed incurable<br \/>\nmisunderstandings engendered. Those times are now fading into a half-remembered<br \/>\npast. The second year of the paper&#8217;s existence has begun with a prosecution for<br \/>\nsedition, but circumstances have so changed that in its hour of trial it has the<br \/>\nsympathy of the whole of Bengal at its back. We note with satisfaction and<br \/>\ngratitude that all classes of men, rich and poor, all shades of opinion,<br \/>\nmoderate or extremist, the purveyors of ready made loyalty alone excepted, have<br \/>\ngiven us a sympathy and support which is not merely emotional. This growing<br \/>\nunity is mainly due to the action of the bureaucracy in attempting to put down<br \/>\nby force a movement which has now taken possession of the nation&#8217;s heart beyond<br \/>\nthe possibility of dislodgment. This is the last and crowning blessing of<br \/>\nBritish rule.<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"right\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><I><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">Bande Mataram<\/I>,<I><br \/>\n<\/I> <\/font> <font size=\"3\">August 27, 1907<\/font><\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/P><br \/>\n<P align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><br \/>\n<SPAN><font size=\"3\">Page-523<\/font><\/SPAN><\/P>\n\t\t<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sankharitola&#8217;s Apologia &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; THE omniscient editor of the Indian Nation exposed himself last week to a well-deserved castigation at our hands by trespassing into&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","wpcat-8-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}