{"id":787,"date":"2013-07-13T01:30:25","date_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=787"},"modified":"2013-07-13T01:30:25","modified_gmt":"2013-07-13T01:30:25","slug":"10-the-pro-petition-plot-vol-27-supplement-volume-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/01-works-of-sri-aurobindo\/01-sabcl\/27-supplement-volume-27\/10-the-pro-petition-plot-vol-27-supplement-volume-27","title":{"rendered":"-10_The Pro- Petition Plot.htm"},"content":{"rendered":"<table border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"6\" style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" width=\"100%\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">\n<p><b><font size=\"4\">The<span><br \/>\n<span>Pro-Petition Plot<\/span><\/span><\/font><\/b><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"text-align:justify;margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;line-height:150%\">\n<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font face=\"Times New Roman\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b><font size=\"5\"><br \/>\n<\/font><\/b><\/font><\/span><font face=\"Times New Roman\"><b><font size=\"5\">I<\/font><\/b>T IS impossible, we think, to condemn too strongly the attempt that is<br \/>\nbeing made, by means of confidential circulars from Calcutta, to get up a fresh<br \/>\nmemorial to the Secretary of State for India for the revocation or modification<br \/>\nof the Partition of Bengal. We are strongly opposed, it is well known, to<br \/>\nsending any fresh memorial on this subject, but this general objection apart,<br \/>\nthe methods that have been adopted to get up new memorial are open to serious<br \/>\nobjection, and it is to these that we desire to call public attention today. A<br \/>\ntelegraphic message was received in Comilla about the middle of last month n one<br \/>\nof the Calcutta leaders, asking the local leaders to send a delegate to a<br \/>\nConference that was proposed to be held on some urgent matters the following<br \/>\nSunday. What these urgent matters were<span>&nbsp; <\/span>was<br \/>\nleft to the imagination of the addressees to discover for themselves. Comilla<br \/>\nstrongly objected to be worked upon in this mysterious, if not masterly way from<br \/>\nCalcutta, and wired <span style=\"font-size:13.0pt\">back<\/span> <span>asking<br \/>\nfor definite and detailed information. No <\/span>I, we understand, was received<br \/>\nin reply, but about a week later, just a few hours before the time fixed for the<br \/>\nConference, a printed letter, marked confidential, was received by Babu Ananga<br \/>\nMohan Ghosh, from the <i>Bengalee <\/i>office, containing excerpts from certain<br \/>\nletters secured from London, which suggested that a fresh memorial should be<br \/>\nsent to the Secretary of <font size=\"3\"> State for India<span>&nbsp; <\/span>for<br \/>\na reconsideration of the Partition of Bengal. One of the extracts said:<br \/>\n&quot;What appeared <i>absolutely hopeless <\/i>four weeks ago appears <i>hopeful <\/i>now. There are indications that the cabinet<br \/>\nare willing to reconsider the Partition Question on its merits, There are<br \/>\nindications that in due time the question, if properly urged, will be reopened.<br \/>\nI am not at liberty to speak about conferences I had just before leaving London.<br \/>\nAll that I tell you is to advise you to have an influential and representative<br \/>\nmeeting, say, early in September, to adopt a strong, well-<\/p>\n<p> <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">\n<font size=\"2\"><br \/>\nPage-25<\/font>\n<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"justify\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\">reasoned memorial, suggesting alternative<br \/>\nschemes of Partition based on racial and linguistic grounds and to submit it to<br \/>\nthe Secretary of State through the Indian Government. <span>Bengal<br \/>\nhas <\/span>worked splendidly during the last eleven months, <span>&#8211;<\/span><br \/>\n<span>Bengal will <\/span><span>have to work a little longer, &#8211; not hysterically, but rationally and<br \/>\nstrongly,<\/span> <span>&#8211;<\/span> <span>making<br \/>\nit clear that she will not accept the present Partition. I believe redress is at<br \/>\nhand.&quot;<br \/>\n<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span>Later on the writer, after quoting Sir .Henry Campbell- Bannerman&#8217;s reply<br \/>\nto Mr<\/span>. O&#8217;Donnell, modified his previous advice regarding public meeting and said: &quot;On second thoughts, a simple<br \/>\nmemorial seems to be enough if influentially signed, &#8211; a meeting is unnecessary.&quot;<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\"><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span>This letter<br \/>\ncame from a high authority. But it is clear on the face of it that that high<br \/>\nauthority was playing into the hands of the Liberals interested in India. The<br \/>\nenforced retirement of Sir B. Fuller was a distinct confession on the part of<br \/>\nthe Government of the failure of the policy which prompted the Partition scheme,<br \/>\nand which subsequently came to be so closely associated with the late<br \/>\nLieutenant-Governor of East Bengal and Assam. This failure is distinctly due to<br \/>\nthe resistful attitude that has been assumed by the people of late, and in view<br \/>\nof the complications with which the Government is threatened by the present<br \/>\nanti-Partition and boycott agitation in Bengal, the authorities in England, as<br \/>\nwell as in this country, are evidently anxious to get out of the unpleasant and<br \/>\nrisky position wherein their own perversity has placed them. To do this<br \/>\nhonourably and without any loss of prestige they want a plea for reopening the<br \/>\ndiscussion of Mr. Morley&#8217;s settled fact, and a fresh memorial from Bengal would<br \/>\nfind them this plea. This, it seems clear, is the meaning of the excerpts quoted<br \/>\nby us above from the London letter, on the strength of which the Calcutta<br \/>\nleaders want a fresh memorial to be got up. They might make the attempt, there<br \/>\nis no reason why, if they are convinced that it is their duty to send a fresh<br \/>\nmemorial, they should not make this attempt. But what we object to is the<br \/>\nsecretiveness of the whole thing. Why have they tried to keep this new proposal<br \/>\nfrom the public? Why should they arrogate to themselves the right of deciding,<br \/>\nin consultation with a handful of men, as to what should be done in this matter?<br \/>\nThe Conference<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"center\">\n<font size=\"2\">Page-26<br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"justify\">\n<font size=\"3\" face=\"Times New Roman\"><br \/>\n<span>&nbsp;<\/span>held in the Landholders&#8217;<br \/>\nAssociation should have been an open<br \/>\nconference. But even at this closed conference, the general opinion, if the<br \/>\nreports that have reached us be correct, was decidedly against sending any fresh<br \/>\npetition or memorial. It is said that Babu Motilal Ghosh and others were<br \/>\ndistinctly opposed to the<br \/>\nidea and the words petition and memorial had to be dropped under pressure of this<br \/>\ngeneral opinion, especially among the mofussil delegates; all that was conceded<br \/>\nby the Conference was that some suggestions might be sent. We do not know if the<br \/>\nquestions of the channel through which the suggestions were to<br \/>\nbe sent was raised at all. But whatever was decided by the conference we find that a secret attempt is being made to send not<br \/>\nsuggestions, but a live, real memorial again to the Secretary of state for India<br \/>\non the Partition Question. We do not respect official secrets, but, when public<br \/>\ninterests demand it, widely publish them, and there is no reason why we should<br \/>\nrespect non-official secrets when their publication is called for in the interests<br \/>\nof<br \/>\nthe public good. We, therefore, make no apology for publishing the following letter that has been addressed<br \/>\nfrom the <i>Bengalee <\/i><br \/>\nOffice, to the leaders of public opinion in the mofussil<\/font>:<\/p>\n<p><i>Confindential<\/i><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"right\" style=\"text-align: right;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\"><span style=\"font-size:13.0pt\">Bengalee Office<br \/>\n70, Colootola Street, Calcutta&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"right\" style=\"text-align: right;margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\"><span style=\"font-size:13.0pt\"> 29th August, 1906<\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoBodyText\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"justify\">My dear \u2026\u2026.,<br \/>\n<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size=\"3\"><br \/>\n<\/font><\/span><font size=\"3\">At a Conference held in the Rooms of the Landholders&#8217;<br \/>\nAssociation on Sunday last, at which several delegates from the mofus<span>sil<\/span><br \/>\nwere present, it was resolved to submit a representation to the Secretary of<br \/>\nState for reviewing the Partition of Bengal. It was agreed that the<br \/>\nrepresentation, if possible, should be forwarded early in September. The<br \/>\nrepresentation is being drawn up, and in the meantime I beg you will forward to<br \/>\nthe Bengalee Office as <span>many<\/span><br \/>\n signatures (including of course the signatures of<br \/>\nthe leading inhabitants in your District). The representation would ask for Bengal<br \/>\n(old and new Province) being placed under a Governor and Council, or in the<br \/>\nalternative, the Bengalee-speaking<\/font><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size:13.0pt\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size=\"2\"><br \/>\n<\/font><br \/>\n<\/span><font size=\"2\">Page-27<\/font><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoBodyText\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"justify\"><font size=\"3\"><br \/>\npopulation being placed under one and the same administration. I beg you will<br \/>\nconsider the matter as very urgent.<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoBodyText\" align=\"right\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\"><font size=\"3\">Yours<br \/>\nsincerely<br \/>\n<\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoBodyText\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\" align=\"justify\"><font size=\"3\">It is clear thus, that a<br \/>\nsecret memorial is being got up to be sent again to the Indian State Secretary;<br \/>\nand as this memorial will clearly be sent in the name and on behalf of the<br \/>\npublic, the public have just cause for complaint that in regard to such a vital<br \/>\nquestion of policy they should have been left so entirely in the dark. There was<br \/>\na time when the people in general took really little or no interest in public<br \/>\nquestions of this kind; and in those days the getting up of such memorials in<br \/>\nconsultation with a few lawyers\\n the different districts, might have been<br \/>\njustified; because they were about the only persons who took any interest in<br \/>\nthese public and political questions. The present Swadeshi agitation has,<br \/>\nhowever, changed all this. We have called up <i>the <\/i>real nation out of its<br \/>\nancient slumber, and the masses have commenced to take a keen, and possibly a<br \/>\nmore earnest interest in public questions than even the so-called educated<br \/>\nclasses. They have joined our meetings in their thousands and their tens of<br \/>\nthousands, and have taken, during the last twelve months, an intelligent<br \/>\ninterest in our movements. What right have we now to ignore them in such<br \/>\nmomentous matters as the submission of a fresh memorial to the Secretary of<br \/>\nState, which may radically change the face of the whole agitation? The tactics<br \/>\nadopted by the Calcutta clique seem, therefore, to be absolutely vicious. They<br \/>\nstrike at the very root of those principles of Democracy upon which the national<br \/>\nmovement in India and especially in Bengal is professedly based. Democracy must<br \/>\nhave its leaders, and the leaders must exercise the right of guiding and shaping<br \/>\nthe opinions and activities of the Democracy. But to guide, to train, to shape<br \/>\nand to control public opinion and public activities is one thing but to ignore<br \/>\nor suppress the views and sentiments of the public is another. It is the<br \/>\nautocrat alone who does or attempts to do so. And this pernicious autocratic<br \/>\ntendency in the leaders of Bengal must at once be knocked relentlessly on the<br \/>\nhead, if the present movement is to realise the high<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0in;margin-bottom:0;text-align:center;line-height:150%\"><font size=\"2\"><br \/>\nPage-28<\/font>\n<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"justify\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\"><font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"3\"><br \/>\n<span>promise<\/span>  that is in it. The old leaders in Calcutta and those who<br \/>\nlance in the mofussil to their tune, must be made to<br \/>\nunderstand this distinctly that they will not be permitted to speak and<br \/>\nact in ,name of the public without fully and frankly taking that public into<br \/>\ntheir confidence in regard to all important public questions. Signs are not,<br \/>\nindeed, wanting that the people will not suffer the tyrannies of their own<br \/>\nleaders more patiently than they are prepared to suffer those of their foreign<br \/>\nmasters. The Comilla Resolution on this very subject of sending a fresh memorial<br \/>\nto Government is significant as we pointed out yesterday. A similar Resolution,<br \/>\npublished in our telegraphic columns last Wednesday, has been adopted at a<br \/>\ngathering of 20,000 men at Chittagong, in spite of the attempt made by some<br \/>\npeople to refer, the matter to the local leaders. The question was asked whether<br \/>\nlarger vote could be taken on this topic at any meeting of the<br \/>\nlocal Association, and it was frankly answered in the negative. There were many men at this gathering who had come from<br \/>\nthe villages, and they all seemed clearly<br \/>\nflattered by the fact that they were given such an opportunity of expressing<br \/>\ntheir views <span>on so<\/span>  important<br \/>\na matter, and this sense of satisfaction is a distinct guarantee of their<br \/>\nfuture interest in public questions.<br \/>\nHenceforth they will not look on our movements with their old<br \/>\n<span>listlessness<\/span><br \/>\n and indifference. Is this a small gain? Are we to<br \/>\nneglect such a result for small favours from the Government? What even if<br \/>\nthe Partition continues, if only we can arouse a real interest in the masses in<br \/>\nour public and political agitations? If the masses once awake from their present<br \/>\ntorpor, they will be able to undo a thousand evil and obstructive measures like the<br \/>\nPartition of Bengal. True statesmanship would prefer this quickening of public<br \/>\nlife and public spirit in the people to the revocation, as a favour, of even the<br \/>\nmost obnoxious and pernicious Government measure. But autocracy whether in the<br \/>\nGovernment or in the governed, has no eye for the people; and is, therefore, the<br \/>\ngreatest enemy of human progress everywhere, and should be ruthlessly exposed<br \/>\nand knocked on the head by those who care for the advancement of the people and<br \/>\nfor their civic salvation.<\/font>\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"right\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">Bande<br \/>\nMataram, september 10,1906\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"center\" style=\"margin-top: 0;margin-bottom: 0;line-height:150%\">\n<font face=\"Times New Roman\" size=\"2\">Page-29<\/font><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Pro-Petition Plot &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; IT IS impossible, we think, to condemn too strongly the attempt that is being made, by means of confidential circulars&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-27-supplement-volume-27","wpcat-16-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=787"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worksofthemotherandsriaurobindo.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}