{"id":2925,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:38","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2925"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:38","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:38","slug":"06-is-india-civilised-vol-20-the-renaissance-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/20-the-renaissance-in-india\/06-is-india-civilised-vol-20-the-renaissance-in-india","title":{"rendered":"-06_Is India Civilised.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n <\/p>\n

\n
\n“Is India Civilised?” <\/font><\/b>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n“Is India Civilised?” <\/font><\/b>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nA<\/font>
\nBOOK <\/b>under this rather startling title was published some years ago by Sir John Woodroffe, the well-known
\nscholar and writer on Tantric philosophy, in answer to an extravagant <\/span>
\njeu d’esprit<\/span> <\/span>
\n<\/i>by Mr. William Archer. That well-known dramatic critic leaving his safe natural sphere for fields in which his chief claim to speak was a sublime and confident
\nignorance, assailed the whole life and culture of India and even lumped together all her greatest achievements, philosophy, religion, poetry, painting, sculpture, Upanishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana in one wholesale condemnation as a repulsive mass
\nof unspeakable barbarism. It was argued by many at the time that to reply to a critic of this kind was to break a butterfly, or
\nit might be in this instance a bumble-bee upon the wheel. But Sir John Woodroffe insisted that even an attack of this ignorant
\nkind ought not to be neglected; he took it as a particularly useful type in the general kind, first, because it raised the question
\nfrom the rationalistic and not from the Christian and missionary standpoint and, again, because it betrayed the grosser underlying
\nmotives of all such attacks. But his book was important, not so much as an answer to a particular critic, but because it raised
\nwith great point and power the whole question of the survival of Indian civilisation and the inevitability of a war of cultures.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe question whether there has been or is a civilisation in India is not any longer debatable; for everyone whose opinion
\ncounts recognises the presence of a distinct and a great civilisation unique in its character. Sir John Woodroffe’s purpose was
\nto disclose the conflict of European and Asiatic culture and, in greater prominence, the distinct meaning and value of Indian
\ncivilisation, the peril it now runs and the calamity its destruction would be to the world. The author held its preservation to be
\nof an immense importance to mankind and he believed it to   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 55<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nbe in great danger. In the stupendous rush of change which is coming on the human world as a result of the present tornado of upheaval, ancient India’s culture, attacked by European modernism, overpowered in the material field, betrayed by the
\nindifference of her children, may perish for ever along with the soul of the nation that holds it in its keeping. The book was an
\nurgent invitation to us to appreciate better this sacred trust and the near peril which besets it and to stand firm and faithful in
\nthe hour of the ordeal. It will be useful to state briefly its gist as an introduction to this all-important issue.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nA true happiness in this world is the right terrestrial aim of man, and true happiness lies in the finding and maintenance
\nof a natural harmony of spirit, mind and body. A culture is to be valued to the extent to which it has discovered the right
\nkey of this harmony and organised its expressive motives and movements. And a civilisation must be judged by the manner
\nin which all its principles, ideas, forms, ways of living work to bring that harmony out, manage its rhythmic play and secure its
\ncontinuance or the development of its motives. A civilisation in pursuit of this aim may be predominantly material like modern
\nEuropean culture, predominantly mental and intellectual like the old Graeco-Roman or predominantly spiritual like the still
\npersistent culture of India. India’s central conception is that of the Eternal, the Spirit here incased in matter, involved and immanent in it and evolving on the material plane by rebirth of the individual up the scale of being till in mental man it enters the
\nworld of ideas and realm of conscious morality, dharma<\/i>. This achievement, this victory over unconscious matter develops its
\nlines, enlarges its scope, elevates its levels until the increasing manifestation of the sattwic or spiritual portion of the vehicle
\nof mind enables the individual mental being in man to identify himself with the pure spiritual consciousness beyond Mind. India’s social system is built upon this conception; her philosophy formulates it; her religion is an aspiration to the spiritual consciousness and its fruits; her art and literature have the same upward look; her whole dharma or law of being is founded
\nupon it. Progress she admits, but this spiritual progress, not the  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 3<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n 57<\/i>
\nexternally self-unfolding process of an always more and more prosperous and efficient material civilisation. It is her founding
\nof life upon this exalted conception and her urge towards the spiritual and the eternal that constitute the distinct value of her
\ncivilisation. And it is her fidelity, with whatever human shortcomings, to this highest ideal that has made her people a nation
\napart in the human world. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut there are other cultures led by a different conception
\nand even an opposite motive. And by the law of struggle which is the first law of existence in the material universe, varying
\ncultures are bound to come into conflict. A deep-seated urge in Nature compels them to attempt to extend themselves and
\nto destroy, assimilate and replace all disparates or opposites. Conflict is not indeed the last and ideal stage; for that comes
\nwhen various cultures develop freely, without hatred, misunderstanding or aggression and even with an underlying sense of
\nunity, their separate special motives. But so long as the principle of struggle prevails, one must face the lesser law; it is fatal to
\ndisarm in the midmost of the battle. The culture which gives up its living separateness, the civilisation which neglects an active
\nself-defence will be swallowed up and the nation which lived by it will lose its soul and perish. Each nation is a Shakti or power of
\nthe evolving spirit in humanity and lives by the principle which it embodies. India is the Bharata Shakti, the living energy of a
\ngreat spiritual conception, and fidelity to it is the very principle of her existence. For by its virtue alone she has been one of the
\nimmortal nations; this alone has been the secret of her amazing persistence and perpetual force of survival and revival.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe principle of struggle has assumed the large historical aspect of an agelong clash and pressure of conflict between Asia
\nand Europe. This clash, this mutual pressure has had its material side, but has borne also its cultural and spiritual aspect. Both
\nmaterially and spiritually Europe has thrown herself repeatedly upon Asia, Asia too upon Europe, to conquer, assimilate and
\ndominate. There has been a constant alternation, a flowing backward and forward of these two seas of power. All Asia
\nhas always had the spiritual tendency in more or less intensity,   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 57<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nwith more or less clearness; but in this essential matter India is the quintessence of the Asiatic way of being. Europe too in
\nmediaeval times had a culture in which by the dominance of the Christian idea
\n\u2014 but Christianity was of Asiatic origin \u2014
\nthe spiritual motive took the lead; then there was an essential similarity as well as a certain difference. Still the differentiation
\nof cultural temperament has on the whole been constant. Since some centuries Europe has become material, predatory, aggressive, and has lost the harmony of the inner and outer man which is the true meaning of civilisation and the efficient condition of
\na true progress. Material comfort, material progress, material efficiency have become the gods of her worship. The modern
\nEuropean civilisation which has invaded Asia and which all violent attacks on Indian ideals represent, is the effective form
\nof this materialistic culture. India, true to her spiritual motive, has never shared in the physical attacks of Asia upon Europe;
\nher method has always been an infiltration of the world with her ideas, such as we today see again in progress. But she has
\nnow been physically occupied by Europe and this physical conquest must necessarily be associated with an attempt at cultural
\nconquest; that invasion too has also made some progress. On the other hand English rule has enabled India still to retain her
\nidentity and social type; it has awakened her to herself and has meanwhile, until she became conscious of her strength, guarded
\nher against the flood which would otherwise have submerged and broken her civilisation.1<\/font><\/sup> It is for her now to recover herself, defend her cultural existence against the alien penetration, preserve her distinct spirit, essential principle and characteristic
\nforms for her own salvation and the total welfare of the human race.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut many questions may arise, \u2014 and principally whether
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\n1
\nThis contention cannot be accepted in an unqualified sense. English rule has by its general principle of social and religious non-interference prevented any direct and violent
\ntouch, any deliberate and purposeful social pressure; but it has undermined and deprived of living strength all the preexisting centres and instruments of Indian social life and by
\na sort of unperceived rodent process left it only a rotting shell without expansive power or any better defensive force than the force of inertia.
\n   <\/font>
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 58<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nsuch a spirit of defence and attack is the right spirit, whether union, harmony, interchange are not our proper temperament
\nfor the coming human advance. Is not a unified world-culture the large way of the future? Can either an exaggeratedly spiritual
\nor an excessively temporal civilisation be the sound condition of human progress or human perfection? A happy or just reconciliation would seem to be a better key to a harmony of Spirit, Mind and Body. And there is the question too whether the forms
\nof Indian culture must be preserved intact as well as the spirit. To these queries the reply of the author is to be found in his law
\nof graduality of the spiritual advance of humanity, its need of advancing through three successive stages.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe first stage is the period of conflict and competition which has been ever dominant in the past and still overshadows
\nthe present of mankind. For even when the crudest forms of material conflict are mitigated, the conflict itself still survives
\nand the cultural struggle comes into greater prominence. The second step brings the stage of concert. The third and last is
\nmarked by the spirit of sacrifice in which, because all is known as the one Self, each gives himself for the good of others. The
\nsecond stage has hardly at all commenced for most; the third belongs to the indeterminate future. Individuals have reached
\nthe highest stage; the perfected Sannyasin, the liberated man, the soul that has become one with the Spirit, knows all being as
\nhimself and for him all self-defence and attack are needless. For strife does not belong to the law of his seeing; sacrifice and
\nself-giving are the whole principle of his action. But no people has reached that level, and to follow a law or principle involuntarily
\nor ignorantly or contrary to the truth of one’s consciousness is a falsehood and a self-destruction. To allow oneself to be killed,
\nlike the lamb attacked by the wolf, brings no growth, farthers no development, assures no spiritual merit. Concert or unity may
\ncome in good time, but it must be an underlying unity with a free differentiation, not a swallowing up of one by another or an
\nincongruous and inharmonious mixture. Nor can it come before the world is ready for these greater things. To lay down one’s
\narms in a state of war is to invite destruction and it can serve no  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 59<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ncompensating spiritual purpose. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nSpiritual and temporal have indeed to be perfectly harmonised, for the spirit works through mind and body. But the purely intellectual or heavily material culture of the kind that
\nEurope now favours, bears in its heart the seed of death; for the living aim of culture is the realisation on earth of the kingdom
\nof heaven. India, though its urge is towards the Eternal, since that is always the highest, the entirely real, still contains in her
\nown culture and her own philosophy a supreme reconciliation of the eternal and the temporal and she need not seek it from
\noutside. On the same principle the form of the interdependence of mind, body and spirit in a harmonious culture is important
\nas well as the pure spirit; for the form is the rhythm of the spirit. It follows that to break up the form is to injure the spirit’s
\nself-expression or at least to put it into grave peril. Change of forms there may and will be, but the novel formation must be a new
\nself-expression or self-creation developed from within; it must be characteristic of the spirit and not servilely borrowed from
\nthe embodiments of an alien nature. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWhere then does India actually stand in this critical hour
\nof her necessity and how far can she be said to be still firmly seated on her eternal foundations? Already she has been largely
\naffected by European culture and the peril is far from over; on the contrary it will be greater, more insistent, more imperatively
\nviolent in the immediate future. Asia is rearising; but that very fact will intensify and is already intensifying the attempt, natural
\nand legitimate according to the law of competition, of European civilisation to assimilate Asia. For if she is culturally transformed
\nand conquered, then when she again counts in the material order of the world, it will not be with any menace of the invasion of
\nEurope by the Asiatic ideal. It is a cultural quarrel complicated with a political question. Asia must become culturally a province
\nof Europe and form politically one part of a Europeanised if not a European concert; otherwise Europe may become culturally
\na province of Asia, Asiaticised by the dominant influence of wealthy, enormous, powerful Asiatic peoples in the new
\nworld-system. The motive of Mr. Archer’s attack is frankly a political  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 60<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nmotive. This is the burden of all his song that the reconstruction of the world must take place in the forms and follow the
\ncanons of a rationalistic and materialistic European civilisation. On his reasoning, India if she adheres to her own civilisation,
\nif she cherishes its spiritual motive, if she clings to its spiritual principle of formation, will stand out as a living denial,
\na hideous “blot” upon this fair, luminous, rationalistic world. Either she must Europeanise, rationalise, materialise her whole
\nbeing and deserve liberty by the change or else she must be kept in subjection and administered by her cultural superiors: her
\npeople of three hundred million religious savages must be held down firmly, taught and civilised by her noble and enlightened
\nChristian-atheistic European warders and tutors. A grotesque statement in form, but in substance it has in it the root of the
\nmatter. As against the attack \u2014 not universal, for understanding and appreciation of Indian culture are now more common than
\nbefore, \u2014 India is indeed awaking and defending herself, but not sufficiently and not with the whole-heartedness, the clear sight
\nand the firm resolution which can alone save her from the peril. Today it is close; let
\nher choose, \u2014 for the choice is imperatively
\nbefore her, to live or to perish. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe warning cannot be neglected; recent utterances of European publicists and statesmen, recent books and writings against India and the joyful and enthusiastic welcome they have received
\nfrom the public of occidental countries, point to the reality of the danger. It arises indeed as a necessity from the present political situation and cultural trend of humanity at this moment of enormous decisive change. It is not necessary to follow the
\nwriter in all the viewpoints expressed in his book. I cannot myself accept in full his eulogy of the mediaeval civilisation of
\nEurope. Its interest, the beauty of its artistic motives, its deep and sincere spiritual urgings are marred for me by its large strain of
\nignorance and obscurantism, its cruel intolerance, its revolting early-Teutonic hardness, brutality, ferocity and coarseness. He
\nseems to me to hit a little too hard at the later European culture. This predominantly economic type of civilisation has been ugly
\nenough in its strain of utilitarian materialism, which we shall   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 61<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nerr grossly if we imitate; still it has been uplifted by some nobler ideals that have done much for the race. But even these are
\ncrude and imperfect in their form and need to be spiritualised in their meaning before they can be wholly admitted by the mind of
\nIndia. I think too that the author has a little underrated the force of the Indian revival. I do not mean its outward realised strength,
\nfor that is very deficient, but the inevitability of its drive, its spiritual and potential force. And he has made a little too much of
\nthe servile type of Indian who is capable of mouthing the portentously obsequious imagination that “European institutions are
\nthe standard by which the aspirations of India are set.” That, except for the rapidly dwindling class to which this spokesman
\nbelongs, has its truth now only in a single field, the political, \u2014 a very important exception, I admit, and one which opens the
\ndoor to a peril of stupendous proportions. But even there a deep change of spirit is foreshadowed although it has not yet taken
\ndefinite form and has now to meet a fresh invasion of furious Europeanism inspired by the militant crudeness of proletarian
\nRussia. Again he does not attach a sufficient importance to the increasing infiltration of India’s spiritual thought into Europe
\nand America, which is her characteristic retort to the European invasion. It is from this point of view that the whole question
\ntakes on a different aspect. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nSir John Woodroffe invites us to a vigorous self-defence.
\nBut defence by itself in the modern struggle can only end in defeat, and, if battle there must be, the only sound strategy
\nis a vigorous aggression based on a strong, living and mobile defence; for by that aggressive force alone can the defence itself
\nbe effective. Why are a certain class of Indians still hypnotised in all fields by European culture and why are we all still hypnotised by it in the field of politics? Because they constantly saw all the power, creation, activity on the side of Europe, all the
\nimmobility or weakness of a static inefficient defence on the side of India. But wherever the Indian spirit has been able to react,
\nto attack with energy and to create with \u00e9clat, the European
\nglamour has begun immediately to lose its hypnotic power. No one now feels the weight of the religious assault from Europe
\n   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 62<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nwhich was very powerful at the outset, because the creative activities of the Hindu revival have made Indian religion a living
\nand evolving, a secure, triumphant and self-assertive power. But the seal was put to this work by two events, the Theosophical movement and the appearance of Swami Vivekananda at Chicago. For these two things showed the spiritual ideas for
\nwhich India stands no longer on their defence but aggressive and invading the materialised mentality of the Occident. All
\nIndia had been vulgarised and anglicised in its aesthetic notions by English education and influence, until the brilliant and sudden
\ndawn of the Bengal school of art cast its rays so far as to be seen in Tokio, London and Paris. That significant cultural event has
\nalready effected an aesthetic revolution in the country, not yet by any means complete, but irresistible and sure of the future. The
\nsame phenomenon extends to other fields. Even in the province of politics that was the internal sense of the policy of the
\nso-called extremist party in the Swadeshi movement; for it was a movement which attempted to override the previous apparent
\nimpossibility of political creation by the Indian spirit upon other than imitative European lines. If it failed for the time being, not
\nby any falsity in its inspiration, but by the strength of a hostile pressure and the weakness still left by a past decadence, if its
\nincipient creations were broken or left languishing and deprived of their original significance, yet it will remain as a finger-post
\non the roads. The attempt is bound to be renewed as soon as a wider gate is opened under more favourable conditions. Till that
\nattempt comes and succeeds, a serious danger besets the soul of India; for a political Europeanisation would be followed by a
\nsocial turn of the same kind and bring a cultural and spiritual death in its train. Aggression must be successful and creative if
\nthe defence is to be effective. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThis great question must be given its larger world-wide import if we are to see it in its true lines. The principle of struggle, conflict and competition still governs and for some time will still
\ngovern international relations; for even if war is abolished in the near future by some as yet improbable good fortune of the race,
\nconflict will take other forms. At the same time a certain growing   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 63<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nmutual closeness of the life of humanity is the most prominent phenomenon of the day. The War has brought it into violent
\nrelief; but the after-war is bringing out all its implications as well as the mass of its difficulties. This is as yet no real concert,
\nstill less the beginning of a true unity, but only a compelling physical oneness forced on us by scientific inventions and modern circumstances. But this physical oneness must necessarily bring its mental, cultural and psychological results. At first it
\nwill probably accentuate rather than diminish conflict in many directions, enhance political and economic struggles of many
\nkinds and hasten too a cultural struggle. There it may bring about in the end a swallowing unification and a destruction of
\nall other civilisations by one aggressive European type: whether that type will be bourgeois economical or labour materialistic
\nor a rationalistic intellectualism cannot easily be foreseen, but at present in one form or another this is the actuality that is most
\nin the front. On the other hand it may lead to a free concert with some underlying oneness. But the ideal of the entire separateness
\nof the peoples each developing its sharply separatist culture with an alien exclusion law for other leading ideas and cultural forms,
\nalthough it has been for some time abroad and was growing in vigour, is not likely to prevail. For that to happen the whole aim
\nof unification preparing in Nature must fall to pieces, an improbable but not quite impossible catastrophe. Europe dominates the
\nworld and it is natural to forecast a Westernised world with such petty differences as might be permissible in a European unity
\ngiven up to the rigorous scientific pursuit of the development and organisation of material life. Across this possibility falls the
\nshadow of India. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nSir John Woodroffe quotes the dictum of Professor Lowes
\nDickinson that the opposition is not so much between Asia and Europe as between India and the rest of the world. There is a
\ntruth behind that dictum; but the cultural opposition of Europe and Asia remains an unabolished factor. Spirituality is not the
\nmonopoly of India; however it may hide submerged in intellectualism or hid in other concealing veils, it is a necessary part of
\nhuman nature. But the difference is between spirituality made the  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 64<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nleading motive and the determining power of both the inner and the outer life and spirituality suppressed, allowed only under
\ndisguises or brought in as a minor power, its reign denied or put off in favour of the intellect or of a dominant materialistic
\nvitalism. The former way was the type of the ancient wisdom at one time universal in all civilised countries
\n\u2014 literally, from
\nChina to Peru. But all other nations have fallen away from it and diminished its large pervasiveness or fallen away from it
\naltogether as in Europe. Or they are now, as in Asia, in danger of abandoning it for the invading economic, commercial,
\nindustrial, intellectually utilitarian modern type. India alone, with whatever fall or decline of light and vigour, has remained
\nfaithful to the heart of the spiritual motive. India alone is still obstinately recalcitrant; for Turkey and China and Japan, say her
\ncritics, have outgrown that foolishness, by which it is meant that they have grown rationalistic and materialistic. India alone as a
\nnation, whatever individuals or a small class may have done, has till now refused to give up her worshipped Godhead or bow her
\nknee to the strong reigning idols of rationalism, commercialism and economism, the successful iron gods of the West. Affected
\nshe has been, but not yet overcome. Her surface mind rather than her deeper intelligence has been obliged to admit many Western
\nideas, liberty, equality, democracy and others, and to reconcile them with her Vedantic Truth; but she has not been altogether at
\nease with them in the Western form and she seeks about already in her thought to give to them an Indian which cannot fail to
\nbe a spiritualised turn. The first passion to imitate English ideas and culture has passed; but another more dangerous has recently
\ntaken its place, the passion to imitate continental European culture at large and in particular the crude and vehement turn of
\nrevolutionary Russia. On the other hand one sees a growing revival of this ancient Hindu religion and the immense sweep
\nof a spiritual awakening and its significant movements. And out of this ambiguous situation there can be only one out of two
\nissues. Either India will be rationalised and industrialised out of all recognition and she will be no longer India or else she will be
\nthe leader in a new world-phase, aid by her example and cultural  
\n66<\/i> <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 65<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ninfiltration the new tendencies of the West and spiritualise the human race. That is the one radical and poignant question at
\nissue. Will the spiritual motive which India represents prevail on Europe and create there new forms congenial to the West,
\nor will European rationalism and commercialism put an end for ever to the Indian type of culture?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nNot, then, whether India is civilised is the query that should be put, but whether the motive which has shaped her civilisation
\nor the old-European intellectual or the new-European materialistic motive is to lead human culture. Is the harmony of the spirit,
\nmind and body to found itself on the gross law of our physical nature, rationalised only or touched at the most by an ineffective
\nspiritual glimmer, or is the dominant power of spirit to take the lead and force the lesser powers of the intellect, mind and body to
\na more exalted effort after a highest harmony, a victorious ever-developing equipoise? India must defend herself by reshaping
\nher cultural forms to express more powerfully, intimately and perfectly her ancient ideal. Her aggression must lead the waves
\nof the light thus liberated in triumphant self-expanding rounds all over the world which it once possessed or at least enlightened
\nin far-off ages. An appearance of conflict must be admitted for a time, for as long as the attack of an opposite culture continues.
\nBut since it will be in effect an assistance to all the best that is emerging from the advanced thought of the Occident, it will
\nculminate in the beginning of concert on a higher plane and a preparation of oneness.
\n   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 66<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n
\nT<\/font>HIS QUESTION<\/b> of Indian civilisation, once it has raised this greater issue, shifts from its narrow meaning and
\ndisappears into a much larger problem. Does the future of humanity lie in a culture founded solely upon reason and
\nscience? Is the progress of human life the effort of a mind, a continuous collective mind constituted by an ever changing sum
\nof transient individuals, that has emerged from the darkness of the inconscient material universe and is stumbling about in
\nit in search of some clear light and some sure support amid its difficulties and problems? And does civilisation consist in
\nman’s endeavour to find that light and support in a rationalised knowledge and a rationalised way of life? An ordered knowledge
\nof the powers, forces, possibilities of physical Nature and of the psychology of man as a mental and physical being is then
\nthe only true science. An ordered use of that knowledge for a progressive social efficiency and well-being, which will make his
\nbrief existence more efficient, more tolerable, more comfortable, happier, better appointed, more luxuriously enriched with the
\npleasures of the mind, life and body, is the only true art of life. All our philosophy, all our religion,
\n\u2014 supposing religion
\nhas not been outgrown and rejected, \u2014 all our science, thought, art, social structure, law and institution must found itself upon
\nthis idea of existence and must serve this one aim and endeavour. This is the formula which European civilisation has accepted and
\nis still labouring to bring into some kind of realisation. It is the formula of an intelligently mechanised civilisation supporting a
\nrational and utilitarian culture. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nOr is not the truth of our being rather that of a Soul embodied in Nature which is seeking to know itself, to find itself, to enlarge its consciousness, to arrive at a greater way of existence,
\nto progress in the spirit and grow into the full light of self  <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 67<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nknowledge and some divine inner perfection? Are not religion, philosophy, science, thought, art, society, all life even means only
\nof this growth, instruments of the spirit to be used for its service and with this spiritual aim as their dominant or at least their
\nultimate preoccupation? That is the idea of life and being, \u2014 the knowledge of it, as she claims,
\n\u2014 for which India stood till
\nyesterday and still strives to stand with all that is most persistent and powerful in her nature. It is the formula of a spiritualised
\ncivilisation striving through the perfection but also through an exceeding of mind, life and body towards a high soul-culture.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWhether the future hope of the race lies in a rational and an intelligently mechanised or in a spiritual, intuitive and religious civilisation and culture, \u2014 that, then, is the important issue. When the rationalist critic denies that India is or ever has
\nbeen civilised, when he declares the Upanishads, the Vedanta, Buddhism, Hinduism, ancient Indian art and poetry a mass of
\nbarbarism, the vain production of a persistently barbaric mind, what he means is simply that civilisation is synonymous and
\nidentical with the cult and practice of the materialistic reason and that anything which falls below or goes above that standard
\ndoes not deserve the name. A too metaphysical philosophy, a too religious religion,
\n\u2014 if not indeed all philosophy and all religion,
\n\u2014 any too idealistic and all mystic thought and art and every kind of occult knowledge, all that refines and probes beyond
\nthe limited purview of the reason dealing with the physical universe and seems therefore to it bizarre, over-subtle, excessive, unintelligible, all that responds to the sense of the Infinite, all that is obsessed with the idea of the eternal, and a society
\nwhich is too much governed by ideas born of these things and not solely by intellectual clarity and the pursuit of a material
\ndevelopment and efficiency, are not the products of civilisation, but the offspring of a crudely subtle barbarism. But this thesis
\nobviously proves too much; most of the great past of humanity would fall under its condemnation. Even ancient Greek culture
\nwould not escape it; much of the thought and art of modern European civilisation itself would in that case have to be damned
\nas at least semi-barbarous. Evidently, we cannot without falling  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 68<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ninto exaggeration and absurdity narrow the sense of the word and impoverish the significance of the past strivings of the race.
\nIndian civilisation in the past has been and must be recognised as the fruit of a great culture, quite as much as the Graeco-Roman,
\nthe Christian, the Islamic or the later Renaissance civilisation of Europe.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut the essential question remains open; the dispute is only narrowed to its central issue. A more moderate and perspicacious rationalistic critic would admit the past value of India’s achievements. He would not condemn Buddhism and Vedanta
\nand all Indian art and philosophy and social ideas as barbarous, but he would still contend that not there lies any future good
\nfor the human race. The true line of advance lies through European modernism, the mighty works of Science and the great
\nmodern adventure of humanity, its effort well founded not upon speculation and imagination but on ascertained and tangible
\nscientific truth, its laboriously increased riches of sure and firmly tested scientific organisation. An Indian mind faithful to its ideals
\nwould contend on the contrary that while reason and science and all other auxiliaries have their place in the human effort, the real
\ntruth goes beyond them. The secret of our ultimate perfection is to be discovered deeper within us and things and Nature; it
\nis to be sought centrally in spiritual self-knowledge and self-perfection and in the founding of life on that self-knowledge.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWhen the issue is so stated, we can at once see that the gulf between East and West, India and Europe is much less profound and unbridgeable now than it was thirty or forty years ago. The basic difference still remains; the life of the West is
\nstill chiefly governed by the rationalistic idea and a materialistic preoccupation. But at the summits of thought and steadily penetrating more and more downward through art and poetry and music and general literature an immense change is in progress. A
\nreaching towards deeper things, an increasing return of seekings which had been banished, an urge towards higher experience
\nyet unrealised, an admission of ideas long foreign to the Western mentality can be seen everywhere. Aiding this process and aided
\nby it there has been a certain infiltration of Indian and Eastern   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 69<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nthought and influence; even here and there we find some growing recognition of the high value or the superior greatness of the
\nancient spiritual ideal. This infiltration began at a very early stage of the near contact between the farther Orient and Europe
\nof which the English occupation of India was the most direct occasion. But at first it was a slight and superficial touch, at most
\nan intellectual influence on a few superior minds. An academic interest or an attracted turn of scholars and thinkers towards
\nVedanta, Sankhya, Buddhism, admiration for the subtlety and largeness of Indian philosophic idealism, the stamp left by the
\nUpanishads and the Gita on great intellects like Schopenhauer and Emerson and on a few lesser thinkers, this was the first
\nnarrow inlet of the floods. The impression did not go very far at the best and the little effect it might have produced was
\ncounteracted and even effaced for a time by the great flood of scientific materialism which submerged the whole life-view of
\nlater nineteenth-century Europe. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut now other movements have arisen and laid hold on
\nthought and life with a triumphant success. Philosophy and thought have taken a sharp curve away from rationalistic materialism and its confident absolutisms. On the one hand, as a first consequence of the seeking for a larger thought and vision
\nof the universe, Indian Monism has taken a subtle but powerful hold on many minds, though often in strange disguises. On the
\nother hand new philosophies have been born, not indeed directly spiritual, vitalistic rather and pragmatic, but yet by their greater
\nsubjectivity already nearer to Indian ways of thinking. The old limits of scientific interest have begun to break down; various
\nforms of psychical research and novel departures in psychology and even an interest in psychism and occultism, have come into
\nincreasing vogue and fasten more and more their hold in spite of the anathemas of orthodox religion and orthodox science.
\nTheosophy with its comprehensive combinations of old and new beliefs and its appeal to ancient spiritual and psychic systems,
\nhas everywhere exercised an influence far beyond the circle of its professed adherents. Opposed for a long time with obloquy
\nand ridicule, it has done much to spread the belief in Karma,  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 70<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nreincarnation, other planes of existence, the evolution of the embodied soul through intellect and psyche to spirit, ideas which
\nonce accepted must change the whole attitude towards life. Even Science itself is constantly arriving at conclusions which only
\nrepeat upon the physical plane and in its language truths which ancient India had already affirmed from the standpoint of spiritual knowledge in the tongue of the Veda and Vedanta. Every one of these advances leads directly or in its intrinsic meaning
\ntowards a nearer approach between the mind of East and West and to that extent to a likelihood of a better understanding of
\nIndian thought and ideals. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIn some directions the change of attitude has gone remarkably far and seems to be constantly increasing. A Christian missionary quoted by Sir John Woodroffe is “amazed to find
\nthe extent to which Hindu Pantheism has begun to permeate the religious conceptions of Germany, of America, even of England”
\nand he considers its cumulative effect an imminent “danger” to the next generation. Another writer cited by him goes so far as
\nto attribute all the highest philosophical thought of Europe to the previous thinking of the Brahmins and affirms even that all
\nmodern solutions of intellectual problems will be found anticipated in the East. A distinguished French psychologist recently
\ntold an Indian visitor that India had already laid down all the large lines and main truths, the broad schema, of a genuine
\npsychology and all that Europe can now do is to fill them in with exact details and scientific verifications. These utterances
\nare the extreme indications of a growing change of which the drift is unmistakable.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nNor is it only in philosophy and the higher thinking that this turn is visible. European art has moved in certain directions
\nfar away from its old moorings; it is developing a new eye and opening in its own manner to motives which until now were
\nheld in honour only in the East. Eastern art and decoration have begun to be widely appreciated and have exercised a strong if
\nsubtle influence. Poetry has for some time commenced to speak uncertainly a new language,
\n\u2014 note that the world-wide fame
\nof Tagore would have been unthinkable thirty years ago, \u2014 and   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 71<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\none often finds the verse even of ordinary writers teeming with thoughts and expressions which could formerly have found few
\nparallels outside Indian, Buddhistic and Sufi poems. And there are some first preliminary signs of a similar phenomenon in
\ngeneral literature. More and more the seekers of new truth are finding their spiritual home in India or owe to her much of their
\ninspiration or at least acknowledge her light and undergo her influence. If this turn continues to accentuate its drive, and there
\nis little chance of a reversion, the spiritual and intellectual gulf between East and West if not filled up, will at least be bridged
\nand the defence of Indian culture and ideals will stand in a stronger position.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut then, it may be said, if there is this certainty of an approximative understanding, what is the need of an aggressive
\ndefence of Indian culture or of any defence at all? Indeed, what is the need for the continuance of any distinctive Indian civilisation
\nin the future? East and West will meet from two opposite sides and merge in each other and found in the life of a unified humanity a common world-culture. All previous or existing forms, systems, variations will fuse in this new amalgam and find their
\nfulfilment. But the problem is not so easy, not so harmoniously simple. For, even if we could assume that in a united
\nworld-culture there would be no spiritual need and no vital utility for strong distinctive variations, we are still very far from any such
\noneness. The subjective and spiritual turn of the more advanced modern thought is still confined to a minority and has only very
\nsuperficially coloured the general intelligence of Europe. Moreover, it is a movement of the thought only; the great life-motives
\nof European civilisation stand as yet where they were. There is a greater pressure of certain idealistic elements in the proposed
\nreshaping of human relations, but they have not shaken off or even loosened the yoke of the immediate materialistic past. It
\nis precisely at this critical moment and in these conditions that the whole human world, India included, is about to be forced
\ninto the stress and travail of a swift transformation. The danger is that the pressure of dominant European ideas and motives,
\nthe temptations of the political needs of the hour, the velocity   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 72<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nof rapid inevitable change will leave no time for the growth of sound thought and spiritual reflection and may strain to
\nbursting-point the old Indian cultural and social system, and shatter this ancient civilisation before India has had time to
\nreadjust her mental stand and outlook or to reject, remould or replace the forms that can no longer meet her environmental
\nnational necessities, create new characteristic powers and figures and find a firm basis for a swift evolution in the sense of her own
\nspirit and ideals. In that event a rationalised and Westernised India, a brown ape of Europe, might emerge from the chaos,
\nkeeping some elements only of her ancient thought to modify, but no longer to shape and govern her total existence. Like other
\ncountries she would have passed into the mould of occidental modernism; ancient India would have perished.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nCertain minds would see in this contingency no disaster, but rather a most desirable turn and a happy event. It would mean,
\nin their view, that India had given up her spiritual separation and undergone the much needed intellectual and moral change
\nthat would at last entitle her to enter into the comity of modern peoples. And since in the new world-comity there would enter an
\nincreasing spiritual and subjective element and much perhaps of India’s own religious and philosophical thought would be appropriated by its culture, the disappearance of her antique spirit and personal self-expression need be no absolute loss. Ancient India
\nwould have passed like ancient Greece, leaving its contribution to a new and more largely progressive life of the race. But the
\nabsorption of the Graeco-Roman culture by the later European world, even though many of its elements still survive in a larger
\nand more complex civilisation, was yet attended with serious diminutions. There was a deplorable loss of its high and clear
\nintellectual order, a still more calamitous perdition of the ancient cult of beauty, and even now after so many centuries there has
\nbeen no true recovery of the lost spirit. A much greater diminution of the world’s riches would result from the disappearance of
\na distinctive Indian civilisation, because the difference between its standpoint and that of European modernism is deeper, its
\nspirit unique and the rich mass and diversity of its thousand   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 73<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nlines of inner experience a heritage that still India alone can preserve in its intricate truth and dynamic order.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe tendency of the normal Western mind is to live from below upward and from out inward. A strong foundation is
\ntaken in the vital and material nature and higher powers are invoked and admitted only to modify and partially uplift the
\nnatural terrestrial life. The inner existence is formed and governed by the external powers. India’s constant aim has been on
\nthe contrary to find a basis of living in the higher spiritual truth and to live from the inner spirit outwards, to exceed the present
\nway of mind, life and body, to command and dictate to external Nature. As the old Vedic seers put it, “Their divine foundation
\nwas above even while they stood below; let its rays be settled deep within us,”
\nnīcīnah sthur upari budhna esām<\/i>, asme antar<\/i> nihitāh ketavah
\nsyuh<\/i>. Now that difference is no unimportant
\nsubtlety, but of a great and penetrating practical consequence. And we can see how Europe would deal with any spiritual influence by her treatment of Christianity and its inner rule which she never really accepted as the law of her life. It was admitted
\nbut only as an ideal and emotional influence and used only to chasten and give some spiritual colouring to the vital vigour of
\nthe Teuton and the intellectual clarity and sensuous refinement of the Latins. Any new spiritual development she might accept
\nwould be taken in the same way and used to a like limited and superficial purpose, if an insistent living culture were not there
\nin the world to challenge this lesser ideal and insist on the true life of the spirit.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt may well be that both tendencies, the mental and the vital and physical stress of Europe and the spiritual and psychic
\nimpulse of India, are needed for the completeness of the human movement. But if the spiritual ideal points the final way to a
\ntriumphant harmony of manifested life, then it is all-important for India not to lose hold of the truth, not to give up the highest
\nshe knows and barter it away for a perhaps more readily practicable but still lower ideal alien to her true and constant nature.
\nIt is important too for humanity that a great collective effort to realise this highest ideal
\n\u2014 however imperfect it may have been,
\n  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 74<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ninto whatever confusion and degeneration it may temporarily have fallen, \u2014 should not cease, but continue. Always it can
\nrecover its force and enlarge its expression; for the spirit is not bound to temporal forms but ever-new, immortal and infinite. A
\nnew creation of the old Indian svadharma<\/i>, not a transmutation to some law of the Western nature, is our best way to serve and
\nincrease the sum of human progress. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThere arises the necessity of a defence and a strong, even
\nan aggressive defence; for only an aggressive defence can be effective in the conditions of the modern struggle. But here we
\nfind ourselves brought up against an opposite turn of mind and its stark obstructive temper. For there are plenty of Indians
\nnow who are for a stubbornly static defence, and whatever aggressiveness they put into it consists in a rather vulgar and
\nunthinking cultural Chauvinism which holds that whatever we have is good for us because it is Indian or even that whatever
\nis in India is best, because it is the creation of the Rishis. As if all the later clumsy and chaotic developments were laid down
\nby those much misused, much misapplied and often very much forged founders of our culture. But the question is whether a
\nstatic defence is of any effective value. I hold that it is of no value, because it is inconsistent with the truth of things and
\ndoomed to failure. It amounts to an attempt to sit stubbornly still while the Shakti of the world is rapidly moving on her way,
\nand not only the Shakti of the world but the Shakti in India also. It is a determination to live only on our past cultural capital, to
\neke it out, small as it has grown in our wasteful and incompetent hands, to the last anna: but to live on our capital without using
\nit for fresh gains is to end in bankruptcy and pauperism. The past has to be used and spent as mobile and current capital for
\nsome larger profit, acquisition and development of the future: but to gain we must release, we must part with something in
\norder to grow and live more richly, \u2014 that is the universal law of existence. Otherwise the life within us will stagnate and perish
\nin its immobile torpor. Thus to shrink from enlargement and change is too a false confession of impotence. It is to hold that
\nIndia’s creative capacity in religion and in philosophy came to   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 75<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nan end with Shankara, Ramanuja, Madhwa and Chaitanya and in social construction with Raghunandan and Vidyaranya. It is
\nto rest in art and poetry either in a blank and uncreative void or in a vain and lifeless repetition of beautiful but spent forms
\nand motives. It is to cling to social forms that are crumbling and will continue to crumble in spite of our efforts and risk to be
\ncrushed in their collapse. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe objection to any large change \u2014 for a large and bold
\nchange is needed and no peddling will serve our purpose \u2014 can be given a plausible turn only if we rest it on the contention
\nthat the forms of a culture are the right rhythm of its spirit and in breaking the rhythm we may expel the spirit and dissipate
\nthe harmony for ever. Yes, but though the Spirit is eternal in its essence and in the fundamental principles of its harmony immutable, the actual rhythm of its self-expression in form is ever mutable. Immutable in its being and in the powers of its being
\nbut richly mutable in life, that is the very nature of the spirit’s manifested existence. And we have to see too whether the actual
\nrhythm of the moment is still a harmony or whether it has not become in the hands of an inferior and ignorant orchestra a discord
\nand no longer expresses rightly or sufficiently the ancient spirit. To recognise defect in the form is not to deny the inherent spirit;
\nit is rather the condition for moving onward to a greater future amplitude, a more perfect realisation, a happier outflow of the
\nTruth we harbour. Whether we shall actually find a greater expression than the
\npast gave us, depends on our own selves, on our capacity of response to the
\neternal Power and Wisdom and the illumination of the Shakti within us and on our
\nskill in works, the skill that comes by unity with the eternal spirit we are in
\nthe measure of our light labouring to express; yogah karmasu kauśalam<\/i>. .<\/i>
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThis from the standpoint of Indian culture, and that must be always for us the first consideration and the intrinsic standpoint.
\nBut there is also the standpoint of the pressure of the Time Spirit upon us. For this too is the action of the universal Shakti and
\ncannot be ignored, held at arm’s length or forbidden entrance. Here too the policy of new creation imposes itself as the true
\nand only effective way. Even if to stand still and stiff within our  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 76<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nwell-defended gates were desirable, it is no longer possible. We can no longer take our single station apart in humanity, isolated
\nlike a solitary island in the desert ocean, neither going forth nor allowing to enter in,
\n\u2014 if indeed we ever did it. For good
\nor for ill the world is with us; the flood of modern ideas and forces are pouring in and will take no denial. There are two
\nways of meeting them, either to offer a forlorn and hopeless resistance or to seize and subjugate them. If we offer only an
\ninert or stubborn passive resistance, they will still come in on us, break down our defences where they are weakest, sap them
\nwhere they are stiffer, and where they can do neither, steal in unknown or ill-apprehended by underground mine and tunnel.
\nEntering unassimilated they will act as disruptive forces, and it will be only partly by outward attack, but much more by
\nan inward explosion that this ancient Indian civilisation will be shattered to pieces. Ominous sparks are already beginning to
\nrun about which nobody knows how to extinguish, and if we could extinguish them, we should be no better off, for we should
\nyet have to deal with the source from which they are starting. Even the most rigid defenders of the present in the name of
\nthe past show in their every word how strongly they have been affected by new ways of thinking. Many if not most are calling
\npassionately, calling inevitably for innovations in certain fields, changes European in spirit and method which, once admitted
\nwithout some radical assimilation and Indianisation, will end by breaking up the whole social structure they think they are
\ndefending. That arises from confusion of thought and an incapacity of power. Because we are unable to think and create in
\ncertain fields, we are obliged to borrow without assimilation or with only an illusory pretence of assimilation. Because we cannot
\nsee the whole sense of what we are doing from a high inner and commanding point of vision, we are busy bringing together
\ndisparates without any saving reconciliation. A slow combustion and swift explosion are likely to be the end of our efforts.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAggressive defence implies a new creation from this inner and commanding vision and while it demands a bringing of what
\nwe have to a more expressive force of form, it must allow also   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 77<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nan effective assimilation of whatever is useful to our new life and can be made harmonious with our spirit. Battle, shock and
\nstruggle themselves are no vain destruction; they are a violent cover for Time’s great interchanges. Even the most successful
\nvictor receives much from the vanquished and if sometimes he appropriates it, as often it takes him prisoner. The Western attack is not confined to a breaking down of the forms of Eastern culture; there is at the same time a large, subtle and silent appropriation of much that is valuable in the East for the enrichment of occidental culture. Therefore to bring forward the glories of
\nour past and scatter on Europe and America as much of its treasures as they will receive, will not save us. That liberality
\nwill enrich and strengthen our cultural assailants, but for us it will only serve to give a self-confidence which will be useless
\nand even misleading if it is not made a force of will for a greater creation. What we have to do is to front the attack with new and
\nmore powerful formations which will not only throw it back, but even, where that is possible and helpful to the race, carry the
\nwar into the assailant’s country. At the same time we must take by a strong creative assimilation whatever answers to our own
\nneeds and responds to the Indian spirit. In certain directions, as yet all too few, we have begun both these movements. In
\nothers we have simply created an unintelligent mixture or else have taken and are still taking over rash, crude and undigested
\nborrowings. Imitation, a rough and haphazard borrowing of the assailant’s engines and methods may be temporarily useful,
\nbut by itself it is only another way of submitting to conquest. A stark appropriation is not sufficient; successful assimilation
\nto the Indian spirit is the needed movement. The problem is one of immense difficulty and stupendous in its proportions and
\nwe have not yet approached it with wisdom and insight. All the more pressing is the need to awaken to the situation and
\nmeet it with original thinking and a conscious action wise and powerful in insight and sure in process. A mastering and helpful
\nassimilation of new stuff into an eternal body has always been in the past a peculiar power of the genius of India.
\n  
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 78<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n
\nB<\/font>UT THERE<\/b> is yet another point of view from which the challenge put in front of us ceases to be an issue crudely
\nand provokingly phrased in a conflict of cultures. Instead it presents itself as a problem with a deep significance; it becomes
\na thought-provoking suggestion that affects not only ours but all civilisations still in existence.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWe can reply on the cultural issue from the view-point of the past and the valuation of different cultures as acquired
\ncontributions to the growth of the human race, that Indian civilisation has been the form and expression of a culture as
\ngreat as any of the historic civilisations of mankind, great in religion, great in philosophy, great in science, great in thought
\nof many kinds, great in literature, art and poetry, great in the organisation of society and politics, great in craft and trade and
\ncommerce. There have been dark spots, positive imperfections, heavy shortcomings; what civilisation has been perfect, which
\nhas not had its deep stains and cruel abysses? There have been considerable lacunae, many blind alleys, much uncultured or
\nill-cultured ground: what civilisation has been without its unfilled parts, its negative aspects? But our ancient civilisation can
\nsurvive the severest comparisons of either ancient or mediaeval times. More high-reaching, subtle, many-sided, curious and profound than the Greek, more noble and humane than the Roman, more large and spiritual than the old Egyptian, more vast and
\noriginal than any other Asiatic civilisation, more intellectual than the European prior to the eighteenth century, possessing
\nall that these had and more, it was the most powerful, self-possessed, stimulating and wide in influence of all past human
\ncultures. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAnd if we look from the view-point of the present and the
\nfruitful workings of the progressive Time-Spirit, we can say that   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 79<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\neven here in spite of our downfall all is not on the debit side. Many of the forms of our civilisation have become inapt and
\neffete and others stand in need of radical change and renovation. But that can be said equally well of European culture; for all its
\nrecently acquired progressiveness and habit of more rapid self-adaptation, large parts of it are already rotten and out of date.
\nIn spite of all drawbacks and in spite of downfall the spirit of Indian culture, its central ideas, its best ideals have still their
\nmessage for humanity and not for India alone. And we in India hold that they are capable of developing out of themselves by
\ncontact with new need and idea as good and better solutions of the problems before us than those which are offered to us
\nsecondhand from Western sources. But besides the comparisons of the past and the needs of the present there is too a view-point
\nof the ideal future. There are the farther goals towards which humanity is moving,
\n\u2014 and the present is only a crude aspiration
\ntowards them and the immediate future we now see in hope and strive to bring about in form, only its crude preparatory stage.
\nThere is an unrealised standard of the ideas which to the mind of the moment are figments of Utopia, but may become to a
\nmore developed humanity the commonplaces of their daily environment, the familiar things of the present which they have to
\noverpass. How stands Indian civilisation with regard to this yet unrealised future of the race? Are its master ideas and dominant
\npowers guiding lights or helping forces towards it or do they end in themselves with no vistas on the evolutionary potentialities
\nof the earth’s coming ages? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe very idea of progress is an illusion to some minds; for
\nthey imagine that the race moves constantly in a circle. Or even their view is that greatness more often than not is to be found
\nin the past and that the line of our movement is a curve of deterioration, a downward lapse. But that is an illusion created
\nwhen we look too much upon the highlights of the past and forget its shadows or concentrate too much on the dark spaces
\nof the present and ignore its powers of light and its aspects of happier promise. It is created too by a mistaken deduction from
\nthe phenomenon of an uneven progress. For Nature effects her  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 80<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nevolution through a rhythm of advance and relapse, day and night, waking and sleep; there is a temporary pushing of certain
\nresults at the expense of others not less desirable for perfection and to a superficial eye there may seem to be a relapse even in
\nour advance. Progress admittedly does not march on securely in a straight line like a man sure of his familiar way or an army covering an unimpeded terrain or well-mapped unoccupied spaces. Human progress is very much an adventure through the unknown, an unknown full of surprises and baffling obstacles; it stumbles often, it misses its way at many points, it cedes here
\nin order to gain there, it retraces its steps frequently in order to get more widely forward. The present does not always compare
\nfavourably with the past; even when it is more advanced in the mass, it may still be inferior in certain directions important to
\nour inner or our outer welfare. But earth does move forward after all, eppur si muove<\/i>. Even in failure there is a preparation
\nfor success: our nights carry in them the secret of a greater dawn. This is a frequent experience in our individual progress, but the
\nhuman collectivity also moves in much the same manner. The question is whither are we marching or what are the true routes
\nand harbours of our voyage. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWestern civilisation is proud of its successful modernism.
\nBut there is much that it has lost in the eagerness of its gains and much which men of old strove towards that it has not
\neven attempted to accomplish. There is much too that it has wilfully flung aside in impatience or scorn to its own great loss,
\nto the injury of its life, to the imperfection of its culture. An ancient Greek of the time of Pericles or the philosophers suddenly
\ntransported in time to this century would be astonished by the immense gains of the intellect and the expansion of the mind, the
\nmodern many-sidedness of the reason and inexhaustible habit of inquiry, the power of endless generalisation and precise detail.
\nHe would admire without reserve the miraculous growth of science and its giant discoveries, the abundant power, richness and
\nminuteness of its instrumentation, the wonder-working force of its inventive genius. He would be overcome and stupefied
\nrather than surprised and charmed by the enormous stir and   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 81<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\npulsation of modern life. But at the same time he would draw back repelled from its unashamed mass of ugliness and vulgarity,
\nits unchastened external utilitarianism, its vitalistic riot and the morbid exaggeration and unsoundness of many of its growths.
\nHe would see in it much ill-disguised evidence of the uneliminated survival of the triumphant barbarian. If he recognised
\nits intellectuality and the scrupulous application of thought and scientific reason to the machinery of life, he would miss in it
\nhis own later attempt at the clear and noble application of the ideal reason to the inner life of the mind and the soul. He would
\nfind that in this civilisation beauty had become an exotic and the shining ideal mind in some fields a debased and exploited
\nslave and in others a neglected stranger. As for the great spiritual seekers of the past, they would experience in all this huge activity
\nof the intellect and the life the sense of an aching void. A feeling of its illusion and unreality because that which is greatest in
\nman and raises him beyond himself had been neglected, would oppress them at every step. The discovery of the laws of physical
\nNature would not compensate in their eyes for the comparative decline \u2014 for a long time it was the almost absolute
\ncessation \u2014
\nof a greater seeking and finding, the discovery of the freedom of the spirit.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut an unbiassed view will prefer to regard this age of civilisation as an evolutionary stage, an imperfect but important turn of the human advance. It is then possible to see that great gains have been made which are of the utmost value to
\nan ultimate perfection, even if they have been made at a great price. There is not only a greater generalisation of knowledge
\nand more thorough use of intellectual power and activity in multiple fields. There is not only the advance of Science and its
\napplication to the conquest of our environment, an immense apparatus of means, vast utilisations, endless minute conveniences,
\nan irresistible machinery, a tireless exploitation of forces. There is too a certain development of powerful if not high-pitched
\nideals and there is an attempt, however external and therefore imperfect, to bring them to bear upon the working of human
\nsociety as a whole. Much has been diminished or lost, but it  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 82<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ncan be recovered, eventually, if not with ease. Once restored to its true movement, the inner life of man will find that it has
\ngained in materials, in power of plasticity, in a new kind of depth and wideness. And we shall have acquired a salutary habit of
\nmany-sided thoroughness and a sincere endeavour to shape the outer collective life into an adequate image of our highest ideals.
\nTemporary diminutions will not count before the greater inner expansion that is likely to succeed this age of external turmoil
\nand outward-looking endeavour. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIf on the other hand an ancient Indian of the time of the
\nUpanishads, the Buddhist period or the later classical age were to be set down in modern India and note that larger part of its life
\nwhich belongs to the age of decline, he would experience a much more depressing sensation, the sense of a national, a cultural
\ndebacle, a fall from the highest summits to discouragingly low levels. He might well ask himself what this degenerate posterity
\nhad done with the mighty civilisation of the past. He would wonder how with so much to inspire, to elevate, to spur them to
\nyet greater accomplishment and self-exceeding, they could have lapsed into this impotent and inert confusion and, instead of
\ndeveloping the high motives of Indian culture to yet deeper and wider issues, allowed them to overload themselves with ugly
\naccretions, to rust, to rot, almost to perish. He would see his race clinging to forms and shells and rags of the past and missing
\nnine-tenths of its nobler values. He would compare the spiritual light and energy of the heroic ages of the Upanishads and the
\nphilosophies with the later inertia or small and broken fragmentarily derivative activity of our philosophic thought. After
\nthe intellectual curiosity, the scientific development, the creative literary and artistic greatness, the noble fecundity of the classical
\nage he would be amazed by the extent of a later degeneracy, its mental poverty, immobility, static repetition, the comparative
\nfeebleness of the creative intuition, the long sterility of art, the cessation of science. He would deplore a prone descent to ignorance, a failing of the old powerful will and
\ntapasyā, almost a volitional impotence. In place of the simpler and more spiritually
\nrational order of old times he would find a bewildering chaotic   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 83<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ndisorganised organisation of things without centre and without any large harmonising idea. He would find not a true social order
\nbut a half arrested, half hastening putrescence. In place of the great adaptable civilisation which assimilated with power and
\nwas able to return tenfold for what it received, he would meet a helplessness that bore passively or only with a few ineffectual
\ngalvanic reactions the forces of the outside world and the stress of adverse circumstance. At one time he would see that there had
\nbeen even a loss of faith and self-confidence so considerable as to tempt the intellectuals of the nation to scrap the ancient spirit
\nand ideals for an alien and imported culture. He would note indeed the beginning of a change, but might perhaps doubt how
\ndeep it had gone or whether it was powerful enough to save, forceful enough to upheave the whole nation from its cherished
\ntorpor and weakness, enlightened enough to guide a new and robust creative activity towards the building of new significant
\nforms for the ancient spirit. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nHere too a better understanding points to hope rather than
\nto the flat despondency suggested by a too hasty surface glance. This last age of Indian history is an example of the constant local
\nsuccession of night even to the most long and brilliant day in the evolution of the race. But it was a night filled at first with many
\nand brilliant constellations and even at its thickest and worst it  <\/i>
\n <\/i>  <\/i>
\nwas the darkness of Kalidasa’s viceya-tārakā prabhāta-kalpeva<\/i> śarvarī<\/i>, “night preparing for dawn, with a few just decipherable
\nstars.” Even in the decline all was not loss; there were needed developments, there were spiritual and other gains of the greatest
\nimportance for the future. If the high spiritualised mind and  <\/i>
\nstupendous force of spiritual will, tapasyā<\/i>, that characterised ancient India were less in evidence, there were new gains of
\nspiritual emotion and sensitiveness to spiritual impulse on the lower planes of consciousness, that had been lacking before.
\nArchitecture, literature, painting, sculpture lost the grandeur, power, nobility of old, but evoked other powers and motives
\nfull of delicacy, vividness and grace. There was a descent from the heights to the lower levels, but a descent that gathered riches
\non its way and was needed for the fullness of spiritual discovery  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 84<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nand experience. And in the worst period of decline and failure the spirit was not dead in India, but only torpid, concealed and
\nshackled; now emerging in answer to a pressure of constant awakening shocks for a strong self-liberation it finds that its
\nsleep was a preparation of new potentialities behind the veil of that slumber. The decline of our past culture may even be
\nregarded as a needed waning and dying of old forms to make way not only for a new, but, if we will that it should be so, a
\ngreater and more perfect creation. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nFor after all it is the will in the being that gives to circumstances their value, and often an unexpected value; the hue of apparent actuality is a misleading indicator. If the will in a race
\nor civilisation is towards death, if it clings to the lassitude of decay and the laissez-faire of the moribund or even in strength
\ninsists blindly upon the propensities that lead to destruction or if it cherishes only the powers of dead Time and puts away from
\nit the powers of the future, if it prefers life that was to life that will be, nothing, not even abundant strength and resources and
\nintelligence, not even many calls to live and constantly offered opportunities will save it from an inevitable disintegration or
\ncollapse. But if there comes to it a strong faith in itself and a robust will to live, if it is open to the things that shall come,
\nwilling to seize on the future and what it offers and strong to compel it where it seems adverse, it can draw from adversity
\nand defeat a force of invincible victory and rise from apparent helplessness and decay in a mighty flame of renovation to the
\nlight of a more splendid life. This is what Indian civilisation is now rearising to do as it has always done in the eternal strength
\nof its spirit. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe greatness of the ideals of the past is a promise of
\ngreater ideals for the future. A continual expansion of what stood behind past endeavour and capacity is the one abiding
\njustification of a living culture. But it follows that civilisation and barbarism are words of a quite relative significance. For
\nfrom the view of the evolutionary future European and Indian civilisation at their best have only been half achievements, infant
\ndawns pointing to the mature sunlight that is to come. Neither   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 85<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nEurope nor India nor any race, country or continent of mankind has ever been fully civilised from this point of view; none has
\ngrasped the whole secret of a true and perfect human living, none has applied with an entire insight or a perfectly vigilant
\nsincerity even the little they were able to achieve. If we define civilisation as a harmony of spirit, mind and body, where has
\nthat harmony been entire or altogether real? Where have there not been glaring deficiencies and painful discords? Where has the
\nwhole secret of the harmony been altogether grasped in all its parts or the complete music of life evolved into the triumphant
\nease of a satisfying, durable and steadily mounting concord? Not only are there everywhere positive, ugly, even “hideous”
\nblots on the life of man, but much that we now accept with equanimity, much in which we take pride, may well be regarded
\nby a future humanity as barbarism or at least as semi-barbarous and immature. The achievements that we regard as ideal, will
\nbe condemned as a self-satisfied imperfection blind to its own errors; the ideas that we vaunt as enlightenment will appear as
\na demi-light or a darkness. Not only will many forms of our life that claim to be ancient or even eternal, as if that could be
\nsaid of any form of things, fail and disappear; the subjective shapes given to our best principles and ideals will perhaps claim
\nfrom the future at best an understanding indulgence. There is little that will not have to undergo expansion and mutation,
\nchange perhaps beyond recognition or accept to be modified in a new synthesis. In the end the coming ages may look on
\nEurope and Asia of today much as we look on savage tribes or primitive peoples. And this view from the future, if we can get it,
\nis undoubtedly the most illuminating and dynamic standpoint from which we can judge our present; but it does not invalidate
\nour comparative appreciation of past and extant cultures. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nFor this past and present are creating the greater steps of that
\nfuture and much of it will survive even in that which supplants it. There is behind our imperfect cultural figures a permanent
\nspirit to which we must cling and which will remain permanent even hereafter; there are certain fundamental motives or essential
\nidea-forces which cannot be thrown aside, because they are part  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 86<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nof the vital principle of our being and of the aim of Nature in us, our svadharma<\/i>. But these motives, these idea-forces are,
\nwhether for nation or for humanity as a whole, few and simple in their essence and capable of an application always varying
\nand progressive. The rest belongs to the less internal layers of our being and must undergo the changing pressure and satisfy
\nthe forward-moving demands of the Time-Spirit. There is this permanent spirit in things and there is this persistent swadharma
\nor law of our nature; but there is too a less binding system of laws of successive formulation,
\n\u2014 rhythms of the spirit, forms,
\nturns, habits of the nature, and these endure the mutations of the ages, yugadharma<\/i>. The race must obey this double principle
\nof persistence and mutation or bear the penalty of a decay and deterioration that may attaint even its living centre.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nCertainly we must repel with vigour every disintegrating or injurious attack; but it is much more important to form our
\nown true and independent view of our own past achievement, present position and future possibilities,
\n\u2014 what we were, what
\nwe are and what we may be. In our past we must distinguish all that was great, essential, elevating, vitalising, illuminating,
\nvictorious, effective. And in that again we must distinguish what was close to the permanent, essential spirit and the persistent law
\nof our cultural being and separate from it what was temporary and transiently formulative. For all that was great in the past
\ncannot be preserved as it was or repeated for ever; there are new needs, there are other vistas before us. But we have to distinguish
\ntoo what was deficient, ill-grasped, imperfectly formulated or only suited to the limiting needs of the age or unfavourable
\ncircumstances. For it is quite idle to pretend that all in the past, even at its greatest, was entirely admirable and in its kind the
\nhighest consummate achievement of the human mind and spirit. Afterwards we have to make a comparison of this past with our
\npresent and to understand the causes of our decline and seek the remedy of our shortcomings and ailments. Our sense of the
\ngreatness of our past must not be made a fatally hypnotising lure to inertia; it should be rather an inspiration to renewed
\nand greater achievement. But in our criticism of the present we   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 87<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nmust not be one-sided or condemn with a foolish impartiality all that we are or have done. Neither flattering or glossing over
\nour downfall nor fouling our nest to win the applause of the stranger, we have to note our actual weakness and its roots, but
\nto fix too our eyes with a still firmer attention on our elements of strength, our abiding potentialities, our dynamic impulses of
\nself-renewal. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nA second comparison has to be made between the West
\nand India. In the past of Europe and the past of India we can observe with an unbiassed mind the successes of the West, the
\ngifts it brought to humanity, but also its large gaps, striking deficiencies, terrible and even “hideous” vices and failures. On
\nthe other balance we have to cast ancient and mediaeval India’s achievements and failures. Here we shall find that there is little
\nfor which we need lower our heads before Europe and much in which we rise well and sometimes immeasurably above her. But
\nwe have to scrutinise next the present of the West in its strong success, vitality, conquering insolence. What has been great in
\nit we shall allow, but take deep note too of its defects, stumblings and dangers. And with this dangerous greatness we must
\ncompare the present of India, her downfall and its causes, her velleities of revival, her elements that still make for superiority
\nnow and in the future. Let us see and take account of all that we must inevitably receive from the West and consider how we can
\nassimilate it to our own spirit and ideals. But let us see too what founts of native power there are in ourselves from which we
\ncan draw deeper, more vital and fresher streams of the power of life than from anything the West can offer. For that will help us
\nmore than occidental forms and motives, because it will be more natural to us, more stimulating to our idiosyncrasy of nature,
\nmore packed with creative suggestions, more easily taken up and completely followed in power of practice.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut far more helpful than any of these necessary comparisons will be the forward look from our past and present towards
\nour own and not any foreign ideal of the future. For it is our evolutionary push towards the future that will give to our past
\nand present their true value and significance. India’s nature, her  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 88<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nmission, the work that she has to do, her part in the earth’s destiny, the peculiar power for which she stands is written there
\nin her past history and is the secret purpose behind her present sufferings and ordeals. A reshaping of the forms of our spirit
\nwill have to take place; but it is the spirit itself behind past forms that we have to disengage and preserve and to give to it
\nnew and powerful thought-significances, culture-values, a new instrumentation, greater figures. And so long as we recognise
\nthese essential things and are faithful to their spirit, it will not hurt us to make even the most drastic mental or physical adaptations and the most extreme cultural and social changes. But these changes themselves must be cast in the spirit and mould of India
\nand not in any other, not in the spirit of America or Europe, not in the mould of Japan or Russia. We must recognise the great
\ngulf between what we are and what we may and ought to strive to be. But this we must do not in any spirit of discouragement
\nor denial of ourselves and the truth of our spirit, but in order to measure the advance we have to make. For we have to find its
\ntrue lines and to find in ourselves the aspiration and inspiration, the fire and the force to conceive them and to execute.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAn original truth-seeking thought is needed if we are to take this stand and make this movement, a strong and courageous
\nintuition, an unfailing spiritual and intellectual rectitude. The courage to defend our culture against ignorant occidental criticism and to maintain it against the gigantic modern pressure comes first, but with it there must be the courage to admit not
\nfrom any European standpoint but from our own outlook the errors of our culture. Apart from all phenomena of decline or deterioration, we should recognise without any sophistical denial those things in our creeds of life and social institutions which are
\nin themselves mistaken and some of them indefensible, things weakening to our national life, degrading to our civilisation,
\ndishonouring to our culture. A flagrant example can be found in the treatment of our outcastes. There are those who would
\nexcuse it as an unavoidable error in the circumstances of the past; there are others who contend that it was the best possible
\nsolution then available. There are still others who would justify   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 89<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nit and, with whatever modifications, prolong it as necessary to our social synthesis. The contention is highly disputable. The
\nexcuse was there, but it is no justification for continuance. A solution which condemns by segregation one sixth of the nation to permanent ignominy, continued filth, uncleanliness of the inner and outer life and a brutal animal existence instead
\nof lifting them out of it is no solution but rather an acceptance of weakness and a constant wound to the social body and to
\nits collective spiritual, intellectual, moral and material welfare. A social synthesis which can only live by making a permanent
\nrule of the degradation of our fellowmen and countrymen stands condemned and foredoomed to decay and disturbance. The evil
\neffects may be kept under for a long time and work only by the subtler unobserved action of the law of Karma; but once
\nthe light of Truth is let in on these dark spots, to perpetuate them is to maintain a seed of disruption and ruin our chances of
\neventual survival. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAgain, we have to look on our cultural ideas and our social
\nforms and see where they have lost their ancient spirit or real significance. Many of them are now a fiction and no longer in
\naccordance with the ideas they assume or with the facts of life. Others even if good in themselves or else beneficent in their
\nown time are no longer sufficient for our growth. All these must either be transformed or discarded and truer ideas and
\nbetter formulations must be found in their place. The new turn we must give them will not always be a return upon their old
\nsignificance. The new dynamic truths we have to discover need not be parked within the limited truth of a past ideal. On our
\npast and present ideals we have to turn the searchlight of the spirit and see whether they have not to be surpassed or enlarged
\nor brought into consonance with new wider ideals. All we do or create must be consistent with the abiding spirit of India, but
\nframed to fit into a greater harmonised rhythm and plastic to the call of a more luminous future. If faith in ourselves and fidelity to
\nthe spirit of our culture are the first requisites of a continued and vigorous life, a recognition of greater possibilities is a condition
\nnot less indispensable. There cannot be a healthy and victorious  
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 90<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nsurvival if we make of the past a fetish instead of an inspiring impulse.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe spirit and ideals of our civilisation need no defence, for in their best parts and in their essence they were of eternal value. India’s internal and individual seeking of them was earnest, powerful, effective. But the application in the collective
\nlife of society was subjected to serious reserves. Never sufficiently bold and thoroughgoing, it became more and more limited and
\nhalting when the life-force declined in her peoples. This defect, this gulf between ideal and collective practice, has pursued all
\nhuman living and was not peculiar to India; but the dissonance became especially marked with the lapse of time and it put at last
\non our society a growing stamp of weakness and failure. There was a large effort in the beginning at some kind of synthesis
\nbetween the inner ideal and the outer life; but a static regulation of society was its latter end. An underlying principle of spiritual
\nidealism, an elusive unity and fixed helpful forms of mutuality remained always there, but also an increasing element of strict
\nbondage and minute division and fissiparous complexity in the social mass. The great Vedantic ideals of freedom, unity and
\nthe godhead in man were left to the inner spiritual effort of individuals. The power of expansion and assimilation diminished and when powerful and aggressive forces broke in from outside, Islam, Europe, the later Hindu society was content with
\nan imprisoned and static self-preservation, a mere permission to live. The form of living became more and more narrow and it
\nendured a continually restricted assertion of its ancient spirit. Duration, survival was achieved, but not in the end a really
\nsecure and vital duration, not a great, robust and victorious survival.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAnd now survival itself has become impossible without expansion. If we are to live at all, we must resume India’s great
\ninterrupted endeavour; we must take up boldly and execute thoroughly in the individual and in the society, in the spiritual and in the mundane life, in philosophy and religion, in art and literature, in thought, in political and economic and social
\nformulation the full and unlimited sense of her highest spirit   <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 91<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nand knowledge. And if we do that, we shall find that the best of what comes to us draped in occidental forms, is already implied
\nin our own ancient wisdom and has there a greater spirit behind it, a profounder truth and self-knowledge and the capacity of
\na will to nobler and more ideal formations. Only we need to work out thoroughly in life what we have always known in
\nthe spirit. There and nowhere else lies the secret of the needed harmony between the essential meaning of our past culture and
\nthe environmental requirements of our future. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThat view opens out a prospect beyond the battle of cultures
\nwhich is the immediate dangerous aspect of the meeting of East and West. The Spirit in man has one aim before it in all mankind;
\nbut different continents or peoples approach it from different sides, with different formulations and in a differing spirit. Not
\nrecognising the underlying unity of the ultimate divine motive, they give battle to each other and claim that theirs alone is the
\nway for mankind. The one real and perfect civilisation is the one in which they happen to be born, all the rest must perish or go
\nunder. But the real and perfect civilisation yet waits to be discovered; for the life of mankind is still nine tenths of barbarism to
\none tenth of culture. The European mind gives the first place to the principle of growth by struggle; it is by struggle that it arrives
\nat some kind of concert. But this concert is itself hardly more than an organisation for growth by competition, aggression and
\nfarther battle. It is a peace that is constantly breaking, even within itself, into a fresh strife of principles, ideas, interests,
\nraces, classes. It is an organisation precarious at its base and in its centre because it is founded on half-truths that deteriorate
\ninto whole falsehoods; but it is still or has been till now vigorous in constant achievement and able to grow powerfully and to
\ndevour and assimilate. Indian culture proceeded on the principle of a concert that strove to find its base in a unity and reached out
\nagain towards some greater oneness. Its aim was a lasting organisation that would minimise or even eliminate the principle of
\nstruggle. But it ended by achieving peace and stable arrangement through exclusion, fragmentation and immobility of status; it
\ndrew a magic circle of safety and shut itself up in it for good.
\n\t\t\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 92<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nIn the end it lost its force of aggression, weakened its power of
\nassimilation and decayed within its barriers. A static and limited concert, not always enlarging itself, not plastic becomes in our
\nhuman state of imperfection a prison or a sleeping-chamber. Concert cannot be anything but imperfect and provisional in its
\nform and can only preserve its vitality and fulfil its ultimate aim if it constantly adapts, expands, progresses. Its lesser unities must
\nwiden towards a broader and more comprehensive and above all a more real and spiritual oneness. In the larger statement of our
\nculture and civilisation that we have now to achieve, a greater outward expression of spiritual and psychological oneness, but
\nwith a diversity which the mechanical method of Europe does not tolerate, will surely be one leading motive. A concert, a
\nunity with the rest of mankind, in which we shall maintain our spiritual and our outer independence will be another line of our
\nendeavour. But what now appears as a struggle may well be the first necessary step, before we can formulate that unity of
\nmankind which the West sees only in idea, but cannot achieve because it does not possess its spirit. Therefore Europe labours to
\nestablish unity by accommodation of conflicting interests and the force of mechanical institutions; but so attempted, it will either
\nnot be founded at all or will be founded on sand. Meanwhile she wishes to blot out every other culture, as if hers were the
\nonly truth or all the truth of life and there were no such thing as truth of the spirit. India, the ancient possessor of the truth of the
\nspirit, must resist that arrogant claim and aggression and affirm her own deeper truths in spite of heavy odds and against all
\ncomers. For in its preservation lies the only hope that mankind instead of marching to a new cataclysm and primitive beginning
\nwith a constant repetition of the old blind cycles will at last emerge into the light and accomplish the drive forward which
\nwill bring the terrestrial evolution to its next step of ascent in the progressive manifestation of the Spirit.
\n  
\n   <\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\n <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 93<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Is India Civilised?”     “Is India Civilised?”   A BOOK under this rather startling title was published some years ago by Sir John Woodroffe,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-20-the-renaissance-in-india","wpcat-55-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}