{"id":3051,"date":"2013-07-13T01:45:38","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:45:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=3051"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:45:38","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:45:38","slug":"59-internationalism-vol-25-the-human-cycle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/25-the-human-cycle\/59-internationalism-vol-25-the-human-cycle","title":{"rendered":"-59_Internationalism.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n\t<span lang=\"en-gb\"> <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><font size=\"4\">Chapter XXXII <\/font> <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><font size=\"4\">Internationalism<\/font> <\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 0pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<b><font size=\"5\">T<\/font>HE IDEA<\/b> of humanity as a single race of beings with a common life and a common general interest is among the<br \/>\n most characteristic and significant products of modern<br \/>\nthought. It is an outcome of the European mind which proceeds characteristically from life-experience to the idea and, without<br \/>\ngoing deeper, returns from the idea upon life in an attempt to change its outward forms and institutions, its order and system. In the European mentality it has taken the shape known currently as internationalism. Internationalism is the attempt of<br \/>\nthe human mind and life to grow out of the national idea and form and even in a way to destroy it in the interest of the larger<br \/>\nsynthesis of mankind. An idea proceeding on these lines needs always to attach itself to some actual force or developing power<br \/>\nin the life of the times before it can exercise a practical effect. But usually it suffers by contact with the interests and prepossessions<br \/>\nof its grosser ally some lesser or greater diminution of itself or even a distortion, and in that form, no longer pure and absolute,<br \/>\nenters on the first stage of practice. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThe idea of internationalism was born of the thought of the<br \/>\n\t\t\teighteenth century and it took some kind of voice in the first<br \/>\n\t\t\tidealistic stages of the French Revolution. But at that time, it was<br \/>\n\t\t\trather a vague intellectual sentiment than a clear idea seeing its<br \/>\n\t\t\tway to practice; it found no strong force in life to help it to take<br \/>\n\t\t\tvisible body. What came out of the French Revolution and the<br \/>\n\t\t\tstruggle that grew around it, was a complete and self-conscious<br \/>\n\t\t\tnationalism and not internationalism. During the nineteenth century<br \/>\n\t\t\twe see the larger idea growing again in the minds of thinkers,<br \/>\n\t\t\tsometimes in a modified form, sometimes in its own pure idealism,<br \/>\n\t\t\ttill allying itself with the growing forces of socialism and<br \/>\n\t\t\tanarchism it took a clear body and a recognisable vital force. <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 548<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nIn its absolute form, it became the internationalism of &nbsp;the intellectuals, intolerant of nationalism as a narrow spirit of the past, contemptuous of patriotism as an irrational prejudice,<br \/>\na maleficent corporate egoism characteristic of narrow intellects and creative of arrogance, prejudice, hatred, oppression, division<br \/>\nand strife between nation and nation, a gross survival of the past which the growth of reason was destined to destroy. It is founded<br \/>\non a view of things which looks at man in his manhood only and casts away all those physical and social accidents of birth, rank,<br \/>\nclass, colour, creed, nationality, which have been erected into so many walls and screens behind which man has hidden himself<br \/>\nfrom his fellow-man; he has turned them into sympathy-proof shelters and trenches from which he wages against him a war of<br \/>\ndefence and aggression, war of nations, war of continents, war of classes, war of colour with colour, creed with creed, culture<br \/>\nwith culture. All this barbarism the idea of the intellectual internationalist seeks to abolish by putting man face to face with man<br \/>\non the basis of their common human sympathy, aims, highest interests of the future. It is entirely futurist in its view; it turns<br \/>\naway from the confused and darkened good of the past to the purer good of the future when man, at last beginning to become<br \/>\na truly intelligent and ethical being, will shake away from him all these sources of prejudice and passion and evil. Humanity will<br \/>\nbecome one in idea and feeling, and life be consciously what it now is in spite of itself, one in its status on earth and its destiny. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThe height and nobility of the idea is not to be questioned and certainly a mankind which set its life upon this basis would<br \/>\nmake a better, purer, more peaceful and enlightened race than anything we can hope to have at present. But as the human being<br \/>\nis now made, the pure idea, though always a great power, is also afflicted by a great weakness. It has an eventual capacity, once<br \/>\nborn, of taking hold of the rest of the human being and forcing him in the end to acknowledge its truth and make some kind<br \/>\nof attempt to embody it; that is its strength. But also because man at present lives more in the outward than in the inward, is<br \/>\ngoverned principally by his vital existence, sensations, feelings and customary mentality rather than by his higher thought-mind<br \/>\nand feels himself in these to be really alive, really to exist and<br \/>\nbe, while the world of ideas is to him something remote and abstract and, however powerful and interesting in its way, not<br \/>\na living thing, the pure idea seems, until it is embodied in life, something not quite real; in that abstractness and remoteness<br \/>\nlies its weakness. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 549<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThe sense of this abstractness imposes on the idea an undue<br \/>\nhaste to get itself recognised by life and embodied in a form. If it could have confidence in its strength and be content to<br \/>\ngrow, to insist, to impress itself till it got well into the spirit of man, it might conceivably become a real part of his soullife, a permanent power in his psychology and might succeed in remoulding his whole life in its image. But it has inevitably<br \/>\na desire to get as soon as possible admitted into a form of the life, for until then it does not feel itself strong and cannot quite<br \/>\nbe sure that it has vindicated its truth. It hurries into action before it has real knowledge of itself and thereby prepares its<br \/>\nown disappointment, even when it seems to triumph and fulfil its object. For in order to succeed, it allies itself with powers and<br \/>\nmovements which are impelled by another aim than its own, but are glad enough to get its aid so that they may strengthen their<br \/>\nown case and claim. Thus when it realises itself at last, it does it in a mixed, impure and ineffective form. Life accepts it as a<br \/>\npartial habit, but not completely, not quite sincerely. That has been the history of every idea in succession and one reason at<br \/>\nleast why there is almost always something unreal, inconclusive and tormented about human progress. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tThere are many conditions and tendencies in human life at present which are favourable to the progress of the internationalist idea. The strongest of these favourable forces is the constant drawing closer of the knots of international life, the multiplication of points of contact and threads of communication and an increasing community in thought, in science and in knowledge.<br \/>\nScience especially has been a great force in this direction; for science is a thing common to all men in its conclusions, open to<br \/>\nall in its methods, available to all in its results: it is international in its very nature; there can be no such thing as a national science,<br \/>\nbut only the nations&#8217; contributions to the work and growth of science which are<br \/>\n\t\t\tthe indivisible inheritance of all humanity. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 550<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nTherefore it is easier for men of science or those strongly influenced by science to grow into the international spirit and all the world is now beginning to feel the scientific influence and to live<br \/>\nin it. Science also has created that closer contact of every part of the world with every other part, out of which some sort of<br \/>\ninternational mind is growing. Even cosmopolitan habits of life are now not uncommon and there are a fair number of persons<br \/>\nwho are as much or more citizens of the world as citizens of their own nation. The growth of knowledge is interesting the peoples<br \/>\nin each other&#8217;s art, culture, religion, ideas and is breaking down at many points the prejudice, arrogance and exclusiveness of the<br \/>\nold nationalistic sentiment. Religion, which ought to have led the way, but owing to its greater dependence on its external parts<br \/>\nand its infrarational rather than its spiritual impulses has been as much, or even more, a sower of discord as a teacher of unity,<br \/>\n\t\t\t\u2014 religion is beginning to realise, a little dimly and ineffectively as yet, that spirituality is after all its own chief business and true<br \/>\naim and that it is also the common element and the common bond of all religions. As these influences grow and come more<br \/>\nand more consciously to cooperate with each other, it might be hoped that the necessary psychological modification will quietly,<br \/>\ngradually, but still irresistibly and at last with an increasing force of rapidity take place which can prepare a real and fundamental<br \/>\nchange in the life of humanity. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tBut this is at present a slow process, and meanwhile the<br \/>\n\t\t\tinternationalist idea, eager for effectuation, allied and almost<br \/>\n\t\t\tidentified itself with two increasingly powerful movements which<br \/>\n\t\t\thave both assumed an international character, Socialism and<br \/>\n\t\t\tAnarchism. Indeed, it is this alliance that most commonly went by<br \/>\n\t\t\tthe name of internationalism. But this socialistic and anarchistic<br \/>\n\t\t\tinternationalism was recently put to the test, the fiery test of the<br \/>\n\t\t\tEuropean war, and thus tried, it was found sadly wanting. In every<br \/>\n\t\t\tcountry, the Socialist party shed its internationalist promise with<br \/>\n\t\t\tthe greatest ease and lightness, <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 551<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\nGerman socialism, the protagonist of the idea, massively leading the way in this<br \/>\nformidable abjuration. It is true that a small minority in &nbsp;each country either remained heroically faithful to its principles or soon returned to them, and as the general weariness of the<br \/>\ngreat international massacre grew, even the majority showed a sensible turn in the same direction; but this was rather the fruit<br \/>\nof circumstance than of principle. Russian socialism, it may be said, has, at least in its extremer form, shown a stronger root<br \/>\nof internationalistic feeling. But what it has actually attempted to accomplish is a development of Labour rule on the basis of<br \/>\na purified nationalism, non-aggressive except for revolutionary purposes and self-contained, and not on the larger international<br \/>\nidea. In any case, the actual results of the Russian attempt show only up to the present a failure of the idea to acquire the vital strength and efficiency which would justify it to life; it is possible to use them much more as a telling argument against<br \/>\ninternationalism than as a justification of its truth or at least of its applicability in the present stage of human progress. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tBut what is the cause of this almost total bankruptcy of the international ideal under the strong test of life? Partly it may<br \/>\nbe because the triumph of socialism is not necessarily bound up with the progress of internationalism. Socialism is really an<br \/>\nattempt to complete the growth of the national community by making the individual do what he has never yet done, live for<br \/>\nthe community more than for himself. It is an outgrowth of the national, not of the international idea. No doubt, when the<br \/>\nsociety of the nation has been perfected, the society of nations can and even must be formed; but this is a later possible or<br \/>\neventual result of Socialism, not its primary vital necessity. In the crises of life it is the primary vital necessity which tells, while the<br \/>\nother and remoter element betrays itself to be a mere idea not yet ready for accomplishment; it can only become powerful when it<br \/>\nalso becomes either a vital or a psychological necessity. The real truth, the real cause of the failure is that internationalism is as<br \/>\nyet, except with some exceptional men, merely an idea; it is not yet a thing near to our vital feelings or otherwise a part of our<br \/>\npsychology. The normal socialist or syndicalist cannot escape from the general human feeling and in the test he too turns out,<br \/>\neven though he were a professed <i>sans-patrie <\/i>in ordinary times, in his<br \/>\n\t\t\tinner heart and being a nationalist. <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 552<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tAs a vital fact, moreover, these movements have been a revolt of Labour aided by a number of intellectuals against the established state of things, and they have only allied themselves with internationalism because<br \/>\nthat too is an intellectual revolt and because its idea helps them in the battle. If Labour comes to power, will it keep or shed<br \/>\nits internationalistic tendencies? The experience of countries in which it is or has been at the head of affairs does not give an<br \/>\nencouraging answer, and it may at least be said that, unless at that time the psychological change in humanity has gone much<br \/>\nfarther than it has now, Labour in power is likely to shed more of the internationalist feeling than it will succeed in keeping and<br \/>\nto act very much from the old human motives. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"line-height: 150%;text-indent: 25pt;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\tNo doubt, the European war itself was an explosion of all<br \/>\nthat was dangerous and evil in successful nationalism, and the resulting conflagration may well turn out to have been a purificatory process that has burned up many things that needed to die. It has already strengthened the international idea and forced<br \/>\nit on governments and peoples. But we cannot rely too greatly on ideas and resolutions formed in a moment of abnormal crisis under the violent stress of exceptional circumstances. Some effect there may be in the end, some first recognition of juster<br \/>\nprinciples in international dealings, some attempt at a better, more rational or at least a more convenient international order.<br \/>\nBut until the idea of humanity has grown not only upon the intelligence but in the sentiments, feelings, natural sympathies<br \/>\nand mental habits of man, the progress made is likely to be more in external adjustments than in the vital matters, more in a use<br \/>\nof the ideal for mixed and egoistic purposes than at once or soon in a large and sincere realisation of the ideal. Until man in<br \/>\nhis heart is ready, a profound change of the world conditions cannot come; or it can only be brought about by force, physical<br \/>\nforce or else force of circumstances, and that leaves all the real work to be done. A frame may have then been made, but the<br \/>\nsoul will have still to grow into that mechanical body. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0\">\n\t\t\t<font size=\"2\">Page <font face=\"Times New Roman\">\u2013 553<\/font><\/font><\/span><span lang=\"en-gb\"><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chapter XXXII &nbsp; Internationalism &nbsp; THE IDEA of humanity as a single race of beings with a common life and a common general interest is&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3051","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-25-the-human-cycle","wpcat-58-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3051","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3051"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3051\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3051"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3051"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3051"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}