{"id":380,"date":"2013-07-13T01:27:39","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:27:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=380"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:27:39","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:27:39","slug":"079-the-acclamation-of-the-house-vol-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/01-sabcl\/01-bande-mataram-volume-01\/079-the-acclamation-of-the-house-vol-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","title":{"rendered":"-079_The Acclamation of the House.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"6\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<font size=\"4\"><b>The Acclamation of the House<\/b><\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<span><font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><span><b><font size=\"3\">A<\/font><\/b><\/span><b><span><font size=\"3\"><br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><\/b><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\"><b>GREAT<\/b><br \/>\ndeal is being made in the Anglo-Indian press of the unanimous appreciation with<br \/>\nwhich the House of Commons received Mr. Morley&#8217;s speech on the Budget. The<br \/>\ndiscovery that superior culture has not destroyed the primitive savage in the<br \/>\nAnglo-Saxon has been welcomed with fierce gratification. One English paper<br \/>\nwrites: \u2014 &quot;It was a healthy sign to which the attention of native<br \/>\nsedition-mongers may be usefully directed that the House of Commons which gave<br \/>\nan appreciative reception to the speech of the Secretary of State showed<br \/>\nimpatience at the captious and mischievous vapourings of Mr. C. J.<br \/>\nO\u2019Donnell.&quot; Well, but why draw attention to it? We have been arguing the<br \/>\nsame thing from the very beginning of our propaganda. We were among the first to<br \/>\npoint out to a too credulous nation that the friends of India in Parliament<br \/>\nrepresented nobody but themselves. It was one of the principal items on the<br \/>\ndestructive side of the Nationalist programme, to prove the delusiveness of the<br \/>\nprevalent faith in the ultimate sense of justice of the British people. If the<br \/>\nHouse of Commons saves us the trouble of farther argument and itself<br \/>\nconclusively proves the soundness of our reasoning, we accept its assistance<br \/>\nwith gratitude but without surprise. We may draw the attention of our monitor in<br \/>\nreturn to an equally healthy sign in India. Nobody now, at least in Bengal,<br \/>\nventures in public to advocate an appeal to the bureaucracy or to the people in<br \/>\nEngland for the redress of our grievances. There may not be agreement as to the<br \/>\nbest means of gathering strength by self-help but the hope of gaining rights and<br \/>\nprivileges by what is known as constitutional agitation has been given up by one<br \/>\nand all. It is a faded superstition which has no longer any hold on the Indian<br \/>\nmind. To warn us that the highly illiberal speech of Mr. Morley struck a<br \/>\nresponsive chord in every bosom in the House is therefore labour wasted. As<br \/>\nnobody now looks with wistful eyes to that quarter, it is immaterial what they<br \/>\nthink or do. They may<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<span><font size=\"3\">Page-462<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<font size=\"3\">go<br \/>\ninto ecstasies over the speech of Morley, or they may gnash their teeth at the<br \/>\nvapourings of O&#8217;Donnell; we in India are no longer affected by their frown or by<br \/>\ntheir smile. The sympathy of people beyond the seas is no longer our guiding<br \/>\nstar and what happens at Westminster is no concern of ours. We have to improvise<br \/>\nour own means of meeting the Regulation lathi and other bureaucratic means of<br \/>\nrepression and we neither hope for nor desire its mitigation.<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><span><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><font size=\"3\">If it were possible for anyone to re-evoke that dead phantom of a<br \/>\nphantom, British sympathy, we should not be grateful to him for constraining our<br \/>\nunbound spirit into bonds again. The legend of British sympathy misled us for a<br \/>\ncentury and now that the phantasm has of itself ceased to haunt us, let no one<br \/>\ntry to juggle and deceive us again with the Mantras of that modern black art.<br \/>\nBoth Mr. Morley&#8217;s speech and its effect on the British people are, we repeat,<br \/>\nmatters of supreme indifference to us, and the British and Anglo-Indian journals<br \/>\nwho want to frighten us into our old mendicant attitude by trumpeting the<br \/>\n&quot;sensible and resolute speech&quot; of Mr. Morley and the appreciation it<br \/>\nreceived in the House, merely show that they have no true conception of the<br \/>\nNationalist movement. The mind of our people has at last attained a certain<br \/>\namount of freedom. Faith in unrealities no longer clogs its progress. The Budget<br \/>\nspeech admirably exposed the true relation between England and India and<br \/>\nbetrayed the hollowness of the so-called liberal professions which have so long<br \/>\nexerted their poisonous influence on the unsophisticated Indian mind, displaced<br \/>\nas it was from its own orbit by an un- national education. Mr. Morley&#8217;s<br \/>\noutspokenness was welcome to the House? Well, it was tenfold more welcome to his<br \/>\n&quot;enemies&quot; in India. Mr. Lalmohan Ghose in one of his more recent<br \/>\nspeeches, has said: &quot;Dazzled by the meretricious glitter of a tawdry<br \/>\nimperialism, conspicuous members of Parliament are now trying to sponge from<br \/>\ntheir slate the teachings of men like Gladstone and Bright.&quot; It was<br \/>\nreserved for Mr. Morley to tell all India what some of us had perceived long<br \/>\nago, that those teachings were never meant to be carried out in practice.<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><span><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><font size=\"3\">Whoever is a scourge of India must naturally be a demigod to the British<br \/>\npeople. The political instinct of a free people long<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<span><font size=\"3\">Page-463<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\">\n<font size=\"3\">accustomed<br \/>\nto the international struggle for life, shrewd, commercial, practical, is not<br \/>\nlikely to be misled by humanitarian generalities as the politically<br \/>\ninexperienced middle class in India have been misled; they have always felt that<br \/>\nthe man who trod down India under a mailed heel and crushed Indian manhood and<br \/>\naspiration was serving their own interests.<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><span><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><font size=\"3\">The sequel to the trial of Warren Hastings is an excellent example of<br \/>\nthis dominant instinct. Twenty-seven years after the impeachment, sixteen years<br \/>\nafter the death of Burke had left his orations as a classic to English<br \/>\nliterature, \u2014 a scene was enacted in the House of Commons similar in spirit to<br \/>\nthe unanimous acclamation of Mr. Morley&#8217;s speech. Warren Hastings \u2014 an<br \/>\nold man of eighty \u2014 appeared at the bar<br \/>\nto give evidence in connection with the renewal of the East India Charter. He<br \/>\nwas received with acclamations, a chair was ordered for him, and when he retired<br \/>\nthe members rose and uncovered. The political instinct of the people perceived<br \/>\nthat this man, ruthless and monstrous tyrant though he had been, had<br \/>\nconsolidated for them a political Empire and basis of commercial supremacy, and<br \/>\nthe means by which this great work had been accomplished, were sanctified by the<br \/>\nresult. The scourge of India, a recital of whose misdeeds had 27 years before<br \/>\nmade some of Burke&#8217;s listeners swoon with horror, was honoured as a hero and<br \/>\ngod, and biographies and histories have been written by the score to justify his<br \/>\naction and exalt him to the skies. When therefore Mr. Morley declared his<br \/>\nintention of preserving the Empire Hastings had consolidated, by any means<br \/>\nhowever unjust or tyrannical, is it any wonder that an English House of Commons<br \/>\nshould recognise in him a worthy successor of Hastings and accord to him an<br \/>\nunanimous applause?<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"right\" class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin:0;line-height:150%\"><i><br \/>\n<font size=\"3\">Bande<br \/>\nMataram<\/i>,<i><br \/>\n<\/i> <\/font><font size=\"3\">July 2, 1907<\/font><\/p>\n<h2 align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;line-height:150%\">\n&nbsp;<\/h2>\n<h2 align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;line-height:150%\">\n<span style=\"font-weight:400\"><font size=\"3\">Page-464<\/font><\/span><\/h2>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Acclamation of the House &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A GREAT deal is being made in the Anglo-Indian press of the unanimous appreciation with which the House&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-01-bande-mataram-volume-01","wpcat-8-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/380\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}