On Thoughts And Aphorisms

 

1958-70

 

Contents

 

PRE CONTENT

 

Jnana (Knowledge)

(1958)

 

Aphorism 1

Aphorism 2

Aphorism 3

Aphorism 4

Aphorism 5

Aphorism 6

Aphorism 7

Aphorism 8

Aphorism 9

Aphorism 10

Aphorism 11

Aphorism 12

 

Jnana (Knowledge)

(1960-61)

Aphorism 13

Aphorism 14

Aphorism 15

Aphorism 16

Aphorism 17

Aphorism 18

Aphorism 19

Aphorism 20

Aphorism 21

Aphorism 22-23

Aphorism 24

Aphorism 25

Aphorism 26

Aphorism 27

Aphorism 28

Aphorism 29

Aphorism 30

Aphorism 31

Aphorism 32

Aphorism 33

Aphorism 34

Aphorism 35-36

Aphorism 37

Aphorism 38

Aphorism 39

Aphorism 40

Aphorism 41

Aphorism 42

Aphorism 43

Aphorism 44

Aphorism 45

Aphorism 46

Aphorism 47

Aphorism 48

Aphorism 49

Aphorism 50

Aphorism 51

Aphorism 52

Aphorism 53-54

Aphorism 55

Aphorism 56

Aphorism 57

Aphorism 58

Aphorism 59

Aphorism 60

Aphorism 61

Aphorism 62

Aphorism 63-65

Aphorism 66

Aphorism 67-68

 

Jnana (Knowledge)

(1960-61)

Aphorism 69

Aphorism 70

Aphorism 71

Aphorism 72

Aphorism 73

Aphorism 74-75

Aphorism 76

Aphorism 77-78

Aphorism 79-80

Aphorism 81-83

Aphorism 84-87

Aphorism 88-92

Aphorism 93

Aphorism 94

Aphorism 95

Aphorism 96

Aphorism 97

Aphorism 98

Aphorism 99-100

Aphorism 101-102

Aphorism 103-107

Aphorism 108

Aphorism 109

Aphorism 110

Aphorism 111-112

Aphorism 113-114

Aphorism 115-116

Aphorism 117-121

Aphorism 122-124

 

 

Jnana (Knowledge)

(1969-70)

Aphorism 125-126

Aphorism127

Aphorism 128-129

Aphorism 130

Aphorism 131-132

Aphorism 133

Aphorism 134-136

Aphorism 137

Aphorism 138

Aphorism 139

Aphorism 140

Aphorism 141

Aphorism 142

Aphorism 143-144

Aphorism 145

Aphorism 146-150

Aphorism 151

Aphorism 152-153

Aphorism 154-156

Aphorism 157-158

Aphorism 159

Aphorism 160-161

Aphorism 162

Aphorism 163-164

Aphorism 165

Aphorism 166

Aphorism 167

Aphorism 168-169

Aphorism 170-171

Aphorism 172

Aphorism 173-174

Aphorism 175

Aphorism 176-177

Aphorism 178

Aphorism 179

Aphorism 180

Aphorism 181-182

Aphorism 183-184

Aphorism 185-186

Aphorism 187-188

Aphorism 189-191

Aphorism 192

Aphorism 193-196

Aphorism 197-198

Aphorism 199-200

Aphorism 201-202

Aphorism 203-204

Aphorism  205

   

 

Karma (Works)

(1969-70)

Aphorism 206

Aphorism 207

 Aphorism 208-209

Aphorism 210-211

Aphorism 212

Aphorism 213

Aphorism 214-215

Aphorism 216

Aphorism 217

Aphorism 218-221

Aphorism 222-224

Aphorism 225-227

Aphorism 228-230

Aphorism 231-234

Aphorism 235-237

Aphorism 238-240

Aphorism 241-242

Aphorism 243-247

Aphorism 248-250

Aphorism 251

Aphorism 252-254

Aphorism 255-257

Aphorism 258-261

Aphorism 262-264

Aphorism 265-269

Aphorism 270-271

Aphorism 272-273

Aphorism 274-276

Aphorism 277-278

Aphorism 279

Aphorism 280-281

Aphorism 282

Aphorism 283-285

Aphorism 286-288

Aphorism 289-290

Aphorism 291-292

Aphorism 293-294

Aphorism 295-296

Aphorism 297-298

Aphorism 299-302

Aphorism 303-305

Aphorism 306

Aphorism 307

Aphorism 308-310

Aphorism 311-312

Aphorism 313-314

Aphorism 315-316

Aphorism 317-318

Aphorism 319

Aphorism 320-321

Aphorism 322-324

Aphorism 325-326

Aphorism 327-328

Aphorism 329-331

Aphorism 332-334

Aphorism 335-336

Aphorism 337-338

Aphorism 339

Aphorism 340

Aphorism 341-343

Aphorism 344-345

Aphorism 346-348

Aphorism 349-351

Aphorism 352-356

Aphorism 357

Aphorism 358-361

Aphorism 362

Aphorism 363-369

Aphorism 370-373

Aphorism 374-376

Aphorism 377-378

Aphorism 379-381

Aphorism 382

Aphorism 383-385

 

 

Disease and Medical Science

Aphorism 386-389

Aphorism 390-393

Aphorism 394-399

Aphorism 400-403

Aphorism 404-407

 

Bhakti (Devotion)

(1969-70)

Aphorism 408-412

Aphorism 413

Aphorism 414-420

Aphorism 421-424

Aphorism 425-427

Aphorism 428

Aphorism 429-430

Aphorism 431-434

Aphorism 435-438

Aphorism 439-444

Aphorism 445-449

Aphorism 450-455

Aphorism 456-461

Aphorism 462-463

Aphorism 464-465

Aphorism 466-468

Aphorism 469-471

Aphorism 472

Aphorism 473

Aphorism 474-475

Aphorism 476

Aphorism 477-479

Aphorism 480-481

Aphorism 482-483

Aphorism 484

Aphorism 485-489

Aphorism 490-492

Aphorism 493-494

Aphorism 495-496

Aphorism 497-499

Aphorism 500-503

Aphorism 504

Aphorism 505

Aphorism 506

Aphorism 507

Aphorism 508

Aphorism 509-512

Aphorism 513-514

Aphorism 515-516

Aphorism 517-518

Aphorism 519

Aphorism 520

Aphorism 521

Aphorism 522-523

Aphorism 524

Aphorism 525-526

Aphorism 527-528

Aphorism 529-530

Aphorism 531-533

Aphorism 534

Aphorism 535

Aphorism 536-537

Aphorism 538

Aphorism 539-540

Aphorism 541

72 – The sign of dawning Knowledge is to feel that as yet I know little or nothing; and yet, if I could only know my knowledge, I already possess everything.

 

In sleep one occasionally has a very accurate knowledge of what is going to happen, with an extraordinary precision in the material details, as if everything were already there complete down to the smallest details, on an occult plane. Is that correct? What is this plane of knowledge? Is there one or several? What should one do to gain access to it consciously in the waking state? And how is it that people who are serious, who have a divine realisation, sometimes make such gross mistakes in their predictions?

 

But it is a whole world in itself! It is not one question, but twenty!

There are all kinds of premonitory dreams. There are premonitory dreams that are fulfilled immediately, that is to say, you dream in the night what will happen on the next day, and there are premonitory dreams that are fulfilled over varying lengths of time. And according to their position in time, these dreams are seen on various planes.

The higher we rise towards absolute certainty, the greater the distance is, because these visions belong to a region which is very close to the Origin and the length of time between the revelation of what is going to be and its realisation may be very great. But the revelation is certain, because it is very close to the Origin. There is a place – when one is identified with the Supreme – where one knows everything absolutely, in the past, 

Page - 125


the present, the future and everywhere. But usually people who go there forget what they have seen when they return. An extremely strict discipline is needed to remember. And that is the only place where one cannot make a mistake.

But the links of the chain of communication are not always all there and one very rarely remembers.

To come back to what I was saying, according to the plane on which one has seen, one can more or less judge the time that the vision will take to be fulfilled. And the immediate things are already realised, they already exist in the subtle physical and they can be seen there – they simply are, they exist there. They are only the reflection – not even a transcription – the reflection or projection of the image in the material world which will appear on the next day or in a few hours. There you see the exact thing in all its details, because it already exists; so everything depends on the accuracy of the vision and the power of vision. If you have a power of vision that is objective and sincere, you see the thing accurately; if you add your own feelings and impressions to it, it is coloured by them. So accuracy in the subtle physical depends exclusively on the instrument, that is to say, on the one who sees.

But as soon as you enter a more subtle region, such as the vital – and even more so in the mental, but already in the vital there is a small margin of possibility – then there you can see roughly what is going to happen, but in detail it may be like this or like that; there are wills and influences that may possibly intervene and create a difference.

And this is because the original Will is reflected, so to say, in the various regions, and each region alters the organisation and the relation of the images. The world we live in is a world of images. It is not the thing itself in its essence, it is the reflection of the thing. One could say that we are, in our material existence, only a reflection, an image of what we are in our essential reality. And the modalities of these reflections bring in every error and falsification – what you see in the essence is 

Page - 126


perfectly true and pure and exists from all eternity; the images are essentially variable. And according to the degree of falsehood that enters into the vibrations, the degree of distortion and alteration increases. One could say that every circumstance, every event, every thing has a pure existence, which is the true existence, and a considerable number of impure or distorted existences, which are the existence of the same thing in the various domains of being. For example, in the intellectual domain, there is already a good deal of distortion; in the mental domain there is a considerable amount of distortion, and as all the emotional and sensorial domains come in, the distortions increase. And once you reach the material plane, it is most often unrecognisable. It is completely distorted – so much so that it is sometimes very difficult to know that this is the material expression of that – they are no longer very much alike.

It is a rather novel way of approaching the problem and it may be the key to many things.

Thus when you know someone well and you often see him physically, if you see him in the subtle physical, already there are things which become more marked, more visible, more outstanding, which you had not seen physically, because in the greyness of the material world they had merged with many other things on the same plane. There are characteristics or expressions of character which become outstanding enough to be quite visible, although they had not been physically apparent. When you look at a person physically, there is the complexion, the features, the expression; at the same moment, if you see this face in the subtle physical, you suddenly notice that one part of the face is one colour, another part another colour; that in the eyes there is an expression and a kind of light which were not at all visible; and that the whole has quite a different appearance and, above all, gives a very different feeling, which to our physical eyes would seem rather extravagant, but which to the subtle vision is very expressive and revealing of the character, or even of the influences acting on this person. What I say here is the  

Page - 127


record of an experience that I had again a few days ago.

So according to the degree to which you are conscious and the extent to which you see, you perceive images, see events that are more or less near, and you see them more or less accurately. The only vision that is true and sure is the vision of the divine Consciousness. So the problem is to become aware of the divine Consciousness and to keep this consciousness in all details all the time.

Until then, there are all sorts of ways of receiving indications. The precise, accurate, familiar vision that certain people have may come from several sources. It may be a vision by identity with circumstances and things, when you are used to extending your consciousness all around you. It may be an indication given by a talkative being from the invisible world who amuses himself by informing you of what is going to happen – this happens very often. Then everything depends on the moral character of your “informant”; if he is amusing himself at your expense, he tells you all kinds of tales and this is what happens most of the time to people who get information from entities. To lure people on, they may very often tell them things as they really will be, since they have a universal vision in some domain of the vital or of the mind; and then when they are quite sure that you will trust them, they may start telling you tales and you make a fool of yourself. This happens very often. You yourself should be in a higher state of consciousness than these individuals or entities or these little gods, as some people call them, and be able to verify from above what their statements are worth.

If you have a universal mental vision, you can see all mental formations. Then you see – and it is very interesting – how the mental world is organised to realise itself on the physical plane. You see the various formations, the way in which they approach and fight each other, combine together and organise themselves, the ones that prevail and gain influence and achieve a more complete realisation. Now if you really want to 

Page - 128


have a higher vision, you must rise above the mental world and see the original wills as they descend to express themselves. In this case, you may not possess all the details, but the central fact, the fact in its central truth, is indisputable, undeniable, absolutely correct.

Some people also have the power to predict things which already exist on earth, but at a distance, at a great distance, very far from the physical eyes. These are usually people who are capable of widening and extending their consciousness. They have a physical, but slightly more subtle vision, which depends on an organ that is more subtle than the purely material one – what might be called the life of this organ – and so, by projecting their consciousness with a will to see, they can see very well, they can see things: these things already exist, only they are not within the field of our ordinary vision. People who have this capacity and who tell what they see, who are sincere and who are not bluffers, see in a way that is absolutely precise and exact.

In fact, an important factor for those who predict or see, is their absolute sincerity. Unfortunately, because of people's curiosity, their insistence, the pressure they apply – which very few can resist – what happens, when there is something they do not see exactly and precisely, is that there is an almost involuntary faculty of inner imagination, which adds the little missing element. This is what causes the flaws in their predictions. Very few have the courage to say, Oh no, I do not know about that, it eludes me. They do not even have the courage to say it to themselves. And then, just a touch of imagination, acting almost subconsciously, and they fill in the vision, the information – anything can happen. Very few people can resist that. I have known many, many clairvoyants, I have known many people who had a marvellous gift; very few of them would stop when they come to the end of their knowledge. Or else they would add some little detail. This is what always gives these faculties a rather doubtful quality. One must truly be a saint – a great 

Page - 129


saint, a great sage – and completely free, not at all influenced by other people. Naturally, I am not speaking of those who seek fame, because there they fall into the crudest traps; but even goodwill, the wish to make people happy, to please them, to help them, is enough to create a distortion.

 

When events are already prepared in the subtle physical and you have a vision of them, is it too late to change things? Can one still act?

 

I know of a very interesting example. There was a time when in the newspaper Le Matin – was a long time ago, you must have been very young – every day there was a little cartoon of a boy pointing to something – a kind of page-boy dressed like that – and always showing the date or something – a little cartoon. Now the gentleman in this story was travelling and he was staying in a big hotel, I do not remember in which town, and one night or early in the morning, very early, he had a dream. He saw this page-boy pointing to his funeral carriage – you know, when they take people to the cemetery, in Europe – and inviting him to step into it! He saw that and then in the morning when he was ready, he left his room which was on the top floor, and there, on the landing, the same boy, dressed in the same way, was pointing out the lift for him to go down. That gave him a shock. He refused and said, “No thank you.” The lift fell and crashed, killing the people inside.

He told me that after that he believed in dreams.

It was a vision. He saw the boy, but instead of the lift, the boy was showing him his hearse. So when he saw the same gesture, the same boy – like the cartoon, you see – he said, “No thank you, I'll walk down”, and the machine – it was one of those hydraulic lifts – broke and fell. It was right at the top. It was crushed to a pulp.

My explanation is that an entity had forewarned him. The image of the page-boy seems to indicate that an intelligence, a  

Page - 130


consciousness had intervened; it does not seem to have been his own subconscient. Or it might be that his subconscient was aware and had seen in the subtle physical that this was going to happen. But why did his subconscient give him an image like that? I do not know. Perhaps something in the subconscient knew, because it was already there, it was already in the subtle physical. The accident already existed before it happened – the law of the accident.

Obviously, there is always, in every case, some difference, sometimes a few hours – but that is the maximum – sometimes a few seconds. And very often, things tell you that they are there, and it takes them sometimes a few minutes, sometimes a few seconds to come into contact with your consciousness. Constantly, constantly I know what is going to happen, and for things that are of absolutely no interest – there is no advantage in knowing it beforehand, it changes nothing; but it exists, it is all around you. If your consciousness is wide enough, you know all that, for example, that a certain person is going to bring you a parcel, things like that. And it is like that every day. Or that a certain person is about to arrive. It is because the consciousness is extended, so it contacts things.

But in that case we cannot say that it is a premonition, for it already exists, only the contact with our senses takes a few seconds to be realised, because there is a door or a wall or something that prevents us from seeing.

But several times I have had experiences like this. For example, once when I was walking in the mountains, I was on a path where there was only room for one – on one side the precipice, on the other sheer rock. There were three children behind me and a fourth person bringing up the rear. I was leading. The path ran along the edge of the rock; we could not see where we were going – and besides, it was very dangerous; if anyone had slipped, he would have been over the edge. I was walking in front when suddenly I saw, with other eyes than these – although I was watching my steps carefully – I saw a snake,  

Page 131


there, on the rock, waiting on the other side. Then I took one step, gently, and indeed on the other side there was a snake. That spared me the shock of surprise, because I had seen and I was advancing cautiously; and as there was no shock of surprise, I was able to tell the children without giving them a shock, “Stop, keep quiet, don't stir.” If there had been a shock, something might have happened. The snake had heard a noise, it was already coiled and on the defensive in front of its hole, with its head swaying – it was a viper. This was in France. Nothing happened, whereas if there had been any confusion or commotion, anything could have happened.

This kind of thing has happened to me very, very often – with snakes it happened to me four times. Once, it was completely dark, here, near the fishing village of Ariankuppam. There was a river and it happened just at the place where it flows into the sea. It was dark – the night had fallen very quickly. We were walking along the road and just as I was about to put my foot down – I had already lifted my foot and I was going to put it down – I distinctly heard a voice in my ear: “Be careful!” And yet nobody had spoken. So I looked and saw, just as my foot was about to touch the ground, an enormous black cobra, which I would have comfortably stepped on those people don't like that. He streaked away and across the water what a beauty, my child! His hood open, head erect above the water, he went across like a king. Obviously, I would have been punished for my impertinence.

I have had hundreds and hundreds of experiences like that; at the very last moment, not a second too soon, I was informed. And in the most varied circumstances. Once, in Paris, I was crossing the Boulevard Saint Michel. It was during the last weeks; I had decided that within a certain number of months I would achieve union with the psychic Presence, the inner Divine, and I no longer had any other thought, any other concern. I lived near the Luxembourg Gardens and every evening I used to walk there – but always deeply absorbed within. There is a 

Page - 132


kind of intersection there, and it is not a place to cross when one is deeply absorbed within; it was not very sensible. And so I was like that, I was walking, when I suddenly received a shock, as if I had received a blow, as if something had hit me, and I jumped back instinctively. And as soon as I had jumped back, a tram went past – it was the tram that I had felt at a little more than arm's length. It had touched the aura, the aura of protection – it was very strong at that time, I was deeply immersed in occultism and I knew how to keep it – the aura of protection had been hit and that had literally thrown me backwards, as if I had received a physical shock. And what insults from the driver! I jumped back just in time and the tram went by.

I could tell scores of such stories, if I could remember them.

The protection may come from many different sources. Very often it was someone who informed me: a little entity, or some kind of being; sometimes it was the aura that protected me. And it was for all kinds of things. That is to say, life was seldom limited to the physical body – this is convenient, this is good. It is necessary, it increases your capacities. This is what the person who taught me occultism told me straightaway: “You are depriving yourself of senses which are most useful even for the most ordinary life.” And this is true, quite true. We can know infinitely more things than we usually do, simply by using our own senses. And not only from the mental point of view, but also from the vital and even the physical point of view.

 

But what is the method?

 

Oh, the method is very easy. There are disciplines. It depends on what you want to do.

It depends. For each thing there is a method. And the first method is to want it, to begin with, that is, to take a decision. Then you are given a description of all these senses and how they work – that takes some time. You take one sense or several,

Page - 133


or the one which is easiest for you to start with, and you decide. Then you follow the discipline. It is the equivalent of exercises for developing the muscles. You can even succeed in creating a will in yourself.

But for more subtle things, the method is to make for yourself an exact image of what you want, to come into contact with the corresponding vibration, and then to concentrate and do exercises – such as to practise seeing through an object or hearing through a sound,¹ or seeing at a distance. For example, once, for a long time, for several months, I was confined to bed and I found it rather boring – I wanted to see. I was in a room and at one end there was another little room and at the end of the little room there was a kind of bridge; in the middle of the garden the bridge became a staircase leading down into a very big and very beautiful studio, standing in the middle of the garden. I wanted to go and see what was happening in the studio, for I was feeling bored in my room. So I would remain very quiet, close my eyes and send out my consciousness, little by little, little by little, little by little. And day after day – I chose a fixed time and did the exercise regularly. At first you make use of your imagination and then it becomes a fact. After some time I really had the physical sensation that my vision was moving; I followed it and then I could see things downstairs which I knew nothing about. I would check afterwards. In the evening I would ask, Was this like that? And was that like this?

But for each one of these things you must practise for months with patience, with a kind of obstinacy. You take the senses one by one, hearing, sight, and you can even arrive at subtle realities of taste, smell and touch.

 

¹ Mother explained later: To hear behind the sound is to come into contact with the subtle reality which is behind the material fact, behind the word or the physical sound or behind music, for example. One concentrates and then one hears what is behind. It means coming into contact with the vital reality which is behind the appearances. There can also be a mental reality, but generally, what lies immediately behind the physical sound is a vital reality. 

Page - 134


From the mental point of view it is easier, for there you are accustomed to concentration. When you want to think and find a solution, instead of following the deductions of thought, you stop everything and try to concentrate and concentrate, intensify the point of the problem. You stop everything and wait until, by the intensity of the concentration, you obtain an answer. This also requires some time. But if you used to be a good student, you must be quite used to doing that and it is not very difficult.

There is a kind of extension of the physical senses. Red Indians, for example, possess a sense of hearing and smell with a far greater range than our own – and dogs! I knew an Indian – he was my friend when I was eight or ten years old. He had come with Buffalo Bill, at the time of the Hippodrome – was a long time ago, I was eight years old – and he would put his ear to the ground and was so clever that he knew how far away… according to the intensity of the vibration, he knew how far away someone's footsteps were. After that, the children would immediately say, I wish I knew how to do that!

And then you try. That is how you prepare yourself. You think you are playing but you are preparing yourself for later on.  

27 February 1962 

73 – When Wisdom comes, her first lesson is, There is no such thing as knowledge; there are only aperçus of the Infinite Deity.

 

This is very good.

There is no need for any questions.

 

74 – Practical knowledge is a different thing; that is real and serviceable, but it is never complete. Therefore to systematise and codify it is necessary but fatal. 

Page - 135


75 – Systematise we must, but even in making and holding the system, we should always keep firm hold on this truth that all systems are in their nature transitory and incomplete.

 

I have looked at this very, very often. There was even a time when I thought that if one could have a total, complete and perfect knowledge of the entire working of physical Nature as we perceive it in the world of Ignorance, that might be a way to rediscover or to re-attain the truth of things. After my latest experience¹ I cannot think this any more.

I do not know if I am making myself clear. There was a time – for a very long period – when I thought that if science were to realise its full potential, but in an absolute way, if that were possible, it would reach true Knowledge. For example, in its study of the composition of Matter, by pushing and pushing its investigations further and further, a time would come when the two would meet. Well, when I had the experience of passing from the eternal Truth-consciousness to the consciousness of the individualised world, it became clear to me that this was impossible. And if you ask me now, I think that both these things, the possibility of a meeting by carrying science to its extreme and the impossibility of any true conscious connection with the material world, are equally incorrect. There is something else.

And these last few days, more and more, I find myself faced with the total problem, as if I had never seen it before.

Perhaps they are two paths leading to a third point, and at the moment perhaps it is this third point that I am not exactly studying, but searching for, where the two would meet in a third one which would be the True Thing.

But certainly, objective, scientific knowledge carried to its extreme, if it is possible for it to become absolutely total, leads at least to the threshold. That is what Sri Aurobindo says. Only he says that it is fatal, because all those who have devoted them

 

¹ A particular yogic experience which took place on 13 April 1962. 

Page - 136


selves to that knowledge, have believed in it as an absolute truth, and for them this has closed the door to the other approach. In that way it is fatal.

But according to my personal experience, I could say that for all those who believe in the exclusive spiritual approach, the approach through inner experience, at least if it is exclusive, is also fatal – because it shows them one aspect, one truth of the Whole, not the Whole. The other aspect seems equally indispensable to me, in the sense that while I was so totally immersed in the supreme Realisation, it was absolutely indisputable that the other realisation, the outer, the illusory one, was only a distortion, probably accidental, of something that was just as true as that one.

It is this “something” that we are searching for – perhaps not only searching for it, but making it.

We are being used so that we can participate in the manifestation of that, of that which is still inconceivable to everyone, because it is not yet there. It is an expression that is yet to come.

This is all I can say.  

(Silence)

 

 That is really the state of consciousness I am living in at present. It is as if I were confronted with this eternal problem, but from another standpoint.

These standpoints, the spiritual and the materialist, if one may say so, that think they are exclusive – exclusive and unique, so that one denies the value of the other, from the point of view of Truth – are insufficient, not only because they do not accept one another, but also because to accept both and to unite both is not enough to solve the problem. It is something else – a third thing which is not the result of these two, but something that is yet to be discovered, which will probably open the door to the total Knowledge. 

Page - 137


This is the point I have reached.

I cannot say more because that is where I am.

 

In practice, how can we participate in this…?

 

This discovery?

Well!… Basically, it is always the same thing. It is always the same thing: to realise one's own being, to enter into conscious relation with the supreme Truth of one's own being, in any form, by any path – it does not matter at all – but this is the only way. We carry, each individual carries within him a truth, and this is the truth he must unite with, this is the truth he must live; and so the path he must follow to reach and realise this truth is the path that will lead him as near as possible to Knowledge. That is to say, the two are absolutely one: the personal realisation and the Knowledge.

Who knows, perhaps this very multiplicity of approach will yield the secret – the secret that will open the door.

I do not think that a single individual on the earth as it is now, a single individual, however great, however eternal his consciousness and origin, can on his own change and realise – change the world, change the creation as it is and realise this higher Truth which will be a new world, a world more true, if not absolutely true. It would seem that a certain number of individuals – until now it seems to have been more in time, as a succession, but it could also be in space, a collectivity – are indispensable so that this Truth can become concrete and realise itself.

Practically, I am sure of it.

That is to say, however great, however conscious, however powerful he may be, one Avatar cannot by himself realise the supramental life on earth. It is either a group in time, extending over a period of time, or a group spread out in space – perhaps both – that are indispensable for this Realisation. I am convinced of it.  

Page - 138


The individual can give the impulsion, indicate the path, walk on the path himself – that is to say, show the path by realising it himself – but he cannot fulfil. The fulfilment obeys certain group laws which are the expression of some aspect of Eternity and Infinity – naturally, it is all the same Being! They are not different individuals or different personalities, it is all the same Being. And it is all the same Being expressing Himself in a way which for us becomes a body, a group, a collectivity.

There. Do you have another question on the same subject?

 

In what way has your vision become different since this experience?

 

I repeat. For a very long time it seemed to me that if a perfect union could be achieved between the scientific approach carried to its extreme and the spiritual approach carried to its extremes – its extreme realization – if both could be joined, we would find, we would naturally obtain the Truth we are seeking, the total Truth. But with the two experiences I have had – the experience of external life, with universalisation, impersonalisation, in short, all the yogic experiences one can have in the physical body, and on the other hand the experience of total and perfect union with the Origin – now that I have had these two experiences and that something has happened, which I cannot describe yet, I know that the knowledge of the two and the union of the two is not enough; that they lead to a third thing and it is this third thing which is in the making, in course of elaboration. It is this third thing that can lead to the Realisation, to the Truth we seek.

 Is it clear this time?

 

I had something else in mind… In what way has your vision of the physical world changed since then?

 

One can only give an approximation of that consciousness. 

Page - 139


Through yoga, I had achieved a kind of relationship with the material world, based on the notion of the fourth dimension – inner dimensions, which become innumerable in yoga – and the use of this attitude and this state of consciousness. I studied the relationship between the material world and the spiritual world with a sense of the inner dimensions, and by perfecting the consciousness of these inner dimensions – that was my experience until the latest one.

Naturally, for a long time, there has no longer been any question of three dimensions – this belongs absolutely to the world of illusion and falsehood. But now the whole use of the sense of the fourth dimension with all that it entails seems superficial to me! This is so strong that I have lost it. The other one, the three-dimensional world is absolutely unreal; and this one seems to be – how to put it? – conventional. As if it were a conventional interpretation that allows you to make a certain kind of approach.

And as for saying what the other one is, the true poise… it is so far beyond any intellectual state that I am unable to formulate it.

Yet the formula will come, I know. But it will come through a series of experiences that must be lived and which I have not yet had.

 

(Silence)

 

This approach, which was very convenient, very helpful to me, which I used in my yoga, which gave me a hold on Matter, appeared to me as a method, a means, a process, but it is not that.

This is my present state.

More I cannot say.  

 24 May 1962  

Page - 140