{"id":2904,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:29","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2904"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:29","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:29","slug":"162-bande-mataram-3-12-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/06-07-bande-mataram\/162-bande-mataram-3-12-07-vol-06-07-bande-mataram","title":{"rendered":"-162_Bande Mataram 3-12-07.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"100%\" valign=\"top\">\n\t\t\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\"><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"><b><font size=\"4\">Bande Mataram<\/font><\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"><br \/>\n\t<b>{<br \/>\n\tCALCUTTA, December 3rd, 1907  }<br \/>\n\t<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<span lang=\"en-gb\"><br \/>\n<b>Personality or Principle?<br \/>\n<\/b><br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n<span lang=\"en-gb\">Our contemporary, the <i>Punjabee<\/i>, has in its last issue a balanced and carefully impartial comment on the Congress trouble and<br \/>\nthe action of the All-India Congress Committee, or rather of Sir Pherozshah Mehta in the exercise of his role of Congress<br \/>\nLion and Dictator. There is one remark of our contemporary&#8217;s, however, which seems to us unfair to the Nationalist party and<br \/>\nwith which therefore we feel bound to join issue. He censures the Nagpur Nationalists for forcing on a division in the camp over<br \/>\na personal question like the election of Mr. Tilak as President. The question of the Presidentship is, in his opinion, not only a<br \/>\npurely personal issue but also extremely trivial, as the President has no function of importance and a democratic body like the<br \/>\nCongress ought not to make a vital issue out of a nomination to a purely honorific post. We have already given our reasons<br \/>\nfor originally raising and still persisting in this question and we again assert that we are not swayed in the slightest degree by<br \/>\npersonal questions. It will not raise Mr. Tilak in our eyes if he becomes President, it will not lower him in our eyes if he is never<br \/>\nnominated. To a certain extent the Presidentship is a position of honour, and so far as it is so, a man of ability and reputation, an<br \/>\nacknowledged leader and moulder of opinion who has suffered courageously for the country is entitled to that honour. But that<br \/>\nis not the position we take. The Presidentship is in our view much more a position of responsibility and service. We cannot<br \/>\nagree that it is of no importance who is chosen to fill the chair, even if the Congress be a democratic body, which, as at present<br \/>\nconstituted and conducted, it is not. In no democratic assembly is the choice of the President, whether he be a virtual ruler, as&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 765<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n <span lang=\"en-gb\">in America, or only a moderator, as in France, a question of no<br \/>\nimportance. Our Congress is not as yet either a deliberative or a legislative body, but even so the Presidentship is a function of<br \/>\nconsiderable importance. The President is the embodiment to all observers of the dignity and personality of that year&#8217;s session and<br \/>\nas such his address, though it may not be binding on the whole body, is an utterance of great weight and is or ought to be largely<br \/>\nindicative of the national temper and policy. The Congress shows the importance it attaches to his address by devoting the first<br \/>\nday to it, an arrangement which, if the address has no weight or value as a manifesto of Congress views and policy, is an<br \/>\nabsurd and reprehensible waste of time. Besides, the President is a moderator of debate in the Subjects Committee, and of<br \/>\nrule and decorum in the public sitting. When divided views are before the national gathering it depends on him whether all<br \/>\nsides shall get a fair hearing and a chance of impressing their views on the Congress. We raised the question of Mr. Tilak&#8217;s<br \/>\nPresidentship at a time when Swadeshi was the question before the country partly in order that the most powerful Swadeshi<br \/>\nworker in the country might pronounce for Swadeshi from the President&#8217;s chair and the Congress by electing him might show<br \/>\nits sympathy with the movement. We made no secret of our object at the time and it was certainly not of a personal nature.<br \/>\nBut there was a second point at issue which was in the minds of all though it was never formulated, and this too was a point<br \/>\nof principle, viz. that the Congress should not in any of its actions be influenced by the desire of bureaucratic favour or<br \/>\nthe fear of bureaucratic displeasure, that it should declare its complete independence as a body which looked to the people<br \/>\nalone and not to the bureaucracy. This could not be better done than by the election of a great man and leader who was not a<br \/>\npersona grata with the bureaucrats and had undergone sentence of imprisonment for the crime of patriotism. That is the real<br \/>\ndifficulty in the way of the Moderates&#8217; accepting Mr. Tilak and it is equally the reason why the Nationalists refuse to give up<br \/>\ntheir point. An apparently personal question often conceals one of essential principle, even when the person is not as in this case&nbsp;<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 766<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\">a great patriot and leader. It was not for profligate John Wilkes<br \/>\nthat the people of Middlesex fought in the eighteenth century but for the liberty of the Press which was attacked in his person.<br \/>\nWe too fight not for honour to be done to a man however great and noble, but for the liberty of the Congress from all shadow of<br \/>\nbureaucratic influence and its new-creation as an independent, popular and democratic assembly.&nbsp;<br \/>\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"text-indent: 0pt;line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"><br \/>\n\t<font face=\"Times New Roman\" color=\"#000000\" size=\"2\">Page \u2013 767<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bande Mataram { CALCUTTA, December 3rd, 1907 } &nbsp; Personality or Principle? &nbsp; Our contemporary, the Punjabee, has in its last issue a balanced and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-06-07-bande-mataram","wpcat-54-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}