{"id":2942,"date":"2013-07-13T01:44:46","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=2942"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:44:46","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:44:46","slug":"27-aspects-of-the-mothers-life-in-the-ashram-vol-32-the-mother-with-letters-on-the-mother","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/32-the-mother-with-letters-on-the-mother\/27-aspects-of-the-mothers-life-in-the-ashram-vol-32-the-mother-with-letters-on-the-mother","title":{"rendered":"-27_Aspects of the Mother’s Life in the Ashram.html"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n

\n\tAspects of the Mother’s Life
\n<\/font><\/b> <\/p>\n


\nin the Ashram <\/font><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Mother’s Music
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

It is not by knowledge of music that the understanding [of the<\/i> Mother’s music<\/i>] comes; nor is it by effort of the mind 
\n\u2014it is
\nby becoming inwardly silent, opening within and getting the spontaneous feeling of what is in the music. <\/p>\n

1932 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I feel within me a tendency for music, but I understand nothing of harmony, tune and rhythm. Yet sometimes when I hear the
\nMother’s music, I am spellbound and lose all sense of time. <\/p>\n

It is not necessary to have technical knowledge in order to feel
\nwhat is behind the music. Mother of course does not play for the sake of a technical musical effect, but to bring down something
\nfrom the higher planes and that anyone can receive who is open.<\/p>\n

\n

16 September 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

When I entered the Mother’s room, she had just finished playing for a long time 
\n\u2014that is why I did not expect her to play for me. <\/p>\n

The Mother has played music from her childhood upwards 
\n\u2014so it is no trouble to her to sing or play several times. <\/p>\n

16 September 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Why does my mind become so full of joy listening to the Mother’s music? Today while listening to her play, my mind,
\nmy heart, my whole consciousness became full of peace and joy and then went high up somewhere. <\/p>\n

\nWhat else is the Mother’s music except the bringing down of these things? She
\ndoes not play or sing merely for the music’s <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 571<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

sake, but to call down the Divine Consciousness and its Powers.<\/p>\n

\n

16 September 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yesterday when the Mother was playing her music, I was much
\nstruck by the descent of forces in me. I clearly experienced these three elements: aspiration, surrender and the receiving
\nof blessings. First, her soul as the immanent Divine aspired to the transcendent Divine; it was a call for her transcendent
\nSelf to come down and take possession of the downtrodden natures of her children. Then the surrender: in her zeal for
\nunion with her highest Divine Self, she almost loses herself. Then from the highest, her Voice comes down for the benefit
\nof her children. She receives the blessings from above and showers them upon all her children. I do not know how far I
\nam right. <\/p>\n

I think it is fairly correct. At any rate the first and second parts
\nare quite correct. I do not remember the third in this form but it was a firm assurance of the realisation. <\/p>\n

27 September 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Is it true that when the Mother plays on the organ she calls down the Gods of the higher planes to help us? <\/p>\n

Not consciously.<\/p>\n

\n

9 February 1934 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

You wrote in reply to my letter of yesterday: “Not consciously.” Does it mean that the Gods are attracted to the Mother’s music and so come down to hear it? <\/p>\n

They may be.<\/p>\n

\n

10 February 1934 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tWhen the Mother plays the organ, something new enters into my consciousness.
\n\tDoes she really bring down something while playing? <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 572<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

If she did not bring something, why should she play at all?<\/p>\n

\n

19 April 1934 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Yesterday I heard the Mother playing Indian music and a few
\ndays ago she was corresponding with X <\/i>about Indian music. <\/p>\n

The Mother’s music has often been recognised by
\nY <\/i>as Indian
\nmusic of this or that raga. The Mother plays whatever comes through her  \u2014she does not usually play any previously composed music whether European or Indian 
\n\t\u2014the latter in fact she has never learned. <\/p>\n

11 September 1934 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Some people think that in the Overmind and Supermind there will be no need of prayer or aspiration. They must have forgotten that even our Mother has aspired constantly, day and night, or that when she plays her music we feel that she is
\npraying. <\/p>\n

Yes. All that is very true. It is a prayer or an invocation that
\nMother makes in the music.<\/p>\n

\n

1 June 1935 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Mother’s Attitude towards Music and Other Arts
\n\t<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Why should you think the Mother does not approve of expression, 
\n\t\u2014provided it is the right expression of the right thing,  \u2014or suppose that silence and true expression are contradictory?
\nThe truest expression comes out of an absolute inner silence. The spiritual silence is not a mere emptiness; nor is it indispensable
\nto abstain from all activity in order to find it.<\/p>\n

\n

26 April 1931 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tFor the moment I am answering only to your question about the music. Let me
\n\tsay at once that all of you seem to have too great an aptitude for making
\n\tdrastic conclusions on the strength of very minor facts. It is always
\n\tperilous to take two or three small facts, put them together and build upon
\n\tthem a big inference. It <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 573<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

becomes still more dangerous when you emphasise minor facts and set aside or belittle the meaning of the main ones. In this
\ncase the main facts are (1) that the Mother has loved music all her life and found it a key to spiritual experience, (2) that she
\nhas given all encouragement to your music in special and to the music of others also. She has also made clear the relation of Art
\nand Beauty with Yoga. It is therefore rather extraordinary that anyone should think she only tolerates music here and considers
\nit inconsistent with Yoga. It is perfectly true that Music or Art are not either the first or the only thing in life for her, 
\n\u2014any
\nmore than Poetry or Literature are with me,  \u2014the Divine, the divine consciousness, the discovery of the conditions for a divine
\nlife are and must be our one concern, with Art, Poetry or Music as parts or means only of the divine life or expression of the
\nDivine Truth and the Divine Beauty. That does not mean that they are only “tolerated”, but that they are put in their right
\nplace.<\/p>\n

\n

29 October 1932 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

At the music one or two words of X<\/i>‘s song practically made
\nme weep with rapture, and some of Y<\/i>‘s soft and deep turns of phrase almost led to tears. Afterwards it was silence. Is it
\nthe Mahalakshmi aspect of the Mother that is working these days? <\/p>\n

On the music days it is always the Mahalakshmi aspect that is prominent. <\/p>\n

25 December 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nWhat can be stranger than this idea of yours that Mother likes only European
\nmusic and does not like or appreciate Indian music  \u2014that she only pretends
\nto do it or that she tolerates it so as not to discourage people! Remember that
\nit is the Mother who has always praised and supported your music and put her
\nforce behind you so that your music might develop into spiritual perfection and
\nbeauty. In your poetry it was I that supported you most, in detail; the Mother
\ncould only do it with a general force, because she could not read the original
\n(though she found them<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 574<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

in translations very beautiful), but that in music it has been just the other way round. You surely are not going to say that all
\nthat was unfelt? And the development of X<\/i>? That too was Indian music, not European. And then when I write to you in praise
\nof your music, do you think it is only my opinion that I am transmitting? Most often it is her words that I use to express
\nour common feeling.<\/p>\n

\n

26 December 1933 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

There have been instances where people have taken up music
\nwith your approval, and they have worked at it only to find out later that it was not their line. What a waste of time for
\nnothing! This is the thought that curbs my enthusiasm for writing poetry. Otherwise I quite understand that one has to
\nsuffer the “pangs of delivery”. What do you say? <\/p>\n

Approval or permission? People get it into their heads that they
\nwould like to do some music, because it is the fashion or because they like it so much, and the Mother may tolerate it or say, “All
\nright, try.” That does not mean they are predestined or doomed to be musicians 
\n\t\u2014or poets  \u2014or painters according to the case.
\nPerhaps one of them who try may bloom, others drop off. X starts painting and shows only a fanciful dash at first, after a
\ntime he brings out work, remarkable work. Y does clever facile things; one day he begins to deepen and a possible painter in the
\nmaking outlines. Others,  \u2014well, they don’t. But they can try  \u2014they will learn something about painting at least. <\/p>\n

Labour at your sestets if the spirit pushes you. The Angel of Poetry may be delivered out of the labour, even if with a forceps. <\/p>\n

24 May 1935 <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

You have spoken of your singing. You know well that we approve of it and I have constantly stressed its necessity for you as
\nwell as that of your poetry. But the Mother absolutely forbade X<\/i>‘s singing. To music for some again she is indifferent or discourages it, for others she approves as for Y<\/i>, Z <\/i>
\nand others. For some time she encouraged the concerts, afterwards she stopped
\nthem.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 575<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

You drew from the prohibition to X <\/i>and the stopping of the concerts that Mother did not like music or did not like Indian
\nmusic or considered music bad for sadhana and all sorts of strange mental reasons like that. Mother prohibited
\nX <\/i>because
\nwhile music was good for you, it was spiritually poison to X<\/i>  \u2014the moment he began to think of it and of audiences, all the
\nvulgarity and unspirituality in his nature rose to the surface. You can see what he is doing with it now! So again with the concerts 
\n\u2014though in a different way  \u2014she stopped them because she had seen that wrong forces were coming into their atmosphere
\nwhich had nothing to do with the music in itself; her motives were not mental. It was for similar reasons that she drew back
\nfrom big public displays like Udayshankar’s. On the other hand she favoured and herself planned the exhibition of paintings at
\nthe Town Hall. She was not eager for you to have your big audiences for your singing because she found the atmosphere
\nfull of mixed forces and found too you had afterwards usually a depression; but she has always approved of your music in
\nitself done privately or before a small audience. If you consider then, you will see that here there is no mental rule, but in each
\ncase the guidance is determined by spiritual reasons which are of a flexible character and look only at what in each case are
\nthe spiritual conditions, benefits, possibilities. There is no other consideration, no rule. Music, painting, poetry and many other
\nactivities which are of the mind and vital can be used as part of spiritual development or of the work and for a spiritual purpose 
\n\u2014”it depends on the spirit in which they are done”.<\/p>\n

\n

24 October 1936 <\/p>\n


\nGolconde<\/a>1<\/sup><\/b><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The institution of visitors’ cards was not made for love of discipline or rule
\n\t\u2014making, but out of practical necessity. People from the town were coming in pretending to be visitors and taking
\ntheir meals in the dining room and unpermitted visitors were <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t1<\/sup> <\/font> A large Ashram residence and guesthouse built in the late 1930s. 
\n\t\u2014Ed.<\/font><\/i> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 576<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

passing themselves in for the Darshan; it was not possible for the dining room workers or the gatekeepers to know all the
\nvisitors or who were or were not genuine. I don’t see myself why anybody should object or resent this necessary precaution. The
\nalternative would be to let everybody who wanted enter for the Darshan and to let anybody who wanted to take his meal in the
\ndining room. That would soon make things impossible. <\/p>\n

As for X’<\/i>s handbag that is part of the special rules for Golconde. These rules, which do not obtain for the rest of the Asram houses, are read out to everybody who is to stay in Golconde and
\nif he does not want he can be given accommodation elsewhere. X <\/i>seemed to be very happy about his stay here; if he was not
\nreally so and felt badly about these rules, why on earth did he refuse to stay in your place? <\/p>\n

I may mention that he told Y <\/i>that there were two things he specially admired in the Asram, first the fact that everybody
\nhere rich or poor or of whatever caste was on the same level, and secondly the discipline of the Asram. He said, according to
\nY<\/i>, that the absence of discipline was the great bane in India, neither individuals nor groups had any discipline. Then why did
\nhe weep merely because he was not allowed to put his handbag in a place not intended for it? I do not agree myself with
\nhim in the idea that there is perfect discipline in the Asram; on the contrary, there is a great lack of it, much indiscipline,
\nquarrelling and self \u2014assertion. What there is, is organisation and order which the Mother has been able to establish and maintain
\nin spite of all that. That organisation and order is necessary for all collective work; it has been an object of admiration and
\nsurprise for all from outside who have observed the Asram; it is the reason why the Asram has been able to survive and outlive
\nthe malignant attacks of the Catholic priests and of many people in Pondicherry who would otherwise have got it dissolved long
\nago. The Mother knew very well what she was doing and what was necessary for the work she had to do. <\/p>\n

\nDiscipline itself is not something especially Western; in Oriental countries
\nlike Japan, China and India it was at one time all \u2014regulating and supported by
\nsevere sanctions in a way that <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 577<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

Westerners would not tolerate. Socially whatever objections we may make to it, it is a fact that it preserved Hindu religion and
\nHindu society through the ages and through all vicissitudes. In the political field there was on the contrary indiscipline, individualism and strife; that is one reason why India collapsed and entered into servitude. Organisation and order were attempted
\nbut failed to endure. Even in the spiritual life India has had not only the free wandering ascetic, a law to himself, but has
\nfelt impelled to create orders of Sannyasins with their rules and governing bodies and there have also been monastic institutions
\nwith a strict discipline. Since no work can be done successfully without these things 
\n\u2014even the individual worker, the artist for
\ninstance, has to go through a severe discipline in order to become efficient 
\n\u2014why should the Mother be held to blame if she insists
\non discipline in the exceedingly difficult work she has had put in her charge? <\/p>\n

I don’t see on what ground you expect order and organisation to be carried on without rules and without discipline. You
\nseem to say that people should be allowed complete freedom with only such discipline as they choose to impose upon themselves; that might do if the only thing to be done were for each individual to get some inner realisation and life did not matter
\nor if there were no collective life or work or none that had any importance. But this is not the case here. We have undertaken
\na work which includes life and action and the physical world. In what I am trying to do, the spiritual realisation is the first
\nnecessity, but it cannot be complete without an outer realisation also in life, in man, in this world. Spiritual consciousness within
\nbut also spiritual life without. The Asram as it is now is not that ideal, for that all its members would have to live in a spiritual
\nconsciousness and not in the ordinary egoistic mind and mainly rajasic vital nature. But all the same, the Asram is a first form
\nwhich our effort has taken, a field in which the preparatory work has to be done. The Mother has to maintain it and for that all
\nthis order and organisation has to be there and it cannot be done without rules
\nand discipline. Discipline is even necessary for the overcoming of the ego and
\nthe mental preferences and<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 578<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

the rajasic vital nature, as a help to it at any rate. If these were overcome outward rules etc. would be less necessary; spontaneous agreement, unity, harmony and spontaneous right action might take its place. But while the present state of things exists,
\nwith the abandonment or leaving out of discipline except such as people might choose or not choose to impose upon themselves,
\nthe result would be failure and disaster. One has only to think what would have been the result if there had been no rules and
\nno discipline prohibiting sex \u2014indulgence; even with them things have not been so very good. On that principle the work also
\nwould have gone to pot, there would have been nothing but strife, assertion by each worker of his own idea and self
\n\u2014will
\nand constant clashes; even as it is, that has abounded and it is only the Mother’s authority, the frame of work she has given
\nand her skill in getting incompatibles to act together that has kept things going. <\/p>\n

I do not find that Mother is a rigid disciplinarian. On the contrary, I have seen with what a constant leniency, tolerant
\npatience and kindness she has met the huge mass of indiscipline, disobedience, self
\n\u2014assertion, revolt that has surrounded her, even
\nabuse to her very face and violent letters overwhelming her with the worst kind of vituperation. A rigid disciplinarian would not
\nhave treated these things like that. <\/p>\n

I do not know what ill
\n\t\u2014treatment visitors have received,
\napart from the insistence on rules of which you complain, but it cannot be a general complaint, otherwise the number of visitors
\nwould not be constantly increasing nor would so many people want to come back again or even come every time or so many
\nwant to stay on if the Mother allowed them. After all they do not come here on the basis of a social occasion but for Darshan
\nof those whom they regard to be spiritually great or in the case of constant visitors for a share in the life of the Asram and for
\nspiritual advantage and for both of these motives one would expect them to submit willingly to the conditions imposed and
\nnot to mind a little inconvenience. <\/p>\n

As regards Golconde
\n\tand its rules  \u2014they are not imposed elsewhere  \u2014there is a reason
\n\tfor them and they are not imposed <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 579<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n

for nothing. In Golconde Mother has worked out her own idea through Raymond, Sammer and others. First, Mother believes
\nin beauty as a part of spirituality and divine living; secondly, she believes that physical things have the Divine Consciousness
\nunderlying them as much as living things; and thirdly, that they have an individuality of their own and ought to be properly
\ntreated, used in the right way, not misused or improperly handled or hurt or neglected so that they perish soon or lose their
\nfull beauty or value; she feels the consciousness in them and is so much in sympathy with them that what in other hands may
\nbe spoilt or wasted in a short time lasts with her for years or decades. It is on this basis that she planned Golconde. First,
\nshe wanted a high architectural beauty, and in this she succeeded  \u2014architects and people with architectural knowledge
\nhave admired it with enthusiasm as a remarkable achievement; one spoke of it as the finest building of its kind he had seen,
\nwith no equal in all Europe or America; and a French architect, pupil of a great master, said it executed superbly the idea which
\nhis master had been seeking for but failed to realise; but also she wanted all the objects in it, the rooms, the fittings, the furniture
\nto be individually artistic and to form a harmonious whole. This too was done with great care. Moreover, each thing was
\narranged to have its own use, for each thing there was a place, and there should be no mixing up, or confused and wrong use.
\nBut all this had to be kept up and carried out in practice; for it was easy for people living there to create a complete confusion
\nand misuse and to bring everything to disorder and ruination in a short time. That was why the rules were made and for
\nno other purpose. The Mother hoped that if the right people were accommodated there or others trained to a less rough and
\nready living than is common, her idea could be preserved and the wasting of all the labour and expense avoided. <\/p>\n

Unfortunately the crisis of accommodation came and we were forced to house people in Golconde who could not be accommodated elsewhere and a careful choice could not be made. So, often there was damage and misuse and the Mother had
\nto spend sometimes 200\/300 Rupees after Darshan to repair
\n <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\nPage <\/font>\u2013 580<\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tthings and restore what had been realised. Z <\/i>has taken the responsibility of the house and of keeping things right as much as possible. That was why she interfered in the handbag affair 
\n\t\u2014it
\nwas as much a tragedy for the table as for the doctor, for it got scratched and spoiled by the handbag 
\n\t\u2014and tried to keep both
\nthe bag and shaving utensils in the places that had been assigned for them. If I had been in the doctor’s place, I would have been
\ngrateful to her for her care and solicitude instead of being upset by what ought to have been for him trifles although, because of
\nher responsibility, they had for her their importance. Anyhow, this is the rationale for the rules and they do not seem to me to
\nbe meaningless regulation and discipline. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tFinally, about financial arrangements. It has been an arduous and trying work for the Mother and myself to keep up this Asram,
\n\twith its ever \u2014increasing numbers, to make both ends meet and at times to
\n\tprevent deficit budgets and their results, especially in this war time, when
\n\tthe expenses have climbed to a dizzy and fantastic height. Only one
\n\taccustomed to these things or who had similar responsibilities can
\n\tunderstand what we have gone through. Carrying on anything of this magnitude
\n\twithout any settled income could not have been done if there had not been
\n\tthe working of a Divine Force. Works of charity are not part of our work,
\n\tthere are other people who can see to that. We have to spend all on the work
\n\twe have taken in hand and what we get is nothing compared to what is needed.
\n\tWe cannot undertake things that would bring in money in the ordinary ways.
\n\tWe have to use whatever means are possible. There is no general rule that
\n\tspiritual men must do works of charity or they should receive and care for
\n\twhatever visitors come or house and feed them. If we do it, it is because it
\n\thas become part of our work. The Mother charges visitors for accommodation
\n\tand food because she has expenses to meet and cannot make money out of air;
\n\tshe charges in fact less than her expense. It is quite natural that she
\n\tshould not like people to take advantage of her and allow those who try to
\n\ttake meals in the dining room under false pretences; even if they are a few
\n\tat first, yet if this were allowed, a few would soon become a legion. As for
\n\tpeople being <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 581<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nallowed to come in freely for Darshan without permission, which would soon convert me into a thing for show and an object of
\ncuriosity, often critical or hostile curiosity, it is I who would be the first to cry “stop”.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nI have tried to explain our standpoint and have gone to some length to do it. Whether it is agreed with or not, at any
\nrate it is a standpoint and I think a rational one. I am writing only on the surface and I do not speak of what is behind or from
\nthe Yogic standpoint, the standpoint of the Yogic consciousness from which we act; that would be more difficult to express. This
\nis merely for intellectual satisfaction, and there there is always room for dispute.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n25 February 1945 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nAs for Golconde, it is in that house of all the 80 or more houses in the Asram that she has been trying to carry out her idea of
\nphysical things, their harmony and order and proper treatment, she has not been imposing it elsewhere except in the matter
\nof cleanliness and hygiene, which are surely not objectionable. I may say that you are mistaken in thinking that everybody
\nwho stays in Golconde is in a state of misery or revolt. On the contrary, there are many who have asked to be put and
\nare put there at their own request every time they come. And they are not Europeans. Mother thoroughly appreciated and
\npraised the old Indian way of living, its simplicity, harmony and order when she saw it exemplified by
\nX <\/i>and his brother
\nin the Asram, but that is not the way of living most prevalent nowadays which is a mixture. Chairs, tables, electric fans etc.
\nare European introductions, but I don’t suppose those who have got accustomed to them would like to give them up or return
\nto the true simplicity of Indian life. That however is by the way. But I fail to see why you should treat this external trifle as of so
\nstupendous an importance. Mother should be free to carry out her idea in this corner of her kingdom; all that is to be seen is
\nthat those who violently dislike it should not stay in Golconde.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t25 October 1945<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 582<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nThe French Book L’Ether Vivant<\/i>
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tMany of the questions asked in your letter about the condition
\nafter death are dealt with in the French book L’Ether Vivant<\/i>. This book was written by Paul Richard, but all the substance was
\ntaken by him from the Mother, as he himself had no knowledge about these things. You can send the book to the Mother and
\nshe will mark the passages. You should also read what is said in the Conversations
\n<\/i>about these things.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n18 November 1931 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tMeeting the Dead
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tIs there any indication the Mother has received to tell her that my brother’s soul really wanted at the end to come to her Light
\nand the Master’s? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tMother cannot say particularly because so many people come to
\nher in the night for the passage to the other side whom she has not known in the body. Your brother may very well have been
\none of them and in view of X<\/i>‘s account, there is little doubt that he must have been.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nDecember 1933 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nWhen Mother said that it was not good to try to meet the dead, she was speaking from a spiritual standpoint which is not usually
\nknown or regarded by the spiritists.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t25 August 1936
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tIt is not for everything that the souls of the departed come direct
\nto the Mother, but this is a special action of hers and usually she sees the persons whom she has to help. But she has seen only
\nX<\/i>‘s mental being and it was still interested in earthly things; his vital being she has not seen and it is that that usually comes for
\nhelp. Some however come at a later stage of the passage and not at first.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n8
\nDecember 1936<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 583<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nSpeaking to People about Past Lives
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Mother only speaks to people about their past births when
\nshe sees definitely some scene or memory of their past in concentration; but this happens rarely nowadays.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n30 June 1933 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nMother does not usually look into past lives; only when things come of themselves from the past she looks.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n24 July 1934 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tSending Ethereal Beings to the Sadhaks
\n\t<\/a> <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\tX <\/span> <\/i>said that ever since he wrote the sonnet “Hieroglyphics” as a joke, sonnets no longer come to him; this, you said, is
\nbecause sonnets have a being of their own which is shocked by any crudity, jesting or misuse. My mind then caught the idea
\nthat there are beings, probably of the intuitive plane, who have very subtle and refined vibrations. At times they enter
\nhuman beings and then something of their peace, refinement and purity manifests in men. But if there is anger, passion,
\ndesire, vanity or unrefinement, they recede and live in their own region. These beings are ethereal, peaceful, pure, loving,
\nshy, like beautiful children. One should not injure their sense of harmony, purity, refinement and beauty by allowing any
\nlower vital crudities. Mother sends one of these beings to each of us according to his possibility.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThere is much truth in what you write 
\n\u2014there are beings of that kind and your description is good. But it is not to
\neach <\/i>one that
\nMother sends them  \u2014only to some when there is an opening.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t28 January 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nAn Occult or Yogic Faculty
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\tX <\/span> <\/i>has reported Mother’s observation correctly but he does not
\nseem to have understood it. The Mother never meant that by merely willing one could know at once what was in someone
\nelse or that all one’s impressions about him would be spontaneously and infallibly correct. What she meant was that there
\n  
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 584<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nis a faculty or power (an occult or Yogic faculty) by which one can get the right perceptions and impressions and if one has
\nthe will to do so, one can develop it. Not at once, not by an easy method 
\n\u2014tra la la and there you are: it may take years
\nand one has to be careful and scrupulous about it. For these are intuitive perceptions and intuition is a thing that can easily be
\nimitated by many other movements of consciousness that are much more fallible. Your impressions may be mental or vital
\nand a mental or vital impression may have something to justify it or may not 
\n\u2014but even in the first case there is no certainty
\nat all that it will be correct; even if there is that something, it may be incorrectly caught or caught with much mixture of error,
\ntwisted into falsehood, put in the wrong way etc. etc. And there may be no justification at all; it may be a mere wrong formation of your own mind or vital or else somebody else’s wrong impression conveyed to you and accepted by you as your own.
\nYour impression may be the result of a want of affinity between you and the other person, so that if he impresses you as null and
\nneutral, it is because you cannot feel what is in him, it does not come home to you 
\n\u2014or, again, if you feel that he is in a wrong
\ncondition, it may be only because his vital vibrations rub yours the wrong way. There are lots of things like that which one must
\nhave the power to distinguish very carefully and exactly; until one knows one’s own consciousness and its operations well, one
\ncannot know the operations of the consciousness of others. But it is possible to develop a certain direct sight or a certain direct
\nfeeling or contact by which one can know, but only after much time and much careful, scrupulous and vigilant observation and
\nself \u2014training. Till then one can’t go about saying that this is an advanced sadhak or that one is not advanced and that other is
\nno good at all. Even if one knows, it is not necessary always to air one’s knowledge.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n9 February 1935 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother Takes upon Herself Difficulties and Illnesses
\n\t<\/a> <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tWhy did the Mother fall ill last time, she who is beyond the reach of death
\n\tand disease? Why did she take medicine like<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 585<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nher blind children, she who is the cause of all medicines? Why did she suffer innocently like her frail children? Was it all a
\nshow to mask her infiniteness? Kindly write something to stop these questions in my mind.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt is much easier for the sadhak by faith in the Mother to get free from illness than for the Mother to keep free 
\n\u2014because the
\nMother by the very nature of her work had to identify herself with the sadhaks, to support all their difficulties, to receive into
\nherself all the poison in their nature, to take up besides all the difficulties of the universal earth
\n\u2014Nature, including the possibility of death and disease in order to fight them out. If she had not done that, not a single sadhak would have been able to
\npractise this Yoga. The Divine has to put on humanity in order that the human being may rise to the Divine. This is a simple
\ntruth, but nobody in the Asram seems able to understand that the Divine can do that and yet remain different from them 
\n\u2014can still remain the Divine.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t8 May 1933
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tPeople believe that their difficulties and illnesses are taken
\naway by the Mother and so she sometimes suffers or, as X<\/i> puts it, “Mother has to pay.” Is this suffering due to the identity of consciousness that the Mother calls into play and thus enters into the depths of obscure Matter? But at that rate there
\nwould be too great an onrush of these things on her from many sadhaks. An idea comes to me of taking upon myself some of
\nthese difficulties and illnesses so that I can also suffer with her pleasantly?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nPleasantly? It would be anything but pleasant either for you or for us.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nBut perhaps all these ideas are only conjectures of people.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tIt is rather a crude statement of a fact. The Mother in order
\nto do her work had to take all the sadhaks inside her personal being and consciousness; thus personally (not merely impersonally) taken inside, all the disturbances and difficulties in them including illness could throw themselves upon her in a way that
\n  
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 586<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ncould not have happened if she had not renounced the selfprotection of separateness. Not only illnesses of others could
\ntranslate themselves into attacks on her body  \u2014these she could generally throw off as soon as she knew from what quarter
\nand why it came  \u2014but their inner difficulties, revolts, outbursts of anger and hatred against her could have the same and a
\nworse effect. That was the only danger for her (because inner difficulties are easily surmountable), but matter and the body are
\nthe weak point or crucial point of our Yoga, since this province has never been conquered by the spiritual Power, the old Yogas
\nhaving either left it alone or used on it only a detailed mental and vital force, not the general spiritual force. It was the reason
\nwhy after a serious illness caused by a terribly bad state of the Asram atmosphere, I had to insist on her partial retirement so
\nas to minimise the most concrete part of the pressure upon her. Naturally the full conquest of the physical would revolutionise
\nmatters, but as yet it is the struggle.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t31 March 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tIs it inevitable that in the process of conversion and transformation all these resistances, disturbances, revolts should come? Could they be eliminated to some extent from the very
\nbeginning of one’s sadhana so that there would be less of these things for the Mother to take into herself?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe nature of the terrestrial consciousness and of humanity being what it is, these things were to some extent inevitable. It is
\nonly a very few who escape with the slighter adverse movements only. But after a time these things should disappear. It does so
\ndisappear in individuals  \u2014but there seems to be a great difficulty in getting it to disappear from the atmosphere of the Asram 
\n\u2014somebody or other always takes it up and from him it tries to spread to others. It is of course because there is behind it one
\nof the principles of life according to the Ignorance  \u2014a deeply rooted tendency of vital Nature. But it is the very aim of sadhana
\nto overcome that and substitute a truer and diviner vital Force.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t1 April 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 587<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nYou have written to me that standing is not good for Mother, and yet I see the Mother standing in concentration on the
\nstaircase for at least fifteen minutes every night. Remembering what you told me, I feel so anxious. I feel she has
\nonly to sit down on a seat or a chair. Can it not be done, please?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWhen Mother stands on the stairs in full concentration it is quite a different thing from standing talking with people. In the
\nformer condition nothing can touch her. In the second she has to identify herself with the general physical consciousness and
\nopen herself to its forces, so the conditions are not the same. Nowadays there is an improvement in the physical, but still
\nlimits must be kept.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t5 November 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tThere are people who tend to take away one’s vital strength.
\nWhat should one do? Should one not talk to others or merely exchange smiles with them or walk gravely past them? Should
\none try to help others at all? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThe danger of helping others is the danger of taking upon oneself
\ntheir difficulties. If one can keep oneself separate and help, this does not occur. But the tendency in helping is to take the person
\npartially or completely into one’s larger self. That is what the Mother has had to do with the sadhaks and the reason why she
\nhas sometimes to suffer  \u2014for one cannot always be on guard against any backwash when one is absorbed or in action. There
\nis also the difficulty that the persons helped get the habit of drawing and pulling on your forces instead of leaving it to you
\nto give just what you can and ought to give. And many other smaller possibilities one who helps others has to face.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n29 January 1935 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nSomebody told me that when the Mother tries to do something with X<\/i>, if his vital does not agree, he revolts against her with
\nsuch a force that it sometimes brings illness to her body. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThere are many who did that in the past. I don’t know that he<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 588<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ndoes it now. But all bad thoughts upon the Mother or throwing of impurities on her may affect her body as she has taken the
\nsadhaks into her consciousness, nor can she send these things back to them as it might hurt them.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n17 March 1936 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nDo people really throw their impurities on the Mother or does she draw their impurities into herself in order to purify them?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThere is not the slightest necessity for the Mother drawing impurities into herself 
\n\u2014any more than for the sadhak inviting
\nimpurity to come into himself. Impurity has to be thrown away, not drawn in.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n18 March 1936 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nI don’t know whether the Mother was joking or was serious when she wrote to me: “But why should I have any desires
\neither? You want me to be burdened with desires about you, so that you be free from desires? That might be good for you 
\n\t\u2014not for me.” I suppose this was a joke. Certainly we all wish to unload our desires on the Mother so that she may
\nreject them or transform them. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tThe idea of unburdening desires, imperfections, impurities,
\nillnesses on the Mother so that she may bear the results instead of the sadhaks is a curious one. I suppose it is a continuation
\nof the Christian idea of Christ suffering on the cross for the sake of humanity. But it has nothing to do with the Yoga of
\ntransformation.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t1 November 1936
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tDo our grumblings and imputations against the Mother hurt
\nher in some way? Does this have any undesirable effect on her body?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nI
\ncannot say that it does not have an effect  \u2014sometimes it may not have, if
\nshe is on her guard, at other times it has. It is not the imputations that do
\nit, but the force behind which throws the darkness in you and takes the form of
\na vital upsetting in you<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 589<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nbut passes on to her as an attack on the body since other things in her are unattackable. That is why these moods should never
\nbe formed against her.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t12 January 1937
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tWhat you saw is correct, but if the attitude of the sadhak is the
\ntrue psychic attitude, then the Mother has not to suffer; she can act on them without anything falling on her.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n22 January 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nMother has stopped the Pranam because something happened with her eyes. Sometimes we notice that she catches a cold.
\nHow do these things happen since she is the incarnated Divine?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt is due to attacks. As the material is not yet conquered, the Mother’s body has to bear the attacks which come daily and
\nto which the sadhaks freely open the doors. If she cut off her consciousness altogether from that of the sadhaks or put them
\noutside her consciousness, these things would not happen.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t8 February 1937
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tI could not help writing in order to know why the Mother’s
\nleft cheek was swollen. I was shocked to see it at the Sunday meditation. Is it due to the impurities of the sadhaks thrown
\non her, which she gladly receives for our relief? Or is it due to some other reason?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt is due to the impurities of the sadhaks thrown on the Mother.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tHow calmly she bears the agonies of her children. Is there no
\nend to it? Will it disappear after the full transformation of the physical?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThere seems to be no remedy possible before the physical change. If the Mother puts an inner wall between her and the sadhaks,
\nit would not happen, but then they would be unable to receive anything from her.
\nIf all were more careful to come to her with<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 590<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\ntheir deepest or highest consciousness, then there would be less chance of these things happening.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n3 May 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother and Medicines
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tI know that we inflict a lot of undesirable things on the Mother and that sometimes she does not reject them, but takes them
\nupon herself. But why should she not reject her cold and accept a medicine to do it? I am therefore enclosing a new phial, an
\nolfactory; Mother should take half \u2014a \u2014dozen inhalations in each nostril four times a day. That is all that is necessary.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nMother does not use medicines so it is no use sending them to her. But there are people who send to her suggestions such
\nas “Oh you are very ill, you won’t be able to sit through the Pranam” and some of these are thrown with force and she has
\nto work them out of the system, as happened today at Pranam. If you will give these people a medicine which will stop this habit
\nof theirs, it will be very useful.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t5 September 1936
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tI am afraid Mother still has a strong photophobia. X <\/i>said
\nthere is ptosis also . . . <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tWhat is ptosis?
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nwhich may remain if neglected. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tWhy do people make such prognostications? Suggestions of the
\nkind ought never to be made, mentally even  \u2014they might act like suggestions and do more harm than any good medicines
\ncould do. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tX <\/span> <\/i>
\n\tdoesn’t understand, and neither do I, why Mother doesn’t take kindly to
\n\tmedicines and doctors when it could be cured in a short time, he says. Well,
\n\twhat could I say! Shall we stop medical reports or do you see them? Frankly,
\n\tI don’t know how much our allopathic medicines can help.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 591<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nThen why don’t you understand? If medicines can’t help, what’s the use of putting foreign matter in the eye merely because
\nit is a medicine? Medicines have a quite different action on the Mother’s body than they would have on yours or
\nX<\/i>‘s or
\nanybody else’s and the reaction is not usually favourable. Her physical consciousness is not the same as that of ordinary people 
\n\u2014though even in ordinary people it is not so identical in all cases as science would have us believe.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n1 February 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nI am surprised to hear that even “prognostications” are very harmful. So far we have taken these things as simple superstitions.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tPrognostications of that kind should not be lightly thought or
\nspoken  \u2014especially in the case of the Mother  \u2014in other cases, even if there is a possibility or probability, they should be kept
\nconfidential from the person affected, unless it is necessary to inform. This is because of the large part played by state of
\nconsciousness and suggestion in illness. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tWhat is ptosis? Ptosis means drooping of the upper eyelid by
\na paralysis temporary or otherwise. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tBut, confound it, there is nothing of the kind. The drooping of
\nthe eyelid was quite voluntary.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t2 February 1937
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tWhatever little doctors have found by experience to be effective, you absolutely disallow. For instance, they recommend Calomel for diarrhoea; you say it is not to be given . . .
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIt is no use discussing these matters  \u2014the Mother’s views are too far
\nremoved from the traditional nostrums to be understood by a medical mind, except
\nthose that have got out of the traditional groove or those who after long
\nexperience have seen things and can become devastatingly frank about the
\nlimitations of their own "science".
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 592<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nMilk of Magnesia is usually harmless; but it can also be harmful, as it was in this case.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nIdeas differ. Both the Mother and X <\/i>were horrified at the idea of a child of 4 months being given a purgative. The leading
\nchildren’s doctor in France told the Mother no child under 12 months should be given a purgative, as it is likely to do great
\nharm and may be dangerous. But here, we understand, it is the practice to dose children freely with purgatives from their day of
\nbirth almost. Perhaps that and overadministration of medicines is one cause of excessive infant mortality.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n4 April 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nOnce Mother asked me to try this method of diagnosis: instead of analysing the various possibilities and probabilities and then
\ndiagnosing by elimination, to just keep quiet and go at it. So also in the case of choosing medicines. Just wait for the true
\nintuition of the thing to come. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tWell, so that’s how the Mother’s statements are understood! A
\nfree permit for anything and everything calling itself an intuition to go crashing into the field of action! Go at it, indeed! Poor it!
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nWhat the Mother says in the matter is what she said to Dr. X <\/i>with his entire agreement 
\n\u2014viz. reading from symptoms by
\nthe doctors is usually a mere balancing between possibilities (of course except in clear and simple cases) and the conclusion is a
\nguess. It may be a right guess and then it will be all right, or it may be a wrong guess and then all will be wrong unless Nature is
\ntoo strong for the doctor and overcomes the consequences of his error  \u2014or at the least the treatment will be ineffective. On the
\ncontrary if one develops the diagnostic flair, one can see at once what is the real thing among the possibilities and see what is to
\nbe done. That is what the most successful doctors have,  \u2014they have this flashlight which shows them the true point.
\nX <\/i>agreed
\nand said the cause of the guessing was that there were whole sets of symptoms which could belong to any one of several diseases
\nand to decide is a most delicate and subtle business, no amount of book knowledge or reasoning will ensure a right decision. A
\n  <\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 593<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nspecial insight is needed that looks through the symptoms and not merely at them. This last sentence, by the way, is my own,
\nnot X<\/i>‘s. About development of intuition afterwards  \u2014no time tonight.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n6 April 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nI am afraid X <\/i>has obstinate constipation. Treatment? Well, I am damned, for except enema castor oil is the medicine for
\nchildren in our “science”. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tAll “science” does not recommend castor oil for children 
\n\t\u2014I
\nthink it is a nineteenth century fad which has prolonged itself. The Mother’s “children’s doctor” told her it should not be done 
\n\t\u2014also in her own case when a child the doctors peremptorily stopped it on the ground that it spoiled the stomach and liver.
\nI suppose you will say doctors disagree? They do! When Y<\/i>‘s child reached Madras, the first doctor said “Stop mother’s milk
\nfor three days”, the second said “Mother’s milk to be taken at once, at once!” So, sir. Anyhow for
\nX <\/i>Mother proposes diet
\nfirst  \u2014small bananas Z <\/i>will give, very good for constipation 
\n\t\u2014papaya if available in the garden. Also as he is pimply, cocoanut
\nwater on an empty stomach. Afterwards we can see if medicine is necessary.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n9 April 1937 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother and Eye Treatment
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tI believe the Mother is using glasses for reading. Would she like to try my treatment [palming, etc.<\/i>]?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe Mother has seen that these methods are perfectly effective, but she cannot follow a treatment because she has no time. Her
\nsight is variable: when she can rest and concentrate a little and do what is necessary, she can read without glasses.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n8 July 1934 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tGiving Money to the Mother
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tYou will find with this a letter from the Mother giving you her point of
\n\tview with regard to the request for a written statement<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 594<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nfrom herself about approaching people for money. You must make X <\/i>understand that this is not done and cannot be done. If
\nhe feels moved to do this as work for the Mother, the knowledge that it is needed should be enough. It is not a question of a public
\nappeal for funds, but of getting friends and sympathisers to help. You will see from the Mother’s letter the spirit in which it should
\nbe done.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\tcirca 29 April 1938
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tThe Mother has never objected to people who “cannot pay” residing or visiting the Asram without paying; she expects payment only from visitors who can pay. She did object strongly to the
\naction of some rich visitors (on one occasion) who came here, spent money lavishly on purchases etc. and went off without
\ngiving anything to the Asram or even the smallest offering to the Mother, that is all.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n21 October 1943 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\nMy book is going into a second edition. The publisher promises to send me what he owes me (to be offered to the Mother,
\nof course). So far he hasn’t sent me a pice. I wonder how much he will send in the end? Do you think I am getting too
\ncommercial? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tIf you give the money to the Mother, that can’t be commercial;
\ncommerce implies personal profit, and here your profit is only spiritual.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n2 April 1944 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother’s Accounts
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t<\/p>\n

\n\tX <\/span> <\/i>showed me the play of numbers in his account book today. The total was Rs.
\n\t7 As. 7 Ps. 7. Today is also the 7th day of the 7th month of the year and
\n\tafter I decided to write to you about this I saw that the number on the door
\n\tof the house where I was working was also 7. Elsewhere one does not come
\n\tacross such a play of numbers. I think it occurs here because the numbers
\n\t(perhaps the occult beings of numbers) feel at ease in our atmosphere 
\n\t\u2014as do the sparrows in the main building!  \u2014and they play with the
\n\tnumbers if one plays upon them and<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 595<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\nloves them. In government departments and other places they feel the atmosphere mechanical, heavy and rigorous and so
\nthey do not find any joy in such play. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tI suppose your explanation is correct 
\n\t\u2014at least from the occult
\npoint of view. The Mother is always having these numerical harmonies in her accounts.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n7 July 1936 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother’s Attire
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tWhy does the Mother wear rich and beautiful clothes?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tBeauty is as much an expression of the Divine as Knowledge,
\nPower or Ananda. Does anyone ask why does the Mother want to manifest the divine consciousness by knowledge or by power
\nand not by ignorance and weakness?2 It would not be a more absurd or meaningless question than this one put by the vital
\nagainst wearing artistic and beautiful dress.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t27 February 1933
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tDoes it make any difference to the Mother’s consciousness
\nwhether she puts on the best saris or the old ones, whether she lives in a palace or in a forest? What do these outer things
\nadd to the inner reality? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tOuter things are the expression of something in the inner reality.
\nA fine sari or a palace are expressions of the principle of beauty in things and that is their main value. The Divine Consciousness
\nis not bound by these things and has no attachment, but it is also not bound to abstain from them if beauty in things is part
\nof its intended action. The Mother, when the Asram was still unformed, was wearing patched cotton saris; when she took up
\nthe work, it was necessary to change her habits, so she did so.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t22 October 1935<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\t2 The Mother also replied to this question. She wrote: “Is it your idea that the Divine<\/i>
\n\t<\/font>
\nshould be represented on earth by poverty and ugliness?”  \u2014Ed.<\/font><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 596<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\nThe Mother’s Photograph
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tWhen I get sleepy during meditation, I often just sit in a quietly
\nconcentrated wakefulness and look at the Mother’s photo or your photo. Can I get the same amount of benefit simply by
\nlooking at Mother’s photo or yours with all the concentration I can command?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nYes, very many do. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tSometimes in that state I pray; sometimes the inside is void 
\n\u2014no thoughts or words at all, so I simply gaze. Am I pursuing the right line?
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nYes.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t10 March 1933
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother’s Naming of Cats <\/a> <\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tThe Mother gave names for cats because they understand and
\nanswer; she has never given any for birds and does not wish to do it. Now even for cats she is not giving names.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n28 April 1932 <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother’s Symbol
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tIn the chakra which is printed on the book
\n\tthe Mother, what colours are appropriate for the central dot and for the “four
\npowers”? I am thinking of preparing a powder design with a little addition at the circumference.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nCentre and 4 powers white. The 12 all of different colours, in three groups, (1) top group red passing through orange towards
\nyellow, (2) next group yellow passing through green towards blue, (3) blue passing through violet towards red. If white is not
\nconvenient, the centre may be gold (powder).<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t20 March 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tIn the chakra for the central circle you have asked me to use either white
\n\tor gold  \u2014suppose I use gold at the centre, then should I use white at
\n\tthe strap around it? In that case the straps <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 597<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n

\naround the two bigger circles will have gold and the central strap alone will have white.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\nThe central circle need not have a strap 
\n\u2014simply a gold disc.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\n\t11 April 1934
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t*<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t 
\n <\/span><\/p>\n

\n\tI have frequently been thinking of the Mother’s symbol
\n(chakra) and its significance. I have understood it as follows: <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

\n\tCentral circle 
\n\t\u2014Transcendental power.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

\n\tFour inner petals 
\n\t\u2014Four powers working from the Supermind to Overmind.
\n<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

\n\tTwelve outer petals 
\n\t\u2014Division of four into twelve powers from Overmind to Intuition and mind.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n

\n\tIs my conception at all tenable? <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tEssentially (in general principle) the 12 powers are the vibrations
\nthat are necessary for the complete manifestation. These are the 12 seen from the beginning above the Mother’s head. Thus there
\nare really 12 rays from the sun, not 7, 12 planets etc. <\/span> <\/p>\n

\n\tAs to the exact interpretation of the detail of the powers, I
\nsee nothing against the arrangement you have made. It can stand very well.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n15 April 1934 <\/span> <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\t
\n\tThe Mother’s Flag
\n<\/a>
\n<\/b>
\n\t<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n\tAbout the blue flag. I presume you mean the flag with the white lotus. If so, it is the Mother’s flag, for the white lotus is her
\nsymbol as the red lotus is mine. The blue of the flag is meant to be the colour of Krishna and so represents the spiritual or
\nDivine Consciousness which it is her work to establish so that it may reign upon earth. This is the meaning of the flag being
\nused as the Ashram flag, that our work is to bring down this consciousness and make it the leader of the world’s life.
\n\t<\/span> <\/p>\n

\n14
\nMarch 1949<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n
\nPage <\/font>\u2013 598<\/font><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Aspects of the Mother’s Life in the Ashram   The Mother’s Music   It is not by knowledge of music that the understanding [of the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-32-the-mother-with-letters-on-the-mother","wpcat-56-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}