{"id":2887,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:23","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2887"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:23","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:23","slug":"145-bande-mataram-25-9-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/145-bande-mataram-25-9-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-145_Bande Mataram 25-9-07.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" valign=\"top\">\n\t\t\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\"><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><b><font size=\"4\">Bande Mataram<\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<b><span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">{<br \/>\n\tCALCUTTA, September<br \/>\n\t25th, 1907  } <\/span> <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>\t<\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n<b><br \/>\n<i>Bande Mataram <\/i>Prosecution<br \/>\n<\/b><br \/>\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">The prosecution of the <i>Bande Mataram<\/i>, the most important of the numerous Press prosecutions recently instituted by the<br \/>\nbureaucracy, commenced with a flourish of trumpets, eagerly watched by a hopeful Anglo-Indian Press, has ended in the most<br \/>\ncomplete and dismal fiasco such as no Indian Government has ever had to experience before in a sedition case. The failure has<br \/>\nnot been the result of any lukewarmness or half-heartedness in the conduct of the prosecution or any unwillingness to convict<br \/>\non the part of the trying Magistrate. The Police left no stone unturned to get a particular man convicted, the Standing Counsel<br \/>\ndid not hesitate to press every possible point and make the most of every stray scrap or faint shadow of evidence against the accused, the Magistrate was a Civilian Magistrate whose leanings have never been concealed, the same who gave two years to the<br \/>\n<i>Yugantar <\/i>Printer, who sent Bipin Pal before a subservient Bengali Magistrate with a plain hint to give him a heavy punishment,<br \/>\nwho sentenced Sushil Kumar to fifteen stripes, who brushed aside the evidence of barristers in favour of Police testimony, and<br \/>\nevery paragraph of whose judgment in the present case shows that he would readily have dealt out a handsome term of hard<br \/>\nlabour if the evidence had afforded him the slightest justification for a conviction. All the winning cards in the game are in the<br \/>\nhands of the bureaucracy in such a trial. They can command the best legal knowledge in the country, they have a detective and<br \/>\nsecret service system which for political purposes is popularly supposed to be second only in its elaborateness to the Russian,<br \/>\nthey have their own servants sitting on the bench to try a case in which they are deeply interested, there is no trouble about<br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 686<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">juries who might be unwilling to convict, the Police have unlimited powers of search and can even turn the Post Office into a branch of the detective department, their methods of discovering<br \/>\nwitnesses are various and effective; yet with all this they were unable to bring forward a single scrap of convincing evidence<br \/>\nto prove that the particular man they were bent on running down was the Editor. The Magistrate in his judgment and the<br \/>\naffectionate Friend of India in Chowringhee in his comments have drawn from this failure the lesson that the laws against<br \/>\nthe freedom of the Press should be made more stringent. An ordinary unilluminated intelligence would have come rather to<br \/>\nthe conclusion that the executive authorities would do well to reform their method of instituting proceedings in a political trial.<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 25pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">The one important lesson of the <i>Bande Mataram <\/i>case is the light which it throws on the spirit in which the bureaucracy<br \/>\nhave been instituting the political prosecutions and persecutions which have latterly seemed to be their only reason of existence.<br \/>\nThis spirit has been exposed in a lurid and sensational manner in the Comilla case when an innocent man with difficulty escaped<br \/>\nthe gallows to which a political prosecution had condemned him. But in the <i>Bande Mataram<br \/>\n<\/i>case also there has been a less<br \/>\nsensational though sufficient exposure of the same sinister spirit. What has been the whole meaning and aim of this prosecution?<br \/>\nCertainly not an honest impartial desire to vindicate outraged law and check without personal animus or any purely political aim a wanton tendency to disturb the public tranquillity, which would be the only excuse for a sedition prosecution. It<br \/>\nhas been an obvious attempt to crush a particular paper and a particular individual. The bureaucracy has sought to cripple or<br \/>\nsilence the <i>Bande Mataram <\/i>because it has been preaching with extraordinary success a political creed which was dangerous to<br \/>\nthe continuance of bureaucratic absolutism and was threatening to become a centre of strength round which many Nationalistic<br \/>\nforces might gather. It has sought to single out and silence a particular individual because it chose to think that he was, as<br \/>\nthe Friend of India expresses it, the master mind behind the policy of the paper. If we are challenged to justify this assertion,<br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 25pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 687<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">it will be sufficient to point to the conduct of this case from<br \/>\nits very inception. The <i>Bande Mataram <\/i>has been for over a year attacking without fear and without disguise the present system of<br \/>\ngovernment and advocating a radical and revolutionary change. It has advocated that change on grounds of historical experience,<br \/>\nthe first principles of politics and the necessity of national self-preservation. It has not minced matters or sought to conceal<br \/>\nrevolutionary aspirations under the veil of moderate professions or ambiguous phraseology. It has not concealed its opinion that<br \/>\nthe bureaucracy cannot be expected to transform itself, that the people of India and not the people of England must save India,<br \/>\nand that we cannot hope for any boons but must wrest what we desire by strong national combination from unwilling hands.<br \/>\nHundreds of articles have appeared in the paper in this vein and the bureaucrats had only to pick and choose. But they have not<br \/>\nattacked one of these articles, nor did their counsel venture to cite even a single one of them to prove seditious intention. The<br \/>\nfact is that, however dangerous such a propaganda may be to an absolutist handful desiring to perpetuate their irresponsible rule,<br \/>\nno government pretending to call itself civilised can prosecute it as seditious without forfeiting all claim to the last vestige of<br \/>\nthe world&#8217;s respect. But though the paper could not be characterised as seditious, it was highly inconvenient, and there was<br \/>\na growing clamour which extended even to the cloudy home of the Thunderer in London, for its prosecution and, if possible,<br \/>\nsuppression. And so watch is kept to find the paper tripping over some trifle, for which it can be hauled up and got into<br \/>\ntrouble on a side issue. What is the matter for which the <i>Bande<\/i> <i>Mataram<br \/>\n<\/i>was prosecuted? A reprint of the official translations<br \/>\nof certain articles from a vernacular paper, translations issued as part of a case in the law-courts and reproduced as such, that is one count; and an insignificant correspondence which does not even profess to give voice to the policy of the paper, that is the second and third; and there is no other. The <i>Yugantar<\/i> was prosecuted on articles expressing its essential policy; the<br \/>\n<i>Sandhya <\/i>has been proceeded against on articles expressing its views on important matters; but it was sought to crush the<br \/>\n<i>Bande<\/i><br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 688<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<i>Mataram <\/i>partly for a technical offence and partly on a side-issue.<br \/>\nSo eagerly, so carelessly is the casual chance given snatched at that the executive do not even trouble to know what is the article<br \/>\non which action is being taken; they give sanction to prosecute on an advertisement in the right-hand corner of the paper, and<br \/>\nbut for the compassionate correction vouchsafed by an officer of the Company the mistake would have had to be rectified<br \/>\nin the course of the trial itself. Sanction is given to prosecute a nameless Editor and the police at once proceed to ask for a<br \/>\nwarrant against Aurobindo Ghose. It is in evidence that they had nothing better to go on than hearsay. But they had no hesitation<br \/>\nin immediately pouncing on one particular writer of the <i>Bande<\/i> <i>Mataram<br \/>\n<\/i>without possessing the least scrap of evidence against<br \/>\nhim. Obviously they cannot have done this without instructions. It was popularly believed that Srijut Aurobindo Ghose was all<br \/>\nin all on the <i>Bande Mataram <\/i>staff, that all the best articles were written by him, that he gave the tone of the paper and that it<br \/>\ncould not last without him. Why did the police take a body-warrant against Aurobindo Ghose to the office and why, having<br \/>\ntaken it, did they not arrest him? Obviously they took it because they thought that they would find plenty of evidence against him<br \/>\nin the search, and they did not execute it because they found that not a scrap of proof rewarded their efforts. After that there was<br \/>\na pause till Anukul Mukherji testimony was secured, and on that flimsy evidence the trial was started. Had it been honestly<br \/>\nintended to deal only with the Editor, whoever he might turn out to be, the proceedings against Aurobindo Ghose would<br \/>\nhave been given up, but the police made no secret of the fact that it was this one man who was wanted and that no other,<br \/>\nwhatever the evidence against him, would be thought worth capture. Even when the case for the prosecution was complete<br \/>\nwithout any evidence fit to raise more than a flimsy presumption the Standing Counsel would not give up, but in an outrageous<br \/>\naddress in which he rode roughshod over the higher traditions of his office, pressed weak points and wrested ambiguous evidence<br \/>\nto get the charge framed. And after Anukul had broken down in cross-examination and made admissions fatal to their case, still<br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 689<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">the prosecution struggled for a verdict. And with what result?<br \/>\nEven a civilian Magistrate willing to support the prestige of the Government had more sense of law and justice than the<br \/>\nbureaucracy and its advisers and was able to see that a man could not be sent to two years&#8217; rigorous imprisonment without<br \/>\nany shadow of evidence. Their prey escaped them; the Manager who seems to have been arrested on spec and tried without<br \/>\neven any pretence that there was any evidence against him was acquitted, and only an unfortunate Printer who knew no English<br \/>\nand had no notion what all the pother was about, was sent to prison for a few months to vindicate the much-damaged majesty<br \/>\nof the almighty bureaucracy. <\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<b><i>__________<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<b><i>Pioneer <\/i>or <i>Hindu Patriot<\/i>?<br \/>\n<\/b><br \/>\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">Here is a precious paragraph from the <i>Patriot<\/i>!\u2014<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 25pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">&#8220;THE following Press<br \/>\n<i>communique <\/i>has been issued: `There<br \/>\nis no truth whatever in the rumour that questions affecting the Permanent Settlement in Bengal are under the consideration of<br \/>\nGovernment. It would not have been thought necessary to take any notice of the absurd reports in circulation, but for the numerous references to the matter which have appeared in the Press.&#8217; What says now the `official<br \/>\n<i>Pioneer<\/i>?&#8221;&#8216;<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 25pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">We can well understand the chagrin of the <i>Hindu Patriot<\/i> at the <i>Pioneer<br \/>\n<\/i>being still recognised as the organ of Anglo<br \/>\nIndian officialdom. For who is there so ignorant of things as not to know that since the assumption of the reins of the Bengal<br \/>\nGovernment by Sir Andrew Fraser the <i>Hindu Patriot <\/i>has conveniently combined the functions of the apologist in ordinary to the<br \/>\nBengal Government with those of the organ of the British Indian Association; and like the clever equestrian in the circus arena the<br \/>\nEditor of the paper has been riding the two horses simultaneously? Let the future historian of our own times note that it<br \/>\nwas he who accompanied, though suffering from high fever, Sir Andrew Fraser to Bombay when the latter went to England<br \/>\non leave; and it was he again who fell ill when accompanying &nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 690<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\">Sir Lancelot Hare to Shillong. He should further note that this<br \/>\namiable Editor is now at Darjeeling, no doubt busy advising the Bengal Government on matters political.<br \/>\n &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\" style=\"vertical-align: top\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 691<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, September 25th, 1907 } &nbsp; Bande Mataram Prosecution &nbsp; The prosecution of the Bande Mataram, the most important of the numerous&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2887"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2887\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}