{"id":3093,"date":"2013-07-13T01:45:53","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:45:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=3093"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:45:53","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:45:53","slug":"67-self-determination-vol-25-the-human-cycle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/03-cwsa\/25-the-human-cycle\/67-self-determination-vol-25-the-human-cycle","title":{"rendered":"-67_Self-Determination.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n
\n\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tSelf-Determination <\/font><\/b><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tA <\/font>NEW<\/b> phrase has recently been cast out from the bloodstained yeast of war into the shifty language of politics,
\n\t\t\t\u2014 that strange language full of Maya and falsities, of self-illusion and deliberate delusion of others, which almost
\nimmediately turns all true and vivid phrases into a jargon, so that men may fight in a cloud of words without any clear sense
\nof the thing they are battling for, \u2014 it is the luminous description of liberty as the just power, the freely exercised right of
\nself-determination. The word is in itself a happy discovery, a thought-sign of real usefulness. For it helps to make definite and
\nmanageable what was apt till now to be splendidly vague and nebulous. Its invention is a sign at once of a growing clarity of
\nconception about this great good which man has been striving to achieve for himself through the centuries, as yet without any
\nsatisfying success to boast of anywhere, and of the increasing subjectivity of our ideas about life. This clarity and this subjectivity must indeed go together; for we can only get good hold of the right end of the great ideas which should govern our ways
\nof living when we begin to understand that their healthful process is from within outward, and that the opposite method, the
\nmechanical, ends always by turning living realities into formal conventions. No doubt, to man the animal the mechanical alone
\nseems to be real; but to man the soul, man the thinker through whom we arrive at our inner manhood, only that is true which
\nhe can feel as a truth within him and feel without as his external self-expression. All else is a deceptive charlatanry, an acceptance
\nof shows for truths, of external appearances for realities, which are so many devices to keep him in bondage. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tLiberty in one shape or another ranks among the most ancient and
\n\t\t\tcertainly among the most difficult aspirations of our race: it
\n\t\t\tarises from a radical instinct of our being and is yet opposed to
\n\t\t\tall our circumstances; it is our eternal good and our condition of
\n\t\t\tperfection, but our temporal being has failed to find its key. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 623<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThat perhaps is because true freedom is only possible if we live in the infinite, live, as the Vedanta bids us, in and from our
\nself-existent being; but our natural and temporal energies seek for it at first not in ourselves, but in our external conditions.
\nThis great indefinable thing, liberty, is in its highest and ultimate sense a state of being; it is self living in itself and determining by
\nits own energy what it shall be inwardly and, eventually, by the growth of a divine spiritual power within determining too what
\nit shall make of its external circumstances and environment; that is the largest and freest sense of self-determination. But
\nwhen we start from the natural and temporal life, what we practically come to mean by liberty is a convenient elbow-room
\nfor our natural energies to satisfy themselves without being too much impinged upon by the self-assertiveness of others. And
\nthat is a difficult problem to solve, because the liberty of one, immediately it begins to act, knocks up fatally against the liberty
\nof another; the free running of many in the same field means a free chaos of collisions. That was at one time glorified under
\nthe name of the competitive system, and dissatisfaction with its results has led to the opposite idea of State socialism, which
\nsupposes that the negation of individual liberty in the collective being of the State can be made to amount by some mechanical
\nprocess to a positive sum of liberty nicely distributable to all in a carefully guarded equality. The individual gives up his freedom
\nof action and possession to the State which in return doles out to him a regulated liberty, let us say, a sufficient elbow-room
\nso parcelled out that he shall not at all butt into the ribs of his neighbour. It is admirable in theory, logically quite unexceptionable, but in practice, one suspects, it would amount to a very oppressive, because a very mechanical slavery of the individual
\nto the community, or rather to something indefinite that calls itself the community. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tExperience has so far shown us that the human attempt to arrive at a mechanical freedom has only resulted in a very
\nrelative liberty and even that has been enjoyed for the most part by some at the
\n\t\t\texpense of others. It has amounted usually to the rule of the
\n\t\t\tmajority by a minority, and many strange things have been done in
\n\t\t\tits name.   <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 624<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tAncient liberty and democracy meant in Greece the self-rule
\n\t\t\t\u2014 variegated by periodical orgies of mutual
\nthroat-cutting \u2014 of a smaller number of freemen of all ranks who lived by the labour of a great mass of slaves. In recent
\ntimes liberty and democracy have been, and still are, a cant assertion which veils under a skilfully moderated plutocratic
\nsystem the rule of an organised successful bourgeoisie over a proletariate at first submissive, afterwards increasingly dissatisfied and combined for recalcitrant self-assertion. The earliest use of liberty and democracy by the emancipated proletariate
\nhas been the crude forceful tyranny of an ill-organised labour oligarchy over a quite disorganised peasantry and an impotently
\nrecalcitrant bourgeoisie. And just as the glorious possession of liberty by the community has been held to be consistent with
\nthe oppression of four-fifths or three-fifths of the population by the remaining fraction, so it has till lately been held to be
\nquite consistent with the complete subjection of one half of mankind, the woman half, to the physically stronger male. The
\nseries continues through a whole volume of anomalies, including of course the gloriously beneficent and profitable exploitation
\nof subject peoples by emancipated nations who, it seems, are entitled to that domination by their priesthood of the sacred cult
\nof freedom. They mean no doubt to extend it to the exploited at some distant date, but take care meanwhile to pay themselves the
\nfull price of their holy office before they deliver the article. Even the best machinery of this mechanical freedom yet discovered
\namounts to the unmodified will of a bare majority, or rather to its selection of a body of rulers who coerce in its name all
\nminorities and lead it to issues of which it has itself no clear perception. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThese anomalies, \u2014 anomalies of many kinds are inseparable from the mechanical method,
\n\t\t\t\u2014 are a sign that the real
\nmeaning of liberty has not yet been understood. Nevertheless the aspiration and the effort itself towards the realisation of a
\ngreat idea cannot fail to bear some fruit, and modern liberty and democracy,
\n\t\t\thowever imperfect and relative, have had this result that for the
\n\t\t\tcommunities which have followed them, they have removed the pressure
\n\t\t\tof the more obvious, outward and aggressive forms of oppression and
\n\t\t\tdomination which were inherent in the systems of the past.    <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 625<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThey have made life a little more tolerable for the mass, and if they have not yet made life free,
\nthey have at least given more liberty to thought and to the effort to embody a freer thought in a more adequate form of life. This
\nlarger space for the thought in man and its workings was the necessary condition for a growing clarity which must enlighten
\nin the end the crude conceptions with which the race has started and refine the crude methods and forms in which it has embodied
\nthem. The attempt to govern life by an increasing light of thought rather than allow the rough and imperfect actualities of life to
\ngovern and to limit the mind is a distinct sign of advance in human progress. But the true turning-point will come with the
\nfarther step which initiates the attempt to govern life by that of which thought itself is only a sign and an instrument, the
\nsoul, the inner being, and to make our ways of living a freer opportunity for the growing height and breadth of its need of
\nself-fulfilment. That is the real, the profounder sense which we shall have to learn to attach to the idea of self-determination as
\nthe effective principle of liberty. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe principle of self-determination really means this that
\nwithin every living human creature, man, woman and child, and equally within every distinct human collectivity growing or
\ngrown, half developed or adult there is a self, a being, which has the right to grow in its own way, to find itself, to make
\nits life a full and a satisfied instrument and image of its being. This is the first principle which must contain and overtop all
\nothers; the rest is a question of conditions, means, expedients, accommodations, opportunities, capacities, limitations, none of
\nwhich must be allowed to abrogate the sovereignty of the first essential principle. But it can only prevail if it is understood
\nwith a right idea of this self and its needs and claims. The first danger of the principle of self-determination, as of all others, is
\nthat it may be interpreted, like most of the ideals of our human existence in
\n\t\t\tthe past, in the light of the ego, its interests and its will
\n\t\t\ttowards self-satisfaction.    <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 626 <\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\nSo interpreted it will carry us
\nno farther than before; we shall arrive at a point where our principle is brought up short, fails us, turns into a false or a
\nhalf-true assertion of the mind and a convention of form which covers realities that are quite the opposite of itself. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tFor the ego has inalienably the instinct of a double selfassertion, its self-assertion against other egos and its selfassertion by means of other egos; in all its expansion it is impelled to subordinate their need to its own, to use them for
\nits own purpose and for that purpose to establish some kind of control or domination or property in what it uses, whether by
\nforce or by dexterity, openly or covertly, by absorption or by some skilful turn of exploitation. Human lives cannot run upon
\nfree parallels; for they are compelled by Nature continually to meet, impinge on each other, intermix, and in the ego life that
\nmeans always a clash. The first idea of our reason suggests that our human relations may be subjected to a mechanical
\naccommodation of interests which will get rid of the clash and the strife; but this can only be done up to a certain point: at
\nbest we diminish some of the violence and crude obviousness of the clashing and the friction and give them a more subtle
\nand less grossly perceptible form. Within that subtler form the principle of strife and exploitation continues; for always the
\negoistic instinct must be to use the accommodations to which it is obliged or induced to assent, as far as possible for its own
\nadvantage, and it is only limited in this impulse by the limits of its strength and capacity, by the sense of expediency and
\nconsequence, by the perception of some necessity for respecting other egoisms in order that its own egoism too may be respected.
\nBut these considerations can only tone down or hedge in the desire of a gross or a subtle domination and exploitation of
\nothers; they do not abrogate it. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe human mind has resorted to ethics as a corrective; but
\nthe first laws of ethical conduct also succeed at best in checking only the egoistic rule of life and do not overcome it. Therefore
\nthe ethical idea has pushed itself forward into the other and opposite principle
\n\t\t\tof altruism.   <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 627<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe main general results have been a clearer perception of collective egoisms and their claim
\non the individual egoism and, secondly, a quite uncertain and indefinable mixture, strife and balancing of egoistic and altruistic
\nmotive in our conduct. Often enough altruism is there chiefly in profession or at best a quite superficial will which does not
\nbelong to the centre of our action; it becomes then either a deliberate or else a half-conscious camouflage by which egoism
\nmasks itself and gets at its object without being suspected. But even a sincere altruism hides within itself the ego, and to be able
\nto discover the amount of it hidden up in our most benevolent or even self-sacrificing actions is the acid test of sincere selfintrospection, nor can anyone really quite know himself who has not made ruthlessly this often painful analysis. It could not
\nbe otherwise; for the law of life cannot be self-immolation; selfsacrifice can only be a step in self-fulfilment. Nor can life be
\nin its nature a one-sided self-giving; all giving must contain in itself some measure of receiving to have any fruitful value or
\nsignificance. Altruism itself is more important even by the good it does to ourselves than by the good it does to others; for the
\nlatter is often problematical, but the former is certain, and its good consists in the growth of self, in an inner self-heightening
\nand self-expansion. Not then any general law of altruism, but rather a self-recognition based upon mutual recognition must
\nbe the broad rule of our human relations. Life is self-fulfilment which moves upon a ground of mutuality; it involves a mutual
\nuse of one by the other, in the end of all by all. The whole question is whether this shall be done on the lower basis of
\nthe ego, attended by strife, friction and collision with whatever checks and controls, or whether it cannot be done by a higher
\nlaw of our being which shall discover a means of reconciliation, free reciprocity and unity. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tA right idea of the rule of self-determination may help to set us on the way to the discovery of this higher law. For we may
\nnote that this phrase self-determination reconciles and brings together in one complex notion the idea of liberty and the idea
\nof law. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t Page \u2013 628<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThese two powers of being tend in our first conceptions, as in the first appearances of life itself, to be opposed to each other as rivals or enemies; we find therefore ranged against each
\nother the champions of law and order and the defenders of liberty. There is the ideal which sets order first and liberty either
\nnowhere or in an inferior category, because it is willing to accept any coercion of liberty which will maintain the mechanical stability of order; and there is the ideal which on the contrary sets liberty first and regards law either as a hostile compression or a
\ntemporarily necessary evil or at best a means of securing liberty by guarding against any violent and aggressive interference with
\nit as between man and man. This use of law as a means of liberty may be advocated only in a minimum reducible to the
\njust quantity necessary for its purpose, the individualistic idea of the matter, or raised to a maximum as in the socialistic idea
\nthat the largest sum of regulation will total up to or at least lead up to or secure the larger sum of freedom. We have continually
\ntoo the most curious mixing up of the two ideas, as in the oldtime claim of the capitalist to prevent the freedom of labour to
\norganise so that the liberty of contract might be preserved, or in the singular sophistical contention of the Indian defenders of
\northodox caste rigidity on its economic side that coercion of a man to follow his ancestral profession in disregard not only of
\nhis inclinations, but of his natural tendencies and aptitudes is a securing to the individual of his natural right, his freedom to
\nfollow his hereditary nature. We see a similar confusion of ideas in the claim of European statesmen to train Asiatic or African
\npeoples to liberty, which means in fact to teach them in the beginning liberty in the school of subjection and afterwards to
\ncompel them at each stage in the progress of a mechanical selfgovernment to satisfy the tests and notions imposed on them by
\nan alien being and consciousness instead of developing freely a type and law of their own. The right idea of self-determination
\nmakes a clean sweep of these confusions. It makes it clear that liberty should proceed by the development of the law of one’s
\nown being determined from within, evolving out of oneself and not determined from outside by the idea and will of another. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 629 <\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThere remains the problem of relations, of the individual and the collective self-determination and of the interaction of the self-determination of one on the self-determination of another.
\nThat cannot be finally settled by any mechanical solution, but only by the discovery of some meeting-place of the law of our
\nself-determination with the common law of mutuality, where they begin to become one. It signifies in fact the discovery of
\nan inner and larger self other than the mere ego, in which our individual self-fulfilment no longer separates us from others but
\nat each step of our growth calls for an increasing unity. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tBut it is from the self-determination of the free individual
\nwithin the free collectivity in which he lives that we have to start, because so only can we be sure of a healthy growth of
\nfreedom and because too the unity to be arrived at is that of individuals growing freely towards perfection and not of human
\nmachines working in regulated unison or of souls suppressed, mutilated and cut into one or more fixed geometrical patterns.
\nThe moment we sincerely accept this idea, we have to travel altogether away from the old notion of the right of property
\nof man in man which still lurks in the human mind where it does not possess it. The trail of this notion is all over our past,
\nthe right of property of the father over the child, of the man over the woman, of the ruler or the ruling class or power over
\nthe ruled, of the State over the individual. The child was in the ancient patriarchal idea the live property of the father; he was
\nhis creation, his production, his own reproduction of himself; the father, rather than God or the universal Life in place of God,
\nstood as the author of the child’s being; and the creator has every right over his creation, the producer over his manufacture. He
\nhad the right to make of him what he willed, and not what the being of the child really was within, to train and shape
\nand cut him according to the parental ideas and not rear him according to his own nature’s deepest needs, to bind him to the
\npaternal career or the career chosen by the parent and not that to which his nature and capacity and inclination pointed, to fix
\nfor him all the critical turning-points of his life even after he had reached maturity. In education the child was regarded not
\nas a soul meant to grow, but as brute psychological stuff to be  shaped into a
\n\t\t\tfixed mould by the teacher.  <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 630<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tWe have travelled to another conception of the child as a soul with a being, a nature
\nand capacities of his own who must be helped to find them, to find himself, to grow into their maturity, into a fullness of
\nphysical and vital energy and the utmost breadth, depth and height of his emotional, his intellectual and his spiritual being.
\nSo too the subjection of woman, the property of the man over the woman, was once an axiom of social life and has only in
\nrecent times been effectively challenged. So strong was or had become the instinct of this domination in the male animal man,
\nthat even religion and philosophy have had to sanction it, very much in that formula in which Milton expresses the height of
\nmasculine egoism, “He for God only, she for God in him,” \u2014 if not actually indeed for him in the place of God. This idea
\ntoo is crumbling into the dust, though its remnants still cling to life by many strong tentacles of old legislation, continued
\ninstinct, persistence of traditional ideas; the fiat has gone out against it in the claim of woman to be regarded, she too, as a
\nfree individual being. The right of property of the rulers in the ruled has perished by the advance of liberty and democracy; in
\nthe form of national imperialism it still indeed persists, though more now by commercial greed than by the instinct of political
\ndomination; intellectually this form too of possessional egoism has received its death-blow, vitally it still endures. The right of
\nproperty of the State in the individual which threatened to take the place of all these, has now had its real spiritual consequence
\nthrown into relief by the lurid light of the war, and we may hope that its menace to human liberty will be diminished by this
\nclearer knowledge. We are at least advancing to a point at which it may be possible to make the principle of self-determination a
\npresent and pressing, if not yet an altogether dominant force in the whole shaping of human life. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tSelf-determination viewed from this subjective standpoint carries us back at once towards the old spiritual idea of the Being
\nwithin, whose action, once known and self-revealed, is not an obedience to external and mechanical impulses, but proceeds in
\neach from the powers of the soul, an action self-determined bythe essential quality and principle of which all our becoming is the apparent movement, svabhava-niyatam karma<\/i>. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 631   <\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tBut it is only
\nas we rise higher and higher in ourselves and find out our true self and its true powers that we can get at the full truth of this swabhava. Our present existence is at the most a growth towards it and therefore an imperfection, and its chief imperfection is the
\nindividual’s egoistic idea of self which reappears enlarged in the collective egoism. Therefore an egoistic self-determination or a
\nmodified individualism, is not the true solution; if that were all, we could never get beyond a balance and, in progress, a
\nzigzag of conflict and accommodation. The ego is not the true circle of the self; the law of mutuality which meets it at every
\nturn and which it misuses, arises from the truth that there is a secret unity between our self and the self of others and therefore
\nbetween our own lives and the lives of others. The law of our self-determination has to wed itself to the self-determination
\nof others and to find the way to enact a real union through this mutuality. But its basis can only be found within and not through
\nany mechanical adjustment. It lies in the discovery within by the being in the course of its self-expansion and self-fulfilment that
\nthese things at every turn depend on the self-expansion and self-fulfilment of those around us, because we are secretly one
\nbeing with them and one life. It is in philosophical language the recognition of the one self in all who fulfils himself variously
\nin each; it is the finding of the law of the divine being in each unifying itself with the law of the divine being in all. At once
\nthe key of the problem is shifted from without to within, from the visible externalities of social and political adjustment to the
\nspiritual life and truth which can alone provide its key. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tNot that the outer life has to be neglected; on the contrary
\nthe pursual of the principle in one field or on one level, provided we do not limit or fix ourselves in it, helps its disclosure in
\nother fields and upon other levels. Still if we have not the unity within, it is in vain that we shall try to enforce it from without
\nby law and compulsion or by any assertion in outward forms. Intellectual assertion too, like the mechanical, is insufficient;
\nonly the spiritual can give it, because it alone has the secure
\npower of realisation. <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 632<\/p>\n

\n

<\/font><\/font><\/font> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThe ancient truth of the self is the eternal truth; we have to go back upon it in order to carry it out in newer
\nand fuller ways for which a past humanity was not ready. The recognition and fulfilment of the divine being in oneself and in
\nman, the kingdom of God within and in the race is the basis on which man must come in the end to the possession of himself as
\na free self-determining being and of mankind too in a mutually possessing self-expansion as a harmoniously self-determining
\nunited existence.   <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tPage \u2013 633<\/font><\/font><\/font><\/font><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Self-Determination   A NEW phrase has recently been cast out from the bloodstained yeast of war into the shifty language of politics, \u2014 that strange…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3093","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-25-the-human-cycle","wpcat-58-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3093","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3093"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3093\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3093"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3093"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3093"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}